Connect with us

World

Harassment Case Tests Women’s Rights in Costa Rica’s Close Election

Published

on

SAN JOSÉ, Costa Rica — He was demoted from a senior place on the World Financial institution due to sexual harassment. Now, the economist Rodrigo Chaves — who has campaigned as a populist outsider in an election marked by anger at conventional politicians — leads the polls to turn into Costa Rica’s subsequent president on Sunday.

It’s an sudden rise to prominence in a rustic that has taken a lead function within the development of progressive insurance policies in Central America, underlining how the need to punish political elites for what many citizens see as an insufficient authorities response to the area’s political scandals and financial challenges is overshadowing most different points.

In 2019, Mr. Chavez was reprimanded by the World Financial institution for what was proven to be a sample of sexual misconduct towards junior staff, although the small print of his conduct have been made public by a Costa Rica newspaper solely in August — particulars the presidential candidate has repeatedly rebutted.

Mr. Chaves’s denial and downplaying of a documented historical past of sexual harassment come two years after one other Costa Rican politician, the previous president and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Óscar Arias Sánchez, narrowly prevented prosecution for sexual abuse, in a scandal that shook the nation.

Mr. Arias was accused in 2019 of sexual assault or misconduct by a minimum of 9 ladies, rising as some of the important #MeToo instances in Latin America. Nevertheless, in December 2020, the fees introduced towards him by two of the ladies have been dropped.

Advertisement

Human rights activists now say that Mr. Chaves’s bid for energy threatens to undermine progress in Central America’s most liberal and egalitarian nation.

“The message that that is sending to society is that sexual abuse is one thing minor, one thing not critical,” stated Larissa Arroyo, a Costa Rican human rights lawyer. “This marketing campaign is normalizing and legitimizing the abuse.”

Mr. Chaves and his press workplace didn’t reply to an interview request.

Mr. Chaves languished in obscurity till his alliance with Pilar Cisneros, a distinguished feminine Costa Rican journalist, who introduced him to Costa Rican voters as an skilled administrator who would sort out corruption.

Only a day after Ms. Cisneros joined Mr. Chaves’s marketing campaign in August, the native newspaper La Nación made public the World Financial institution’s investigation that discovered he demonstrated a sample of sexual harassment towards junior feminine staff between 2008 and 2013.

Advertisement

Mr. Chaves responded by downplaying the findings: “Those that have kidnapped the nation are already displaying their worry of the candidacy of Rodrigo Chaves.” he stated in a video handle posted on social media hours after the article’s publication.

The revelations did little to wreck Mr. Chaves’s marketing campaign. When the investigation was revealed, he was polling at simply 2 p.c. By the primary spherical of nationwide elections, held in February, he had earned sufficient votes to maneuver onto the presidential runoff.

Ms. Cisneros got here to Mr. Chaves’s protection, serving to to protect him from the total impression of the revelations. “Do you suppose that Pilar Cisneros would have supported a sexual harasser?” she informed the native media in January. The following month, she gained a congressional seat for Mr. Chaves’ celebration.

Forward of the ultimate vote on Sunday, the state-run College of Costa Rica discovered Mr. Chaves narrowly main towards his opponent: a former Costa Rican president, José María Figueres. In a ballot of 1,000 voters carried out by the college on March 24-28, Mr. Chaves led by 3.4 proportion factors, barely above the survey’s margin of error of three.1 p.c.

A separate ballot revealed by the College of Costa Rica on March 1 discovered that solely 13 p.c of voters thought that harassment accusations towards Mr. Chaves have been false. However 45 p.c stated that the accusations wouldn’t affect their vote.

Advertisement

Mr. Chaves has benefited from the unpopularity of his opponent, Mr. Figueres, who has been marred by accusations of corruption throughout his first time period in workplace within the Nineteen Nineties. Mr. Figueres, who leads the nation’s oldest and largest political celebration, the Nationwide Liberation Occasion, is accused of receiving funds within the early 2000s from a French telecommunications firm in return for preferential therapy whereas he was president.

Mr. Figueres has denied the accusations, and prosecutors who investigated the funds, which occurred after he stepped down, didn’t press fees.

Nevertheless, within the eyes of many Costa Ricans, Mr. Figueres and his celebration have come to symbolize the venality and elitism of the nation’s political system, which many imagine is now not capable of clear up the nation’s financial issues, stated Ronald Alfaro, who leads the College of Costa Rica’s Middle of Political Research and Investigation.

Costa Rica’s tourism-reliant financial system suffered drastically from the pandemic — in 2020, its gross home product noticed its best drop in 4 a long time. Whereas components of the financial system bounced again, the nation is struggling to rein in rising meals and gasoline prices.

“The accusations find yourself canceling one another,” Mr. Alfaro stated. “Voters find yourself casting their ballots not for the candidate they like however towards the candidate they imagine has extra fleas than the opposite,” he stated.

Advertisement

Turned off by the scandals round each candidates, most Costa Ricans seem to have misplaced curiosity within the election. Solely 1 / 4 of all registered voters solid their ballots for both Mr. Chaves or Mr. Figueres within the first spherical of elections, which had the bottom turnout in 70 years.

Paperwork from the World Financial institution’s inner tribunal and labor union present that Mr. Chaves was punished in 2019 after two feminine staff filed harassment complaints. On the time, he was the financial institution’s nation head for Indonesia, a director-level place overseeing billions of {dollars} of lending to one of many world’s largest creating economies.

The ladies stated Mr. Chaves made makes an attempt to kiss junior staff on the mouth, made sexual feedback about their appearances and repeatedly made unwelcome invites to resort rooms and dinners. The identities of the ladies haven’t been made public.

One girl, who reported to Mr. Chaves, informed the tribunal that he “commented that he preferred it when she bent over, then proceeded to drop an merchandise and ask her to select it up for him,” a request she stated she refused.

Mr. Chaves was demoted and his wage was frozen, however the financial institution stopped wanting explicitly calling his conduct sexual harassment. He left the group days later and returned to his native Costa Rica to turn into the finance minister for the president, Carlos Alvarado.

Advertisement

The Costa Rican Communication Ministry stated the present authorities had been unaware of the harassment case, and that Mr. Chaves informed its members on the time that he returned as a result of he needed to spend his retirement together with his aged mom.

Inside six months, Mr. Chaves left his ministry place and introduced a presidential bid with a little-known political celebration, promising to “return energy to residents” by holding referendums on essential coverage subjects.

Regardless of Mr. Chaves’s departure from the World Financial institution, his accusers introduced an enchantment to the inner tribunal to overview the financial institution’s misconduct investigation.

“The details of the current case point out that Mr. C’s conduct was sexual in nature and that he knew or ought to have identified that his conduct was unwelcome,” the tribunal stated in its June ruling. A World Financial institution official stated the financial institution didn’t dispute the details of the case as introduced within the ruling.

Even earlier than the ruling was issued, in January 2021, the group banned Mr. Chaves from its premises and imposed a rehiring ban. The financial institution’s sister group, the Worldwide Financial Fund, stated it additionally restricted Mr. Chaves’s entry to its premises.

Advertisement

Within the months since, Mr. Chaves has denied or misrepresented the findings; as an alternative, he’s stated that the World Financial institution discovered little greater than an allegation towards him, referring to the financial institution’s preliminary determination to not name his wrongdoings sexual harassment.

He has additionally stated that he can freely go to the World Financial institution’s workplaces — contradicting the financial institution’s ban on his entry — and that as president he’ll proceed doing enterprise with the financial institution, which has $2.3 billion in excellent loans in Costa Rica.

Mr. Chaves has additionally promised to “revise” the legal guidelines on in vitro fertilization and abortion, which have been made extra accessible by current presidential decrees. Abortion is authorized in Costa Rica when the being pregnant threatens a girl’s well being.

These measures threaten to derail the sluggish however noticeable advances in ladies’s reproductive rights underneath the current governments, stated Ms. Arroyo, the human rights lawyer. She stated the proposals additionally would injury Costa Rica’s function within the development of social rights in a deeply socially conservative area the place abortion is essentially banned and the place violence towards ladies goes largely unpunished.

Costa Rica’s political stability and powerful democracy have lengthy made it an outlier in a area dominated by authoritarians and arranged crime, and the nation has achieved one in all Latin America’s highest ranges of social inclusion, in areas starting from entry to schooling and well being care to civil rights.

Advertisement

“If Costa Rica declines in its safety of girls’s rights,” Ms. Arroyo stated, “it’s almost definitely that the remainder of the neighboring nations is not going to have this instance to maintain shifting ahead.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Christopher Reeve’s Son Will Reeve to Appear in James Gunn’s ‘Superman’

Published

on

Christopher Reeve’s Son Will Reeve to Appear in James Gunn’s ‘Superman’

James Gunn‘s “Superman” is celebrating both the legacy of the Man of Steel and the actor who originated him on the big screen with a special cameo.

The late Christopher Reeve experienced his greatest commercial success playing Superman and his alter ego Clark Kent in the first four Superman movies. Now, his youngest son, journalist and ABC News correspondent Will Reeve, will make a cameo playing a TV reporter in the upcoming DC Studios movie.

The project is currently filming in Cleveland, Ohio, where local reporters (via Cleveland.com) captured all the behind-the-scenes action, including Reeve’s appearance on set during a major scene. David Corenswet stars as Superman in the character’s latest revival, written and directed by Gunn, the co-head of Warner Bros.-owned DC Studios. The film arrives in theaters on July 11, 2025.

Will Reeve and his older siblings Matthew and Alexandra have had the superhero front of mind lately thanks to Ian Bonhote and Peter Ettedgui’s documentary “Super/Man,” which chronicles their late father’s life and career. The Reeve children appear in the documentary as it explores the actor’s rise to Hollywood icon status and the near-fatal horse-riding accident in 1995 that left him paralyzed from the neck down. (Reeve died in 2004.) Following its buzzy Sundance Film Festival premiere, “Super/Man” finalized a deal to sell to Warner Bros. Discovery for roughly $15 million.

“The majority of my memories of my dad involve him after the accident because I was not yet three years old when he was injured,” Will Reeve told Variety at the festival. “So to see his entire life leading up until that time laid out so poetically and cinematically and authentically by our wonderful directors has been a real gift for me.”

Advertisement

In that interview, the Reeve children were also asked about their thoughts on Christopher Reeve’s appearance in last year’s Warner Bros. comic book tentpole “The Flash,” in which his iteration of Superman (recreated by CGI) is spotted by Ezra Miller’s Flash out in the multiverse. None of them had watched “The Flash” and they did not have involvement in that cameo. But, Will Reeve’s appearance in the upcoming “Superman” marks a step forward in the synergistic relationship between the family and the studio as all things Superman trend up, up and away.

The documentary will hit the big screen this fall, playing in select theaters on Sept. 21 followed by an encore presentation on Christopher Reeve’s birthday, Sept. 25. DC Studios is collaborating with Fathom Events on the theatrical release.

DC Studios did not return request for comment on Reeve’s cameo.

Continue Reading

World

Death toll climbs to 116 in religious gathering stampede in India

Published

on

Death toll climbs to 116 in religious gathering stampede in India

Thousands of people at a religious gathering in India rushed to leave a makeshift tent, setting off a stampede Tuesday that killed more than 100 and left scores injured, officials said.

It was not immediately clear what triggered the panic following an event with a Hindu guru known locally as Bhole Baba. Local news reports cited authorities who said heat and suffocation in the tent could have been a factor. Video of the aftermath showed the structure appeared to have collapsed.

At least 116 people died, most of them women and children, said Prashant Kumar, the director-general of police in northern India’s state of Uttar Pradesh, where the stampede occurred.

AT LEAST 60 DEAD AFTER STAMPEDE AT RELIGIOUS GATHERING IN NORTHERN INDIA

More than 80 others were injured and admitted to hospitals, senior police officer Shalabh Mathur said.

Advertisement

“People started falling one upon another, one upon another. Those who were crushed died. People there pulled them out,” witness Shakuntala Devi told the Press Trust of India news agency.

Relatives wailed in distress as bodies of the dead, placed on stretchers and covered in white sheets, lined the grounds of a local hospital. A bus that arrived there carried more victims, whose bodies were lying on the seats inside.

Deadly stampedes are relatively common around Indian religious festivals, where large crowds gather in small areas with shoddy infrastructure and few safety measures.

Police officer Rajesh Singh said there was likely overcrowding at the event in a village in Hathras district about 220 miles southwest of the state capital, Lucknow.

People mourn next to the bodies of their relatives outside the Sikandrarao hospital in Hathras district about 217 miles southwest of Lucknow, India, Tuesday, July 2, 2024. A stampede among thousands of people at a religious gathering in northern India killed at least 60 and left scores injured, officials said Tuesday, adding that many women and children were among the dead and the toll could rise. (AP Photo)

Advertisement

Initial reports said organizers had permission to host about 5,000 people, but more than 15,000 came for the event by the Hindu preacher, who used to be a police officer in the state before he left his job to give religious sermons. He has led other such gatherings over the last two decades.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi offered condolences to the families of the dead and said the federal government was working with state authorities to ensure the injured received help.

Uttar Pradesh’s chief minister, Yogi Adityanath, called the stampede “heart-wrenching” in a post on X. He said authorities were investigating.

“Look what happened and how many people have lost their lives. Will anyone be accountable?” Rajesh Kumar Jha, a member of parliament, told reporters. He said the stampede was a failure by the state and federal governments to manage large crowds, adding that “people will keep on dying” if authorities do not take safety protocols seriously enough.

In 2013, pilgrims visiting a temple for a popular Hindu festival in central Madhya Pradesh state trampled each other amid fears that a bridge would collapse. At least 115 were crushed to death or died in the river.

Advertisement

In 2011, more than 100 Hindu devotees died in a crush at a religious festival in the southern state of Kerala.

Continue Reading

World

Judge delays Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until September

Published

on

Judge delays Trump’s sentencing in hush money case until September

Trump became the first former US president convicted of felony charges and was originally set to be sentenced next week.

The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money case has granted a request to delay the former United States president’s sentencing until at least September.

The decision on Tuesday follows a ruling by the US Supreme Court that ordered broad criminal immunity for presidents in their official acts.

Trump’s legal team had cited the top court’s decision in a letter to Judge Juan Merchan requesting the delay in the sentencing, which was originally scheduled on July 11.

The lawyers representing Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, told Merchan they needed time to build their case that Trump’s conviction on 34 felony charges of falsifying business documents to cover up hush money payments made to an adult actress should be overturned in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Advertisement

Before Merchan’s decision, prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney’s office said Trump’s argument was “without merit” but agreed to delay the sentencing.

Merchan said the sentencing would be delayed until at least September 18, less than two months before the November 8 elections.

Prosecutors had argued that Trump falsified business records to cover up his former lawyer Michael Cohen’s $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence on an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.

They directly connected the payments to a wider scheme to influence the 2016 presidential election.

In their letter to Merchan, Trump’s lawyers argued that during the trial, prosecutors had presented evidence involving Trump’s official acts as president, including social media posts he made and conversations he had while in the White House.

Advertisement

That evidence should have been protected under presidential immunity, the lawyers said, per the Supreme Court’s Monday ruling.

The ruling from the majority of six justices on the nine-member bench said presidents have “absolute immunity” from criminal liability for any acts within their “core constitutional powers”. Evidence related to those official acts also may not be presented at a trial, the majority opinion said.

However, the ruling, which was assailed by the court’s three liberal justices, said presidents could still be prosecuted for acts outside those powers. The exact delineations remain unclear.

In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned the decision opened the door to “nightmare scenarios”, including possible immunity for assassinating a political rival.

“In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law,” she wrote.

Advertisement

Political implications

The Supreme Court ruling bodes well for Trump, who faces three additional criminal trials.

It is expected to be the most bedeviling to the legal argument at the heart of a federal case related to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results after his loss to President Joe Biden.

It could also have implications for a state trial in Georgia related to efforts to pressure officials to change the 2020 vote count as well as a second federal trial related to Trump allegedly hiding and hoarding classified White House documents at his Florida estate.

The New York trial, however, was the only trial expected to finish before the election. While the initial guilty verdict did not show a major shift in support for Trump, analysts have argued that a severe sentence could turn off some would-be Trump voters.

Merchan’s decision comes five days after Biden delivered a dismal performance in the first presidential debate against Trump, which has sent the Democrat’s campaign into damage control while bringing concerns over the 81-year-old’s age to the fore.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, a Reuters/Ipsos poll was released showing one in three Democrats think Biden should end his re-election bid after the debate performance. Still, the poll found no prominent elected Democrat would perform any better than Biden in a hypothetical matchup against Trump.

On Wednesday, Biden was reportedly set to meet with Democratic governors in an effort to allay their concerns.

White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre also said Biden would give his first post-debate interview to ABC News on Friday and would hold a news conference during a NATO conference next week.

She reiterated that Biden has no intention of dropping out of the race.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending