World
As Malaysia prepares for an election, refugees watch warily
On November 19, tens of millions of Malaysian voters will go to the polls to resolve the course of their nation for the following 5 years.
However whereas Malaysians vote in a spirit of hope for the nation they need to see, the 183,000 refugees who additionally reside there are watching warily amid what seems to be a latest hardening of rhetoric in direction of asylum seekers and refugees.
Thought-about “unlawful immigrants” beneath Malaysian regulation, refugees are one of the marginalised and susceptible communities within the nation, with no proper to work nor entry to formal schooling.
Like most of its neighbours in Southeast Asia, Malaysia isn’t a signatory to the UN’s 1951 refugee conference or the 1967 protocol, however in latest months the federal government of incumbent Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob has returned asylum seekers to Myanmar, launched a brand new monitoring system for refugees and introduced its dedication to closing down the workplaces of the United Nations Excessive Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), which presently handles safety wants for asylum seekers and refugees.
“The presence of UNHCR workplaces is seen to be the most important pulling issue in direction of the elevated arrival of international migrants,” a cupboard minister, Abd Latiff Ahmad, stated in a parliamentary reply to then-opposition member of parliament Charles Santiago on October 7 shortly earlier than the home was dissolved.
Ismail Sabri, who’s a vice chairman of the United Malays Nationwide Organisation, is campaigning for re-election as a part of the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition towards two different broad coalitions, together with BN’s present accomplice in authorities Perikatan Nasional (PN) and Pakatan Harapan, which received the final election in Might 2018 however collapsed amid political manoeuvring.
Human Rights Watch’s Asia deputy director, Phil Robertson, instructed Al Jazeera that some see the strikes as an election ploy.
“Many observers imagine that the Dwelling Affairs Minister is pushing this subject laborious for political causes, to attempt to scapegoat UNHCR as the issue, which performs nicely with components of the conservative citizens who’re extra xenophobic and anti-refugee,” he stated.
“That’s an actual disgrace as a result of refugees shouldn’t be demonised for any motive as a result of it places individuals’s lives in danger.”
‘Horrible and unhappy’
Many refugees are alarmed on the potential closure of the UNHCR workplaces.
The company not solely assesses safety wants but in addition helps confirm the identification of these caught up within the immigration detention system, though the federal government has not allowed entry to the centres since 2019 throughout Pakatan Harapan’s temporary interval in energy.
James Bawi Thang Bik, a consultant for The Alliance of Chin Refugees in Malaysia, described the transfer as “horrible and unhappy information for the refugee neighborhood”.
Individuals from Myanmar account for 85 per cent of the refugees in Malaysia, and ethnic Chins who come from the nation’s west are the second-largest group after the largely Muslim Rohingya.
“If there isn’t a UNHCR, they [refugees] could have no hope, no safety, and they are often exploited at any time. Suicide instances is perhaps elevated amongst refugees,” he instructed Al Jazeera.
The UNHCR is normally the primary level of name for brand spanking new arrivals, who undergo a collection of interviews and checks with company employees to evaluate whether or not they’re in real want of safety. These assessed as refugees are given identification playing cards from the company, with the fortunate few ultimately securing resettlement elsewhere.
However the strategy of getting a card can take months and resettlement years.
“We’re afraid the registration course of will take longer than the UNHCR registration course of,” stated Zafar Ahmad Abdul Ghani, the president of the Myanmar Ethnic Rohingya Human Rights Group in Malaysia (MEHROM). “Normally, it’s going to take between three to 6 years for the Rohingya asylum seekers to be recognised as refugees. In some instances, greater than six years.”
Zafar himself was the goal of a disinformation marketing campaign that compelled him into hiding in 2020 after a false Fb put up claimed that he had demanded Malaysian citizenship for Rohingya refugees. Two years later, he and his household are nonetheless receiving demise threats and harassment.
‘Establishing a nationwide framework’
The UN refugee company first started working in Malaysia through the Vietnam refugee disaster within the Nineteen Seventies and has expanded quickly because of conflicts in nations from Myanmar to Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and Syria.
Its colonial-era bungalow in Kuala Lumpur has been prolonged a number of occasions, and the once-lush backyard is roofed over with portacabins, parking and an enormous coated constructing the place asylum seekers anticipate interviews and for claims to be processed.
When requested concerning the authorities’s plan to shut the workplaces, Yante Ismail, the Kuala Lumpur-based UNHCR spokesperson, instructed Al Jazeera that it “welcomes the continued engagement of the Authorities of Malaysia and ongoing efforts to discover nearer cooperation on a wide range of points associated to refugee safety”.
She added that the organisation has been in shut discussions on a framework of cooperation on managing refugees within the nation for years by means of a government-initiated Joint Activity Power, cochaired by the Malaysian Ministry of International Affairs and the UN refugee company.
“UNHCR welcomes the Malaysian Authorities’s continued curiosity in establishing a nationwide framework to handle the refugee state of affairs within the nation which will ultimately consequence within the Authorities assuming better duty for refugee administration and safety,” she stated.
However others are sceptical concerning the authorities’s capacity to deal with the work.
“The underside line is the federal government doesn’t actually have the capability to handle the refugee state of affairs within the nation,” Human Rights Watch’s Robertson stated.
“With greater than 180,000 UNHCR-recognised refugees, there’s a main human rights safety problem to maintain these individuals protected, and nothing the Malaysian authorities has executed to this point signifies that they’re up for that problem.”
Questions over resettlement
The plan to take management of asylum seekers and refugees in Malaysia has additionally raised questions concerning the resettlement course of beneath which individuals are in a position to begin new lives in third nations. The UNHCR is central to the method and works with accepting nations to submit refugees for resettlement. In Malaysia, most refugees are resettled in america.
“What I can say is that there will probably be no extra resettlement for refugees within the absence of UNHCR,” stated James Bawi Thang Bik. “I feel resettlement for refugees is past the capability of a authorities with out UNHCR.”
Robertson notes that almost all governments require a UNHCR interview to find out the standing of a refugee.
“The truth that Malaysia isn’t a state celebration of the UN Refugee Conference implies that UNHCR’s position is much more vital and that closing down the workplace can be like Malaysia capturing itself within the foot,” he stated.
Whereas UNHCR identifies refugees in want of resettlement, it’s as much as resettlement nations to resolve what number of refugees they are going to settle for with a quota determined every monetary yr. The US, which takes within the most individuals, has stated it’s going to settle for 125,000 refugees beneath resettlement after reaching an all-time low through the administration of former President Donald Trump when the quota was minimize to fifteen,000.
Regardless of the difficult state of affairs in Malaysia, many refugees are hoping that whoever wins energy this week is not going to solely rethink the plan to shut the workplaces of the UN refugee company but in addition develop a extra complete coverage for refugees and asylum seekers, regardless that the competing coalitions’ manifestos barely contact on the difficulty.
Officers have periodically talked of giving refugees the suitable to work, whereas outgoing International Minister Saifuddin Abdullah has typically visited neighborhood colleges for Rohingya refugees whereas in workplace.
Again in 2016, as he confronted rising questions over his position within the multibillion-dollar corruption scandal, now-jailed Prime Minister Najib Razak held a mass rally condemning Myanmar’s “genocide” towards the Rohingya.
It was not doable for the world to “sit by and watch genocide happening” he instructed 1000’s of individuals at a Kuala Lumpur stadium, including that the persecution of the Rohingya was an “insult” to Islam.
The subsequent yr, tons of of 1000’s extra Rohingya had been compelled to flee because the Myanmar military launched a brutal crackdown within the nation’s northwest that’s now the topic of a genocide trial on the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice.
“We hope the brand new authorities will permit the UNHCR to renew their work to help refugees and asylum seekers and discover a sturdy answer for them,” stated MEHROM’s Zafar.
World
At last, some welcome news on college costs. Tuition has fallen significantly at many schools
BOSTON (AP) — The cost of college keeps spiraling ever higher, right?
Not necessarily. New research indicates students are paying significantly less to attend public universities than they were a decade ago. And tuition increases at private colleges have finally slowed after years of hefty rises.
Figures compiled by the nonprofit College Board indicate the average student attending an in-state public university this year faces a tuition bill of $11,610, which is down 4% from a decade earlier when taking inflation into account. But the real savings come in what the average student actually pays after getting grants and financial aid. That’s down 40% over the decade, from $4,140 to $2,480 annually, according to the data.
That reduced cost means less borrowing. Just under half of students attending in-state public universities are graduating with some debt, down from 59% a decade earlier, according to the College Board figures. And among those who do borrow, the average loan balance has fallen by 17%, to $27,100.
Meanwhile, at private colleges, tuition continues to rise, but at a much slower rate. It has increased 4% over the past decade, when taking inflation into account, to an average $43,350, according to the College Board. That’s a big change from the two decades prior, when tuition increased 68%.
Costs are coming down as Americans question whether college is worth the price. Surveys find that Americans are increasingly skeptical about the value of a degree, and the percentage of high school graduates heading to college has fallen to levels not seen in decades, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Yet research still finds that, over time, a degree pays off. Americans with a bachelor’s degree earn a median of $2.8 million during their careers, 75% more than if they had only a high school diploma, according to research from Georgetown University’s Center on Education and the Workforce.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a big factor in the cost reductions, said Jennifer Ma, an executive research scientist at the College Board and lead author of the study.
“We know that during COVID, a lot of institutions — public and private — froze tuition,” Ma said.
As states and the federal government responded to the pandemic, Ma said, they increased higher education funding, allowing colleges to reduce the cost of attendance. Some of that money has since expired, however, including an infusion of federal pandemic aid that was mostly used up by the end of 2022.
Cost was a major consideration in Kai Mattinson’s decision to attend Northern Arizona University. It would have cost her about $39,000 annually to attend the public university but discounts and scholarships bring that down to between $15,000 and $20,000 for the 22-year-old senior from Nevada.
“I originally wanted to go to the University of Arizona, but when it came down to tuition and other cost, Northern Arizona University was the best option,” said Mattinson, a physical education major who also works as a long-term substitute at a local elementary school.
Many institutions have tried to limit cost increases. Purdue University in Indiana, for example, has frozen its annual in-state tuition at $9,992 for the past 13 years.
Mark Becker, the president of the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, said he was pleased to see the new data.
“Institutional efforts to control costs, combined with many states’ efforts to increase investments in public universities and federal investment in the Pell Grant, have increased college affordability and enabled significant progress on tackling student debt,” Becker said in a statement.
Costs for those attending public two-year community colleges have fallen even more, by 9% over the past decade, according to the College Board data, which is broadly in line with federal figures collected by the National Center for Education Statistics.
Still, for parents paying for their children to attend out-of-state public universities or private colleges, the costs remain daunting — as much as $95,000 annually, in some cases. However, many institutions offer significant discounts to the sticker price for middle- and lower-income students.
Some private colleges have been expanding their financial aid, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which in November announced undergraduates with a family income below $200,000 would no longer need to pay any tuition at all starting in the fall.
Other private colleges are discounting tuition as a marketing move in an increasingly difficult environment. They face a dwindling pool of young adults, and students who are more wary of signing up for giant loans. Recruiting students is crucial for staying afloat as operational costs rise. After temporary relief thanks to federal money during the pandemic, many colleges have cut programs to try to keep costs under control.
___
Associated Press writer Collin Binkley contributed to this report from Washington, D.C. Mumphrey reported from Phoenix.
World
Italian journalist Cecilia Sala freed from detention in Iran
- Italian journalist Cecilia Sala, who was detained in Iran for three weeks, was released on Wednesday, Italian officials said.
- Italian commentators speculated that Iran arrested Sala as a bargaining chip to ensure the release of Mohammad Abedini, who was arrested at Milan’s Malpensa airport on a U.S. warrant.
- The U.S. Justice Department accused Abedini and another Iranian of supplying Iran with the drone technology used in a January 2024 attack that killed three American troops in Jordan. He remains in detention in Italy.
An Italian journalist detained in Iran for three weeks, whose fate became intertwined with that of an Iranian engineer wanted by the United States, was freed Wednesday and is heading home, Italian officials said.
A plane carrying Cecilia Sala, 29, left Tehran after “intensive work on diplomatic and intelligence channels,” Premier Giorgia Meloni’s office said, adding that the Italian premier had personally informed Sala’s parents of the news.
Iranian media acknowledged the journalist’s release, citing only the foreign reports. Iranian officials offered no immediate comment.
WHO IS GIORGIA MELONI? TRUMP HOSTS ITALIAN PM AT MAR-A-LAGO
Sala, a reporter for the Il Foglio daily, was detained in Tehran on Dec. 19, three days after she arrived on a journalist visa. She was accused of violating the laws of the Islamic Republic, the official IRNA news agency said.
Italian commentators had speculated that Iran detained and held Sala as a bargaining chip to ensure the release of Mohammad Abedini, who was arrested at Milan’s Malpensa airport three days before, on Dec. 16, on a U.S. warrant.
The U.S. Justice Department accused Abedini and another Iranian of supplying the drone technology to Iran that was used in a January 2024 attack on a U.S. outpost in Jordan that killed three American troops. He remains in detention in Italy.
Sala’s release was met with cheers in Italy, where her plight had dominated headlines, as lawmakers hailed the successful negotiations to bring her home.
It came after Meloni made a surprise trip to Florida last weekend to meet with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM IS NEARING ‘THE POINT OF NO RETURN,’ FRANCE’S MACRON SAYS
Meloni tweeted Sala’s return in a statement on X in which she thanked “all those who helped make Cecilia’s return possible, allowing her to reembrace her family and colleagues.”
Sala’s fate became intertwined with that of Abedini as each country’s foreign ministries summoned the other’s ambassador to demand the prisoners’ release and decent detention conditions. The diplomatic tangle was particularly complicated for Italy, which is a historic ally of Washington but maintains traditionally good relations with Tehran.
Members of Meloni’s cabinet took personal interest in the case given the geopolitical implications. Foreign Minister Antonio Tanaji and Defense Minister Guido Crosetto hailed the diplomatic teamwork involved in securing Sala’s release, which amounted to a significant victory for Meloni.
Since the 1979 U.S. Embassy crisis, which saw dozens of hostages released after 444 days in captivity, Iran has used prisoners with Western ties as bargaining chips in negotiations with the world.
In September 2023, five Americans detained for years in Iran were freed in exchange for five Iranians in U.S. custody and for $6 billion in frozen Iranian assets to be released by South Korea.
Western journalists have been held in the past as well. Roxana Saberi, an American journalist, was detained by Iran in 2009 for around 100 days before being released.
Also detained by Iran was Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian, who was held for more than 540 days before being released in 2016 in a prisoner swap between Iran and the U.S.
Both cases involved Iran making false espionage accusations in closed-door hearings.
World
German politicians rebuke Trump over NATO defence spending demand
US President-elect Donald Trump said NATO member states should increase their defence spending to 5% of GDP and criticised Europe’s contributions.
Several politicians in Germany have pushed back against US President-elect Donald Trump’s suggestion that NATO’s European members should spend 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defence, more than double the current target.
On Tuesday evening, Trump said that NATO nations were spending too little on defence and complained that “Europe is in for a tiny fraction of the money that we’re in”.
“They can all afford it, but they should be at 5% not 2%,” Trump told reporters at a press conference in Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida.
None of the alliance’s 32 members are currently spending 5% of GDP on defence, according to NATO data. Poland is the biggest spender by share of GDP at 4.12%, followed by Estonia at 3.43% and the US at 3.38%.
Ralf Stegner, a member of Germany’s Social Democrat Party (SPD) party, called Trump’s comments “delusional and absolutely insane” in a post on Facebook.
“We don’t need more weapons in the world, but fewer,” Stegner told Politico.
Marcus Faber, chairman of the defence committee in Germany’s parliament, agreed that 5% was too high. Faber said that NATO countries would have to agree on a new goal beyond 2%, but stated that the target should be 3% and decided by consensus.
Free Democratic Party (FDP) politician Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmerman said: “We are not at a bazaar here.”
“Trump, who sees himself as a dealmaker, naturally also hopes that the increased financial commitment of the European partners will benefit US industry in particular. But please don’t make up a number out of thin air,” Strack-Zimmerman said.
Trump’s latest call for NATO members to increase their defence spending is nothing new. During his first presidency, he repeatedly threatened to pull out of the military alliance if European allies failed to boost their spending.
The EU’s NATO members have increased their defence spending in recent years, largely as a result of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
NATO estimated that 23 (including 16 from the EU) of its 32 members would meet its goal of spending 2% of GDP in 2024, up from just six countries in 2021. Italy, Belgium, and Spain are among those who are yet to reach the 2% threshold.
Germany will hit the 2% target for the first time this year, after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz promised a complete overhaul of the country’s military in 2022, breaking years of taboo against the country investing heavily in its military.
Despite this, officials and reports have repeatedly suggested that Germany’s military is unfit for purpose. An annual report released by parliament in March 2024 found that the Bundeswehr was “aged and shrinking” and severely lacked equipment and personnel.
The general consensus in Germany’s political establishment is that the nation should either maintain or increase its military spending — with several parties promoting a spending boost as part of their campaigns for the upcoming election set for 23 February.
Green party chancellor candidate Robert Habeck told Spiegel magazine that Germany should aim for 3.5% in upcoming years.
“Geopolitically, it is foreseeable that we – Germany and Europe – will have to take more responsibility for our security, anything else would be naïve in view of the positioning of the USA,” Habeck said.
Friedrich Merz, leader of Germany’s opposition Christian Democrat Union (CDU) and the man tipped to succeed Scholz as chancellor, on Wednesday said the country would spend more on defence but he would not be drawn on a specific spending target.
“The 2, 3 or 5% (targets) are basically irrelevant, the decisive factor is that we do what is necessary to defend ourselves,” Merz told broadcaster Bayerischer Rundfunk.
NATO’s new chief, Mark Rutte, has warned that the 2% target is insufficient, and said in December that citizens of NATO member states should accept “sacrifices” including cuts to their pensions, health and security systems in order to boost military spending in Europe.
-
Business1 week ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports7 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics6 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics5 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics4 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health3 days ago
Ozempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week ago
Ivory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades