Wyoming
How Frugal Wyoming’s Next Budget Is Depends On Who You Ask
Building Wyoming’s biennial budget is a months-long process for the Wyoming Legislature involving hundreds of hours of discussions and mind-numbing number crunching.
When presenting the final $11.1 billion budget that was eventually passed by the Legislature last Friday, state Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, said it represented $10.6 billion in spending, which both Senate President Ogden Driskill, R-Devils Tower, and House Speaker Albert Sommers, R-Pinedale, intimated they agreed with in a press release that came out later that day.
During the Senate budget discussion, however, some questioned just how much is being spent and how much money Wyoming is saving — and the questioning continues a week later.
Some in the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, like its chairman Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette, have argued that the budget represents as much as $11.5 billion in spending, and told Cowboy State Daily it’s “very unfortunate we hear a lot of different things” about it.
“There’s a lot of smoke and mirrors, and it’s truly by design,” he said. “It’s designed that way so people can say whatever they want about the budget.”
Although these debates may seem rather pedantic and possibly a matter of semantics on the surface, they represent a difference of nearly $1 billion in public money and could highly influence perception of the Legislature entering the upcoming election season.
Saving Counts As Spending
Nethercott explained that the budget is a highly dense fiscal project involving many different moving parts that don’t become concrete until signed off on by the governor.
She and Don Richards, budget and fiscal administrator for the Legislature, said the $10.6 billion total reflects flat spending without counting the $375 million put into savings, which is typically considered an expenditure in the Wyoming Legislature.
“How a government does accounting is different from how a business would do theirs,” Nethercott explained. “A transfer of appropriations appears as appropriations.”
A specific example of this within the accounting is a $31 million expenditure within the Wyoming Military Department. This actually reflects the spending of $15.5 million of general fund money to buy land that the state already owns, proceeds of which will then be transferred to the School Foundation Program.
“We’re taking $15 million from one pocket, putting it in another pocket, but in that $11.1 billion (total) it shows up as spending $30 million,” explained Rep. Clark Stith, R-Rock Springs.
Nethercott said Wyoming state government typically makes $1.2 billion in transfers per year. This year that total is about $1.3 billion.
The Wyoming Constitution also requires that revenue from the state’s 1.5% severance tax be dumped into the Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund savings account, which is not reflected anywhere in the budget. There’s also an additional 1% statutory severance tax. Stith said when considering these two savings, about $700 million will be put into savings for the upcoming biennium.
What Do The Budget Analysts Say
Richards said the exact cost of the budget as he views it is $11.03 billion. Of this total, $3.4 billion is coming from the state’s general fund, which is supported by tax dollars. The remainder includes various savings accounts and federal dollars. He said the budget as he views it also includes $170 million of discretionary transfers to savings.
Bear said he views the budget as putting $600 million to $700 million into savings, which he believes as a grand total amounts to a wasteful use of money when considering only up to $234 million will be devoted to property tax relief.
“The leadership continues to believe that putting the taxpayers’ money into their own savings account is better than leaving it in the hands and pockets of the taxpayers,” he said.
Richards said transfers to intermediate or long-term savings accounts are still counted as spending as far as his department is concerned within the budget. But he also said considerable double counting occurs within the budget when referring to the spending of “all funds” for programs such as employer paid health insurance and motor pool rates. When removing double counting, he said the budget could be considered as low as $9.7 billion.
Richards said it’s likely some are arriving at the $11.5 billion figure by combining the $234 million general fund cost of all the other bills passed during the 2024 session with the budget. A total of 55 bills, including the budget, are sitting on Gov. Mark Gordon’s desk for consideration.
Bear said these other bills should be considered as part of the overall budget.
“When you look at all-in spending, you’ve got to look at everything we passed,” he said.
As far as the $10.6 billion number offered by Nethercott, Richards said one could also theoretically exclude $416 million in “enterprise funds,” which largely pertains to the state purchase of liquor subsequently distributed to state liquor stores, bars and restaurants, which is then returned.
Stith said he agrees with the $11.03 billion figure.
“Don (Richards) is amazing, he’s never wrong,” Stith said. “He’s nonpartisan, he’s so even-handed.”
Prior Year’s Money
Another factor in the budget calculations is the use of money budgeted from prior years’ budgets to be reappropriated for the upcoming budget, a process known as “reversions.”
Richards said there are $244.5 million in reversions included in the biennium budget just passed. In addition, $45 million in unused money from the governor’s energy matching funds program was unofficially reappropriated for other purposes.
Bear said all of this money should be counted as spending.
“Those monies that have been reappropriated have been ignored, and they shouldn’t be,” he said. “They’re being reappropriated so they’re going to be in the budget.”
Transparency
The budget discussions during this year’s legislative session were neither easy to understand nor transparent for the general public to understand.
A total of around 125 amendments were considered during the second Joint Conference Committee meeting to square up differences between the House and Senate budgets. None of these amendments were ever posted to the Legislature’s website or widely distributed to the public by paper, both measures Stith said he would support moving forward.
“It wouldn’t make it any less complicated but at least everyone could see it if they wanted to,” he said.
How Did It Turn Out?
The Freedom Caucus has taken a relatively negative tone to the budget that was passed.
“The uniparty and their allies in the media don’t want you to know how much was just spent in Cheyenne – and how much of it was discretionary spending,” Bear and other members of the Freedom Caucus wrote in a Wednesday column. “We believe that you, the taxpayers, deserve to know how much and to what ends every dollar extracted from you via taxation was directed. After all, it’s your money.”
Bear and the Freedom Caucus supported the original Senate version of the budget that spent around $9.9 billion. He believes the House budget, which he did not support, won out in the final budget that was passed.
“It wasn’t a halfway move whatsoever,” he said.
Stith said the budget was a “true compromise” and represents conservative fiscal spending, referring to the $3.4 billion spent out of the general fund. In the last budget made prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, $2.97 billion was spent from the general fund.
“That $2.97 billion is worth $3.5 billion today,” he said. “That’s the inflation factor. So really, on an inflation-adjusted basis, the budget is probably flat for all our general funding spending.”
The Freedom Caucus responds to this argument saying state budget experts determined that to maintain the same level of government services as included in the previous state budgets, it would add up to $8.7 billion in spending. They criticized expenditures like a $10 million study for a new state museum, $3.5 million for a Cheyenne arboretum, and $150 million for a new Rock Springs High School.
The Wyoming House Democrats put out a press release Thursday highlighting some of their efforts from the session and the budget.
They celebrated funding for the Wyoming Business Council and workforce housing as wins, as well as funding to improve mental healthcare, a $10 million trust fund for suicide prevention, and increased access to affordable healthcare.
“We made our case and ultimately prevailed,” Rep. Trey Sherwood, D-Laramie, said. “It’s hard to find regular people in Wyoming who don’t think we need to diversify our economy, or who think the cost of housing isn’t a problem. I was surprised these common-sense solutions faced opposition at all.”
Leo Wolfson can be reached at Leo@CowboyStateDaily.com.
Wyoming
American Rare Earths strengthens board with veteran Wyoming mine builder ahead of planned Nasdaq listing
Veteran mine builder Matthew Gili will join American Rare Earths Ltd (ASX:ARR, OTCQX:ARRNF)’s board as a non-executive director as the company advances the Halleck Creek Rare Earths Project in Wyoming and prepares for a planned Nasdaq compliance listing in H2 2026.
Gili is currently president and CEO of Ur-Energy Inc, a NYSE American and TSX-listed Wyoming uranium producer, and brings more than 25 years of mine development and operational experience across major global mining groups including Rio Tinto and Barrick.
His appointment remains subject to completion of Australian regulatory formalities, which American Rare Earths expects to be completed shortly.
Once formally appointed, Gili will join the company’s Technical Committee and contribute to the Definitive Feasibility Study workstream at Halleck Creek, which American Rare Earths describes as the largest known rare earth deposit in the United States on a total rare earth oxide basis.
Board renewal ahead of US listing plans
The appointment forms part of a broader board renewal process as ARR works toward a Nasdaq compliance dual-listing in H2 2026, while retaining the ASX as its primary listing.
The company is also considering a full US domicile in 2027, subject to a prospective shareholder vote.
CEO Mark Wall said Gili’s operational experience and Wyoming background would strengthen the board as Halleck Creek moves toward construction and production.
“The intended addition of Matt to our Board of Directors further demonstrates our commitment to advancing the largest rare earth element deposit on a total contained rare earths basis in the United States toward construction and operations. Matt brings a tremendous blend of mining technical expertise and Wyoming-specific experience to both the Board and the Technical Committee. His depth of operational knowledge, his relationships in Wyoming, and his proven track record of delivering world-class mining projects, including building the first new copper mine in the United States in a decade, make him exactly the right person to help us get Halleck Creek built.
“As we progress toward our NASDAQ listing later this year, appointments of this calibre send a clear message to U.S. investors about the quality of the team and the seriousness of our intent. Matt’s experience managing ISR uranium operations in Wyoming gives him first-hand knowledge of the hydrometallurgical processing chemistry that will be central to bringing Halleck Creek into production. The parallels between uranium and rare earth processing are substantial and practically meaningful. This is not simply a credential; it is operational expertise that will directly benefit our Technical Committee and Feasibility Study.”
Wyoming
Feds advance permit for controversial Seminoe pumped-water project in Wyoming
by Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile
The Seminoe pumped-water storage hydroelectric project in Carbon County advanced toward final approval this month, when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued its environmental impact statement, leaving critics warning of potential fish kills and other risks to wildlife.
Though the newest plan to minimize myriad impacts to fisheries, wildlife and local recreation economies makes concessions “around the margins,” project skeptics say the FERC ignored calls — including from local and state elected officials — to make more meaningful changes regarding threats, including to a “blue ribbon” trout fishery and a vital bighorn sheep herd.
“I’m very disheartened by the final EIS,” Trout Unlimited’s Wyoming Government Relations Director Patrick Harrington told WyoFile.
The plan still doesn’t mandate operational responses that would effectively prevent a trout kill in the prized Miracle Mile of the North Platte River immediately downstream of Seminoe Reservoir due to the threat of rising water temperatures, Harrington said. Trout are a cold-water species and particularly sensitive to warmer temperatures. Groups like Trout Unlimited and Friends of the North Platte have warned that even one day of higher-than-tolerable water temperatures could result in a devastating fish kill.
The potential for a Miracle Mile fish kill still exists, Harrington said, because FERC declined to update its water forecast modeling to include more recent climate-change analysis that shows higher temperatures and lower annual snowpack for cold water runoff. That leaves the protocol to respond to rising water temperatures woefully inadequate.
“It still leaves serious risk to fisheries — and those go back to our concerns over the data that informs the [water quality] model,” Harrington said.
The revised plan also retains multiple waivers to bypass seasonal construction limitations designed to protect wildlife, including the Ferris-Seminoe bighorn sheep herd. Developer rPlus Hydro says the waivers are vital to the economic feasibility for what it hopes will be a five-year construction period. Complying with the slate of seasonal wildlife restrictions will add major cost, the company has testified.
“These [wildlife timing restrictions] did not come as a surprise to them,” Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation Executive Director Katie Cheesbrough said, adding that granting waivers of science-backed protections would set a dangerous precedent for other industrial projects in the state. “Those wildlife restrictions were publicly available, and they knew that going into it. If it was going to make the project cost-prohibitive, then they shouldn’t do the project. It’s not on Wyoming to ensure that [wildlife protections] are within their cost range.”
rPlus Hydro responds
The Utah-based company proposes building a 13,400-acre-foot reservoir in the Bennett Mountains overlooking Seminoe Reservoir near the dam — one of several reservoirs on the North Platte River. The $4 billion facility would pump water uphill during daytime “off-peak demand” hours for electricity when wind and solar power are plentiful and wholesale electricity is cheapest, according to rPlus Hydro.
“Think of it as a ‘water battery’ that stores energy generated when demand is low,” the company told WyoFile. “When demand increases, water is released from the upper reservoir back into Seminoe, driving hydroelectric turbines to produce electricity.”
Skeptics in Wyoming have cast doubt on the necessity and consumer benefit of the electrical generation daily balance strategy.

” data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/oilcity.news/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/scary1-1.jpg?fit=600%2C450&ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-123725″/><figcaption class=)
For its part, the company contends that the Seminoe pumped-water storage project represents a $200 million annual savings to ratepayers. A company representative also told WyoFile the FERC’s final EIS “confirms the project is needed for future energy growth and reliability while also safeguarding both the North Platte River and bighorn sheep.”
rPlus Hydro Deputy General Counsel Kevin Baker pointed to the fact that the Wyoming Department of Quality granted a “section 401” water quality certificate for the project earlier this year. The state certificate is proof that “the project will not harm downstream waters, including the Miracle Mile, so drinking water, fishing and recreation remain protected,” Baker wrote.
“The state’s conclusion is backed by a robust, state-led Water Quality Adaptive Management Plan which provides real-time monitoring and strong enforcement measures designed to identify and correct any potential issues before they develop.”
The Environmental Protection Agency agreed with Wyoming DEQ’s findings and stipulations, Baker added.
But there remain huge holes in the modeling — rooted in the failure to consider a changing climate — that FERC, DEQ and the EPA have based their analysis on, Harrington contends. “It’s a castle made of sand.”

Regarding wildlife, and the Ferris-Seminoe bighorn sheep herd in particular, rPlus Hydro contends it is committed to “strict construction practices to minimize disturbance and significant investment in habitat and herd management to ensure its continued health and viability.”
But those promises are not enshrined in FERC’s stipulations for the project, said Cheesbrough of the Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation.
There’s no way, she said, to ensure the bighorn sheep herd, and other wildlife, will be protected due to the multiple waivers FERC wants to allow for seasonal restrictions. Understandably, Cheesbrough noted, the restrictions for bighorn sheep, sage grouse, raptors and other wildlife would black out much of the calendar, limiting when construction could take place.
Protecting wildlife, Cheesbrough said, would likely add several years and dramatically increase the project’s cost. But, she added, “For them to be like, ‘Well, we just can’t afford to do it here if we have to abide by all of this,’ and then asking for waivers, it seems like a very dangerous precedent to set.”
Public and government pushback
The FERC is the primary permitting agency for the project because of its reliance on federally managed water-storage reservoirs, hydroelectric and electrical transmission systems. It’s a source of heartburn for locals, Harrington said, because the agency seems less beholden to public and local government input compared to other federal agencies.
“It’s frustrating,” Harrington said. “I think this project is headed toward licensing in September because the adjustments FERC has made have sort of just indicated that there’s not going to be a lot of changes to the plan as proposed.”
“For them to be like, ‘Well, we just can’t afford to do it here if we have to abide by all of this,’ and then asking for waivers, it seems like a very dangerous precedent to set.”
Katie Cheesbrough, Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation
In May, the Legislature’s Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee heard a large outcry from wildlife and recreation enthusiasts opposing the project, as well as from local officials from Carbon and Natrona counties.
“These concerns are not theoretical for us,” Casper Mayor Ray Pacheco told the legislative panel. “Casper relies directly on the North Platte River for drinking water, wastewater treatment, recreation, tourism and the quality of life.”
Committee members bristled at what they saw as a severe lack of engagement by rPlus Hydro and FERC with the public and local officials. Committee leaders agreed to send a letter to Wyoming’s congressional delegation, as well as to FERC, imploring officials to insist on meaningful protections.
What’s next?
The FERC has indicated that the publication of the final EIS this month does not trigger a public comment period before giving its final approval later this year. Some governmental agencies, however, still have the power to persuade the FERC, according to WyoFile sources.
So what powers can be exerted on the FERC to change course on the project?
For example, the wildlife waivers and other accommodations in the FERC’s plan do not align with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s resource management plan for the region, administered by the BLM’s Rawlins Field Office. If the BLM chooses to accommodate FERC’s plan for the project, it would likely have to amend its resource management plan — a process that is more inclusive of public and local government agencies.
Harrington and Cheesbrough both noted that the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, for example, has refused to endorse a carte blanche waiver of seasonal wildlife restrictions. That could be a major factor if the BLM initiates the process to align its management plan with FERC’s proposed certification of the project.
“To me, that’s a massive hurdle,” Harrington said.
This article was originally published by WyoFile and is republished here with permission. WyoFile is an independent nonprofit news organization focused on Wyoming people, places and policy.
Related
Wyoming
New Department of Family Services summer food program launches in Wyoming
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — The Wyoming Department of Family Services recently announced that it will be launching a federal program this week to provide grocery assistance to more than 37,000 school-aged children across the state.
Known as SUN Bucks, the initiative provides a one-time $120 benefit per eligible child to help families cover food costs during the summer months, the department announced in a release. Gov. Mark Gordon previously authorized the program’s implementation through an executive order on April 15.
Gordon described the initiative as an essential tool to support children who may otherwise lack access to healthy food while school is out of session.
“We want our children to thrive, because when our children are successful, so too are our communities,” he stated in the release.
According to DFS, most qualifying children will be automatically enrolled in the program. The department reports that it began sending eligibility notifications this week via mail and email.
Eligible families can expect to receive SUN Bucks electronic benefit transfer cards in the mail starting in early July.
DFS Director Korin Schmidt said in a statement that the program is specifically designed to assist rural children who lose access to school-provided breakfast and lunch during the summer months, adding that the benefits will allow families to purchase groceries as needed to ensure food is available in the home for those missed meals.
The SUN Bucks cards will function similarly to other benefit programs and be accepted at any retailer participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
While tens of thousands of children are enrolled automatically, some eligible families may still need to apply, according to the press release. Residents can check their child’s enrollment status or submit an application through the DFS SUN Bucks website starting June 22.
For more information, people can visit the DFS website, email ask-sunbucks@wyo.gov or call 307-777-8786 between 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Related
-
Los Angeles, Ca15 minutes ago‘What’s going on with our society?’ Elderly L.A. street vendor violently beaten
-
Detroit, MI35 minutes agoTrailblaze Detroit: Blazing New Trails while Backpacking Metro Detroit | Visit Detroit | Visit Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA45 minutes agoGiants open to moving big names before Trade Deadline
-
Dallas, TX50 minutes agoReports: Mavericks acquire Sergio De Larrea in four-team Draft night trade
-
Miami, FL57 minutes agoMiami Gardens police make arrest in cold case murder from 2019
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoWoman killed in Mattapan carjacking crash honored at vigil
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoNuggets trade 26th pick in NBA Draft to Spurs, moving out of first round
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoNBA Commissioner says Las Vegas, Seattle remain expansion targets for 2028-29 season