World
Photos: A Road Trip Through Syria After the Fall of Bashar al-Assad
After one of the most brutal wars of this century, a new Syria is rising from the disastrous legacy of the toppled dictator Bashar al-Assad.
His photos have been torn from the walls, as people exercise freedoms denied during his family’s decades-long reign. Now, a different flag flies across Syria, the emblem of the rebels in charge.
For Syrians, the future is uncertain — a tangle of elation and pain, of hope and fear.
The fall of the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, which ended 13 years of civil war, ushered in a precarious new era for a country deeply scarred by its past.
Syrians are free, but the war’s toll is unfathomable — more than a half-million people killed or missing, millions more displaced and many communities in tatters.
The battles have stopped, but sporadic violence persists, hobbling the country’s efforts to move forward.
I began covering Syria early in my career as a Middle East correspondent, sneaking across the border in 2012 to meet some of the first rebels taking up arms against the government as the civil war picked up. In the years that followed, I chronicled how the conflict spread across the country, devastating cities and bringing incalculable suffering to so many people.
After the Assad regime fell in December, I rushed to the capital, Damascus, and found a swirl of joy and trepidation about the future. Two months later, I returned with the photographer David Guttenfelder and other colleagues to travel the country from south to north to see how Syrians were living through this momentous change.
Over a few weeks and hundreds of miles, we drove on pockmarked highways and dirt roads, met masked gunmen and jubilant children and spoke with scores of Syrians as they worked to rebuild their lives.
Daraa
The Child Martyr
We began our journey a short drive from Syria’s southern border with Jordan at al-Baneen Secondary School, an unremarkable building in a neighborhood so damaged by war that most people have left. The school is scarred by gunfire and shrapnel, its desks, chairs and many of its walls long gone.
It is a building that changed the course of Middle Eastern history.
In 2011, graffiti appeared on its walls threatening Mr. al-Assad, an ophthalmologist by training. “Your turn has come, doctor,” it read.
By that time, the antigovernment uprisings known as the Arab Spring had already overthrown autocrats elsewhere in the Middle East. The Syrian authorities detained some students, demonstrations erupted demanding their release, and the police violently suppressed them, fueling more protests. In the crackdown, a 13-year-old boy named Hamza al-Khateeb was killed.
These events kindled the civil war.
On our trip, we found Hamza’s mother, Samira al-Khateeb, in the town of al-Jeezeh, with the help of neighbors who directed us to her home.
Sitting somberly in her son’s room, she recalled him as a quiet seventh-grader who ate too many cookies and used to kiss her cheeks before leaving for school.
“I still have his clothes and his stuff,” she said. “I miss seeing him sleeping in this room.”
When the uprising began, Hamza tagged along to a demonstration. The security forces attacked, chaos ensued and the boy disappeared, presumably detained by the police.
A month later, his relatives found his corpse in a morgue, bearing signs of abuse in custody. His torso was swollen, discolored and marred by cuts and burns. Bullet holes pierced his chest and shoulder. His penis was missing.
Images of “the child martyr” spread and Hamza became a potent symbol of the regime’s cruelty. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton mourned him, hoping his death would push Syria to “end the brutality and begin a transition to real democracy.”
Things only got worse.
The war escalated, drawing in the Syrian military, rebels, jihadists, Russia, Turkey, Iran and the United States. When it ended, more than half of Syria’s prewar population of 22 million had fled their homes, about six million of them to other countries.
In Daraa when we visited, residents were coming to grips with the war’s toll. Next to the gutted school, boys gathered to play soccer. A large photo of Hamza hung in his family’s sitting room, where his cousin Khalid al-Khateeb, 51, said the years of war had been painful, but worth it to end the regime.
“Now we can breathe,” he said. “Before, the air used to rattle in our lungs.”
As we drove north to the Syrian capital of Damascus, we saw new life emerging, a city brimming with energy and fresh possibilities.
Since it had been Mr. al-Assad’s base, its center bore fewer scars than other parts of the country.
But it is an ancient city whose soul is battered, its people and neighborhoods rived with contradictions.
Damascus
The Divided Capital
Damascus hit like a storm of traffic and pollution. Cars jammed roundabouts. Smoke from tailpipes and generators clogged the air.
Its streets also coursed with revolutionary fervor. People gathered nightly to celebrate, and residents organized concerts, debates and other events that Mr. al-Assad’s security services would have shut down.
“There was no way that this could have happened before,” said Hoda Abu Nabout, an organizer of an event for a book about women’s experiences during the war.
Leila Hashemi, a novelist in attendance, compared practicing Syria’s newfound freedoms to exercising when out of shape.
“Your muscles are still tight from the lack of movement,” she said, flapping her elbows like wings.
Across Damascus, we felt two forces emerging: a people practicing freedoms long denied by a brutal regime and a government exerting control to build a new state. It remains uncertain whether those forces will coexist or clash, especially in a damaged society with vast sectarian divisions whose rules must be rewritten.
The challenges ahead are clear in the neighborhoods beyond the city center that combat reduced to vast expanses of shattered concrete. These ominously quiet areas used to be home to millions of shopkeepers, teachers, mechanics, students, civil servants and others. Now, those residents are scattered elsewhere in Syria or beyond its borders, unable to easily return because their homes are gone.
Some families survive in these ruins.
“We live like cave people,” said Fidaa al-Eissa, a mother of four in the neighborhood of Qaboun.
The family’s damaged apartment building stood next to others that had been flattened. It received two hours of electricity per day, which Ms. al-Eissa used to charge her computer and phone, run the washing machine, make tea and heat bath water.
She kept in touch with former neighbors, refugees in Jordan, Turkey and Germany, and tried to convince them to come home.
“I want there to be life here again,” she said.
The state, too, largely collapsed during the war, its ability to provide services hollowed out by violence, corruption and poverty. Damascus is the focus of efforts by Syria’s president, Ahmed al-Shara, to build an administration that can put the country back together and ensure water, electricity and security.
One morning, hundreds of newly trained officers in crisp blue uniforms lined up outside the Damascus Police College for graduation. They had finished a 10-day course aimed at bolstering the force’s ranks with basic training on how to handle guns and criminals. It also included religious lessons, reflecting the Islamist orientation of Mr. al-Shara’s government.
The ceremony was laced with Islamic language, and large banners atop the college had been repainted, one with a verse from the Quran, another with the Muslim declaration of faith, “There is no God but God and Muhammad is his prophet.”
When we asked whether members of Syria’s other religious groups would join a force whose symbols were so Islamic, a lead trainer, Maawiya al-Khatib, did not understand why not.
“These are simple slogans,” he said. “It’s a normal thing.”
The Islamist background of Mr. al-Shara has left many Syrians worried about how he could change the country and their place in it.
We got a glimpse of these concerns at a new play in Damascus that a friend told us about. At a local theater with buckets in the hallway to catch dripping water, we watched “The Life of Basel Anis,” a dark comedy about a shipwreck survivor who loses a leg to a shark only to find himself preyed upon by the very people who are supposed to help.
The audience laughed throughout, sympathizing with the wounded hero and how much of his life was beyond his control. Backstage, the cast members said they strove to keep the arts alive, but some worried that the new government would impose constraints.
One actor, Sedra Jabakhanji, said she feared the authorities would segregate unmarried men and women or force women to cover their hair.
The original script, the cast said, had poked fun at Mr. al-Shara by quoting a line from one of his speeches. They cut it to avoid problems.
“There are still people who aren’t convinced that the regime fell,” said Anwar al-Qassar, the assistant director. “It takes time to get rid of that phobia.”
The war shredded Syria’s social fabric, pitting neighbor against neighbor.
The regime granted vast privileges to the favored from Mr. al-Assad’s own sect, while oppressing other groups.
After a two-hour drive from Damascus to Homs on the eighth day of our trip, we found former enemies trying to live together.
Homs
The Vanquished
Along a boulevard in Homs, hundreds of cold, nervous men stood in long lines outside a police station, hoping to find a place for themselves in the new Syria.
They had all served in Mr. al-Assad’s military or security services, so when he lost the war, they did too. They were purged from their jobs and surrendered their weapons. Now, they were waiting for hours to receive civilian ID cards.
Stripped of their former privileges and power, they hung their heads and said little as the lines inched forward. The masked rebels-turned-police who controlled the city walked among them, hands on their guns.
The scene reflects one of Syria’s knottiest challenges, as the state grapples with how to deal with those who fought for Mr. al-Assad, many of them Alawites, the same religious minority as the ousted president.
We spent time in Homs to see how people were adapting, because the city’s sectarian mix had made the fighting there particularly personal. Alawite districts loyal to the regime had battled their Sunni Muslim neighbors, who supported the rebels.
We found an unlikely pair of men working together: a muscled former rebel in camouflage and face mask and an Alawite neighborhood leader with a scarf twisted around his head to ward off the cold.
The two men had been on opposite sides of the war and showed no affinity toward each other. But they both wanted their city to recover.
The former rebel gave his nom de guerre, Abu Hajar, and said the regime had exiled him and his comrades from Homs during the war. Now he was 32 years old, back home and in charge.
The government should punish those who killed innocent people, he said, but all of the Alawites could not be blamed for the regime’s violence. “We were against Bashar the dictator, not against his sect,” he said.
His counterpart was Mustafa Aboud, a 58-year-old neighborhood leader and barber on whom other Alawites counted to deal with the new authorities.
The Alawites had suffered, too, Mr. Aboud said, their communities besieged and shelled, their relatives kidnapped. About 2,000 people from his neighborhood alone had been killed in the war, including soldiers, civilians and his own mother, by a rebel car bomb.
The purge of the former regime’s forces had created a crisis in his Alawite neighborhood of Al-Zahra. Families lost their incomes, and residents feared they would be kidnapped or killed if they left the area to look for work.
“If they take me away, I have no one to ask about me, to pay money to get me out,” said one former soldier who declined to give his name for fear of retribution. “I have nothing.”
Mr. al-Shara has called for unity among Syria’s sects, but rights groups have reported regular killings of Alawites. In March, after deadly attacks on the new government’s security forces, armed men rampaged through Syria’s Alawite heartland, killing an estimated 1,600 people.
Hundreds of men from Mr. Aboud’s neighborhood had gathered that morning to get their new IDs together. They had been scared to leave their community, so Mr. Aboud had organized buses and security with Abu Hajar.
In interviews, the men said they had been in Mr. al-Assad’s army, but as guards, cooks or administrators. None admitted having fought.
“I distributed vegetables,” one said, adding that most soldiers never had a choice.
“Even if I had fired shells, the order was not in my hands,” he said.
Mr. Aboud acknowledged that his fellow Alawites feared for the future but said they had to accept Syria’s new reality.
“This situation was imposed on us, so I tell them that we have to live with it and not deceive ourselves,” he said. “It is not about settling scores. It is about the future and how to feed our families.”
Telmanes
The Village With No Roofs
Twelve days into our trip, we diverted from the main highway to see what life was like in a rural area. I expected the villages to have fared better in the war since they had fewer spoils to offer than big cities did. I was wrong.
Our route took us through a succession of towns and hamlets torn apart by shelling and airstrikes and picked apart by pillagers — or both.
Some residents endured in what remained. Men herded sheep near shops smashed to rubble. Women hung laundry near walls with giant holes. Night fell and entire communities went dark.
One of our drivers mentioned a nearby village where “they stole all the roofs.” So the next morning we drove to Telmanes, where we met Abdel-Rahman Hamadi, 38. He had returned home after the war to find that scavengers had hammered in his reinforced concrete roof and stolen the rebar to sell for scrap.
“The dogs climbed up on the roof to steal the metal!” he said.
He had no money for repairs, so he had covered one room with plastic for his family to sleep in. “There are 20 villages around here that are destroyed like this,” he said.
That is likely an undercount. Across Syria, destructive battles often led to industrial-scale pillaging of homes, businesses, power stations and other facilities.
The country needs vast rebuilding projects to recover, but it remains unclear who might pay for them. The United Nations says half of Syria’s infrastructure no longer works and reconstruction is expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars, many times the country’s annual economic output of $29 billion.
The scale of the plundering in Telmanes, a stretch of cinder-block homes surrounded by farmland and orchards, was mind-boggling.
Residents said the army expelled them and took over the village in 2019. Then, on the military’s watch, work crews descended like locusts, stripping the community clean with hammers, saws and bolt cutters.
They hauled off furniture and appliances. They popped tiles off bathroom walls. They tore out electrical wires, sinks, faucets and pipes.
They pulled down power lines and yanked internet cables from the ground. They stole manhole covers — and the ladders inside the manholes. When the obvious spoils were gone, they knocked in the roofs to steal the rebar.
Osama Ismael, the head of the local council, said that only a few hundred of the village’s 5,100 houses and six of its 13 mosques still had roofs.
Less than one-tenth of the prewar population of 28,000 had returned since the war ended and he wasn’t sure when the rest would. “We want people to come back, but there is no water,” he said.
Nor was there a pharmacy, a clinic, a bakery or reliable internet or phone service.
One of the village’s 14 schools had reopened, which had been enough to convince the extended Aboud family to come home.
They stayed together in a house with three rooms, a veranda, a kitchen and a bathroom. All the roofs were gone, so they had covered two rooms with plastic and erected a tent in the yard, where Khadija al-Omar, 30, slept with her husband and three children.
“We have no choice but to live here,” she said.
Life was hard, said Aboud al-Aboud, a relative who teaches at the school.
The family trucked in water to fill a metal tank. They salvaged wood for fires and cooked on an electric stove powered by 12 solar panels lined up across the yard.
“Usually we would put them on the roof,” Mr. al-Aboud said with a shrug. “But since there is no roof….”
The war devastated businesses in Syria’s largest city, Aleppo, once also its economic engine.
Its historic center lies in ruins, where stray dogs outnumber merchants in old stone souks.
As in the rest of the country, the momentous task of rebuilding the economy is just beginning.
Aleppo
The Ravaged Economy
“Aleppo is the nerve center of Syria,” said Khalid Tahhan, the owner of a metal-smelting workshop who said he barely turns a profit. “Aleppo is a disaster zone.”
Before the war, Aleppo boasted a wealth of historic mosques, churches and caravansaries, ringing a towering citadel that drew tourists from around the world. It was a commercial hub, humming with factories that provided jobs and produced textiles, food products and other goods.
I never made it to Aleppo before the war. I first visited in 2012 with rebels who had taken over outlying neighborhoods. Instead of the sights, I saw choppers transporting soldiers and fighter jets dropping bombs.
The fighting chewed through the city over many years, a violent collision of rebels, the Islamic State, government forces and the Russian military. By the time I returned to Aleppo with my colleagues this year, only remnants of its past remained. Tourists are rare, and a small fraction of the industrial zone still functions, mere leftovers of a once-vaunted economy.
Syria faces tremendous hurdles to get its economy running. Hobbled for years by sanctions that are just beginning to ease, the country has been isolated from global trade, causing economic atrophy.
Per capita gross domestic product is one-quarter of what it was before the war. At Syria’s current growth rate, it won’t recoup its losses until 2080, the United Nations says.
Some businesspeople are working to recover.
Inside the Bahhade Furniture factory in the industrial zone, dozens of craftsmen hand-carved patterns into the backs of couches and stapled foam pads onto seats.
Jack Bahhade, a co-owner, said that before the war the family business had employed 40 people and exported to the United States, Britain, Russia and elsewhere.
In 2012, the factory was taken over by rebels from the Nusra Front, the affiliate of Al Qaeda founded by Syria’s new president. While the family operated out of an alternate facility, their original factory was looted. They were trying to rebuild the business when Mr. al-Assad fell.
Production is about 30 percent of what it was before the war. Demand is low and financial transactions are limited because Syrian banks lack cash.
When asked about Mr. al-Shara, Mr. Bahhade laughed, noting that despite the president’s extremist past, he had been welcomed by foreign officials and heads of state.
“If these countries accept him, why shouldn’t we?” he said.
If conditions improved, Mr. Bahhade said, Aleppo’s businesspeople would bounce back.
“If there is security and stability here, everything will go back to the way it was,” he said.
Atmeh
A New Beginning
At the end of our trip, we drove to a refugee camp along the Turkish border in the far north, on the opposite side of Syria from where we began. The camp had spread over the years as it absorbed people with nowhere else to go. Now, suddenly, those people could leave.
In a dirt lane in front of a drab house, we found Khalid al-Hajj, a father of six, piling his meager possessions onto the back of a truck.
After surviving on aid and odd jobs in the camp for 13 years, he didn’t have much: thin mattresses, fuzzy blankets, pots, pans, a rusty dish rack, a gas stove and some firewood.
But he felt good. The war was over and he was going home.
“I was always convinced that I would return,” said Mr. al-Hajj, 53.
His family had fled their hometown, Kafr Zeita, 80 miles to the south, in 2012. Like millions of others, they came to Syria’s rebel-controlled northwest, and they settled in the camp.
It was crowded and poor, a sprawl of concrete structures with few trees or paved roads. At first, the extended family of 11 slept in a tent. Over time, they scraped together the money to build three small rooms.
Missing village life, Mr. al-Hajj planted a rose bush and kept two songbirds in a cage.
A few years ago, he said, a surprising dash of beauty appeared — a green shoot next to the rose bush. Mr. al-Hajj snipped off a piece and its smell gave it away as a peach tree. Pleased, he tended to it as the war, and his time in the camp, dragged on.
His eldest son was killed by a government shell. He had another son, then another daughter, and his adult children bore him three grandchildren. The peach tree grew taller than him.
After the regime fell, he decided to return to his village, to fix up and live in his damaged home.
As he cleaned out his house in the camp, the pile in the back of the truck grew: metal window frames, solar panels and a ceiling fan. He climbed on top to tie everything down.
When it was time to leave, he expressed no nostalgia for the place where he had lived for so many years.
“We will take all of our stuff and leave it behind,” he said.
But first, he stood before the peach tree. It was eight feet tall and the first pink buds of spring had appeared on its branches. Perhaps this year, he said, it would produce fruit, although he would not be there to taste it.
“We hope that it grows so that whoever comes here can eat from it,” he said.
He caressed a branch with his fingers. “May God protect you,” he said.
Then he climbed into the truck and headed home.
World
US economy expands at a surprisingly strong 4.3% annual rate in the third quarter
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. economy grew at a surprisingly strong 4.3% annual rate in the third quarter, the most rapid expansion in two years, as government and consumer spending, as well as exports, all increased.
U.S. gross domestic product from July through September — the economy’s total output of goods and services — rose from its 3.8% growth rate in the April-June quarter, the Commerce Department said Tuesday in a report delayed by the government shutdown. Analysts surveyed by the data firm FactSet forecast growth of 3% in the period.
However, inflation remains higher than the Federal Reserve would like. The Fed’s favored inflation gauge — called the personal consumption expenditures index, or PCE — climbed to a 2.8% annual pace last quarter, up from 2.1% in the second quarter.
A television on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange in New York, display a news conference with Fed chairman Jerome Powell, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Excluding volatile food and energy prices, so-called core PCE inflation was 2.9%, up from 2.6% in the April-June quarter.
Economists say that persistent and potentially worsening inflation could make a January interest rate cut from the Fed less likely, even as central bank official remain concerned about a slowing labor market.
“If the economy keeps producing at this level, then there isn’t as much need to worry about a slowing economy,” said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Northlight Asset Management, adding that inflation could return as the greatest concern about the economy.
In a slow holiday trading week, U.S. markets on Wall Street turned lower following the GDP report, likely due to growing doubts that another Fed rate cut is coming next month.
Consumer spending, which accounts for about 70% of U.S. economic activity, rose to a 3.5% annual pace last quarter, up from 2.5% in the April-June period.
A person carries a shopping bag in Philadelphia, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)
Consumption and investment by the government grew by 2.2% in the quarter after contracting 0.1% in the second quarter. The third quarter figure was boosted by increased expenditures at the state and local levels and federal government defense spending.
Private business investment fell 0.3%, led by declines in investment in housing and in nonresidential buildings such as offices and warehouses. However, that decline was much less than the 13.8% slide in the second quarter.
Within the GDP data, a category that measures the economy’s underlying strength grew at a 3% annual rate from July through September, up slightly from 2.9% in the second quarter. This category includes consumer spending and private investment, but excludes volatile items like exports, inventories and government spending.
Exports grew at an 8.8% rate, while imports, which subtract from GDP, fell another 4.7%.
Tuesday’s report is the first of three estimates the government will make of GDP growth for the third quarter of the year.
Outside of the first quarter, when the economy shrank for the first time in three years as companies rushed to import goods ahead of President Donald Trump’s tariff rollout, the U.S. economy has continued to expand at a healthy rate. That’s despite much higher borrowing rates the Fed imposed in 2022 and 2023 in its drive to curb the inflation that surged as the United States bounced back with unexpected strength from the brief but devastating COVID-19 recession of 2020.
Though inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, the central bank cut its benchmark lending rate three times in a row to close out 2025, mostly out of concern for a job market that has steadily lost momentum since spring.
Roofers work atop a house in Anna, Texas, Thursday, Dec. 18, 2025. (AP Photo/LM Otero)
Last week, the government reported that the U.S. economy gained a healthy 64,000 jobs in November but lost 105,000 in October. Notably, the unemployment rate rose to 4.6% last month, the highest since 2021.
The country’s labor market has been stuck in a “low hire, low fire” state, economists say, as businesses stand pat due to uncertainty over Trump’s tariffs and the lingering effects of elevated interest rates. Since March, job creation has fallen to an average 35,000 a month, compared to 71,000 in the year ended in March. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said that he suspects those numbers will be revised even lower.
World
Israel calls out UN-backed Gaza famine report as biased, ignores aid flow and on-the-ground data
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Israeli officials have slammed the latest report from an organization that earlier this year claimed there was famine in parts of Gaza, saying the new document is biased and that its conclusions were “predetermined.”
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a United Nations-backed organization, previously claimed famine conditions were met in Gaza Governorate in August but now says that about 1.6 million Gazans are facing “high levels of acute food insecurity.
IDF Maj. Gen. Ghassan Alian, of the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), which deals with Gaza, called out what he said were “biased claims” by the IPC which he said, “disregard the volumes of food that entered during the ceasefire, indicating that the report’s conclusions were predetermined.”
ISRAEL PUSHES BACK AT ‘TAILOR-MADE’ UN-BACKED REPORT CLAIMING GAZA FAMINE
Palestinians carry aid supplies which they received from the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in the central Gaza Strip, May 29, 2025. (Ramadan Abed/Reuters)
A statement from COGAT noted, “It is important to recall that this is not the first time IPC reports regarding the Gaza Strip have been published with extreme forecasts and warnings that do not materialize in practice. Time and again, IPC assessments have proven to be incorrect and disconnected from the data on the ground, contradicting verified facts, including aid volumes, food availability and market trends. The international community must act responsibly, avoid falling for false narratives and distorted information and refrain from legitimizing a biased and unprofessional report.”
In its latest report, the IPC’s Famine Review Committee addressed the changing circumstances, explaining that “following the publication of the [last] FRC report, there was a partial relaxation of the blockade and an increase in the availability of food and other essential supplies.” While the FRC says this “came too late to avoid famine in Gaza Governorate in July and early August, the persistence of Famine and its spread to other governorates during the projection period has been avoided.”
Gazans carry food airdropped by Jordan and the United Arab Emirates on July. 27 (TPS-IL)
In August, the IPC projected that two additional governorates would experience famine by Sept. 30. At the time, several experts disputed the presence of famine conditions, including Dr. David Adesnik, vice president of research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Adesnik told Fox News Digital that mortality figures, while worrisome, did not reach levels expected during famine conditions. He also said that the prices on key food items had remained relatively stagnant or even declined during the period of alleged famine.
Following the IPC’s latest report, Adesnik said that the IPC are still “dodging the question of proving that they were right” about prior famine declarations.
US REPORT URGES UN AGENCY’S SHUTDOWN OVER HAMAS TIES, OCT 7 TERROR LINKS
In assessing the lack of mortality numbers that indicate famine, Adesnik said one of the IPC’s current arguments is that “data largely capture trauma-related deaths and overlook a substantial proportion of non-traumatic mortality.” He called this “a big leap,” explaining “They’re basically saying that with all of its efforts to track down every name of someone killed during the war, the Gaza Ministry of Health somehow missed all the people who didn’t die because of bullets, shrapnel or falling buildings — that there’s just all these people who would have died of hunger, disease, other things.”
He said that the IPC’s figures show the highest number of malnutrition-related deaths per month being 27, with all malnutrition deaths peaking at 186. “Hundreds of people dying from malnutrition is still a terrible, terrible thing,” Adesnik said. “But we were asking a question: Is this famine? And that is not remotely close to the threshold for determining famine.”
Palestinians await donated food at a community kitchen in Jabalia, northern Gaza Strip, Monday, May 19, 2025. (Jehad Alshrafi/AP Photo)
The IPC told Fox News Digital that to meet the famine threshold, “at least two in every 10,000 people” “or at least four in every 10,000 children under five are dying daily” on account of “outright starvation or the interaction of malnutrition and disease.”
US-BACKED AID GROUP ENDS GAZA MISSION AFTER DEFYING HAMAS THREATS, UN CRITICISM
In response to questions about its famine data, the IPC told Fox News Digital that “in the case of the Gaza analysis, there was clear evidence that thresholds for starvation and acute malnutrition had been reached, and analysts reasonably assessed from the broader evidence that the mortality threshold (third outcome) has likely been reached.”
Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Oren Marmorstein said on X that “The IPC also disregards the fact that, on average, between 600 and 800 aid trucks enter the Gaza Strip every day, 70% of them carrying food – nearly five times more than what the IPC itself said was required for the Strip.”
Palestinians carry bags and boxes containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed organization, in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, Monday, June 16, 2025. (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP Photo)
Though it is not claiming famine is underway, the IPC still states that in a “worst-case scenario” of a return to conflict, “the entire Gaza Strip is at risk of famine through mid-April 2026.”
Adesnik said that the IPC is merely “guessing about the future.” He noted that accuracy from the IPC holds serious importance given the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice’s allegations of war crimes and genocide against Israel. A declaration of famine would be a “big building block in what seems to prove part of the case.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Last week, the Secretary of State Marco Rubio, sanctioned two more members of the ICC for engaging “in efforts by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel’s consent, including voting with the majority in favor of the ICC’s ruling against Israel’s appeal on December 15.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the State Department “will continue to hold accountable those responsible for the ICC’s morally bankrupt and legally baseless actions against Americans and Israelis.”
World
Trump says Greenland ‘essential’ for security: Could he take it by force?
President Donald Trump has said the United States needs Greenland for its “national security” after naming Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as special envoy to the Danish Arctic island, prompting protests from Copenhagen.
“We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida on Monday, adding that Landry would “lead the charge”.
list of 3 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
Landry said he would make the Arctic territory “a part of the US”.
The comments drew sharp rebukes from Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen.
“You cannot annex another country … Not even with an argument about international security,” they said in a joint statement. “Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders and the US shall not take over Greenland,” they added.
Since Trump returned to the White House in January, he has commented on several occasions about his desire for the mineral-rich island, a demand Denmark and many other European nations have steadfastly rejected.
So, what does Trump sending an envoy mean for Greenland, and could he succeed in acquiring it?
Why is Trump saying Greenland is ‘essential’ to US national security?
The US president insisted that the resource-rich island is “essential” for security reasons, rather than for its mineral resources.
“If you take a look at Greenland, you look up and down the coast, you have Russian and Chinese ships all over the place,” he said on Monday, while adding that the US has “many sites for minerals and oil”.
Trump’s interest in Greenland is not new.
During his first term as US president from 2017 to 2021, he mooted the idea of buying the island from Denmark. Trump then postponed a 2019 visit to the Nordic country after Danish PM Frederiksen slammed the idea.
He has refused to rule out the use of military force to seize control, noting in March that the US would “go as far as we have to”.
Geographically part of North America, Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, lies about 2,900km (1,800 miles) from New York – closer than it is to Copenhagen, Denmark’s capital, which is situated roughly 3,500km (2,174 miles) to the east.
The semi-autonomous territory has a population of 57,000 people.
Why has Trump sent an ‘envoy’ to Greenland – what does that signify?
On Sunday, the US president appointed Louisiana Governor Landry as special envoy to Greenland, prompting anger from Copenhagen, which summoned the US ambassador to explain the decision.
Following the announcement, Landry said it would be an honour to serve in a role meant to “make Greenland a part of the US”, further amplifying Denmark’s concerns about the White House’s intentions.
Taking to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said Landry is aware “how essential Greenland is” for US national security.
Marc Jacobsen, a professor at the Royal Danish Defence College in Denmark, said while Trump is “clearly serious” about his interest in Greenland, it is unlikely he would try to take it by force.
“But we certainly see attempts to gain influence through other channels such as strategic investments and pushing narratives that portray Denmark as a bad partner,” Jacobsen told Al Jazeera.
“The appointment of Jeff Landry as special envoy and Tom Dans as the leader of the US Arctic Research Commission should be seen as new elements in this strategy,” he added.
How have Greenlanders responded to this latest move?
Lokke Rasmussen, the foreign minister of Denmark, said Trump’s appointment of Landry confirmed continued US interest in Greenland.
“However, we insist that everyone – including the US – must show respect for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark,” he told the AFP news agency.
On Monday, Greenland’s Prime Minister Nielsen said Greenland is friendly towards Washington and that “they know there is no obstacle to the United States increasing security in the Arctic on Greenlandic territory if they wish to do so.
“But going from that to pressuring to take over a country that is populated and has its own sovereignty is not acceptable,” Nielsen told the daily Sermitsiaq.
People in Greenland broadly favour increased independence from Denmark – but not the transfer of sovereignty to the US.
In 2009, Denmark granted Greenland extensive self-governing powers, including the right to pursue independence from Denmark via a referendum.
In August, Denmark summoned the US charge d’affaires after at least three officials linked to former President Trump were spotted in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, gauging local sentiment on strengthening ties with the US.
In March, US Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, were accompanied by White House National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright on a tour of the US’s Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland “to receive a briefing on Arctic security issues and meet with US service members”, according to a statement released by Vance’s office.
However, Greenland’s acting head of government, Mute Egede, wrote in an online post at the time that Greenland had not in fact extended any invitation for an official or private visit.
In response to Landry’s announcement, European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa said Arctic security was and will remain a “key priority” for the EU, “one in which we seek to work with allies and partners”.
“Territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law. These principles are essential not only for the European Union, but for nations around the world,” they said on X.
On Tuesday, French President Emmanuel Macron reiterated France’s backing for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of both Denmark and Greenland.
He said Greenland “belongs to its people” and Denmark “serves as its guarantor”.
Why is Greenland strategic for the US?
Trump has repeatedly emphasised that the Arctic’s strategic geography – particularly Greenland’s position between North America and Europe – is key to US defence and global security interests.
Its location, offering the shortest route from North America to Europe, would give Washington leverage for its military and its ballistic missile early-warning system.
The US is also interested in placing radars in the waters that connect Greenland, Iceland and the United Kingdom. These waters are a gateway for Russian and Chinese ships, which the US wants to track.
The island also hosts the Pituffik Space Base, a major US military installation used for surveillance and missile warning operations.
What mineral resources does Greenland have?
Trump has denied that its mineral wealth is the real reason he is so interested in Greenland. However, it is rich in mineral resources critical for the production of modern technologies, including rare-earth elements for electronics and clean energy, as well as uranium, zinc and other base metals.
It also holds potential oil and gas deposits, though their extraction is restricted. Surveys indicate that Greenland contains a substantial share of the critical raw materials identified by the EU.
Which other countries are scrambling for positions in the Arctic and why?
Several countries have become increasingly active in the Arctic in recent years.
Climate change and a rapidly melting ice sheet are the main reasons the Arctic has become a geopolitical hotspot.
The Arctic is heating at a rate four times faster than the global average, increasing its accessibility for maritime trade routes and resource exploration – including by non-Arctic countries as well as those with an Arctic presence.
China has deployed vessels capable of serving both military surveillance and research functions in the region. The purposes are to collect data and secure access to resources and shipping lanes, which are emerging as a result of melting ice.
Last year, Canada unveiled a 37-page security policy detailing plans to enhance its military and diplomatic presence in the Arctic, citing threats posed by increasing Russian and Chinese activity.
In recent years, Russia has expanded its naval presence, deploying missile systems and ramping up weapons testing in the Arctic.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has also noted Trump’s interest in the region.
During an address at the International Arctic Forum in the Russian city of Murmansk, the largest city within the Arctic circle, earlier this year, Putin said he believed Trump was serious about taking Greenland and that the US would continue its efforts to acquire it.
“It can look surprising only at first glance, and it would be wrong to believe that this is some sort of extravagant talk by the current US administration,” said Putin, adding that he expects the US to continue to “systematically advance its geostrategic, military-political and economic interests in the Arctic”.
Putin also expressed concerns about Russia’s neighbours, Finland and Sweden – both of which have borders inside the Arctic circle – joining NATO, the transatlantic military alliance between North America and Europe. Finland joined NATO in 2023, and Sweden joined in 2024.
“Russia has never threatened anyone in the Arctic, but we will closely follow the developments and mount an appropriate response by increasing our military capability and modernising military infrastructure,” Putin said.
Could the US take Greenland by force?
Jacobsen said if the US were to invade Greenland, it would mean the end of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
Denmark and the US are founding members of NATO, a European and North American military alliance founded in 1949.
“On a personal level for Trump, it would also mean the end of any ambitions for getting a peace prize, which he has strived for so long,” Jacobsen told Al Jazeera.
“All his efforts to end the wars in Ukraine, Israel-Palestine and elsewhere would have no effect to this end.”
Jacobsen added that there are still “reasonable people in the right positions” who would pull the “handbrake on such an unreasonable idea like invading Greenland”.
“I truly don’t believe it will happen,” he added.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico7 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine7 days agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off