Connect with us

Washington

Mark Zuckerberg joins struggle over Harvard’s future

Published

on

Mark Zuckerberg joins struggle over Harvard’s future


Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg jumped into the fight over Harvard University’s future on Friday, the latest prominent business leader to do so at a moment of turmoil for the elite university.

Zuckerberg hosted a virtual event in support of Sam Lessin, a Silicon Valley investor and former Harvard classmate of Zuckerberg’s who became an early executive at Facebook. Lessin is running for a slot on the Harvard Board of Overseers, a governing body made up of alumni that, according to Harvard, “provides counsel” to leadership on priorities and has a voice in some decisions such as election of members of the Harvard Corporation.

Lessin has said his candidacy is about restoring excellence to a university that he believes has lost its way. He has accused the previous administration of failing to respond to rising antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Gaza war.

During Friday’s event, Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan stayed away from hot-button topics such as race and the ouster earlier this month of Claudine Gay, Harvard’s first Black president. But their presence at an event backing a candidate who criticized Gay and Harvard’s handling of campus speech issues shows how wealthy donors are increasingly willing to use their clout to shape the school. Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, a Harvard donor who led the charge to oust Gay, has proposed his own slate of candidates for the Board of Overseers.

Advertisement

“Harvard has the unique ability to shape the whole field of higher education, which is obviously important to training whole generations of people,” Zuckerberg said. “Sam is the type of person I would want to be involved in governing Harvard.”

Lessin, Ackman and others are part of a cohort of business leaders who say they’re concerned about the politicization of campus life, diversity initiatives that they say have gone too far, and what they call a double standard around free speech — claiming that antisemitic speech was not condemned strongly enough, especially compared with the school’s response to other events such as the killing of George Floyd. These concerns, along with allegations of plagiarism, led to Gay’s ouster after just a few months in office.

Amid campus tensions that arose amid the Israel-Gaza war, some students, alumni, donors and others — including Lessin — thought her responses were too late and too tepid.

The situation worsened in December when a U.S. House committee grilled Gay, along with the presidents of MIT and the University of Pennsylvania, over antisemitism on their campuses. In tense exchanges with lawmakers, Gay and the other presidents, repeatedly declined to say that calling for the genocide of Jews on campus would violate the school’s policies.

Gay’s answers were viewed by many as unfeeling and tone-deaf, and although she later apologized, political leaders, major donors and others called for her resignation.

Advertisement

Allegations of plagiarism in her scholarly work surfaced and were amplified by her critics, and in early January, she resigned.

The school’s provost and chief academic officer, Alan M. Garber, was named interim president.

Some alumni, politicians and others also posted scathing remarks on social media about the highly opaque Harvard Corporation — the university’s most powerful governing board, which is formally named the President and Fellows of Harvard College — its selection of Gay and handling of the recent controversies. Some called for the Corporation’s senior fellow, Penny Pritzker, to resign. And some alumni launched campaigns for a seat on another university governing body, the Board of Overseers.

Ackman is also backing his own slate of candidates for the board of overseers.

Lessin is aiming to get 3,300 write-in nominations from Harvard alumni for the 2024 Spring Overseers ballot by Jan. 31.

Advertisement



Source link

Washington

Game Preview: 04.12.26 at Washington Capitals | Pittsburgh Penguins

Published

on

Game Preview: 04.12.26 at Washington Capitals  | Pittsburgh Penguins


Game Notes

Quick Hits

1) Evgeni Malkin has 82 points (27G-55A) in 67 career games against the Capitals. It’s the third-most points he’s scored against any one team.

2) Defenseman Sam Girard has five points (5A) and is plus-7 in his last seven games. Only three players have a better plus/minus than him (+7) since Mar. 30.

Advertisement

3) Since March 22, no player in the league has more goals than Rickard Rakell (10).

4) Elmer Soderblom has seven points (3G-4A) over his last eight games. He has nine points (4G-5A) in 18 games with Pittsburgh after recording three points (2G-1A) over 39 games with Detroit this year.

5) Egor Chinakhov has 21 points (8G-14A) over his last 19 games and has picked up 36 points (18G-18A) in 42 games since joining the Penguins. Since his Penguins debut on Jan. 1, only Rickard Rakell (20) has more goals than him on the team.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

DOJ asks judge to allow search of Washington Post reporter’s phone, laptops

Published

on

DOJ asks judge to allow search of Washington Post reporter’s phone, laptops


The Justice Department (DOJ) is asking a federal judge in Virginia to allow it to conduct its own search of a Washington Post reporter’s seized electronic devices, rather than have the court do the review.

Federal prosecutors urged U.S. District Judge Anthony J. Trenga in a March 31 court filing to overturn a lower court ruling that prohibited the DOJ from using a “filter team” to search reporter Hannah Natanson’s phone and laptop as part of an FBI investigation into a government contractor accused of leaking classified material.

Advertisement

Magistrate Judge William Porter ordered in February that the government could not “open, access, review, or otherwise examine” any of Natanson’s “seized data,” instead authorizing an independent judicial review.

“Given the documented reporting on government leak investigations and the government’s well-chronicled efforts to stop them, allowing the government’s filter team to search a reporter’s work product—most of which consists of unrelated information from confidential sources—is the equivalent of leaving the government’s fox in charge of the Washington Post’s henhouse,” Porter wrote.

Federal prosecutors have pushed back, arguing that Porter’s order infringes on the separation of powers by shifting an executive branch function into a judicial one.

They also asserted that it could compromise the neutrality courts are meant to maintain in overseeing search warrants and related proceedings.

“That principle is even more important here because the search authorized by this warrant involves the identification and seizure of classified national defense information, a responsibility the law entrusts to the Executive’s expertise,” federal prosecutors wrote.

Advertisement

The case stems from an FBI search of Natanson’s home in January, in which agents took two laptops, a cellphone and a Garmin watch belonging to the journalist, who had been reporting on the Trump administration’s effort to trim government spending and cuts to the federal workforce.

The search was conducted in connection with a government system administrator in Maryland, who is now behind bars, according to the DOJ.

Attorneys for the Post have contended that the warrant and subsequent search were an example of federal overreach and violated First Amendment press protections.

“The government should not receive permission to rummage through a reporter’s professional universe,” Simon Latcovich said during a Thursday hearing, according to The Post.

The newspaper reported that Trenga, appointed by former President George W. Bush, said he would “get a decision shortly” but seemed skeptical that Porter’s ruling would hamper the DOJ’s ability to build its case against the contractor.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Obama musical tickets; when to go, what to know about ‘44’ in DC

Published

on

Obama musical tickets; when to go, what to know about ‘44’ in DC


play

A critically acclaimed musical about Barack Obama is coming to Washington DC for the first time, with tickets still available for its limited run.

After making its world premiere in Los Angeles in 2024, “44: The Musical” had stops in Chicago, Philadelphia and New York City.

Advertisement

Now it’s coming to DC for a 25-show run at the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s Klein Theatre just a few blocks away from Obama’s former home at the White House.

Here’s what to know about the musical and how you can get tickets.

What is ’44: The Musical’ about?

Told through the “hazy recollection” of Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden, the musical features original songs that capture key moments of Barack Obama’s presidency with satire, humor and a dose of political nostalgia.

“’44: The Musical’ is the story of Obama you won’t read about in history books… because history books are now banned in most states,” Shakespeare Theatre says on its website. “But also because ’44’ is the story of Obama as Joe Biden kinda sorta remembers it.”

Advertisement

The musical features 24 songs through a wide range of genres, including R&B, gospel and pop, along with “a live-band driven score (that captures) the music, momentum and communal spirit that defined a generation.”

Characters in “44: The Musical” include Obama and Biden, Sarah Palin, Michelle Obama, Mitch McConnell and Ted Cruz.

Runtime for the musical, written and directed by former Obama campaign staffer Eli Bauman, is two hours and 15 minutes.

When is ’44: The Musical’ coming to Washington DC?

“44: The Musical” begins its limited run at The Shakespeare Theatre on April 18.

There will be 25 shows, with the last two coming on May 10.

Advertisement

How can you get tickets to the Obama musical in DC?

You can purchase tickets for “44: The Musical” at ShakespeareTheatre.org.

As of April 10, all 25 shows had seating availability.

“The people of D.C. deserve an infusion of joy right now,” Bauman said in a press release. “With all the heaviness going on in our country, ’44’ is here to provide a fun night out — where a room full of strangers can laugh and reminisce about a time when the country felt full of hope, and when the biggest presidential scandal was wearing a tan suit.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending