Wyoming
How the Top 5 Fared in Week 4 of Wyoming HS Basketball 2025

The fourth week of Wyoming High School basketball featured nearly a full slate of action. Most teams returned to play for the first time in the new year. Four tournaments comprised most of the gameplay, but several other games occurred, including some conference action. Two No. 1 ranked girls’ teams suffered a loss, Douglas and Southeast. Douglas was on the road, and Southeast lost to higher-level teams from 4A and 3A. In boys’ play, one top-ranked team, Thermopolis, suffered a loss. Overall, nine ranked boys’ teams lost at least one game.
This is a look at how the top five girls’ and boys’ teams fared in Week 4. It gives fans, players, and coaches a look at each week’s results for the ranked teams in the WyoPreps Coaches and Media Basketball Polls.
It is always ladies first.
Girls Basketball Top 5 Recap
4A
1 – East (3-0) = Won 59-15 vs. Kelly Walsh; Won 48-31 vs. Natrona County; Won 75-16 vs. Rock Springs.
2 – Sheridan (3-0) = Won 43-33 vs. 3A #4 Wheatland; Won 53-23 vs. Riverton; Won 50-23 vs. Rock Springs.
3 – Central (3-0) = Won 66-29 vs. Natrona County; Won 50-32 vs. Green River; Won 65-37 vs. Kelly Walsh.
4 – Campbell County (3-0) = Won 58-37 vs. Natrona County; Won 54-30 vs. Kelly Walsh; Won 63-61 vs. 3A #4 Wheatland.
5 – Laramie (2-1) = Won 43-35 vs. Rock Springs; Lost 53-44 vs. 3A #4 Wheatland; Won 44-29 vs. Riverton.
3A
1 – Douglas (2-1) = Lost 57-50 at #3 Pinedale; Won 71-35 vs. #5 Mountain View; Won 53-23 vs. Lander.
2 – Cody (1-0) = Won 63-34 at Lander.
3 – Pinedale (3-0) = Won 57-50 vs. #1 Douglas; Won 60-48 vs. Buffalo; Won 82-31 vs. Rawlins.
4 – Wheatland (2-2) = Lost 43-33 vs. 4A #2 Sheridan; Won 53-44 vs. 4A #5 Laramie; Lost 63-61 vs. 4A #4 Campbell County; Won 43-20 vs. 1A #1 Southeast.
5 – Mountain View (2-1) = Won 52-43 vs. Buffalo; Lost 71-35 vs. #1 Douglas; Won 52-21 vs. Worland.
2A
1 – Tongue River (4-0) = Won 50-31 vs. 3A Burns; Won 57-44 at Thermopolis; Won 41-33 vs. #3 Pine Bluffs; Won 46-13 at Shoshoni.
2 – Wyoming Indian (2-0) = Won 53-42 vs. Wind River; Won 64-41 vs. Greybull.
T3 – Rocky Mountain (0-2) = Lost 44-32 vs. 3A Powell; Lost 33-19 at 3A Lovell.
T3 – Pine Bluffs (2-2) = Won 45-27 vs. Wright; Won 53-31 vs. #5 Sundance; Lost 41-33 vs. #1 Tongue River; Lost 46-43 vs. Big Horn.
5 – Sundance (4-1) = Won 57-18 at 1A Hulett; Won 57-33 at Shoshoni; Lost 53-31 vs. #3 Pine Bluffs; Won 38-30 vs. 3A Burns; Won 49-42 in OT at Thermopolis.
1A
1 – Southeast (0-3) = Lost 41-24 vs. 4A Green River; Lost 44-33 vs. Cheyenne Central JV; Lost 43-20 vs. 3A #4 Wheatland.
2 – Cokeville (3-0) = Won 50-42 vs. 2A Big Piney; Won 33-22 vs. Star Valley Sophs; Won 50-47 at 2A Kemmerer.
3 – Upton (1-0) = Won 65-7 at Casper Christian.
4 – Lingle-Ft. Laramie (2-0) = Won 48-16 at Hemingford, NE; Won 44-27 vs. H.E.M.
5 – Burlington (2-0) = Won by forfeit at Meeteetse; Won 62-33 vs. Dubois.
Boys Basketball Top 5 Recap
4A
1 – Laramie (3-0) = Won 75-62 vs. Rock Springs; Won 56-39 vs. 3A Wheatland; Won 73-48 vs. Riverton.
2 – Sheridan (3-0) = Won 67-18 vs. 3A Wheatland; Won 48-40 vs. Riverton; Won 69-59 vs. Sheridan.
3 – East (2-1) = Lost 53-47 vs. Kelly Walsh; Won 57-41 vs. Natrona County; Won 77-70 vs. Rock Springs.
4 – Evanston = Did not play.
5 – Central (1-2) = Lost 50-27 vs. Natrona County; Won 57-37 vs. Green River; Lost 50-36 vs. Kelly Walsh.
3A
1 – Lovell (1-0) = Won 57-23 vs. 2A Rocky Mountain.
2 – Cody (1-0) = Won 69-56 at #4 Lander.
3 – Powell (1-0) = Won 50-30 at 2A Rocky Mountain.
T4 – Douglas (3-0) = Won 82-58 vs. Lyman; Won 69-50 vs. Mountain View; Won 75-42 vs. Pinedale.
T4 – Lander (1-3) = Lost 69-56 vs. #2 Cody; Lost 51-48 vs. Worland; Lost 61-59 in OT vs. Buffalo; Won 61-33 vs. Rawlins.
2A
1 – Thermopolis (3-1) = Won 67-54 vs. Big Horn; Won 67-64 at #2 Wright; Lost 57-40 at Sundance; Won 73-45 vs. Tongue River.
2 – Wright (2-1) = Won 91-70 vs. Shoshoni; Lost 67-64 vs. #1 Thermopolis; Won 83-74 vs. #5 Pine Bluffs; one game canceled.
3 – Big Piney (1-2) = Lost 41-38 vs. 1A #3 Cokeville; Won 52-49 vs. 1A Farson-Eden; Lost 69-54 vs. Rich County, UT.
4 – Wyoming Indian (2-0) = Won 102-16 vs. Wind River; Won 56-37 vs. Greybull.
5 – Pine Bluffs (2-1) = Won 59-33 vs. Tongue River; Won 68-57 at Sundance; Lost 83-74 at #2 Wright; one game canceled.
1A
1 – Lingle-Ft. Laramie (2-0) = Won 60-26 at Hemingford, NE; Won 68-20 vs. H.E.M.
2 – Upton (1-0) = Won 70-14 at Casper Christian.
T3 – Cokeville (2-1) = Won 41-38 vs. 2A #3 Big Piney; Won 54-44 vs. Star Valley Sophs; Lost 51-40 at 2A Kemmerer.
T3 – Lusk (2-0) = Won 69-44 vs. Hemingford, NE; Won 70-16 vs. H.E.M.; one game postponed.
5 – Saratoga (0-1) = Lost 43-37 at Encampment.
Week 5 begins on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2025. New rankings come out on Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2025.
Riverton/Stranigan Basketball Tournament
Riverton/Strannigan Basketball Tournament
Gallery Credit: Riverton High School

Wyoming
Colorado State, Wyoming add two games to Border War football series

The Colorado State Rams and Wyoming Cowboys have added two games to their Border War football series, both schools announced Wednesday.
Colorado State is leaving the Mountain West Conference after the 2025 season and will join the Pac-12 Conference beginning in the fall of 2026. As a result, their annual Border War game will have to be played as a non-conference contest.
Back in November, the two schools announced an agreement that included games beginning in 2028 and extending through the 2035 season. Today’s announcement includes the addition of a game on Sept. 5, 2026 at Canvas Stadium in Fort Collins, Colo., and on Sept. 6, 2036 at War Memorial Stadium in Laramie, Wyo.
“Rivalry games are important to us at Colorado State and are a part of what makes College Football so special,” said Colorado State Director of Athletics, John Weber. “Our scheduling goal for our football program is to host seven games every season on campus in Canvas Stadium. Ram Country and Canvas Chaos make a real difference on game day and there is no better place to play than at home on campus in Fort Collins.”
The two schools are scheduled to play this season on Saturday, Oct. 25 in Laramie.
“Having one of the oldest rivalries in the West that features one of the most iconic trophies in college football continue consecutively is outstanding,” added Weber. “The Boot Run with the game ball, the Border Ceremony, and the Bronze Boot Trophy all honor the values and rich ROTC history of both universities and will remain integral to this rivalry for years to come. This game is important to our universities, communities, and fans and I am thrilled that we were able to continue it in 2026.”
Although Colorado State and Wyoming are not scheduled to meet in 2027, there is still the possibility for that contest. When the series was announced last year, both schools stated they were “…working on amendments to schedules for the 2026 and 2027 season for potential additions to the current agreement.”
Colorado State and Wyoming first met on the gridiron in 1899 and have played a total of 116 contests. The Rams currently lead the overall series 60-51-5.
In order to schedule the 2026 game with Colorado State, Wyoming has rescheduled its previously slated home contest against North Texas for Sept. 9, 2034. Colorado State was previously scheduled to play at Indiana on Sept. 5, 2026, but Indiana will now host North Texas on that date instead.
Future Border War Games
Sept. 5, 2026 at CSU
Sept. 23, 2028 at CSU
Sept. 22, 2029 at WYO
Sept. 7, 2030 at CSU
Sept. 20, 2031 at WYO
Sept. 25, 2032 at CSU
Sept. 24, 2033 at WYO
Sept. 23, 2034 at CSU
Sept. 22, 2035 at WYO
Sept. 6, 2036 at WYO
Football Schedules
Future Colorado State Football Schedules
Future Wyoming Football Schedules
Wyoming
Wyoming men's basketball practice is underway in Laramie

Wyoming
Takeaways From Utah’s Gritty Win Over Wyoming

Laramie, WY—Saturday’s 31-6 win at Wyoming highlighted both the flaws Utah must clean up and the strengths it can lean on moving forward.
For one half, Utah looked like a team searching for answers, undone by penalties and missed opportunities. For the other, the Utes looked like the Big 12 contender they aim to be, dominating both sides of the ball and controlling the line of scrimmage.
Utah’s win in Laramie wasn’t always pretty, but it was decisive. After a sloppy, penalty-filled first half, the Utes hit the gas in the second, burying Wyoming with physical defense and a run game that finally found its groove.
Couldn’t have gotten the W without this crowd backing us‼️🫶#GoUtes pic.twitter.com/o4lgR6H9x3
— Utah Football (@Utah_Football) September 14, 2025
Utah’s First Half vs. Second Half
This was a fascinating game that seemed to provide two distinctly different halves of football. However, the only real difference was that Utah simply finished drives better in the second half. Here’s a rundown of how similar the two halves were:
In one half, Utah gained 267 yards, and in the other, they gained 274 yards.
In one half, Utah gained 155 rushing yards, and in the other, 156 rushing yards.
In one half, Utah threw for 112 yards, and in the other, 118 passing yards.
In one half, Utah averaged 6.7 yards per play, and in the other, they averaged 7.1 per play.
In one half, Utah was penalized six times for 63 yards, and in the other, four times for 35.
That’s how similar the two halves of football were from a production standpoint. The issue was the most important stat of any game: points. Utah only finished with 3 first-half points, and in the second half, scored 28.
#GoUtes pic.twitter.com/8nW05pkhDG
— Utah Football (@Utah_Football) September 14, 2025
The first half was sloppy and undisciplined, marred by untimely penalties that stalled drives and left points on the field. In the second half, though penalty issues remained, Utah was determined to convert all scoring opportunities with touchdowns.
The defense was tough throughout most of the game. Wyoming did have a couple of extended drives, but only one ended in points. The secondary looked better, but there are still some things to address.
In general, Utah clearly needs to clean up its play. The penalties simply cannot continue at this same rate. It cost them points in the first half, and against better competition in the future, that will hurt them.
Questions still linger around Utah’s passing game
Through three games, Utah’s passing attack is a mixed bag. Devon Dampier is completing passes at a very high clip, 73% to be exact. However, the yards per attempt still sits right at 7.0 yards, which would be in the bottom half of the country.
The passing game has been a heavy dose of short throws, which has created enough production to preserve Utah’s offensive balance. Until the Utes generate explosive plays downfield, the passing game will remain the biggest question mark heading into Big 12 play.
Still, with emerging weapons like Ryan Davis and Dallen Bentley, there seem to be enough sureties to build with. The passing game is going to have to evolve, and that starts with Beck and Dampier, not the receivers.
.@Utah_Football starting to fire on ALL cylinders 🔥 pic.twitter.com/sd1Bb0Qc4i
— CBS Sports College Football 🏈 (@CBSSportsCFB) September 14, 2025
Dallen Bentley’s emergence
The tight end position has been a hallmark of Utah’s offense in recent years. After the change in coordinator, many believed the tight end spot would fall by the wayside. However, Dallen Bentley had other plans.
Against Wyoming, Bentley hauled in 4-of-7 targets for 46 yards. That included the game-defining 3rd and 21 conversion, where he hauled in a pass down the sideline and trucked a defender to gain the final yard he needed to get the 1st down.
His involvement in the passing game is a promising sign. The 6-foot-5, 259-pounder is now up to 11 receptions for 112 yards and two touchdowns, and seems to be emerging as a go-to target for Dampier.
Whittingham credited Bentley for the work he put in this offseason. Bentley gives Utah a reliable target in critical moments and reinforces the importance of the position at Utah.
Also, tight end Hunter Andrews quietly put together 106 total yards- 44 receiving, 62 rushing, and one touchdown on 11 total touches.
Run game explosiveness
Utah as a whole ran for 311 yards, which included two ball carriers eclipsing the 80-yard threshold, and two others running for at least 60 yards.
Dampier led the team with 86 yards on 13 carries, while Wayshawn Parker got to 80 yards on 10 carries. Hunter Andrews ran for 62 yards on six carries, and NaQuari Rogers totaled 60 yards on 13 carries.
😳 @WayshawnParker GOT UP‼️#GoUtes pic.twitter.com/Sr2g5LhaGr
— Utah Football (@Utah_Football) September 14, 2025
A complement to the offensive line is the lack of negative run plays. Out of 45 total runs, Utah only had four run plays that gained 0 yards, and just two that went for a loss.
This is remarkable run game production and player involvement. Perhaps the biggest positive was the explosiveness Utah displayed in the run game.
Against a competitive, tough, and well-coached defense, the Utes finished with 12 big run plays (gains of at least 10 yards) that generated 193 rushing yards, both being season highs.
Steve Bartle is the Utah insider for KSL Sports. He hosts The Utah Blockcast (SUBSCRIBE) and appears on KSL Sports Zone to break down the Utes. You can follow him on X for the latest Utah updates and game analysis.
Take us with you, wherever you go.
Download the new & improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. You can stream live radio, video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.
-
Health1 week ago
Who Makes Vaccine Policy Decisions in RFK Jr.’s Health Department?
-
Finance4 days ago
Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Bobbi Brown doesn’t listen to men in suits about makeup : Wild Card with Rachel Martin
-
Business1 week ago
How Nexstar’s Proposed TV Merger Is Tied to Jimmy Kimmel’s Suspension
-
North Dakota4 days ago
Board approves Brent Sanford as new ‘commissioner’ of North Dakota University System
-
Technology3 days ago
These earbuds include a tiny wired microphone you can hold
-
Crypto2 days ago
Texas brothers charged in cryptocurrency kidnapping, robbery in MN
-
World1 week ago
Russian jets enter Estonia's airspace in latest test for NATO