Connect with us

World

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov stands by ‘denazification’ claims, dismissing Zelenskyy’s Judaism

Published

on

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov stands by ‘denazification’ claims, dismissing Zelenskyy’s Judaism

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

Russian International Minister Sergei Lavrov stood by his nation’s declare that it invaded Ukraine partly to root out Nazism, dismissing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s Judaism as irrelevant and suggesting that Adolf Hitler “had Jewish blood.”

The Italian information channel Zona Bianca pressed Lavrov on the difficulty throughout an interview Sunday, asking him how Russian President Vladimir Putin can declare he’s attempting to “denazify” Ukraine when Zelenskyy is Jewish.

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

“So what if Zelensky is Jewish,” Lavrov mentioned, The Occasions of Israel reported. “The actual fact doesn’t negate the Nazi components in Ukraine. I imagine that Hitler additionally had Jewish blood.”

Advertisement

On this photograph launched by the Russian International Ministry Press Service, Russian International Minister Sergey Lavrov pauses throughout his and Brazilian International Minister Carlos Franca’s joint information convention following their talks in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Nov. 30, 2021. 
(Russian International Ministry Press Service by way of AP)

Lavrov went on to say that “a few of the worst antisemites are Jews.”

The declare about Hitler’s Jewish blood traces again to Hans Frank, who served as governor-general of Poland throughout the Holocaust, whose memoirs counsel that Hitler’s paternal grandmother had been impregnated by a Jewish man. Historians have lengthy countered this assertion as flimsy and primarily based on an unreliable supply. 

ZELENSKYY TURNS NAZI RHETORIC ON RUSSIA, SAYS US AID PROGRAM WILL DEFEAT THEIR ‘IDEOLOGICAL SUCCESSORS’

Lavrov’s remarks got here in the identical week that Israel commemorates the Holocaust. Talking to The Occasions of Israel, the pinnacle of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust museum, Dani Dayan, condemned Lavrov’s remarks as “false, delusional and harmful, and worthy of all condemnation.”

Advertisement
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks from Kyiv, Ukraine on Thursday.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks from Kyiv, Ukraine on Thursday.
(Ukrainian Presidential Press Workplace by way of AP)

Putin’s try and justify his invasion as a “denazification” effort performs on the Russian public’s longstanding hatred for the Nazi regime, however Zelenskyy is Jewish and had relations perish within the Holocaust. Russian officers have in contrast him to Jews who had been compelled to collaborate with Nazis.

On Friday, Zelenskyy condemned Russian troopers as “much more cynical” than Hitler’s troops.

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in Yerevan, Armenia.

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a gathering of the Supreme Eurasian Financial Council in Yerevan, Armenia.
(Shutterstock)

“Russian troops handle to be much more cynical than the Nazis 80 years in the past,” he mentioned. “At the moment, the invaders didn’t say that it was the Mariupol residents and the defenders of the town who shelled and killed themselves.”

The Ukrainian president predicted that U.S. support within the type of the Lend-Lease program “will assist Ukraine and the entire free world beat the ideological successors of the Nazis, who began a battle in opposition to us on our land.”

Advertisement

Fox Information’ Caitlin McFall contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

World leaders, US politicians react to Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal: 'Long-overdue news'

Published

on

World leaders, US politicians react to Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal: 'Long-overdue news'

Leaders in the U.S. and around the world commended the recent Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal on Wednesday.

Biden announced the terms of the cease-fire during a news conference Wednesday at the White House. It will consist of two phases and will take place over the next several weeks. 

The first phase, which is set to begin Sunday, “includes a full and complete cease-fire, withdrawal of Israeli forces from all the populated areas of Gaza, and the release of a number of hostages held by Hamas, including women and elderly and the wounded,” Biden said.

The second phase is contingent on Israel negotiating “the necessary arrangements,” to mark a complete end to the war.

BIDEN BALKS WHEN ASKED IF TRUMP DESERVES CREDIT FOR ISRAEL-HAMAS CEASE-FIRE DEAL: ‘IS THAT A JOKE?’

Advertisement

Citizens gather on Place de la Republique to celebrate the cease-fire agreement in Gaza between Hamas and Israel in Paris, Wednesday. (Luc Auffret/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The response to the deal was overwhelmingly positive. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said that she was “very encouraged” to see the cease-fire come to fruition.

“This is something I’ve called for many, many months over the last year since the horrific, barbaric attack on innocent civilians in Israel that occurred on October 7 of last year,” Hochul said. “My main priority has been bringing home the hostages.”

Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., wrote on X that he felt “an indescribable sense of relief,” about the return of the hostages.

“The return of the hostages will mark the beginning of closure for Israelis and Jews, as well as countless others, who continue to be deeply affected by the indelible terror and trauma of October 7th,” Torres wrote. “The hostages have been brought home by the power of the world’s most powerful friendship – the US-Israel relationship.”

Advertisement

The deal also attracted international attention. In a statement, British Prime Minister Kier Starmer called the cease-fire “long-overdue news.”

FOX NEWS GETS AN INSIDE LOOK AT IDF’S WAR AGAINST HAMAS

Israelis protest

Hundreds of people, demanding the immediate return of prisoners held by Hamas, gather with banners and photos of prisoners to protest against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government outside the Defense Ministry building in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Wednesday. (Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“[The Israeli and Palestinian people] have borne the brunt of this conflict – triggered by the brutal terrorists of Hamas, who committed the deadliest massacre of Jewish people since the Holocaust on October 7th, 2023,” Starmer said. “The hostages, who were brutally ripped from their homes on that day and held captive in unimaginable conditions ever since, can now finally return to their families.

“But we should also use this moment to pay tribute to those who won’t make it home – including the British people who were murdered by Hamas. We will continue to mourn and remember them. “

In an X post translated from French to English, French President Emmanuel Macron said that the cease-fire must be respected.

Advertisement

“After 15 months of unjustifiable ordeal, immense relief for the Gazans, hope for the hostages and their families,” Macron said. He also referenced Ohad Yahalomi and Ofer Calderon, two French-Israeli hostages.

Though many are celebrating, some have expressed caution about the possibility of the deal falling through. 

Israel-Hamas ceasefire and hostage release deal

President Biden delivers remarks on the recently announced cease-fire deal between Israel and Hamas while joined by Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of State Antony Blinken in the Cross Hall of the White House, Wednesday.  (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

 

On Wednesday, White House national security communications adviser John Kirby said that the “big hurdle” — which included finalizing the deal — had been “overcome.”

Hopefully, come this weekend, we’ll start to see some families reunited,” Kirby said, adding that he was “confident” that the deal will be implemented, despite hard work ahead.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Joshua Comins contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Biden takes aim at oligarchs and extreme wealth in farewell address

Published

on

Biden takes aim at oligarchs and extreme wealth in farewell address

US President Joe Biden said ‘powerful forces’ threatened to undo his climate policies as Trump prepares to take office.

United States President Joe Biden has used his final formal address as president to warn of the dangers of “oligarchy” and “extreme wealth” to democracy, as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to begin his second term with an administration stacked with billionaires.

“Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead,” Biden said in the televised address from the Oval Office in the White House on Wednesday night.

Biden’s speech comes five days before Trump’s inauguration on January 20 and mere hours after Israel and Hamas announced they had agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza, an outcome that appeared to evade the Biden administration for months despite widespread opposition to the war among many Americans.

In his speech, Biden warned of “a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a few ultra-wealthy people” and “dangerous consequences if their abuse of power is left unchecked”.

Advertisement

President-elect Trump’s incoming administration has at least 11 billionaires holding official positions, according to the Democratic Party. They include the world’s richest man, billionaire Elon Musk, who Trump has said will co-lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Biden also warned that “powerful forces” threatened to undo his climate achievements, as unprecedented wildfires burn in Los Angeles, the second-largest city in the US.

Biden began his speech by briefly referring to the newly announced ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has partly attributed to Trump.

“After eight months of nonstop negotiation by my administration, a ceasefire and a hostage deal has been reached by Israel and Hamas,” Biden said.

Biden added that while his team had negotiated the deal, he had told them to keep the “incoming administration fully informed” since it would be “largely implemented” by them.

Advertisement

While claiming the ceasefire as an achievement of his presidency, many voters in the 2024 presidential elections said they were unable to support the Democratic Party due to Biden’s dogged support for Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip.

Biden, 82, dropped out of contention for a second term in office after voters and his own party raised concerns over this performance in the first presidential election debate against then-Republican candidate Donald Trump, with Biden’s vice president, Kamala Harris, going on to contest the presidency and then losing to Trump.

Biden has used his final days in office to introduce a sweeping ban on offshore oil and natural gas drilling covering more than 625 million acres (253 million hectares) including the “entire US East Coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico” and parts of the “Northern Bering Sea in Alaska”.

This has been seen as an apparent move to preempt Trump’s promise to “drill, baby drill” for oil “on day one” of his second term.

Biden said in his farewell address that “it will take time to feel the impact of all we’ve done together, but the seeds are planted, and they’ll grow, and they’ll bloom for decades to come”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Movie Review: A family is torn apart under Brazil’s dictatorship in ‘I’m Still Here’

Published

on

Movie Review: A family is torn apart under Brazil’s dictatorship in ‘I’m Still Here’

It’s easy to fall in love with the Paiva family. Filmmaker Walter Salles makes sure of that in “I’m Still Here.”

He drops the audience into the warm everyday of the beautiful home of Eunice (Fernanda Torres) and Rubens Paiva (Selton Mello), in 1970s Rio de Janeiro, where their five kids run freely between the beach and their living room. Life is calmly chaotic, full of affection, gentle familial teasing and various life stages (one is about to lose a tooth, another about to go to university). Someone always seems to have wet hair, be covered in sand, or bringing in a mangy stray, as their youngest, Marcelo, does in the film’s lovely opening. Even if their life is technically worlds away from any one person in the audience, it feels familiar and close.

Anyone coming to “I’m Still Here” will surely know that this domestic tranquility does not and cannot hold. It was about seven years into Brazil’s military dictatorship, which would last until 1985. And while the film suggests that there was a semblance of normalcy in their day to day, there are also ominous signs of change and oppression — reports of ambassadors being kidnapped on the news, and tense “random” traffic stops that their eldest daughter endures one night. Some left-leaning citizens are making plans to leave, but the Paiva family is not in a terrible rush. They’re even making plans to build a new home.

So when three men in civilian clothes enter their home one afternoon and tell Rubens, a former left-leaning congressman, that he needs to come in for questioning, it happens with little incident. Everyone is on guard — they’re not naive — but you sense that Eunice believes he will come back that night. Maybe even the next day. Rubens is calm changing into a collared shirt and tie and lying to his daughter that he is going into the office, even though it’s a holiday. But he also savors this moment with her, perhaps because he knows he’s likely to not return.

Advertisement
Image

The film is based on a memoir written by Paiva’s son, Marcelo, but you don’t need to know that to know that it is first and foremost a memory piece. It is deeply personal and imbued with the kind of tenderness that is extremely difficult to see or appreciate in the moment. And although it’s certainly idealized and wistful, we accept any assumed white lies because we all wish that for ourselves: to truly recognize what we have before it’s gone.

This story is not about the abduction, however, or what may have happened to Rubens after that day. It’s about how Eunice continues on, through uncertainty, absence and, ultimately, the loss of hope. Salles chooses to tell this story in a rather straightforward manner, which works well, allowing the compelling narrative and the talented actors to carry the audience through.

At the heart of it is Torres, who has already won a Golden Globe for her performance and whose portrayal of Eunice is a true marvel. Mothers and wives often get the short shrift in movies like this, about Big Important Topics decided on by men, but Torres instills Eunice with a deep emotional and practical intelligence that’s beautifully feminine, whether she’s dealing with a misogynist banker, a dead dog in the street or the thugs surveilling her home. She’s fascinating and resilient in a way that so many women are in times of historical strife but rarely celebrated for.

In one particularly poignant scene, she and the kids are being photographed by a journalist hoping to tell their story. They smile together, as they did earlier in the film when Rubens was there. Now he’s not, and the reporters are confused. They ask Eunice to try a more serious expression. She laughs, “They want us to look sad,” and instructs her kids to keep smiling. It’s a perfect encapsulation of the complex spirit of the movie. Political disappearances don’t begin and end with the victim, or the toppling of a regime — they are generational traumas that live on in the survivors and alter everything in their wake.

Advertisement

“I’m Still Here,” a Sony Pictures Classics release in limited release Friday (expanding on Jan. 24), is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association for “smoking, drug use, brief nudity, some strong language, thematic content.” Running time: 135 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Continue Reading

Trending