Connect with us

World

Fire at Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant extinguished, Russia, Ukraine exchange blame

Published

on

Fire at Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant extinguished, Russia, Ukraine exchange blame

The fire that erupted at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant over the weekend has been extinguished, Russian state media reported on Monday while citing Russia’s nuclear energy agency Rosatom. But both Moscow and Kyiv continue to point the blame at each other as concerns over a nuclear meltdown remain high. 

Russian forces have illegally occupied Europe’s largest nuclear power plant for more than two years and on Sunday, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said it had been informed that an alleged drone attack hit one of the plant’s cooling towers.

A screen grab from a video released by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shows a fire in Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant on Aug. 11, 2024. The fire broke out Sunday in Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, located in southern Ukraine. (Ukrainian Presidency/Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Moscow accused Ukrainian forces of striking the cooling tower with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) just hours after Dmitry Rogozin, the former head of the Russian space agency turned Kremlin representative in Zaporizhzhia, was said to have been at the nuclear power plant, sources at East2West told Fox News Digital. 

PUTIN UNDER PRESSURE AS UKRAINE INCURSION CONTINUES, MAY GIVE KYIV BARGAINING CHIPS IN PEACE TALKS: EXPERTS

Advertisement

It remains unclear why Rogozin – who has paid special interest to the use of UAVs and UAGs [unmanned ground vehicles] in Ukraine – was at the plant.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in turn, accused Russian forces of setting fire to the plant in a Sunday night post on X, formerly Twitter, and said Moscow has been using the security of the nuclear plant to “blackmail” not only Ukraine – but “all of Europe, and the world.”

“We are waiting for the world to react, waiting for the IAEA to react. Russia must be held accountable for this,” Zelenskyy said. “Only Ukrainian control over the Zaporizhzhia NPP can guarantee a return to normalcy and complete safety.”

map of nuclear plant fire

An infographic titled, “Fire breaks out in Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant” created in Ankara, Turkey, on Aug. 12, 2024. (Yasin Demirci/Anadolu via Getty Images)

UKRAINE BRINGS WAR TO RUSSIA IN ‘MASSIVE’ DRONE STRIKE ON MILITARY, GOVERNMENT TARGETS

The IAEA confirmed late on Sunday that its experts had witnessed “thick dark smoke coming from the north-western area of the plant, after hearing multiple explosions throughout the evening.”

Advertisement

The IAEA and Zelenskyy confirmed that there was “no impact on nuclear safety” following the fire and that radiation levels remained normal.

The nuclear watchdog did not say who attacked the cooling tower and instead condemned the threat that continuous attacks in the area pose to the plant.

“Reckless attacks endanger nuclear safety at the plant and increase the risk of a nuclear accident. They must stop now,” IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi said.

Rafael Mariano Grossi

Director-General Rafael Grossi speaks at a press conference during the IAEA Board of Governors meeting on March 6, 2023, in Vienna, Austria. (Thomas Kronsteiner/Getty Images)

The IAEA said it has requested immediate access to the cooling tower to “ascertain the extent and possible cause of this event.”

Advertisement

But it remains unclear if access was permitted.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Man United‘s Largest Institutional Shareholder Is Ariel—Again

Published

on

Man United‘s Largest Institutional Shareholder Is Ariel—Again

Manchester United kicks off the Premier League season on Friday with a match against Fulham at Old Trafford. The Red Devils will take the field with a new front-of-jersey sponsor in Snapdragon, and a new largest institutional shareholder of its publicly traded stock.

A Monday SEC filing revealed Chicago-based Ariel Investments bought 3 million Man United shares since the end of March. It raised its stake to 8.3 million shares, or 15% of the outstanding total, up from 10%. Lindsell Train was the previous largest institutional holder at 7.1 million shares, or 13.5% of the total. Lindsell cut its stake by 7.6% during the quarter.

“Manchester United is a terrific franchise,” John Miller, portfolio manager at Ariel Investments, said in a May video interview with Sportico. “We know they have had difficulties lately, and this is the time where you really want to buy into it.”

Ariel first invested in Man United in 2021 when it purchased 6.6 million shares during the third quarter and added another 4.35 million over the following three months when it became Man United’s largest institutional shareholder. Ariel’s holding peaked at 12.3 million as of March 2022. It paid between $12 and $14 for most of its stake.

Advertisement

The firm sold nearly 3 million shares, or 26% of its then stake during the fourth quarter of 2022, as the stock spiked after the Glazer family, which controls the team via a class of supervoting shares, hired The Raine Group to explore “all strategic alternatives” for the 20-time English champions. Shares topped $23 in December.

Ariel continued to pare its United position before the club’s sale process concluded in February with Jim Ratcliffe paying £1.3 billion ($1.6 billion at the time) for 25% of the team. Ratcliffe paid $33 for 25% of the publicly traded shares.

“You know what the value is based on Ratcliffe’s purchase price,” Miller said. “Sports teams make long-term investments that will pay off in the long run, and that is what we are seeing with Manchester United.”

Manchester United shares on the New York Stock Exchange opened Monday at $16.81.

The club ranked first in Sportico’s annual list of the most valuable soccer teams at $6.2 billion and is looking to improve its on-field performance after it finished eighth last season, its worst showing since the launch of the Premier League in 1992.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

'Betting strongly on security': Poland buys 48 new Patriot launchers

Published

on

'Betting strongly on security': Poland buys 48 new Patriot launchers

Poland’s Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz signed a deal with US defence giant Raytheon to produce dozens of Patriot missile launchers, which he described as a step toward “strengthening Polish security”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Representatives from Polish arms company Huta Stalowa Wola and US defence contractor Raytheon signed an agreement on Monday to produce 48 Patriot launchers for the Polish army.

The agreement, guaranteeing the formation of six Patriot missile batteries, was signed between company representatives in the town of Sochaczew.

The contract stipulates Huta Stalowa Wola will manufacture the weaponry scheduled to be delivered starting in 2027.

Poland’s Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz lauded the deal as proof of “our government betting so strongly on security,” he said.

“We are investing in the Polish defence industry, in the armed forces of the republic for the security of us and our allies”.

Advertisement

It comes as Warsaw politicians, such as Poland’s Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski, have repeatedly called for reinforced defences, as fears Russia’s war in Ukraine could spill over into Europe’s eastern countries like Poland, as well as Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.

US Ambassador to Warsaw Mark Brzezinski said the production of these weapons is emblematic of the “intrinsic trust between Poland and America”.

“This defence system intercepts missile and drones, it protects cities and critical infrastructure,” he said.

“For Poland, the Patriot enhances not only our ability to protect the skies above NATO territory, but also our military interoperability”.

The weapons system is a “powerful deterrent” for NATO’s 700-kilometre eastern flank, Brzezinski said. Of this stretch, Poland shares a 230-kilometre border with Russia.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

More Russians are urged to flee Ukraine's cross-border attack as the Kremlin scrambles to respond

Published

on

More Russians are urged to flee Ukraine's cross-border attack as the Kremlin scrambles to respond

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — An official in the Kursk border region of Russia on Monday urged more residents to evacuate due to the “very tense situation” in the area, where Russian forces are still scrambling to respond to a surprise Ukrainian attack after almost a week of fierce fighting.

Russia’s emergency authorities say more than 76,000 people have fled their homes in areas of Kursk, where Ukrainian troops and armor poured across the border on Aug. 6, reportedly driving as deep as 30 kilometers (19 miles) into Russia and sowing alarm.

Ukrainian forces swiftly rolled into the town of Sudzha about 10 kilometers (6 miles) over the border after launching the attack. They reportedly still hold the western part of the town, which is the site of an important natural gas transit station.

The Ukrainian operation is taking place under tight secrecy, and its goals — especially whether Kyiv’s forces aim to hold territory or are staging a raid — remain unclear. The stunning maneuver that caught the Kremlin’s forces unawares counters Russia’s unrelenting effort in recent months to punch through Ukrainian defenses at selected points along the front line in eastern Ukraine.

Russia has seen previous incursions into its territory during the nearly 2 1/2-year war, but the foray into the Kursk region marked the largest attack on its soil since World War II, embarrassing President Vladimir Putin and constituting a milestone in the hostilities.

Advertisement

The advance has delivered a blow to Putin’s efforts to pretend that life in Russia has largely remained unaffected by the war. State propaganda has tried to play down the attack, emphasizing the authorities’ efforts to help residents of the region and seeking to distract attention from the military’s failure to prepare for the attack and quickly repel it.

Retired Gen. Andrei Gurulev, a member of the lower house of the Russian parliament, criticized the military for failing to properly protect the border.

He noted that while the military has set up minefields in the border region, it has failed to deploy enough troops to block enemy raids.

“Regrettably, the group of forces protecting the border didn’t have its own intelligence assets,” he said on his messaging app channel. “No one likes to see the truth in reports, everybody just wants to hear that all is good.”

Pasi Paroinen, an analyst with the Finland-based Black Bird Group open-source intelligence agency, which monitors the war, said the toughest phase of Ukraine’s incursion is likely to begin now as Russian reserves enter the fray.

Advertisement

He said that “if the Ukrainians are going to advance any further from where they are now, it’s going to be a tough battle, unlike the opening moments of this offensive.”

Ukraine’s progress on Russian territory “is challenging the operational and strategic assumptions” of the Kremlin’s forces, according to the Institute for the Study of War.

It could compel Russia to deploy more military assets to the long border between the two countries, the Washington-based think tank said in an assessment late Sunday.

It described the Russian forces responding to the incursion as “hastily assembled and disparate.”

In other developments:

Advertisement

— The International Atomic Energy Agency said a fire near Ukraine’s Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant had “no impact” on the facility’s safety.

Radiation levels are unchanged at what is one of the 10 biggest nuclear plants in the world, the U.N. body said.

Russia and Ukraine blamed each other for the blaze at a cooling tower outside the plant’s perimeter, and the IAEA chief said late Sunday that the war continues to imperil the Zaporizhzhia facility.

“These reckless attacks endanger nuclear safety at the plant and increase the risk of a nuclear accident. They must stop now,” Rafael Mariano Grossi said.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending