Connect with us

Utah

Utah voters, here is what you need to know about Amendment C on your ballot

Published

on

Utah voters, here is what you need to know about Amendment C on your ballot


Utah voters will have to make choices this fall. And one of them will be their decision on Amendment C.

What is Amendment C?

Amendment C is a ballot measure that would change the Utah Constitution to ensure the county sheriff remains an elected position, according to the lieutenant governor’s office. Utah counties already elect their sheriffs per state statute, but the amendment would protect the election of county sheriffs under the Utah Constitution.

When would it take effect?

If the amendment passes, the change would take hold Jan. 1, 2025.

How did it come about?

Then-Utah House Speaker Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, and Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, introduced the proposed amendment in 2023. After its passage through the state Legislature, the amendment had to be voted on during the 2024 general election.

Advertisement

Who wants it and why?

When the bill was seen on the House floor, Wilson said it would protect the election of sheriffs “in perpetuity.”

“I personally believe, and know, it’s nice to vote for my sheriff,” Wilson said. He noted that Pennsylvania and New Jersey established the election of county sheriffs in 1776 — and the vast majority of the country’s 3,000 sheriffs are still elected.

Rep. Carl Albrecht, R-Bicknell, added that the amendment would cement the sheriff’s authority as the supreme law enforcement officers across the state.

“We have BLM [Bureau of Land Management], Forest Service, park service — and those folks have law enforcement for their specific jurisdiction,” Albrecht said. “It’s my belief that this will protect our sheriffs under the constitution of the state of Utah as the premier law enforcement officer in our counties. It’s very important — the folks that represent those other entities are not elected by the people.”

The amendment passed the state Legislature with 72 votes in the House and 26 in the Senate. Neither chamber had votes against the amendment, but each logged three absent votes.

Advertisement

Jim Winder, former Salt Lake County sheriff and former Moab police chief, noted the amendment’s success in the Legislature — and said he believes “it’s going to pass significantly” with voters.

However, Winder questioned the Legislature’s urgency with this measure. “I haven’t seen a risk of them being unelected,” Winder said. “Is there a need for this?”

Winder, who now is retired and working as a consultant for public safety agencies and employee groups, said “it seems we’re more and more finding the need to put things in a constitution. … I don’t know why statutory modifications are no longer seen as effective, but they apparently are not.”

Amendment C does not appear to be part of any national push for new constitutional changes affecting sheriffs. Utah is the only state with a ballot measure this cycle dealing with the election of sheriffs, according to the website Ballotpedia. The website reported one similar measure in 2022, in Kansas, where voters approved an amendment to that state’s constitution to require counties to elect sheriffs (with the exception of one county that had already abolished the position).

How do sheriffs feel about the amendment?

Utah County Sheriff Mike Smith, a Republican who also serves as president of the Utah Sheriffs’ Association, said during a 2023 hearing on the amendment that the change has been of “great importance” to the state’s sheriffs for many years.

Advertisement

“Especially in the turmoil that we see in our world today,” Smith said, “it is such an important thing to have an individual that is elected by the people and for the people as the only law enforcement position in the nation that is elected in that fashion to be able to represent them.”

Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera, a Democrat, also added her support to the amendment during the 2023 hearing.

“It’s very important that the people get to choose who their law enforcement leader is in their county,” Rivera said. “This gives them the better opportunity to look into who their sheriff is, who is representing them as a people.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah man dies of injuries sustained in avalanche in Big Cottonwood Canyon

Published

on

Utah man dies of injuries sustained in avalanche in Big Cottonwood Canyon


A man died after he was caught in an avalanche in Big Cottonwood Canyon over the weekend.

A spokesperson for the Salt Lake County Sheriff’s Office confirmed on Thursday that Kevin Williams, 57, had died.

He, along with one other person, was hospitalized in critical condition after Saturday’s avalanche in the backcountry.

MORE | Big Cottonwood Canyon Avalanche

In an interview with 2News earlier this week, one of Williams’ close friends, Nate Burbidge, described him as a loving family man.

Advertisement

“Kevin’s an amazing guy. He’s always serving, looking for ways that he can connect with others,” Burbidge said.

A GoFundMe was set up to help support Williams’ family.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

_____

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

911 recordings detail hours leading up to discovery of Utah girl, mother dead in Las Vegas

Published

on

911 recordings detail hours leading up to discovery of Utah girl, mother dead in Las Vegas


CONTENT WARNING: This report discusses suicide and includes descriptions of audio from 911 calls that some viewers may find disturbing.

LAS VEGAS — Exclusively obtained 911 recordings detail the hours leading up to the discovery of an 11-year-old Utah girl and her mother dead inside a Las Vegas hotel room in an apparent murder-suicide.

Addi Smith and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, lived in West Jordan and had traveled to Nevada for the JAMZ cheerleading competition.

The calls show a growing sense of urgency from family members and coaches, and several hours passing before relatives learned what happened.

Advertisement

MORE | Murder-Suicide

Below is a timeline of the key moments, according to dispatch records. All times are Pacific Time.

10:33 a.m. — Call 1

After Addi and her mother failed to appear at the cheerleading competition, Addi’s father and stepmother called dispatch for a welfare check.

Addi and her mother were staying at the Rio hotel. The father told dispatch that hotel security had already attempted contact.

“Security went up and knocked on the door. There’s no answer or response it doesn’t look like they checked out or anything…”

11:18 a.m. and 11:27 a.m. — Calls 2 and 3

As concern grew, Addi’s coach contacted the police two times within minutes.

Advertisement

“We think the child possibly is in imminent danger…”

11:26 a.m. — Call 4

Addi’s stepmother placed another call to dispatch, expressing escalating concern.

“We are extremely concerned we believe that something might have seriously happened.”

She said that Tawnia’s car was still at the hotel.

Police indicated officers were on the way.

Advertisement

2:26 p.m. — Call 5

Nearly three hours after the initial welfare check request, fire personnel were en route to the scene. It appeared they had been in contact with hotel security.

Fire told police that they were responding to a possible suicide.

“They found a note on the door.”

2:35 p.m. — Call 6

Emergency medical personnel at the scene told police they had located two victims.

“It’s going to be gunshot wound to the head for both patients with notes”

Advertisement

A dispatcher responded:

“Oh my goodness that’s not okay.”

2:36 p.m. — Call 7

Moments later, fire personnel relayed their assessment to law enforcement:

“It’s going to be a murder suicide, a juvenile and a mother.”

2:39 p.m. — Call 8

Unaware of what had been discovered, Addi’s father called dispatch again.

Advertisement

“I’m trying to file a missing persons report for my daughter.”

He repeats the details he knows for the second time.

3:13 p.m. — Call 9

Father and stepmother call again seeking information and continue to press for answers.

“We just need some information. There was a room check done around 3:00 we really don’t know where to start with all of this Can we have them call us back immediately?”

Dispatch responded:

Advertisement

“As soon as there’s a free officer, we’ll have them reach out to you.”

4:05 p.m. — Call 10

More than an hour later, Addi’s father was put in contact with the police on the scene. He pleaded for immediate action.

“I need someone there I need someone there looking in that room”

The officer confirmed that they had officers currently in the room.

Addi’s father asks again what they found, if Addi and her mother are there, and if their things were missing.

Advertisement

The officer, who was not on scene, said he had received limited information.

5:23 p.m. — Call 11

Nearly seven hours after the first welfare check request, Addi’s grandmother contacted police, describing conflicting information circulating within the family.

“Some people are telling us that they were able to get in, and they were not in the hotel room, and other people saying they were not able to get in the hotel room, and we need to know”

She repeated the details of the case. Dispatch said officers will call her back once they have more information.

Around 8:00 p.m. — Press Conference

Later that evening, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police held a news conference confirming that Addi and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, were found dead inside the hotel room.

Advertisement

The investigation remains ongoing.

______



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Ban on AI glasses in Utah classrooms inches closer to passing

Published

on

Ban on AI glasses in Utah classrooms inches closer to passing


AI glasses could allow you to get answers, snap photos, access audio and take phone calls—and now a proposal moving through the legislature would ban the glasses from Utah school classrooms.

“I think it’s a great idea,” said Kizzy Guyton Murphy, a mother who accompanied her child’s class on a field trip to the state Capitol on Wednesday. “You can’t see inside what the student is looking at, and it’s just grounds for cheating.”

Mom Tristan Davies Seamons also sees trouble with AI glasses.

“I don’t think they should have any more technology in schools than they currently have,” she said.

Advertisement

Her twin daughters, fourth graders Finley and Grayson, don’t have cell phones yet.

“Not until we’re like 14,” said Grayson, adding they do have Chromebooks in school.

2News sent questions to the Utah State Board of Education:

  • Does it have reports of students using AI glasses?
  • Does it see cheating and privacy as major concerns?
  • Does it support a ban from classrooms?

Matt Winters, USBE AI specialist, said the board has not received reports from school districts of students with AI glasses.

“Local Education Agencies (school districts) have local control over these decisions based on current law and code,” said Winters. “The Board has not taken a position on AI glasses.

MORE | Utah State Legislature:

Some districts across the country have reportedly put restrictions on the glasses in schools.

Advertisement

“I think it should be up to the teachers,” said Briauna Later, another mother who is all for preventing cheating, but senses a ban could leave administrators with tired eyes.

“It’s one more thing for the administration to have to keep track of,” said Later.

The proposal, HB 42, passed the House and cleared a Senate committee on Wednesday.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

___



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending