Connect with us

Washington

In the Ukraine war, a battle for the nation’s mineral and energy wealth

Published

on

In the Ukraine war, a battle for the nation’s mineral and energy wealth


Workers sort coal in a mine in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region, not far from the war’s front line. (Wojciech Grzedzinski for The Washington Post)
Employees type coal in a mine in Ukraine’s jap Donbas area, not removed from the struggle’s entrance line. (Wojciech Grzedzinski for The Washington Submit)

Remark

Lower than 100 miles east, artillery salvos pound Ukrainian defensive positions as Russian forces inch ahead. However under the floor of this sprawling Donbas coalfield, a dwindling quantity of miners are nonetheless working, extracting a gasoline that’s emblematic of one in all Ukraine’s greatest challenges.

The Kremlin is robbing this nation of the constructing blocks of its economic system — its pure assets.

Advertisement

After almost six months of combating, Moscow’s sloppy struggle has yielded a minimum of one large reward: expanded management over a number of the most mineral-rich lands in Europe. Ukraine harbors a number of the world’s largest reserves of titanium and iron ore, fields of untapped lithium, in addition to huge deposits of coal. Collectively, they’re value tens of trillions of {dollars}.

The lion’s share of these coal deposits, which for many years have powered Ukraine’s important metal business, are concentrated within the east, the place Moscow has made essentially the most inroads. That’s put them in Russian fingers, together with vital quantities of different worthwhile power and mineral deposits used for every little thing from plane components to smartphones, in line with an evaluation for The Washington Submit by the Canadian geopolitical danger agency SecDev.

Russia possesses huge quantities of pure assets. However denying Ukraine its personal has strategically undermined the nation’s economic system, forcing Kyiv to import coal to maintain the lights on in cities and cities. Ought to the Kremlin achieve annexing the Ukrainian territory it has seized — as U.S. officers imagine it would attempt to do in coming months — Kyiv would completely lose entry to nearly two-thirds of its deposits.

Ukraine would additionally lose myriad different reserves, together with shops of pure gasoline, oil and uncommon earth minerals important for sure high-tech parts that might hamper Western Europe’s seek for options to imports from Russia and China.

“The worst state of affairs is that Ukraine loses land, now not has a powerful commodity economic system and turns into extra like one of many Baltic states, a nation unable to maintain its industrial economic system,” mentioned Stanislav Zinchenko chief government of GMK, a Kyiv-based financial assume tank. “That is what Russia needs. To weaken us.”

Advertisement

Late final month, 1,200 toes underground within the Donbas area mine, soot-caked employees clawed on the black coal seams with a way of urgency. The coal hewed from the partitions fuels a close-by energy plant, a part of an power grid strained and weakened by the struggle.

“People who left to struggle on the entrance are combating for us down right here,” mentioned Yuri, a 29-year-old excavator operator. “We have to get as a lot coal as we are able to. The nation wants it.”

Ukraine is extensively often called an agricultural powerhouse. However as a raw-material mom lode, it’s house to 117 of the 120 most generally used minerals and metals, and a serious supply of fossil fuels. Official web sites now not present geolocations of those deposits; the federal government, citing nationwide safety, took them down in early spring.

But SecDev’s evaluation signifies that a minimum of $12.4 trillion value of Ukraine’s power deposits, metals and minerals at the moment are below Russian management. That determine accounts for almost half the greenback worth of the two,209 deposits reviewed by the corporate. Along with 63 p.c of the nation’s coal deposits, Moscow has seized 11 p.c of its oil deposits, 20 p.c of its pure gasoline deposits, 42 p.c of its metals and 33 p.c of its deposits of uncommon earth and different important minerals together with lithium.

A few of these deposits are onerous to succeed in or require exploration to evaluate their viability. Some had been overtaken throughout both Moscow’s 2014 annexation of Crimea or the Ukrainian authorities’s eight-year struggle with Russian-backed separatists within the east.

Advertisement

Because the invasion started in February, nonetheless, the Kremlin has steadily expanded its holdings. In line with SecDev and Ukrainian mining and metal business executives, it has seized 41 coal fields, 27 pure gasoline websites, 14 propane websites, 9 oil fields, six iron ore deposits, two titanium ore websites, two zirconium ore websites, one strontium website, one lithium website, one uranium website, one gold deposit and a major quarry of limestone beforehand used for Ukrainian metal manufacturing.

Roman Opimakh, director common of the Ukrainian Geological Survey, mentioned the federal government is nonetheless assessing the struggle’s affect on its mineral assets. However given how a lot of Ukraine’s uncooked supplies are within the east and south, he instructed that the worth of misplaced reserves exceeds the full calculated within the impartial evaluation.

“There’s a unfavorable asset, which we’ve misplaced — assets which we use proper now to help our industrial actions and to generate energy,” he famous. “However there’s one other dimension of minerals of the longer term that are nonetheless below the bottom. Sadly, there’s a danger that the Ukrainian individuals won’t get the advantages of the event of these supplies.”

The majority of the nation’s oil and gasoline reserves stays below its management. However for Western Europe, Russia’s expanded land seize in Ukraine quantities to a tactical set again.

“Russian occupation of Ukrainian territory has direct implications for Western power safety,” mentioned Robert Muggah, SecDev co-founder. “Until the Europeans can quickly diversify oil and gasoline sources, they may stay extremely depending on Russian hydrocarbons.”

Advertisement

The best risk is to Ukraine’s future. In the course of the 2014 Russian invasion, by which Ukraine misplaced roughly 7 p.c of its land mass, important Western funding within the power and mining sector was scared away. The present struggle has had the identical affect.

Polish-Ukrainian funding firm Millstone & Co, for example, struck a 2021 take care of an Australian mining firm for lively exploration at two untouched lithium websites. As soon as the struggle began, the businesses froze these plans, mentioned Millstone managing accomplice Mykhailo Zhernov.

One website — a deposit at the moment lined by farmland — now could be so near the entrance traces that Zhernov stays unsure whether or not it’s below Ukrainian or Russian management. Preliminary plans to construct a lithium battery manufacturing facility there have additionally been shelved.

Analysts say licenses for different mineral deposits bought by the Ukrainian authorities final 12 months at the moment are buying and selling at deep reductions as traders query the viability of extraction.

“Day by day, Ukrainians are dropping their economic system,” Zhernov mentioned. “I do know many traders who began geology analysis, however they’ve stopped as a result of [of the war]. Every little thing, it’s a guess now.”

Advertisement

The blow to Ukraine is way worse as a result of Russian seizure of key Ukrainian ports and a broad blockade of the Black Sea. Some analysts see the misplaced sea transit routes as extra vital than the misplaced mineral reservesnotably coal, regardless of its present worth — as different international locations change to greener power.

“Uncooked supplies like coal aren’t the longer term, they’re the previous,” mentioned Anders Aslund, an economist who has lengthy studied Ukraine. “It’s extra about whether or not Ukraine loses its ports, which I don’t assume they may. If they didn’t have these ports, they would want to construct a very new infrastructure for exports.

Coal is by far essentially the most considerable of the deposits in Russian-controlled components of Ukraine. The roughly 30 billion tons of onerous coal deposits there have an estimated industrial worth of $11.9 trillion, SecDev estimates. In addition they have symbolic worth as a storied power supply, with the regional metropolises of Donetsk and Luhansk being constructed on the backs of coal miners and steelworkers.

The poisonous mixture of a lack of uncooked supplies plus broken, destroyed or seized infrastructure has huge implications for a core business like metal, which till the struggle sustained 4 million Ukrainians. Two giant factories had been destroyed or overrun within the siege of Mariupol. Different factories have lowered manufacturing and face a bunch of challenges.

Throughout the nation, lots of the Soviet-era metal vegetation nonetheless run on coal. However the nation’s losses to Russian-backed separatists within the east between 2014 and 2017 compelled Kyiv to start importing vital quantities of coal, each for these vegetation and thermal energy vegetation. In 2021, imports amounted to nearly 40 p.c of Ukraine’s coal consumption.

Advertisement

Together with coal mines, Russia has lately seized a major limestone deposit used for metal manufacturing. The affect of that has been minimized as a result of Ukrainian metal manufacturing has dropped a lot due to the struggle — 60 p.c to 70 p.c — that factories have been capable of make do with lower-quality limestone deposits within the west. However Yuriy Ryzhenkov, chief government of the Ukrainian metal and mining large Metinvest, warned that ramping again as much as regular ranges will imply “we should import it.”

For the miners burrowing in what’s left of the coal-rich tunnels in jap Ukraine, extracting reserves has develop into an act of patriotism. The Submit was granted entry to a mine there on the situation that its precise location not be revealed and the complete names of staff be withheld for safety causes. The power agency that owns the coalfield, DTEK Corp., additionally cited wartime restrictions on publishing particulars on strategic infrastructure.

The miners spent a current morning of digging scattered all through 40 miles of passages. Russian missiles have struck close by communities, and may the cities between the mine and the entrance traces fall, there may be little to separate the Russian troops from these employees.

Dmytro, a third-generation miner, led a crew of 157 earlier than the struggle. A 3rd of them have since enlisted as troopers.

“We have now to cease the occupiers from reaching us,” he mentioned. “The Russians don’t simply steal our assets. They destroy every little thing of their path.”

Advertisement

Additional east, the onslaught unleashed by the invading military has laid waste to Ukraine’s Donbas area, razing complete cities to the bottom. 1000’s of mine staff fled.

Because it seeks to reactivate the economies in seized territories, Russia might attempt to restart some mining and metal manufacturing — because it has appeared to do in one of many two main metal vegetation in captured Mariupol. It’s prone to face vital logistical hurdles, although, together with a scarcity of entry to earlier consumers. Whereas seizure of reserves might assist obtain a struggle objective — to weaken pro-Western Ukraine — few predict Russia might be keen or capable of make the large-scale investments required to extract the minerals.

These assumptions are primarily based partially on what Russia did with mines captured in 2014. Inside a 12 months or so, manufacturing was broadly curtailed, largely as a result of Ukraine refused to purchase coal from the occupied territories, and since Russia has its personal considerable reserves. Moscow has additionally sought to flood some captured coal mines to render them ineffective ought to Ukraine regain misplaced territory.

DTEK chief government Maxim Timchenko doesn’t assume the Russians actually need these uncooked supplies. “They’re simply making an attempt to destroy our economic system,” he mentioned.

However such losses, if everlasting, would compel what’s left of Ukraine to realign its economic system. The attainable upside: a modernization that might make its dated metal vegetation extra environment friendly and greener. Early estimates recommend the worth tag for rebuilding the broader economic system vary upward of $750 billion.

Advertisement

Some financial consultants recommend the struggle’s longer-term affect may very well be blunted even when Ukraine had been to cede vital land, so long as it had been to totally embrace the know-how and repair sectors that helped gasoline progress lately and broaden its pursuit of other energies.

Nonetheless, it could face an enormous process. Ukraine’s more moderen try to modernize its power grid has been upended by struggle. Nearly half its renewable energies vegetation — together with 89 p.c of its wind farms — are situated in seized territory or battle zones. Greater than half of its wind farms are shut down.

Any rebuilding effort with large-scale overseas funding would additionally most likely require a real finish to the combating — versus one other protracted however contained battle with Russia, as was seen in 2014.

“Not solely will Ukraine have misplaced a whole lot of its territory and its assets, however it could be consistently susceptible to a different onslaught by Russia,” mentioned Jacob Kirkegaard, a fellow on the Washington-based Peterson Institute for Worldwide Economics. “Nobody of their proper thoughts, a non-public firm, would put money into the remainder of Ukraine if this had been to develop into a frozen battle.”

Anastacia Galouchka contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Washington Nationals Agree to Terms With Former All-Star Reliever

Published

on

Washington Nationals Agree to Terms With Former All-Star Reliever


The Washington Nationals have continued to invest into the pitching staff with another free agency move on Saturday.

Shared on social media, the Nationals announced that they had agreed to terms with relief pitcher Jorge Lopez on a one-year contract. That deal will be worth $3 million plus incentives per Jon Heyman.

This is the third pitcher that Washington has signed this offseason, with Michael Soroka brought in as a free agent and Trevor Williams receiving a new deal to say.

They also added another reliever, Evan Reifert, as a Rule 5 draft pick from the Tampa Bay Rays.

Advertisement

Lopez made headlines last year with his infamous exit from the New York Mets. He caused a stir after a loss when he referred to himself as ‘the worst teammate on the worst team in baseball.’

For a lot of players, that might spell an end to the season. The fastball-heavy reliever was able to bounce back. He was released and then signed a minor league contract with the Chicago Cubs.

The 31-year-old came back from controversy as strong as ever, posting a 2.03 ERA over the final 26.2 innings of work.

With the loss of Kyle Finnegan, Lopez makes sense as a potential replacement at closer. He does have some closing experience, but has not been his main role for much of his career.

That season, 2022, was the year he made his first and only All-Star team.

Advertisement

He is a ground ball machine that loves to force bad contact. Keeping him in a situational role could also be a smart idea, given that he struggles against lefties.

No matter how he is used, this is another good signal that the Nationals don’t want to throw any season away.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?

Published

on

Michigan basketball vs. Washington prediction: Can U-M stay undefeated in Big Ten?


play

For Michigan basketball, the recent West Coast trip went about as well as hoped.

The No. 24 Wolverines (12-3, 4-0 Big Ten) picked up a pair of double-digit wins against the Big Ten’s Los Angeles-based teams — topping USC, 85-74, last Saturday and then defeating No. 21 UCLA, 94-75, Tuesday night as wildfires raged a few miles away — and now return home looking to make it three consecutive wins against league newcomers, welcoming Washington (10-6, 1-4) to Ann Arbor on Sunday afternoon (2 p.m., Big Ten Network).

Advertisement

The Huskies’ first trip to the Midwest hasn’t started well; they were dog-walked by Michigan State in East Lansing, 88-54, on Thursday. U-W trailed by 29 points at the half (42-13) and by more than 40 points in the second half (82-41 with less than five minutes to play) in an utter annihilation.

After two tight wins in conference play — by three points over Wisconsin and two over Iowa — U-M has won four games in a row by double digits and could make it five straight, with one of the bottom teams in the Big Ten coming to town.

Advertisement

Great Osobor with not-so-great help

U-Dub forward Great Osobor made headlines this offseason when he transferred from Utah State to Washington (following head coach Danny Sprinkle) for a then-record NIL deal worth $2 million.

Apparently, money doesn’t buy wins, because while Osobor has been decent, it hasn’t been nearly enough for the Huskies.

The senior leads the Huskies in scoring (13.8 points per game) and rebounding (8.4) but his efficiency has taken a large drop, as he has shot just 45% from the floor on 3s after hitting at least 57.7% in each of his first three college seasons. Some of that might be attributable to his increased 3-point tries — after attempting just 18 3s (and making four, for a 22.2% success rate) in his first 104 games, he has 14 3-point tries in 16 games this season (with only two makes, a 15.3% rate). More concerning is his 2-point shooting percentage: After hitting 59.1% last season, he’s at 47.7% inside the arc this season.

Advertisement

He has scored in double figures in 11 games with the Huskies, though much of his success came in a weak nonconference schedule. Though he put up 20 points and 14 rebounds vs. Maryland, he had just nine points and three boards vs. USC and a combined 15 points and eight rebounds vs. Illinois and MSU.

Sophomore guard Tyler Harris (Portland) is next at 12.3 points and 5.3 rebounds per game while freshman point guard Zoom Diallo, a top-50 recruit according to 247 Sports’ composite rankings, averages 10.8 points per contest for Sprinkle’s team.

Overall, U-Dub is simply not up to Big Ten standard. On defense, the Huskies are No. 7 nationally in limiting 3-pointers (28%) and No. 69 in efficiency (99.9), per KenPom, but on offense, the Huskies are No. 149 in efficiency (107.4), No. 201 in 2-point shooting (50.1%) and No. 240 on 3s (32%).

Advertisement

Depth on display

The Wolverines, meanwhile, continue to flex their depth and balance with each passing game.

Michigan just defeated UCLA by 19 on the road and did so by scoring 94 points (the most a Mick Cronin team has ever allowed at home) without perhaps its most proven guard: Roddy Gayle Jr. (knee bruise) missed Tuesday’s game vs. the Bruins. U-M coach Dusty May said then it was too early to say if he’d play Sunday.

“Long-term health is priority No. 1 for us,” May said. “But I would say he’ll be back relatively soon.”

Gayle is one of five U-M players scoring in double figures for May in his first season in Ann Arbor. After putting up a career-high 36 points vs. the Bruins, center Vlad Goldin now leads the Wolverines at 15.8 points per game. Point guard Tre Donaldson (13.1 points) is next while Danny Wolf, Goldin’s frontcourt partner, averages a double-double at 12.5 points and 10.2 rebounds per game.

All three had standout games on the trip; Wolf started the L.A. double-dip becoming just the third NCAA player in more than 20 years with at least 20 points, 10 rebounds, seven assists and six blocks, and Donaldson made a career-high four 3-pointers vs. USC, then topped it with six vs. UCLA.

Advertisement

And then there’s Gayle (12.4 points) and Nimari Burnett (10.5 points), who are both shooting better than 50% from the floor. Every starter has led the team in scoring at least once this season, a major reason U-M leads the country in 2-point shooting (62%) and effective field goal percentage (60.2%).

“I mean numbers don’t lie,” Donaldson said. “We’re shooting over 60% inside the arc, I mean just continuing to do that. We got big guys out here … with Danny doing what he does in and out. It’s hard to guard. Nobody’s seen nothing like that before.”

Tony Garcia is the Michigan Wolverines beat writer for the Detroit Free Press. Email him at apgarcia@freepress.com and follow him on X at @RealTonyGarcia.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard

Published

on

Six lawmakers to watch in Washington’s 2025 session • Washington State Standard


Washington’s citizen legislature kicks off its 2025 session Monday in Olympia. 

Lawmakers will have 105 days to make multi-billion dollar shortfalls disappear from state operations and transportation budgets. They’ll wrangle over policies for capping rent hikes, purchasing guns, providing child care, teaching students, and much, much more. With many new faces, they’ll spend a lot of time getting to know one another as well.

Here are six lawmakers and one statewide executive to keep an eye on when the action begins.

Sen. Jamie Pedersen, Democrat, of Seattle 

This is Pedersen’s first session leading the Senate Democrats. He takes over for the longtime majority leader Andy Billig, of Spokane, who retired last year. Pedersen represents one of the most progressive areas in the state, including Seattle’s Capitol Hill, which could indicate a shift in where his caucus is going politically. His new gig won’t be easy as he navigates the needs of 30 Democrats, seeks compromises with his 19 Republican colleagues, and deals with a gaping $12 billion budget hole. He takes the position after years as the majority floor leader, where he was well known for his efficiency, organization and Nordic sweaters.

Advertisement

Rep. Travis Couture, Republican, of Allyn 

As the lead Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, Couture will be the point person for his caucus as it looks to block tax bills and push the Legislature to tamp down state spending. This is a new responsibility for him. It will test his mettle to work with Democratic budget writers in both chambers while simultaneously carrying out his role as a vocal critic of Democratic initiatives his caucus opposes most strongly. For Couture, a conservative who some say can at times “sound like a Democrat” it might not be as difficult as it seems.

Sen. Noel Frame, Democrat, of Seattle

Frame stumbled into the spotlight last month after mistakenly sending an email to all senators — instead of just fellow Democrats — outlining ideas for new taxes. Those include taxing wealthy individuals and large businesses — proposals that are getting traction with her progressive colleagues. She also mentioned an excise tax on guns and ammunition sales, a lift of the 1% cap on annual property tax increases and a sales tax on self-storage unit rentals. Frame takes on a new role this year as vice chair of finance on the Senate Ways and Means Committee, giving her power to explore new revenue ideas and making her a central player in talks about how to solve the budget shortfall.

Sen. Matt Boehnke, Republican, of Kennewick

Boehnke, the top Republican on the Senate Energy, Environment and Technology Committee, is out to retool climate change laws passed by Democrats and outgoing Gov. Jay Inslee. He wants, for example, to repeal a law requiring Washington to adopt California’s tough vehicle emission standards for trucks. And he wants to cut the governor out of decision-making on major clean energy projects. Inslee stirred controversy when his actions led to approval of the state’s largest-ever wind farm, near the Tri-Cities, despite concerns from the community where it will be built. That community happens to be in Boehnke’s home county.

Rep. Emily Alvarado, Democrat, of Seattle

Alvarado will be a key lawmaker leading the charge to pass a cap on rent hikes. This was one of the more controversial bills to fail last year, passing the House but failing twice in the Senate. After the bill died, Alvarado said “momentum is building, and next year, I believe we will pass this bill.” She may have more success this time around, especially if she makes her way over to the Senate to fill Sen. Joe Nguyen’s vacancy (Nguyen is leaving to lead the state Department of Commerce. The appointment process for his seat is still ongoing). Democratic leadership said the rent proposal is a priority for their caucuses, and Pedersen said he believes the idea has more support in his chamber this year. But Alvarado still has her work cut out. The bill, which would cap yearly rent increases at 7% for existing renters, is sure to draw fire from powerful real estate groups and Republicans, who warn that capping rents could undercut the construction of new housing and end up hurting renters.

Rep. Jim Walsh, Republican, of Aberdeen 

Walsh made The Standard’s list of lawmakers to watch in 2024 because he was a legislator, the chair of the Washington State Republican Party and author of six initiatives, half of which are now law. He makes the cut again because he still wears two political hats giving him two separate pulpits to convey the Republican message. While he’s not pushing any ballot measures, yet, he did launch the state party’s “Project to Resist Tyranny in Washington” as a vehicle for opposing incoming Democratic governor Bob Ferguson.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending