World
Midterms reinforce Christian voter trends on abortion, GOP
Within the midterm elections, evangelical Christians throughout the nation reconfirmed their allegiance to conservative candidates and causes, whereas Catholic voters as soon as once more confirmed how carefully divided they’re — even on abortion.
On a profitable, high-profile poll measure within the battleground state of Michigan, proposing to enshrine abortion rights within the state structure, Catholic voters cut up about evenly, in keeping with AP VoteCast, an expansive survey of greater than 94,000 voters throughout the nation.
In Kentucky, a reliably Republican state, voters rejected a GOP-backed poll measure aimed toward denying any state constitutional protections for abortion. Amongst these voting No had been 60% of Catholic voters, in keeping with VoteCast.
In distinction, about two-thirds of white evangelical voters in each Kentucky and Michigan voted towards defending abortion entry.
Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, mentioned rejection of that measure in his state was an “unmitigated catastrophe.”
He was much less stunned by abortion-rights amendments passing in additional liberal Vermont and California and centrist Michigan. However the Kentucky vote was the “hardest loss” and adopted the same vote in August in one other pink state, Kansas.
Mohler mentioned it’s necessary for abortion opponents to be keen to enact their views into coverage.
Voters “who voted for pro-life candidates rotated and voted towards a pro-life constitutional modification,” Mohler lamented.
On the other facet of the struggle, Catholics for Selection president Jamie Manson mentioned abortion entry protections are common.
“In pink states and blue states, with spiritual voters and secular voters, wherever abortion was on the poll, abortion rights disproportionately gained,” she mentioned in a press release.
John Fea, a professor of American historical past at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, mentioned the Kentucky vote signaled that many Individuals appear to need the established order offered underneath the 1973 Roe v. Wade determination. It legalized abortion nationwide — with some limits — till it was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court docket in June.
“Many of the nation needs some restrictions on abortion, however they don’t need bans,” Fea mentioned. “The Christian proper, even though they acquired what they needed with the overturning of Roe, is just not getting the extent of the victory they’d hoped.”
Solely about one in 10 voters nationwide and throughout most states say abortion needs to be unlawful in all instances, in keeping with AP VoteCast. Even amongst white evangelical voters, whereas most say abortion ought to typically be unlawful, solely about two in 10 say abortion needs to be unlawful in all instances.
Regardless of setbacks on the poll measures, abortion opponents took coronary heart from another election outcomes. Michael New, who teaches social analysis at The Catholic College of America, cited the comfy re-election victories for GOP Govs. Greg Abbott in Texas, Brian Kemp in Georgia, Ron DeSantis in Florida and Mike DeWine in Ohio.
“All these governors signed robust pro-life legal guidelines and didn’t conceal from the abortion problem,” New mentioned.
In response to VoteCast, about 4 in 10 Catholics voting within the midterm elections recognized as Democrats; about half as Republicans. A breakdown of some high-profile races for governor and for U.S. Senate illustrated how these voters are very a lot a swing constituency.
In Wisconsin, Catholic voters barely favored Republicans in these two races.
In Pennsylvania, Catholics had been barely extra more likely to have voted for the Republican loser within the Senate race, Mehmet Oz, however extra more likely to vote for the Democratic winner within the governor’s race, Josh Shapiro. Ozis Muslim and Shapiro is Jewish.
In Arizona, Catholic voters had been evenly divided between the Democratic and Republican candidates for governor, whereas about 60% backed Democrat Mark Kelly, in search of re-election to the Senate. The tight races in Arizona stay uncalled by The Related Press.
In every of these three states, roughly two-thirds or extra of white evangelical Christian voters backed the GOP candidates.
One other notable think about these outcomes: massive majorities of voters who describe themselves as nonreligious voted for the Democrats and supported abortion rights of their choices on the Michigan and Kentucky poll measures.
Whereas it stays unsure which celebration will management Congress, John Fea and different students mentioned the election was a setback for no less than some Christian nationalist candidates on the Republican facet – those that fuse Christian and American id, symbols and mission.
Whereas some candidates related to the view succeeded – comparable to U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican re-elected in her overwhelmingly pink Georgia district – these dealing with a extra blended voters struggled.
Republican Doug Mastriano — whose marketing campaign rallies had been infused with Christian music and symbols although he has rejected the “Christian nationalist” label — misplaced decisively within the race for governor in Pennsylvania. Republican U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, additionally related to the motion, confronted a tighter-than-expected race for re-election in Colorado.
Fea mentioned Mastriano could have alienated individuals along with his Christian nationalism but in addition with different components, comparable to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election outcomes.
“I believe it’s a vote towards an excessive model of Christian nationalism, mixed with election denying,” mentioned Fea, creator of “Consider Me: The Evangelical Highway to Donald Trump.”
Mastriano gained about 6 in 10 of the votes of his fellow evangelical Christians, in keeping with VoteCast, however that appeared to barely lag behind the two-thirds who backed Mehmet Oz.
Total, amongst voters nationwide, about 4 in 10 say they attend spiritual companies no less than month-to-month; a couple of third say they by no means attend. A few fifth say they go as soon as every week or extra.
Democrats largely attend spiritual companies much less ceaselessly – about 7 in 10 go lower than month-to-month. Amongst Republicans, 46% attend no less than month-to-month, whereas 54% go much less typically.
___
Observe the AP’s protection of the 2022 midterm elections at https://apnews.com/hub/2022-midterm-elections. And be taught extra in regards to the points and components at play within the midterms at https://apnews.com/hub/explaining-the-elections.
___
Related Press faith protection receives assist by way of the AP’s collaboration with The Dialog US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely accountable for this content material.
World
Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Rental homes will remain an attractive option next year to would-be homebuyers sidelined by high mortgage rates and rising home prices, analysts say.
American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes are two big real estate investment trusts poised to benefit from the trend, say analysts at Mizuho Securities USA and Raymond James & Associates.
Their outlooks boil down to a simple thesis: Many Americans will continue to have a difficult time finding a single-family home that they can afford to buy, which will make renting a house an attractive alternative.
It starts with mortgage rates. While the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell to a two-year low of 6.08% in late September, it’s been mostly rising since then, echoing moves in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.
The yield, which has hovered around 4.4% this week, surged after the presidential election, reflecting expectations among investors that President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed economic policies may widen the federal deficit and crank up inflation.
Analysts at Raymond James and Associates say they see mortgage rates remaining “higher for longer,” given the outcome of the election. Last week, they reiterated their “Outperform” ratings on American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes, noting “we are increasingly confident in the longer-term outlook for single-family rental fundamentals and the industry’s growth prospects.”
They also believe the two companies will continue to benefit from “outsized demographic demand for suburban homes,” and the monthly payment gap between renting and owning a home, which they estimate can be as much as 30% less to rent.
Analysts at Mizuho also expect that homeownership affordability hurdles will maintain “a supportive backdrop” and stoke demand for rental houses, helping American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes to maintain their tenant retention rates.
The companies are averaging higher new and renewal tenant lease rates when compared to several of the largest U.S. apartment owners, including AvalonBay, Equity Residential and Camden Property Trust, according to Mizuho. It has an “Outperform” rating on American Homes 4 Rent and a “Neutral” rating on Invitation Homes.
Shares in Invitation Homes are down 1.2% so far this year, while American Homes 4 Rent is up 4.4%. That’s well below the S&P 500’s 24% gain in the same period.
While individual homeowners and mom-and-pop investors still account for the vast majority of single-family rental homes, homebuilders have stepped up construction of new houses planned for rental communities.
In the third quarter, builders broke ground on about 24,000 single-family homes slated to become rentals. That’s up from 17,000 a year earlier. In the second quarter, single-family rental starts climbed to 25,000, the highest quarterly total going back to at least 1990, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the National Association of Home Builders.
World
US briefed Ukraine ahead of Putin's 'experimental Intermediate-range ballistic' attack
A U.S. official on Thursday confirmed to Fox News Digital that Ukrainian authorities were briefed ahead of Russia’s “experimental Intermediate-range ballistic missile” attack that this type of weapon may be used against Ukraine in order to help it prepare.
Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed the attack Thursday evening local time in an address to the nation and said it was in direct response to the U.S. and the U.K. jointly approving Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range missiles to target Russia.
It remains unclear if there were any casualties in the attack on the city of Dnipro, which was originally reported as an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) strike, and which would have marked the first time such a weapon had been used during a time of war, sending panic across the globe.
1,000 DAYS OF WAR IN UKRAINE AS ZELENSKYY DOUBLES DOWN ON AERIAL OPTIONS WITH ATACMS, DRONES AND MISSILES
Putin and U.S. sources have since confirmed the strike was not an ICBM, but the Kremlin chief also claimed that the weapon used poses a significant challenge for Western nations.
“The missiles attack targets at a speed of MACH 10. That’s 2.5 miles per second,” Putin said according to a translation. “The world’s current air defense systems and the missile defense systems developed by the Americans in Europe do not intercept such missiles.”
Fox News Digital could not immediately verify whether the U.S. or its NATO allies are capable of defending against this latest missile, dubbed the Oreshnik.
But according to one U.S. official, Putin may be playing up his abilities in a move to intimidate the West and Ukraine.
“While we take all threats against Ukraine seriously, it is important to keep a few key facts in mind: Russia likely possesses only a handful of these experimental missiles,” the official told Fox News Digital. “Ukraine has withstood countless attacks from Russia, including from missiles with significantly larger warheads than this weapon.
“Let me be clear: Russia may be seeking to use this capability to try to intimidate Ukraine and its supporters, or generate attention in the information space, but it will not be a game-changer in this conflict,” the official added.
US EMBASSY IN KYIV CLOSED AS ‘POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’ LOOMS
Following President Biden’s position reversal this week to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) against the Russian homeland, Kyiv immediately levied strikes against a military arsenal in the Russian region of Bryansk, more than 70 miles from Ukraine’s border.
While Ukrainian troops are the ones to officially fire the sophisticated missiles, the weapons system still relies on U.S. satellites to hit its target — an issue Putin touched on in his unannounced speech Thursday.
“We are testing the Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions in response to NATO countries’ aggressive actions against Russia. We will decide on the further deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles depending on the actions of the U.S. and its satellites,” he said.
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Putin claimed Russia will alert Ukrainian citizens of an impending attack like the strike he carried out on Thursday, though it remains unclear if he issued a warning to the Ukrainians living in Dnipro.
The Kremlin chief said the “defense industry” was targeted, though images released by the Ukrainian ministry of defense showed what appeared to be civilian infrastructure was also caught in the fray.
The Pentagon on Thursday confirmed that Russia informed the U.S. of the impending attack, which corresponds with information obtained by Fox News Digital, but it is unclear if Moscow clarified which Ukrainian city was the intended target.
A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that the U.S. is committed to helping Ukraine bolster its air defense systems and has done so already by supplying Ukraine with hundreds of additional Patriot and Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles.
World
South Korea says Russia sent North Korea missiles in exchange for troops
South Korea’s national security adviser says North plans to use the weapons to defend its airspace over the capital.
Russia has provided North Korea with anti-air missiles and air defence equipment in return for sending soldiers to support its war against Ukraine, according to a top South Korean official.
Asked what the North stood to gain from dispatching an estimated 10,000 troops to Russia, South Korea’s national security adviser Shin Won-sik said Moscow had given Pyongyang economic and military technology support.
“It is understood that North Korea has been provided with related equipment and anti-aircraft missiles to strengthen Pyongyang’s weak air defence system,” Shin told South Korean broadcaster SBS in an interview aired on Friday.
At a military exhibition in the capital, Pyongyang, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday called for developing and upgrading “ultra-modern” versions of weaponry, and pledged to keep advancing defence capabilities, state media reported.
Russia this month ratified a landmark mutual defence pact with North Korea as Ukrainian officials reported clashes with Pyongyang’s soldiers on the front lines.
The treaty was signed in Pyongyang in June during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It obligates both states to provide military assistance “without delay” in the case of an attack on the other and to cooperate internationally to oppose Western sanctions.
South Korea’s National Intelligence Service told lawmakers this week that the troops deployed to Russia are believed to have been assigned to an airborne brigade and marine corps on the ground, with some of the soldiers having already entered combat, the Yonhap news agency reported.
The intelligence agency also said recently that North Korea had sent more than 13,000 containers of artillery, missiles and other conventional arms to Russia since August 2023 to replenish its dwindling weapons stockpiles.
Experts say Pyongyang could be using Ukraine as a means of realigning foreign policy.
By sending soldiers, North Korea is positioning itself within the Russian war economy as a supplier of weapons, military support and labour – potentially bypassing its traditional ally, neighbour and main trading partner, China, according to analysts.
Russia can also provide North Korea access to its vast natural resources, such as oil and gas, they say.
North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui recently visited Moscow and said her country would “stand firmly by our Russian comrades until victory day“.
North Korea said last month that any troop deployment to Russia would be “an act conforming with the regulations of international law”, but stopped short of confirming that it had sent soldiers.
The deployment has led to a shift in tone from Seoul, which had so far resisted calls to send weapons to Kyiv. However, President Yoon Suk-yeol indicated South Korea might change its longstanding policy of not providing arms to countries in conflict.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Science3 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs