CORVALLIS — Never quite able to pull far enough away for comfort despite a 22-point lead in the first half Saturday, Oregon State men’s basketball beat Southern Utah 81-70 at Gill Coliseum.

The Beavers (5-5) were led by Dez White with 20 points and Johan Munch with 16.

The Thunderbirds (4-7) were the worst team OSU has faced this season in terms of NET ranking at No. 343.

“That’s as good as we’ve seen them play on tape this year,” OSU coach Wayne Tinkle said of Southern Utah. “They did a lot of really good things, played their tails off, caused us some frustration. We did a lot of really good things in spurts, but it wasn’t as good of a 40-minute effort as we need.”

The win was Oregon State’s second straight, coming on the heels of a five-game losing streak.

White was red-hot from the start, hitting his first three attempts to give OSU a 13-6 lead. He had 16 points in the first half alone.

Noah Amenhauser came in at center and forced his will, scoring two straight baskets to make it 17-6 Beavers.

Turnovers and poor transition defense hurt OSU as the first half progressed, though, and Southern Utah rattled off a 6-0 run to cut the OSU lead to 20-16.

“We didn’t keep the ball in front of us,” Tinkle said. “They got downhill, got to the paint at will. In our zone, we didn’t have enough communication or urgency to match. And when we don’t communicate and see our area and the ball, we have breakdowns. They still got to the rim against zone a couple of times and we lost shooters.”

But as the Beavers picked up the pace, they blew the game wide open.

Ja’Quavis Williford — playing his third game since returning from injury — hit two quick buckets to make it 25-16 Beavers. OSU would extend that to 45-23 at one point, fueled by transition play and White’s confident scoring at all three levels.

OSU is dealing with both injuries and illness for key players: Yaak Yaak is still reconditioning after being out for the entire Paradise Jam tournament; Matija Samar is close to being back from a sprained MCL, and the Beavers are hoping to have him next week; and Keziah Ekissi is recovering from an illness that has kept him sidelined.

The Thunderbirds finished the half strong, going on a 7-0 run to cut it to 45-30 at the break.

While OSU came out in the second half sluggish in the early going, Munch powered to the basket on three straight possessions to get the lead up to 55-38 with 13:45 to go.

OSU kept the lead around 12-14 as the second half rolled along, but Tinkle’s frustration was evident throughout the game — primarily in response to defensive breakdowns leading to easy baskets for the Thunderbirds.

OSU led 65-51 at the 9:40 mark. Southern Utah got as close as 68-59 with just under seven minutes to go.

The Beavers picked up the defensive effort down the stretch, including a Munch block. OSU was able to pull out a double-digit victory in the end, but late turnovers and a lack of urgency on offense from the Beavers almost made it interesting as Southern Utah hit its open outside shots.

“We are a long ways off,” Tinkle said. “Defensively, we play stretches of really good defense, but we’ve got to do a good job for 40. Offensively, I think we’re getting more comfortable these last couple games in understanding how important it is to get turns of the ball and not go 1-on-1.

“When we go 1-on-1, that’s when we turn it over, take bad shots, and shoot a poor percentage. And we carry that frustration over to the defensive end.”

Next game: Oregon State (5-5) vs. Montana State (4-5)

• When: Saturday, Dec. 13
• Time: 2:00 pm PT
• Where: Gill Coliseum, Corvallis
• Stream: ESPN+

I grow more and more angry as I go over our budget with a fine-toothed comb, trimming where I can, negotiating our non-negotiables and obsessively checking every line item.

I woke just after 3 a.m. unable to breathe and with a chest cramp that, for me, signals only one thing — a panic attack. It took a few minutes to catch up to what my panic had already figured out and, when it did, an unsettling dread joined the chest cramp and I began to sort the facts.

The night previous we had our annual meeting with an insurance broker to go over our choices for our 2026 healthcare. The news? Bleak. Out of two options, we picked the one that would cover doctors actually in our town instead of the cheaper alternative that would only cover five random doctors but no hospitals or tests. Our first payment, triple the cost from what we are paying now, is due sometime within the next month, just after our last payment for our current plan.

My husband started his business nearly 20 years ago. At that time, I was worried about not qualifying for private insurance due to pre-existing conditions I had sustained surrounding the birth of our son while my husband was serving in the military. Obamacare was on the horizon and, when it passed in 2010, it finally ended expensive coverage for me.

After our broker meeting, I was curious how much our healthcare premiums had changed. From 2009 until 2019, I only have insurance totals from all of our various insurances (health, car, home, work, etc.), but in those early years we were saving around $850 a month to cover it all. I wish I knew what specific portion of that was medical, especially in those couple of years before the Affordable Care Act passed.

Saving of all insurances lumped together topped out at $1,400 a month in 2018. Starting in 2019, we were paying $950 a month for medical insurance, $990 in 2020, $1,020 in 2021, $1,075 in 2022 and $1,270 a month in 2023. In 2024, we finally qualified for a little relief in the form of subsidies and our bill went down to $800 a month instead of the $1,800 it would have been. In 2025, we paid $860 a month.

Being self-employed, you cobble together whatever system works for you to put money aside for months that are a little lean while making sure you keep out money for taxes and medical costs and retirement and life. But there is absolutely no system for any working person that gives the ability to pay a bill that is three times higher from one month to the next.

The “cheaper” option which covered nothing and which we ultimately turned down? $2,100 a month.

The option in which we can stay in our town and not head at least an hour away any time we need medical care? $2,400 a month.

In mid October, I tried to contact my members of Congress, urging them to work on extending health care subsidies while reopening the government. I gave them our personal story, trying to show them the damage to small businesses if they did not. I asked them to do this in tandem with opening the government and working toward more permanent solutions to solve the cost of medical care in this country. It was nearly a week before I heard anything at all.

I am aware of Mike Lee’s reputation for not answering constituents and was therefore not at all surprised when it proved true. Blake Moore, my representative, finally reached out — but he ignored my situation completely. John Curtis also ignored my situation. He did say this, however: “On September 30th, I voted to keep the federal government open and to prevent unnecessary harm to hardworking, taxpaying families in Utah and across America. Sadly, the measure failed…and once again Washington’s dysfunction has forced a shutdown. Utahns know the simple truth: you prepare, you live within your means, and you finish the job.”

I was confused at how, exactly, we are supposed to “prepare” in this situation. I grow more and more angry as I go over our budget with a fine-toothed comb, trimming where I can, negotiating our non-negotiables and obsessively checking every line item to plug holes, bandage hemorrhages and wonder why we are the ones constantly admonished to be smart with our money, to suffer the sins from those in power.

I am completely aware that we fall into a small box of people who will be able to keep coverage, despite the price tag. My heart hurts for the ones that cannot. It is estimated that between 4 and 7 million people will lose their health care coverage as the subsidies expire. And while we are not in that category this time, I worry about how many more years until we are.

This is not sustainable, and it feels like there is no one coming to help.

Tawnya Gibson is a freelance writer living in northern Utah. Her work has appeared in TODAY online, Newsweek, Zibby Mag, Under The Gum Tree, Sky Island Journal and Blue Mountain Review (among others) and she was a longtime contributor to Utah Public Radio.

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.

SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah Legislature’s attempt to restore the state’s Congressional maps to how they were in 2021 has been denied.

In her ruling Friday, Judge Dianna Gibson turned down the request by the Republican leadership in the Legislature that demanded a stay of the new redistricting map that was chosen last month.

Gibson ruled that the request was “procedurally improper and fails to comply with Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.” The judge also rejected the Legislature’s claims that political leaders opposed to the new map had no opportunity to appeal the decision, saying it was their choice not to file an appeal.

Utahns on both political sides hope new redistricting map sets example for nation:

Utahns on both political sides hope new redistricting map sets example for nation

Later in the ruling, Gibson wrote the request to stay the new map “merely repeats previously rejected arguments without any attempt to address the Court’s legal analysis and identify any specific error.”

Gibson also shot down the opinion of the Legislature’s Republican majority that the court didn’t have the authority to choose the map, especially after they had agreed to the process in which it was to be chosen.

Finally, the judge added that the Map C, a version proposed by the Republican majority Legislature, was “extreme partisan gerrymander,” as it favored one party over another, and violated Proposition 4.