Connect with us

Washington

Washington DC police officer charged with lying about leaks to Proud Boys leader

Published

on

Washington DC police officer charged with lying about leaks to Proud Boys leader


A Washington DC police officer has been arrested on charges that he lied about leaking confidential information to Proud Boys extremist group leader Enrique Tarrio.

Metropolitan Police Department Lieutenant Shane Lamond was also charged with obstructing an investigation after group members destroyed a Black Lives Matter banner in the nation’s capital.

An indictment alleges that Lieutenant Lamond, 47, of Stafford, Virginia, warned Tarrio, then national chairman of the far-right group, that law enforcement had an arrest warrant for him related to the banner’s destruction.

Tarrio was arrested in Washington two days before Proud Boys members joined the mob in storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

This month, Tarrio and three other leaders were convicted of seditious conspiracy charges for what prosecutors said was a plot to keep then-president Donald Trump in the White House after he lost the 2020 election.

Advertisement

A federal grand jury in Washington indicted Lieutenant Lamond on one count of obstruction of justice and three counts of making false statements.

A judge ordered Lieutenant Lamond’s release from custody after he pleaded not guilty to the charges during his initial court appearance on Friday.

The indictment accuses Lieutenant Lamond of lying to and misleading federal investigators when they questioned him in June 2021 about his contacts with Tarrio.

‘The feds are locking people up’

The indictment also says Tarrio provided Lieutenant Lamond with information about the January 6 attack.

“Looks like the feds are locking people up for rioting at the Capitol. I hope none of your guys were among them,” Lieutenant Lamond told Tarrio in a Telegram message two days after the siege.

Advertisement

“So far from what I’m seeing and hearing we’re good,” Tarrio replied.

“Great to hear,” Lieutenant Lamond wrote.

“Of course I can’t say it officially, but personally I support you all and don’t want to see your group’s name and reputation dragged through the mud.”

Enrique Tarrio was convicted of seditious conspiracy this month.()

Lieutenant Lamond was placed on administrative leave by the police force in February 2022.

Lieutenant Lamond, who supervised the intelligence branch of the police department’s Homeland Security Bureau, was responsible for monitoring groups like the Proud Boys when they came to Washington.

Advertisement

Lieutenant Lamond declined to comment.

Lamond’s lawyer defends contact with Proud Boys

His attorney, Mark Schamel, released a statement on Friday saying, “Lt Lamond is a decorated officer whose position required contact with extremist groups who sought to undermine our democracy on January 6th, yet he does not, nor has he ever, supported their views.”

Mr Schamel added that “the jury will see the fallacy of these unfairly levied allegations when the evidence is presented.”

Mr Schamel has previously said that Lieutenant Lamond’s job was to communicate with a variety of groups protesting in Washington, and his conduct with Tarrio was never inappropriate.

His lawyer told the Associated Press in December that Lieutenant Lamond was a “decorated veteran” of the police department and “doesn’t share any of the indefensible positions” of extremist groups.

Advertisement

The Metropolitan Police Department said on Friday that it would do an internal review after the federal case against Lieutenant Lamond is resolved.

“We understand this matter sparks a range of emotions, and believe the allegations of this member’s actions are not consistent of our values and our commitment to the community,” the department said in a statement.

Lieutenant Lamond’s name repeatedly came up in the Capitol riot trial of Tarrio and other Proud Boys leaders.

Tarrio’s defence sought to use messages showing that Tarrio was informing Lieutenant Lamond of the Proud Boys plans in Washington in order to support Tarrio’s claims that he was looking to avoid violence, not create it.

Text messages introduced at Tarrio’s trial appeared to show a close rapport between the two men, with Lieutenant Lamond frequently greeting the extremist group leader with the words “hey brother”.

Advertisement

Tarrio’s lawyers had wanted to call Lieutenant Lamond as a witness, but were stymied by the investigation into Lieutenant Lamond’s conduct and his lawyer’s contention that Lieutenant Lamond would claim fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

The defence accused the Justice Department of trying to bully Lieutenant Lamond into keeping quiet because his testimony would hurt their case — a charge prosecutors vehemently denied.

The indictment is the latest sign the Justice Department is moving forward in cases against people whose alleged conduct was uncovered in the massive January 6 investigation, beyond the rioters themselves.

Lamond and Tarrio communicated 500 times

More than 1,000 people have been charged with participating in the attack on the Capitol, but investigators have also been examining broader efforts by Mr Trump and his allies to undermine the 2020 election.

Prosecutors say Lieutenant Lamond and Tarrio communicated at least 500 times across several platforms about things like the Proud Boys’ planned activities in Washington over roughly a year and a half.

Advertisement

Tarrio is expected to be sentenced in August.

His lawyer, Nayib Hassan, declined to comment on Friday on Lieutenant Lamond’s indictment, but said he was “shocked and disgusted” that the government used information in the case against Lieutenant Lamond that Tarrio’s defence was not allowed to show jurors at trial.

Lieutenant Lamond began using the Telegram messaging platform to give Tarrio information about law enforcement activity around July 2020, about a year after they started talking, according to prosecutors.

By November of that year, he was talking about meeting Tarrio during a night out.

In December 2020, Lieutenant Lamond told Tarrio about where competing anti-fascist activists were expected to be.

Advertisement

Lieutenant Lamond, whose job entailed sharing what he learned with others in the department, asked Tarrio whether he should share the information Tarrio gave him about Proud Boys activities, prosecutors said.

Jurors who convicted Tarrio heard testimony that Lieutenant Lamond frequently provided the Proud Boys leader with internal information about law enforcement operations in the weeks before other members of his group stormed the Capitol.

Less than three weeks before the January 6 riot, Lieutenant Lamond warned Tarrio that the FBI and US Secret Service were “all spun up” over talk on an Infowars internet show that the Proud Boys planned to dress up as supporters of President Joe Biden on the day of the inauguration.

In a message to Tarrio on December 25, 2020, Lieutenant Lamond said police investigators had asked him to identify Tarrio from a photograph.

Lieutenant Lamond warned Tarrio that police may be seeking a warrant for his arrest.

Advertisement

Later, on the day of his arrest, Tarrio posted a message to other Proud Boys leaders that said, “The warrant was just signed”.

AP



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Veteran faces extradition to Philippines over unfounded allegations, lawyer says

Published

on

Veteran faces extradition to Philippines over unfounded allegations, lawyer says


A 66-year-old American citizen has been in the DC jail for almost 10 months awaiting extradition to the Philippines for a crime her attorneys say there’s no evidence she committed.

Air Force veteran Grace Lourenco earned commendations for her service. In 1981, she was part of the flight crew aboard the Air Force plane that returned 53 U.S. diplomats and citizens who had been held hostage in Iran, her family said – a moment seen around the world.

She went on to earn a business degree, get married and have a daughter.

Court filings from a 2023 divorce proceeding between Lourenco and her husband, Hans Brunner, show a D.C. judge believed her statements that she had suffered physical abuse in the marriage.

Advertisement

The decree of divorce also contains the judge’s assessment of the alleged crime for which Lourenco was arrested at her Georgetown home earlier this year. It describes an incident in October 2018 at a home the couple owned in the Philippines, where Brunner worked.

“After lunch, on the ride back to their Manila home, Mr. Brunner told Ms. Lourenco he wanted to have an open relationship with [a German woman he’d met] and that he wanted to open a trust fund for her.”

“[Lourenco] remembers waking up in a hospital a couple days later,” said her attorney, William Zapf. “She had been unconscious, and it is believed that she had taken some medication that made her unconscious.”

The judge’s conclusions went on to say: “Later … while standing on the balcony, Mr. Brunner was attacked from behind. The perpetrator hit Mr. Brunner on the back of the head with a sharp, hard weapon. He did not see who attacked him.

“He was in a coma for two days.

Advertisement

“He asserts Ms. Lourenco was the perpetrator. Not only did Mr. Brunner fail to present evidence that Ms. Lourenco was the perpetrator, but he also failed to present evidence that (she) had wanted to kill him to get his pension.”

The judge concluded: “Both parties have committed intrafamily offenses against the other, but Mr. Brunner committed more offenses against Ms. Lourenco, and the Court finds (him) to have been the primary aggressor.”

Lourenco’s attorneys say her future is in the hands of the U.S. State Department.

“In cases like this where there are very serious humanitarian concerns about our client, Grace, this is the type of case where the Secretary of State can say no and should say no,” Zapf said.

Several people she served with in the Air Force have written letters supporting Lourenco.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

GOP Controlling Washington Means It’s Christmas for Lobbyists | Opinion

Published

on

GOP Controlling Washington Means It’s Christmas for Lobbyists | Opinion


About 13,000 registered lobbyists plied their trade in Washington last year, at a total cost of more than $4.2 billion. Most represent industry groups ranging from the Chamber of Commerce to Big Pharma to Big Tech to oil, gas, and chemical producers. This holiday season, they have a golden opportunity to score big gifts for their clients and themselves through an obscure law only known to Washington insiders.

The Congressional Review Act allows a new lineup in the House, Senate, and Oval Office to repeal regulations issued during the last few months of the previous presidential administration with a simple majority vote (no filibuster) and a maximum of ten hours of floor debate (often much less). Historically, it has only really worked when Republicans take over the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and decide to destroy the work of a Democratic administration. The last time Donald Trump was president, Republican lawmakers eliminated 15 rules with little fuss and not much publicity.

The process is designed to allow Republican lawmakers, with almost no effort, to eliminate protections that took years to write. Prominent law firms and consultants are already working to sell lobbying campaigns to their clients. The law only applies to rules issued during the final 60 days that Congress is in session, and we don’t know when the House and Senate will adjourn. But this uncertainty is not stopping lobbyists from drumming up lucrative work.

This year’s list of rules to kill is chilling, targeting everything from pay increases for teachers at Head Start to limits on teenage smoking to drinking water purification. President-elect Donald Trump’s highly successful efforts to dominate the national news has so far masked these potentially destructive lobbying efforts.

Advertisement

Head Start provides early education for children from low-income families and focuses on their cognitive, social, and emotional development. Research shows that the program has produced great benefits for the children who are enrolled, preparing them for primary school where they would otherwise flounder. The program costs are modest, with funding of $12 billion last year.

The rule under attack was issued in August and would raise the salaries of Head Start teachers and improve their working conditions. Like Trump’s threatened Medicaid cuts, cancelling this rule would hurt people who need government help the most. Notably, the complete elimination of Head Start was among the radical proposals contained in the far-right Project 2025. Unknown industry players support this radical change to curry favor with the incoming administration.

Next up in the fight to shrink government is the age limit on buying cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. The targeted rule raises the age from 18 to 21. The Food and Drug Administration’s apparent sin here was following congressional instructions set out in a 2019 law.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 20: U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to members of the press after a Republican House Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on December 20, 2024 in…


Alex Wong/Getty Images

If this rule experiences a rapid death, many members may not realize the significance of reversing a decision they made a mere five years ago. Because manufacturers deliberately add addictive nicotine to cigarettes, people who start smoking in adolescence most often do not quit. Smoking during childhood causes severe health problems, including the onset of respiratory disease, decreased physical fitness, and problems with lung growth.

Other regulations under scrutiny include an Environmental Protection Agency rule that would require the replacement of an estimated 9.2 million lead water pipes serving older housing and distribution systems across the country. The CDC advises that no safe level of lead is known for children under six, who can suffer brain and kidney damage when exposed to even minute amounts of lead.

Advertisement

Methane is released into the air from a variety of sources including facilities that produce oil and natural gas. It is 28 times more potent than carbon dioxide in causing climate change and causes one-third of the warming produced by human emissions of greenhouse gases. A rule being targeted by oil and gas producers would impose a fee for excessive emissions, as required by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. In our hearts, most Americans have a sense that something is very wrong with the climate, as we watch drought, floods, and wildfires overcome communities across the country. If this rule is swept from the books and we take no further action to reduce emissions, conditions will grow intolerable.

Of course, one response to this prediction of doom and gloom is that when a majority of Americans become disgusted enough, they’ll elect different politicians who will resurrect the rules. But the Congressional Review Act has a wrinkle that is even more destructive than sweeping the rules into the garbage with no debate. It is commonly referred to inside the Washington Beltway as “salting the earth.”

Once a rule is killed, an agency is forever barred from writing a new rule that is “in substantially the same form” as the vetoed rule. The first rule killed under the act was an effort under the Clinton administration to prevent ergonomic injuries in a variety of jobs, from meatpacking to manufacturing to health care. The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that 30 percent of injuries that caused employees to miss work were ergonomic injuries.

Ever since, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has been too intimidated to try regulating this serious harm. Today we run the risk of other agencies being similarly deterred from making common-sense rules. Head Start may not get support for its teachers and other staff; teen smoking may increase; lead may remain in drinking water; and climate change may reach a breaking point unless and until Congress comes to its senses.

Rena Steinzor is professor emerita at the University of Maryland Carey Law School. James Goodwin is the policy director at the Center for Progressive Reform.

Advertisement

The views expressed in this article are the writers’ own.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Fire Department adds food drive to annual Santa parade

Published

on

Washington Fire Department adds food drive to annual Santa parade


WASHINGTON (25News Now) – A new tradition was born in the Town of Washington Thursday night, on top of one that’s already been going for 11 years.

The city’s fire department used its annual Santa parade as an opportunity to collect food donations for ‘Washington Helps Its People,’ more commonly known as WHIP.

Fire Captain Jakob Spitzer said the department started its annual Santa parade in 2013 after the tornado tore through town. It was a way to reconnect with neighbors after the tragedy.

As the number of spectators grows each year, the acts of service have started to follow.

Advertisement

“It’s a perfect opportunity for families to come together, to donate, and to give during this Christmas season,” Spitzer said.

WHIP hosts a food pantry twice a month, serving nearly 200 families. However, one volunteer, Sharla Davis, says the number of people in need has recently grown, making community involvement more important.

“Our demand is greater, so our community is really just stepping up. This is a great way that people can just donate from right out of their house; they don’t have to drive the donation to us, they don’t have to send us a check, they can just walk out their door, say hi to Santa, and be able to put food on the truck,” said Davis.

This year marks the first time the firefighters have added the WHIP Collection to the tradition, and they said they’ll continue it from here on out.

During Thursday’s 11-mile parade route, WHIP leaders estimate people donated over 3,000 pounds of food, including canned vegetables, cereal, and crackers.

Advertisement

People interested in donating but missed the collection or the fire trucks didn’t drive down their street can drop off nonperishable items at either the fire department or WHIP off Peoria Street.

You can watch 25News – any newscast, anywhere – streaming LIVE on 25NewsNow.com, our 25News mobile app, and on our WEEK 25News SmartTV streaming app. Learn more about how you can get connected to 25News streaming live news here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending