EAGLE MOUNTAIN, Utah (KUTV) — The Utah Department of Transportation has planned a major groundbreaking for what it calls the first east-west expressway corridor in Utah County.

The plan is to build a six-lane freeway to connect I-15 and Mountainview Corridor, with three lanes in each direction and making 2100 N a frontage road on both sides.

“You almost hate to see it grow, but when it does grow, you like to see reasonable solutions for people’s problems,” said Michael Crofts, resident of Lehi.

MORE | UDOT Projects

Drivers in northern Utah County are no strangers to the 2100 N congestion come rush hour.

“‘Cause one of the big things is that not a lot of jobs are out in Saratoga and Eagle Mountain,” Crofts said. “They’re out here in the East and this part of the valley or North and there does need to be a better way for people to get around.”

To ease traffic flow in the area, UDOT is planning to put the new expressway in the patch of grass between where 2100 N runs now.

“This is one of our biggest projects this year,” said John Gleason, public relations director for UDOT.

It’s about a three-mile segment and will cost roughly $621 million dollars. It will include two bridges—at 3600 W and 2300 W—and have freeway-to-freeway interchanges, so traffic won’t have to stop.

“Right now, there’s not a lot of great options East-West out there; and so by building this freeway, you’re going to improve not only the East-West connection, but you’re going to alleviate some of the traffic on the North-South roads there as well,” Gleason said.

2100 N will stay open during construction, according to UDOT.

“Any short-term issues that you have with construction, we’re hoping that that payoff is going to be great things for everybody that lives and works out in the area,” Gleason said.

“It’s kind of a bittersweet thing because it does feel almost overcrowded, but at the same time it’s one of those, well, but if we build better infrastructure, will it feel less crowded?” Crofts said. “But the bitter part is that they’re like, oh, our little tight-knit community is suddenly grown into a city.”

The groundbreaking is scheduled for March 18th, and UDOT estimates they’ll be building the expressway through late 2028.

_______

SALT LAKE CITY — Measures to turn swaths of public land over to local entities were met with widespread opposition last year, but a Utah legislative committee agrees it could yield good things.

Outdoor recreation groups and others say they’re concerned it could be a slippery slope leading to the loss of public land.

Members of the House Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee voted unanimously on Monday to favorably recommend HCR14, which urges Congress to allow “limited use of unreserved lands near existing communities and infrastructure for moderate income housing.”

Unlike Utah’s effort to secure 18.5 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land or Utah Sen. Mike Lee’s push to include the sale of 0.5% to 0.75% of public lands in Utah and 10 other Western states in a federal budget bill, each of which failed last year, HCR14 supports a “much smaller ask” and a particular type of federal land, said Rep. Raymond Ward, R-Bountiful, the resolution’s sponsor.

The idea was sparked by a conversation with Santa Clara leaders, who are dealing with southwest Utah’s population growth near federal land, but it’s a challenge that many other Utah communities face, he and members of the committee added. That’s contributed to some of the state’s housing affordability and other challenges.

“At least some portion of this difficulty is that land is a lot more expensive than it used to be,” he said. “You can’t make any more land, but there is some land that is right close by us, but because of the way it is designated federally, it is not available to be used for housing.”

Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner announced last year that they formed a joint task force to explore using “underutilized federal land” for housing to increase supply and potentially lower costs. Utah’s resolution, if passed, offers federal leaders “one more thing in their hand that they can use as a tool” when they have these types of land policy discussions in Washington, Ward said.

However, efforts to tinker with public land have been unpopular across all spectrums thus far, especially among those who recreate outdoors. Brett Stewart, president of the Utah OHV Advocates, asked if there are ways to trade state and private land in exchange for public land, so that the public doesn’t lose access to the land.

“Once you start doing this, you start handing it off … it’s going to do the domino effect,” he said. “It’s going to get easier and easier and easier, and now we’ve got that reputation that we’re selling off our public lands, which we’ll never, ever be able to touch again once it’s privatized.”

Housing is an important issue, but there’s a “huge lack of trust” following last year’s effort to sell land off land, said Kael Weston, of Salt Lake County.

Members of the committee agreed that it’s a complicated issue, which could require tighter language in the final resolution to avoid confusion, said House Majority Leader Casey Snider, R-Paradise.

“I think the intent is appropriate. I’d like to see it move forward, but I’m wondering if we could just have a conversation,” he said.

Ward acknowledged that it could be nice to clear up any concerns to reassure the public that the resolution isn’t seeking “a lot of other lands” that should remain in the public’s hands.

Others on the committee said land swaps and other types of agreements can be beneficial for both sides of the conversation. They can produce “win-wins” that support conservation and housing development needs, added Rep. Doug Owens, D-Millcreek.

“I think it’s a great resolution. It’s not in the far distant past where this used to happen more,” he said.

The resolution now heads to the House floor for a wider vote.

SALT LAKE CITY — State leaders announced a partnership with the petroleum industry that they said will increase fuel supply, lower gas prices and resolve an ongoing feud with Idaho.

The announcement comes after weeks of tension between Utah and Idaho leaders over a plan floated by Utah lawmakers to tax fuel exports. Officials in Idaho said that could have raised gas prices there.

Instead of taxing exports, the Legislature plans to cut the state gas tax by 15% while working with the oil and gas industry to increase the supply of fuel at Utah’s refineries, House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, announced Monday.

“If you want lower prices, you have to increase supply. It’s that simple,” Schultz said. “This agreement will bring in nearly 800,000 additional gallons of fuel into the market every single day, boosting competition and putting real downward pressure on prices at the pump.”

At the same time, leaders in Idaho have tentatively agreed to work to increase water supply on the Bear River system, which runs through Idaho, Wyoming and Utah. Gov. Spencer Cox signed a memorandum of understanding about that during a press conference at the state Capitol. Idaho Gov. Brad Little was expected to sign it soon, a spokesperson said.

“We are at a critical crossroads in Utah’s energy and water future and we are choosing an abundance mindset over managing scarcity,” the governor said. “This partnership not only benefits Utahns, but it will benefit the entire Intermountain region.”

He said industry leaders have committed to increase refinery production in Utah by 23,500 barrels of oil per day within the next five years. The state is also investing in fuel storage to help meet seasonal demand and infrastructure to aid production and delivery of fuel, Cox added.

The agreement with Idaho won’t secure any new water rights in the Bear River system, but will let both states work together on managing excess flows and water sustainability.

“We have so much in common — probably more in common with Idaho than any other neighbor out there — and so I’m grateful that the relationship is coming out even stronger,” Cox told reporters.

Meanwhile, the proposal to cut the gas tax, HB575, is moving through the Legislature in the final weeks of the session. Besides slashing the tax, the bill also requires refineries to report to the state how many barrels of oil and other petroleum products they produce. It also aims to make it easier to build pipelines in the state that would increase the supply of gasoline.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Cal Roberts, R-Draper, was unanimously approved by a House committee last week and is awaiting a vote in the full House of Representatives.

Rikki Hrenko-Browning, the president of the Utah Petroleum Association, said “tightening supplies” in the fuel market has led to some higher prices.

“We stand together with state leadership to reaffirm our commitment to the state, to our neighbors and to our customers,” she said. “We look forward to working together to grow Utah to become an energy leader across the Intermountain West.”