Connect with us

World

How Yemen’s Houthi rebels are carrying out attacks on Red Sea ships

Published

on

How Yemen’s Houthi rebels are carrying out attacks on Red Sea ships

How Houthi militants in Yemen are attacking ships in one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes

Advertisement

Iranian-backed Houthi militants, who control swathes of Yemen, have used an array of sophisticated weapons – including ballistic missiles and “kamikaze” drones – in their attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea in support of Palestinian militant group Hamas in its war with Israel in the Gaza Strip.

The attacks began on Nov. 19 when Houthi commandos landed a helicopter on the Galaxy Leader cargo vessel as it was passing through the southern Red Sea. They redirected it toward Hodeidah port in Yemen and seized the crew, who are still being held.

Since then, 29 more ships have been attacked in the area, with 13 of those suffering direct strikes from missiles or drones. The attacks have caused major disruptions to global trade, some 12% of which passes through the Red Sea.

Reuters has cataloged the ships attacked so far and examined how Houthi militants are using a combination of weapons to target commercial ships. The analysis shows how Houthi drone and missile activity has escalated since the Gaza war began, and has continued despite Western military airstrikes on their bases in Yemen, which began on Jan. 11.

Advertisement

Graphic depicting all ships known to be targeted by Houthi attacks since November 19. Shows which ships were hit by missiles and drones and which had near misses.

Houthi attacks have targeted ships in the southern Red Sea and the neighboring Gulf of Aden, which are joined by the Bab al-Mandab strait, a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle East.

Advertisement

In Arabic, Bab al-Mandab means “Gate of Tears”, a reference to the strait’s precarious navigation. The narrow waterway lies between Djibouti and Eritrea on the coast of east Africa and western Yemen, much of which is under Houthi control.

Bab al-Mandab is a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and Indian Ocean: exports to the Western markets from the Gulf and Asia must pass through before entering the Suez Canal.

At only 18 miles wide at its narrowest point, shipping traffic is limited to two channels for inbound and outbound shipments, leading to occasional congestion.

Passing the “Gate of Tears”

Known locations of attacks on ships since Nov. 19

Advertisement

Map and satellite image of the southern Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab strait, showing shipping routes and highlighting locations of attacks.

Advertisement

The Houthis, who control the most populous regions of Yemen, say they will continue their attacks until Israel halts its “siege” of Gaza. The Israeli government has pledged to continue its offensive in Gaza until it has secured the release of hostages seized in the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas and destroyed the Palestinian militant group.

A Reuters analysis of reported incidents shows how Houthi drone and missile strikes have escalated since the Gaza conflict erupted, and have continued since Western airstrikes began against land targets inside Yemen on Jan. 11. In the past week, the pace of those airstrikes has slowed, while interceptions of missiles and drones by U.S. and allied naval forces in the area has increased.

Fabian Hinz, open source analyst and research fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a military think-tank based in London, said it was unclear how far Western airstrikes had depleted the Houthis’ capabilities. “I would say in general it’s almost impossible to degrade an arsenal like that 100%,” he said.

Advertisement

The Houthis have said the airstrikes have had no effect on their capabilities. A spokesman for the group did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

Interceptions of missiles or drones

Israel, the U.S. and allies, have been shooting down Houthi missiles and drones since the conflict broke out in Gaza. Many targets were unknown or heading towards Israel but as time progressed, many were suspected to be targeting naval or commercial ships. Incidents on the chart may have involved multiple missiles or drones.
Target: Ships Unknown

Chart showing allied interceptions of Houthi drones and missiles since October.

Advertisement

Houthi shipping attacks

Attacks began to break through naval overwatch with some ships being struck directly with missiles or drones and others targeted but missed.
Ship: Struck Missed

Chart showing Houthi attacks on ships since October with 13 suffering direct hits and the rest missing their target.

Advertisement

Days with allied air strikes

The U.S., UK and allies started to carry out strikes on Houthi land targets.

Chart showing the number of days with airstrikes increasing in January.

Advertisement

Many of the Houthi attacks have been on container vessels and dry bulk carriers. However, on Jan. 26, the Marlin Luanda oil tanker – operated on behalf of international commodity trader Trafigura – was hit by a Houthi anti-ship missile in the Gulf of Aden, causing a fire that lasted several hours.

While no casualties were reported, the incident was the most destructive of the crisis so far, shipping and insurance sources said.

“The recent strike on the Marlin Luanda highlights the ongoing risk to vessels and the likelihood that the current crisis will impact shipping and commodity markets for the foreseeable future,” data and analytics group Kpler said in a Jan 30 report.

Advertisement

Smoke rises from the Marlin Luanda after the vessel was struck by a Houthi anti-ship missile. Jan. 27, 2024. @indiannavy via X/Handout via REUTERS

The Houthi arsenal

In a show of strength in September, the Houthis paraded thousands of troops and trucks carrying weaponry in the capital Sanaa, including cruise and ballistic missiles as well as long-range armed drones. Armored vehicles and speed boats displayed signs that read: “Death to America, death to Israel!”

The Houthis, who emerged in the 1990s as an armed group in opposition to Saudi Arabia’s religious influence in Yemen, have long received funds, arms and training from Iran, according to regional and military experts.

Despite voicing support for the Houthi campaign, Iran has denied it provides the Yemeni group with weapons and intelligence. The Houthis have insisted they manufacture their own weapons and do not receive arms or take orders from Iran, even if they maintain a close relationship.

Advertisement

September’s military parade showcased Iranian-made weapons, including a surface-to-surface Iranian Toofan missile, which has a range of 850 to 1,200 miles (1,350-1,950 km), making it capable of reaching Israeli territory, according to a report from the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC), an Israel-based think-tank that researches Islamist groups and militias.

TOP: A view shows a military parade held by the Houthis to mark the anniversary of their takeover in Sanaa, Yemen September 21, 2023. Houthi Media Office/Handout via Reuters

BELOW: Still frames from a video showing Toofan and Quds Z-0 missiles displayed in a military parade in Sanaa on Sept. 21, 2023. REUTERSBELOW: Still frames from a video showing Quds Z-0 missiles displayed in a military parade in Sanaa on Sept. 21, 2023. REUTERS

Advertisement

The parade also featured new shore-to-sea missiles capable of hitting vessels in the Red Sea, among them Tankil missiles, which have an estimated range of about 300 miles (500 km), and Quds Z-0s, which are cruise missiles capable of hitting targets both on land and at sea, ITIC said.

Anti-ship missiles

Advertisement

An illustrated graphic shows some of the anti-ship missiles in the Houthi arsenal.

When the Houthis seized Sanaa in 2014, ousting the Saudi-backed government, they also inherited military equipment and staff with know-how from the previous government, notably short-range ballistic missiles as well as surface-to-surface and cruise missiles, some deployed on patrol craft, according to a specialist with Universal Defence and Security Solutions, a UK-based consultancy.

Their new Iranian-made weapons include Qasef-1 and Qasef-2K reconnaissance and attack drones, said the specialist, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue. While cheap and basic, these drones have a 50-60 mile range with a small warhead of around 30-40 kgs.

Advertisement

Other drones included the Sammad 1, 2 and 3, which are similar to the Qasef with a longer range of around 300 miles and smaller 18 kg warheads, he said.

Drones used by Houthis

An illustrated graphic shows some of the drones in the Houthi arsenal.

Advertisement

The defence specialist said that supplies of weapons systems and parts from Iran meant the Houthis should be able to sustain the near-daily rate of attacks in the Red Sea. In addition, the Houthis were able to produce some of their own munitions for basic rockets and drones, he said.

“It’s not particularly important that many of the fired weapon systems do not cause any significant damage: the disruptive impact on maritime trade, which relies on insurance, is quite easy to maintain, causing significant financial impact and operational complexity,” he said.

The Pentagon and the British Department of Defence did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

One-way attack drones

Western military and shipping companies have shared little information publicly on the types of drones used in recent Red Sea shipping attacks.

On Nov. 29, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) – which covers the Middle East, Central and South Asia – said that the destroyer USS Carney shot down an Iranian-produced KAS-04 drone – the U.S. designation for the Samad drone – launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen.

A report commissioned by the Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF), an association of petroleum firms focused on promoting safer and cleaner shipping, identified the Shahed-136 as the “loitering munition” most commonly used against merchant ships operating in the Middle East. These types of drones can circle in an area before a final target is determined.

The Shahed was employed for the first time by the Houthis in Yemen’s war between September and December 2020, according to the report, published in August and produced by global risk analysts Sibylline.

The Shahed-136 – which has been extensively used by Russian forces in Ukraine – can be fired from truck-mounted containers at a slightly upward angle. A small rocket booster helps propel the drone into the air before being jettisoned. Its main piston engine then takes over to power the flight.

Advertisement

An illustration shows how the Shahed-136 is launched from a trailer using a small rocket for initial boost before its engine starts.

The drone will travel towards coordinates it has been assigned. Loitering munitions usually have a navigation system to calculate their speed and position, and sometimes possess sensors connected to commercial satellite networks.

Advertisement

Images released in November 2022 of a Shahed-136 used to attack the MV Pacific Zircon off the coast of Oman indicated a satellite receiver on board, which could enable real-time navigation, according to the OCIMF paper. This technology might also allow Houthi operators to manually alter target coordinates in-flight.

An illustration shows the Shahed-136 and other drones flying in the air.

Advertisement

Once the drone has passed any obstacles and cleared the coast it can take a lower flight path to try to avoid radar. The delta-wing design of the Shahed-136 gives it a low radar signature. Combined with its ability to travel at low-altitude, this makes detection by commercial radar difficult.

An illustration shows how drones can take a low-altitude flight profile towards targets.

Advertisement

As the noisy drone approaches target areas, the distinctive sound of its small piston engine can be heard, resembling the noise of a moped. They are also relatively slow.

An illustration shows rear views of the Shahed-136 and other drones with emphasis on the propeller and engine.

Advertisement

Taimur Khan, regional head of operations in the Gulf for Conflict Armament Research, an investigative organization that tracks weapons used in conflicts, said Houthi drones documented during the civil war were designed to hit static targets by using GPS coordinates. But the shipping attacks appeared more sophisticated.

“In order to reliably hit a moving target such as a cargo ship, even a relatively slow-moving one, there would need to be some kind of terminal guidance,” he said.

Once a target has been acquired, loitering munitions can adjust trajectory, and attack from the top-down, detonating upon impact.

An illustration shows a loitering munition attacking a container ship from above.

Advertisement

Lebanese Shia group Hezbollah – another member of Iran’s ‘Axis of Resistance’ in the Middle East – has provided military training and assistance to the Houthis, military and regional experts say.

The Houthis have denied this. Hezbollah has not commented.

Eyal Pinko, a former senior official with Israel’s intelligence services until 2017 who now works at Bar Ilan University’s Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, said Hezbollah had in particular helped the Houthis to build their naval capabilities.

Advertisement

These include seven naval bases and 30 control posts along Yemen’s coast that have radar and electro-optical directors for better control of missile launches, said Pinko, who has studied the Houthis since 2004.

“It’s a massive coastal defense line for detection, and they’re also using AIS (ship tracking) systems, and also intelligence from Iran,” Pinko said. Automatic identification system, or AIS, is a transponder system that allows maritime authorities and companies to publicly track commercial shipping and identify vessels.

Among the unused weapons in the Houthis arsenal are Iranian-made Sadaf floating mines. While such munitions are relatively unsophisticated and easy to deploy, their impact on merchant shipping would be considerable if they were used in the Red Sea, said Pinko, who also consults on private-sector security.

Floating mines have been placed with great effect in the Black Sea during the war in Ukraine, sowing alarm amongst shipping companies and their insurers.

Advertisement

Pinpoint strikes

The United States, Britain, and other allied nations, have carried out strikes from the air and sea against Houthi military targets in Yemen in response to the attacks on shipping.

The first wave of strikes were conducted on Jan. 11: overnight attacks by the U.S. and Britain targeting almost 30 different locations in Yemen. Strikes continued throughout January.
The Pentagon says it has struck anti-ship missiles on the ground, as well as coastal radar and Houthi air surveillance capabilities and weapon storage sites.

Satellite images taken by Maxar Technologies the day after the Jan.11 strikes show the aftermath. In a compound on the Yemeni coast, bordering the southern Red Sea, craters and scorched earth can be seen. A similar image from Google Earth, taken by Airbus, shows structures in the same location in July last year.

One kilometer north along the coast, a similar compound was struck during the same wave of attacks on Jan.11. Images from Maxar Technologies show scattered debris and structures missing, when compared to a July 2 Airbus image.

Advertisement

Maxar also published images of locations on the outskirts of Sanaa airport showing what appears to be damage when compared to older images. One was described by Maxar as a radar facility, while the other location was unspecified.

Reuters was unable independently to determine the use of the sites or whether they were hit by Western missiles. However, both appear to have been targeted with accuracy.

CENTCOM has said U.S. strikes have hit a number of Houthi anti-ship missiles that were about to be launched.

Advertisement

“This is quite difficult from an intelligence and targeting perspective because you need to know where the missile is, where it’s moving, where they want to fire it from,” said Hinz, the IISS research fellow.

“That indicates that the Americans are having some success,” he added. “We still don’t know to what degree they’ve degraded the (Houthi) arsenal.”

Global Shipping Disruptions

Shipping companies have been re-routing some sailings via Africa’s southern Cape of Good Hope as the attacks continued. The disruption threatens to drive up delivery costs for goods, raising fears it could stoke global inflation.
Container shipping, which transports consumer goods, has been the segment most impacted by the attacks in the Red Sea due to fixed routes through the waterway.
In the period from the start of December last year to Jan. 30, 373 container ships are estimated to have re-routed around Africa, according to analysis from supply chain platform project44.
The number of container vessels sailing through the Suez Canal has fallen by about 65% since the attacks began, project44 data showed.

Because of the high risks, seafarers are signing agreements to receive double pay when entering the high-risk zones around Yemen, according to contract agreements viewed by Reuters and union officials.

Advertisement

“There is a fair degree of trepidation from the seafarers because quite a few ships are being hit,” said Stephen Cotton, General Secretary of the International Transport Workers’ Federation, the leading union for seafarers.

“The feedback from the captains is, certainly on the container trades, they’re much happier to go around the Cape.”

Vessel re-routing

An example of re-routing from Singapore to Rotterdam.

Advertisement

The Suez Canal is used by roughly one third of global container ship cargo. Redirecting ships around the southern tip of Africa is expected to cost up to $1 million in extra in fuel for every round trip between Asia and northern Europe.

Worries about potential disruption to Middle Eastern supply after the latest Red Sea attack drove oil prices higher in the first trading session of 2024.

Tallies of attacks, interceptions and air strikes are collated from MSCHOA, ACLED, UKMTO, CENTCOM, and news reports. Interception incidents may include multiple drones or missiles being shot down. Data is current as of Feb. 1.

Advertisement

The Maritime Security Centre – Horn of Africa (MSCHOA); International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS); Conflict Armament Research; World Bank; U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM); Janes; Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED); The Oil Companies International Marine Forum; United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO); Middle East Institute; United States Institute of Peace; U.S. Naval Institute; Maxar Technologies; LSEG; Shoei Kisen Kaisha.

Advertisement

World

Video: A Death at the Epicenter of Ebola

Published

on

Video: A Death at the Epicenter of Ebola

new video loaded: A Death at the Epicenter of Ebola

Our chief Africa correspondent, Declan Walsh, reports from the epicenter of the Ebola outbreak on how families, medical workers and local volunteers are grappling with losses of life.

By Declan Walsh, Estelle Caswell, Thomas Vollkommer and Arlette Bashizi

June 3, 2026

Continue Reading

World

US ally Kuwait condemns ‘brutal and ongoing Iranian attacks’ after airport was hit

Published

on

US ally Kuwait condemns ‘brutal and ongoing Iranian attacks’ after airport was hit

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Kuwait decried Iranian attacks in a statement issued by its foreign affairs ministry, saying that the Kuwait International Airport had been targeted.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expresses the State of Kuwait’s condemnation and denunciation, in the strongest terms, of the brutal and ongoing Iranian attacks using ballistic missiles and drones, the latest of which occurred at dawn today, targeting once again civilian and vital facilities, including Kuwait International Airport, resulting in the death of one individual, injuries to others, and damage to vital facilities, including diplomatic missions,” part of the statement declared, according to a translation of the Arabic-language post on X.

Kuwait’s Ministry of Defense spokesperson had indicated that a building at Kuwait International Airport was damaged and people were injured, according to a post on X by the official account of Kuwait Army general staff headquarters.

IRANIANS SPEAK OUT OVER POSSIBLE TRUMP-REGIME DEAL

Advertisement

People are seen at Kuwait International Airport in Kuwait City, Kuwait, on June 1, 2026. (Jaber Abdulkhaleq/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“The Official Spokesman for the Ministry of Defense, Brigadier General Saud Abdulaziz Al-Otaibi, stated that a number of hostile drones targeted today the passenger building (T1) at Kuwait International Airport as a result of the criminal Iranian aggression, which resulted in significant material damage to the building and injuries to a number of individuals, who received the necessary medical care,” according to a translation of the Arabic-language post.

“He affirmed that the armed forces are monitoring the situation in coordination with the relevant authorities, and they are in a state of complete readiness to deal with any developments, and to take all necessary measures to preserve the security of the country and its stability,” the post added.

The Iranian hostilities come more than three months since the start of the U.S. war against the Islamic Republic.

In a Tuesday statement, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) indicated that America had engaged in “self-defense strikes” against Iran.

Advertisement

US MILITARY ATTACKS IRAN IN ‘SELF-DEFENSE STRIKES’ OVER WEEKEND

Imam Sadiq (AS) mosque with a giant Iranian flag installed on its front at the Palestine Square in Tehran on April 19, 2026. (ATTA KENARE / AFP via Getty Images)

“U.S. forces successfully defeated multiple Iranian ballistic missiles and drones, and conducted self-defense strikes on Qeshm Island in response to attempted attacks by Iran across the Middle East, June 2. Iran launched several ballistic missiles toward regional neighbors; however, all failed to hit their intended targets. Two Iranian missiles fired at Kuwait fell short or broke apart enroute, and three missiles launched at Bahrain were immediately intercepted by U.S. and Bahrain air defense forces,” the release noted.

“Moments earlier, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces shot down three one-way attack drones launched by Iran toward civilian mariners that were rightfully transiting regional waters. American forces also conducted self-defense strikes on an Iranian military ground control station on Qeshm Island. No U.S. personnel were harmed. CENTCOM forces remain vigilant and ready to defend against unwarranted Iranian aggression during the ongoing ceasefire,” the statement added.

TRUMP INSISTS IRAN TALKS ARE ON, SAYING DEAL IS ‘NOT A SIMPLE THING’

Advertisement

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth listens as Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command, speaks during a press briefing at the Pentagon on April 16, 2026, in Arlington, Va. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

CENTCOM noted in a post on X that, “An additional wave of Iranian drones attempting to attack U.S. forces in Kuwait failed to impact intended targets tonight. U.S. Central Command air defenses successfully downed multiple drones and ensured no American personnel or assets were harmed.”

Continue Reading

World

EU launches major tech push to break US and China dependence

Published

on

EU launches major tech push to break US and China dependence

The European Commission has presented a sweeping package to boost homegrown technologies and reduce dependency on American and Chinese companies. Whether it will make a meaningful difference — and how the two superpowers will react — remain open questions.

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

The EU imports most of its tech services and products from abroad. The digital market is dominated by US giants such as Google, Microsoft and Apple, and Chinese conglomerates such as Alibaba and TikTok-owner ByteDance.

“We live in a world where geopolitics and technology are inseparable. Those who champion technological innovation will shape the future, and we must ensure that Europe plays a leading role in this,” European Commission Executive Vice President Henna Virkkunen said.

The package seeks to boost Europe’s domestic tech sector, with a heavy focus on cloud infrastructure, AI services, open source and chips.

Advertisement

In his landmark report on the languishing state of the European economy, former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi argued that most of the recent divergence in GDP growth between the EU and the US could be explained by digital technologies.

Having missed the first wave of the digital economy — the internet-driven services boom — Draghi warned that Europe’s last chance to rejoin the international tech race was not to be missed, namely the transformative potential of artificial intelligence.

While growing dependency on foreign technologies had been widely known among European decision-makers for decades, US President Donald Trump’s assertive trade agenda and China’s willingness to weaponise such dependencies have provided fresh momentum.

Will Brussels’ move be enough to shift the dial, or is it too little too late? And what will be the economic cost of severing deeply entrenched dependencies if the EU draws the ire of Washington and Beijing?

What’s in the package?

The main target of the European Commission’s proposal is the cloud sector, which provides the physical infrastructure underpinning most digital services. Amazon, Microsoft and Google account for 80% of the European market, with EU-based providers relegated to the margins.

Advertisement

The draft law introduces four different levels of digital sovereignty that public authorities must consider when purchasing cloud services, depending on how sensitive the use case is.

The highest tier, covering sectors such as defence and healthcare, would effectively bar non-European companies from winning public contracts. The aim is to prevent a so-called “kill switch” scenario, the risk that a foreign government might simply cut off access to hospitals or fighter jets.

For MEP Axel Voss (EPP/Germany), the Commission’s approach is both bold and pragmatic. “Building genuine European cloud and AI sovereignty is overdue, and giving our providers a fair seat at the table in strategic public tenders is the right instinct,” he said.

Europe also needs to catch up on chips — the fundamental components at the heart of almost every electronic device. The most advanced chips, used to develop cutting-edge AI technologies, are designed in the US and produced in Taiwan or South Korea.

After the first Chips Act failed to significantly bring semiconductor factories back to Europe through state subsidies, the Commission is trying again — this time focusing on stimulating demand for European chips, on the assumption that supply will follow.

Advertisement

Certain key sectors, such as automotive, will also be required to diversify their chip suppliers in certain circumstances, as part of a broader effort to reduce reliance on Chinese-subsidised producers accused of flooding the market through dumping.

Will it be effective?

The guiding principle of the initiative is AI — the transformative technology that, much like the internet before it, is reshaping the digital economy. Cloud data centres and chips provide the essential infrastructure for the next generation of AI.

Yet the AI market is dominated by the likes of OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepSeek. A European preference in lucrative defence contracts could serve as a lifeline for Mistral AI, the only EU-based company at the cutting edge of the AI race.

The EU lags significantly behind in data centre construction needed to meet expected demand for AI services in the coming years, held back by a mix of slow permitting, high energy costs and a scarcity of available land.

“Europe cannot regulate its way out of technological dependency,” MEP Matthias Ecke (S&D/Germany) told reporters. “It must build its own capacity, overcoming one-sided dependencies and restoring a genuine choice for businesses and consumers alike.”

Advertisement

At the same time, the EU is set to join a US-led initiative, Pax Silica, to secure chip supply chains, in recognition that Europe cannot do without Nvidia chips in the short term.

That dependency could nonetheless prove self-perpetuating: regulators and rivals warn that Nvidia tends to build a closed ecosystem that is difficult to break away from.

Will there be a backlash?

The concept of technological sovereignty originated in French defence circles, rooted in the idea of developing an autonomous nuclear deterrent. The debate spilled over into digital technologies — given their dual-use potential — during Trump’s first term.

A stark wake-up call for EU policymakers came when, after the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the US administration sanctioned several ICC officials — cutting them off from American services woven into daily life, such as Visa, Amazon and Uber.

As Washington has grown more explicit about weaponising critical dependencies, concerns about retaliation against any treatment of US firms deemed unfair have mounted.

Advertisement

Commission insiders, however, consider the US front largely pacified by the EU-US Turnberry agreement, which broadly favours the American side, and say the tone behind the scenes in recent weeks has been far more constructive than the public outbursts suggest.

On the China front, the tech sovereignty debate is just one thread in a far broader tapestry of strained relations between Brussels and Beijing, with discussions around a potential trade war reaching a fever pitch in recent weeks.

Both Washington and Beijing have weaponised strategic dependencies in what analyst Mark Leonard has called the Age of Unpeace. Yet neither superpower can afford to lose access to Europe’s main strength: one of the world’s largest and most lucrative markets.

Where is Europe headed?

In the complex chip value chain, Europe still controls critical chokepoints, most notably through Dutch company ASML, which holds a near-monopoly on the industrial machinery essential to chip production.

The package also includes a strategy to leverage open-source technologies, which could help the EU overcome its fragmented tech landscape — one that has yet to produce a company capable of directly competing with Silicon Valley’s giants with an integrated offering.

Advertisement

Still, the lack of a scalable European single market and access to capital are frequently cited by European start-ups as the main reasons they move abroad — issues the Commission is attempting to address through the EU Inc. proposal and the capital markets union.

In short, the EU faces structural problems dragging its tech sector back. The sovereignty package addresses some of them while attempting to leverage Europe’s own strengths, conscious that complete autonomy in a globalised world is unrealistic.

For instance, Japan coined the concept of “strategic indispensability,” which emphasises controlling critical leverage points.

“The target is to achieve something visible by 2030,” Virkkunen said. “80% of technology is coming from outside Europe. We will not change that overnight.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending