Connect with us

World

New European Parliament intergroups: What’s in and What’s Out

Published

on

New European Parliament intergroups: What’s in and What’s Out

Although informal, parliamentary intergroups are a mirror of Europe’s ever-changing priorities—part tradition, part reinvention, and occasionally, a little bit of whimsy.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the European Parliament embarks on a new legislative mandate, fresh topics are set to capture the attention of MEPs and bring new Parliamentary ‘intergroups’ to life.

These intergroups—informal networks of MEPs from different political groupings—focus on specific issues, often with input from civil society.

Although not official parliamentary bodies, intergroups are formally recognised by the Parliament and established at the start of each term.

For this tenth legislative term, political groups have approved a list of 28 intergroups. Many are being set up this week in Strasbourg, with launch events expected to take place alongside the plenary sessions.

It’s important to note, as the European Parliament clarifies on its website, that intergroups are distinct from “friendship groups”- another more clubbable type of Parliamentary grouping – even if some of their names suggest they might be a lot of fun

Advertisement

To illustrate how MEPs’ interests and engagement with various issues have evolved, Euronews has curated a selection of intergroups—both new and long-standing—from past and present mandates.

The most inclusive LGBTQ+ group in history

The European Parliament’s LGBTQ+ intergroup, confirmed for the fourth time in a row, has come a long way in its journey toward inclusivity.

When it first began, it focused solely on lesbians and gays, even if it’s title “Lesbian and Gay” suggested it consisted of one of each. By the seventh legislative term, the group had expanded to include bisexual and transgender individuals, becoming the LGBT intergroup.

In 2014, “I” was added to represent intersex people, but now that’s been replaced by a “+” symbol, a small change designed to carry a big message: nobody is left out.

Historical Intergroups

Some intergroups have history on their side—quite literally. One focuses on promoting the Camino de Santiago pilgrimage routes and has since broadened its scope to cover other European cultural routes and heritage.

Advertisement

Other enduring intergroups sport distinctive names. SEARICA, for example, tackles seas, rivers, islands, and coastal areas, while ARDI focuses on anti-racism and diversity. But not all historical groups survived this term.

Another intergroup with its own name, the RUMRA dedicated to rural, mountainous, and remote areas since 2014, did not make the cut this time.

Then there are some evergreen intergroups, like those on Sky and Space or Welfare and Conservation, which have been around for several decades and seem destined to outlive us all.

Intergroups not spared by political guidelines

Some new intergroups naturally stem from themes expected to dominate the EU’s agenda in this term. For instance, competitiveness is front and centre with the new intergroup ‘Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable EU’ whose title might have been dubbed by Mario Draghi himself.

Others leave a little more to the imagination. Take the new ‘Police’ intergroup for example—will it focus on tackling police violence or advocating for better protection for law enforcement? Or perhaps it’s a secret fan club for The Police, the legendary English rock band. (We’re still waiting to find out.)

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, mental health has finally earned its own intergroup, reflecting its rising prominence across policy discussions. First-timers like the resilience, disaster management, and civil protection intergroup are also stepping onto the scene.

The ‘cancelled’ ones

As new intergroups emerge, others inevitably fade away. The Green Deal intergroup, active from 2019 to 2024, has been shelved for this term—apparently, nobody volunteered to carry the torch of the flagship initiative of the past mandate.

This isn’t unusual. Many intergroups have lived short, dramatic lives, surviving only a single term. Remember the eighth legislative mandate’s “Media” and “New Media” intergroups? They lasted no longer than a trending tweet.

Another group called ‘Family, children’s rights, and bioethics’ also struggled to make it past a single term.

ADVERTISEMENT

Geopolitical Intergroups

Some intergroups have faded due to shifting political priorities, particularly those dedicated to specific geopolitical areas.

Take the intergroup on Tibet, which ran for a decade before vanishing in 2014, or the Western Sahara group, which has also dissolved now after a decade.

As political tides shift, new groups emerge. This term, a new intergroup titled “The Two-State Solution for Israel and Palestine” has been introduced, reflecting the Parliament’s evolving geopolitical focus and the shifting of interest in the broader geopolitical arena.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Justin Baldoni Lawsuit Alleges Blake Lively Used Taylor Swift to Pressure Him Amid ‘It Ends With Us’ Fight

Published

on

Justin Baldoni Lawsuit Alleges Blake Lively Used Taylor Swift to Pressure Him Amid ‘It Ends With Us’ Fight

The legal battle between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively in the aftermath of “It Ends With Us” expanded its blast zone Thursday morning, with a new lawsuit by Baldoni including text messages between Lively and Baldoni, her co-star and director. In the texts, Lively seemingly alludes to Taylor Swift as “one of her dragons.” The superstar is a friend of Lively.

In the lawsuit, filed against Lively and her husband, actor-producer Ryan Reynolds, on Thursday morning, Baldoni alleges that the couple hijacked the film “It Ends With Us,” and sought to wreck his public reputation with false allegations of sexual harassment. Baldoni is seeking $400 million in damages. Swift is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, nor is her name mentioned in the filing beyond a reference to “Taylor” in a text message sent by Baldoni to Lively.

Swift’s representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In text messages between Baldoni and Lively that are included on pages 23-25 of the 179-page filing, Baldoni discusses a rooftop scene in the film that Lively had allegedly reworked in the script. Baldoni’s lawyers claim that their client “felt obliged to text Lively to say that he had liked her pages and hadn’t needed Reynolds and her megacelebrity friend to pressure him.”

The suit alleges that Lively, along with Reynolds, gradually asserted control over “It Ends With Us” during production, including the rooftop scene in which Lively and Baldoni’s characters first meet. According to the filing, Lively summoned Baldoni to her penthouse in New York, where Reynolds and a “megacelebrity friend” — who appears to be Swift — both praised Lively’s version of the scene.

Advertisement

“Also was working on rooftop scene today, I really love what you did. It really does hep a lot,” Baldoni wrote in the text message. “Makes it so much more fun and interesting. (And I would have felt that way without Ryan and Taylor) You really are a talent across the board. Really excited nd grateful to do this together.”

In a later text from Lively, according to the complaint, the star references Reynolds and another person (whose name is redacted) as being “absolute titans as writers and storytellers outside of their primary gig.” Lively continues, “They also know I’m not always as good at making sure I’m seen and utilized for fear of threatening egos, or fear of affecting the ease of the process. They don’t give a shit about that. And because of that, everyone listens to them with immense respect and enthusiasm. So I guess I have to stop worrying about people liking me.”

The lengthy message closes with Lively comparing herself to Khaleesi, the dragon-controlling queen played by Emilia Clarke on “Game of Thrones,” and alluded to powerful forces that she has in her corner. Lively wrote: “If you ever get around to watching Game of Thrones, you’ll appreciate that I’m Khaleesi, and like her, I happen to have a few dragons. For better or worse, but usually for better. Because my dragons also protect those I fight for. So really we all benefit from those gorgeous monsters of mine. You will too, I can promise you.”

Baldoni’s complaint asserts that this was Lively’s way of exerting pressure on Baldoni.

“The message could not have been clearer,” the complaint states. “Baldoni was not just dealing with Lively. He was also facing Lively’s ‘dragons,’ two of the most influential and wealthy celebrities in the world, who were not afraid to make things very difficult for him.”

Advertisement

Lively filed her own lawsuit against Baldoni, producer Jamey Heath and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel on Dec. 31, 10 days after an initial complaint against them with the California Civil Rights Department. The actor accused Baldoni and others of orchestrating a clandestine media smear campaign against her, in retaliation for her complaints about facing alleged sexual harassment on the set of the film. In response, Baldoni first sued the New York Times — which was the first outlet to report on Lively’s complaint — alleging that the paper had worked with Lively’s team, taking the text messages out of context in order to defame him. At the time, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, promised that more lawsuits would follow.

Continue Reading

World

Israel, Hamas cease-fire held up over renewed debate over Philadelphi security corridor, terrorist exchange

Published

on

Israel, Hamas cease-fire held up over renewed debate over Philadelphi security corridor, terrorist exchange

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Disputes over the now infamous Philadelphi security corridor are once again plaguing efforts to secure a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, an Israeli spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News Digital on Thursday. 

Hopes of cease-fire and hostage exchange deal first confirmed by the U.S. and Qatar on Wednesday appeared to be quelled by the time Americans were waking up on Thursday morning.

Advertisement

“The terrorist organization Hamas repeatedly raises new demands at the last minute, even though everything has already been agreed upon with the mediators, including the U.S.,” spokesman for the prime minister Omer Dostri said, echoing comments made by Netanyahu in which he accused Hamas of “creating a last-minute crisis” and “backing out” of terms negotiated by the mediators. 

KIRBY ‘CONFIDENT’ AMERICANS IN GAZA WILL BE FREED SUNDAY AMID REPORTS OF ISRAEL, HAMAS DEAL HOLDUP

Netanyahu said on Thursday that Israel “will exact a very high price for any act of aggression against us from any quarter whatsoever.” (Ma’ayan Toaf (GPO))

When pressed by Fox News Digital for specifics on what issues have once again apparently stalled the deal set to be implemented on Sunday, Dostri pointed to renewed disagreements over the security corridor that runs between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.

“[Hamas is calling for] changing the deployment of Israeli military forces in the Philadelphia corridor,” Dostri said without expanding on what deployment disagreements have occurred.  

Advertisement

The passage of land has repeatedly proved to be a sticking point in negotiations and may have contributed to the collapse of a July deal in which American-Israeli Hersh Golberg-Polin was slated to be freed, but which never came to fruition. Golberg-Polin and five other hostages were then killed one month later in a tunnel in Gaza. 

Jerusalem has claimed this corridor is vital for its national security interests as Hamas could use it to re-group by relying on smuggling efforts and connections with Jihadi groups in Egypt’s North Sinai region.

Israeli combat engineers search for Hamas tunnels in the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border. 

Israeli combat engineers search for Hamas tunnels in the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border.  (TPS-IL)

In response to Fox News Digital, White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby said, “We’re aware of these issues and we are working through them with the Israeli government, as well as other partners in the region. We are confident these implementing details can be hammered out and that the deal will move forward this weekend.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken echoed this sentiment and told reporters in a press briefing that the deal will be “implemented on Sunday.”

IDF soldiers are battling terrorists in the vital Netzarim Corridor in Gaza.

IDF soldiers are battling terrorists in the vital Netzarim Corridor in Gaza. (IDF Spokesman’s Unit)

A part of the deal believed to have been agreed to this week said that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would remain in the Gaza Strip until the last hostage was freed. But Israel also agreed to begin withdrawing its forces to a security zone surrounding the communities on the Gaza border, reported the Times of Israel.

Advertisement

ISRAEL-HAMAS CEASE-FIRE DEAL HANGS IN BALANCE AS KEY VOTE IS DELAYED

It is unclear what specifics regarding the Philadelphi corridor were agreed under the deal, though a senior diplomatic official told The Times of Israel that Israeli soldiers were intended to remain in the security corridor through the entirety of the first phase of the cease-fire. 

But Ruby Chen, father of Itay Chen – an IDF soldier who is believed to have been killed during the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks and whose body was taken into Gaza by Hamas – believes it is the security demands by the far-right in Israel that could once again pose a threat to the hostage deal. 

Chen pointed to right-wing government members like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich who have repeatedly rejected any deal that does not include continued IDF presence in the Gaza Strip. 

Hamas terrorists in Gaza

File showing Hamas terrorists during a military parade in the Bani Suheila district on July 20, 2017, in Gaza City, Gaza.  (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

“The coalition members of Bibi, are giving him a very hard time. And you know, he might be looking to get out of it,” Chen said. “It’s easy to blame the other side.”

Advertisement

Another issue that has allegedly popped up, according to Netanyahu’s spokesman, is Hamas’ demands over the release of certain terrorist members currently held by Israel, though Fox News Digital was unable to confirm exactly what new demands have been levied. 

In exchange for the hostages still held in Gaza, Israel has agreed to release dozens of Palestinian prisoners in the initial phase of the deal set to last 42 days. During that period, 33 hostages who fall under “humanitarian categories” including any possible children, women, the elderly and the sick will be freed first.

The second phase, which will be negotiated on the 16th day of the cease-fire, will then involve the release of soldiers held by Hamas, both living and dead. Some reports have suggested that Israel could release more than 1,000 prisoners by the time the exchanges are through. 

American hostage families

Family members of Americans who were taken hostage by Hamas during the terrorist attacks in Israel on October 7, including (R-L) Ronen Neutra, Ruby Chen, Jonathan Dekel-Chen, Liz Naftali, Adi Alexander, Orna Neutra, and Yael Alexander talk to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House on December 13, 2023, in Washington, DC. The families were invited to a private meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken.  ( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Chen has arduously pushed for the release of all the hostages, including the deceased, and argued that the plan to release soldiers and the deceased in a separate stage was no longer good enough.

Advertisement

“[That] was maybe needed seven months ago, when the framework was put in place,” Chen said. “Since then, everybody is humanitarian – including the deceased. 

“The only thing that you can predict about the Middle East is that it is unpredictable,” Chen added. “The Middle East is always a match-light away from blowing up.”

Continue Reading

World

Russia hands jail sentences to three Navalny lawyers

Published

on

Russia hands jail sentences to three Navalny lawyers

Lawyers face up to five years in jail on charges of links to Navalny’s groups, which the Kremlin deems ‘extremist’.

A Russian court has sentenced three lawyers who had defended the late opposition leader Alexey Navalny to several years in prison.

Friday’s sentences come as Russia, amid a massive crackdown during its war on Ukraine, seeks to punish Navalny’s associates since his unexplained death in an Arctic prison colony in February 2024.

Igor Sergunin, Alexei Liptser and Vadim Kobzev were handed sentences ranging from three and a half years to five years by a court in the town of Petushki, about 100km (60 miles) east of Moscow for bringing messages from the late opposition leader from prison to the outside world.

The independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta reported that Kobzev said in his final statement in court on January 10 that “we are being tried for transmitting Navalny’s thoughts to other people”.

Advertisement

They were arrested in October 2023 on charges of involvement with “extremist” groups, as Navalny’s networks were deemed by authorities.

The case was widely seen as a way to increase pressure on the opposition to discourage defence lawyers from taking political cases.

At the time, Navalny was serving a 19-year prison term on several criminal convictions, including extremism, which he has vehemently denied.

Navalny’s networks were deemed extremist following a 2021 ruling that outlawed his organisations – the Anti-Corruption Foundation and a network of regional offices – as extremist groups.

That ruling, which exposed anyone involved with the organisations to prosecution, was condemned by Kremlin critics as politically motivated and designed to stifle Navalny’s activities.

Advertisement

According to Navalny’s allies, authorities accused the lawyers of using their position to pass information from him to his team.

Navalny, an anticorruption campaigner and outspoken opponent of President Vladimir Putin, was arrested in 2021 upon his return from Germany, where he was recuperating from a nerve agent poisoning he blamed on the Kremlin.

In December 2023, Navalny was moved from a penal colony in the Vladimir region east of Moscow to one above the Arctic Circle, where he died the following February at the age of 47 under still-unexplained circumstances.

On Friday, his widow issued a statement calling for the three lawyers to be freed “immediately”, describing them as “political prisoners”.

Two other lawyers, Olga Mikhailova and Alexander Fedulov, are on a wanted list but no longer live in Russia.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending