SALT LAKE CITY – Humans have been the main cause of wildfires in Utah so far this year, and fire authorities are putting restrictions in place to contain the flames.

According to Utah Fire Info, there have been 203 wildfires in the state as of June 1. Utah Fire Info reported that 163 of those were human-caused.

Now, fire officials are asking Utahns to do their part and follow summer fire restrictions.

Fire restrictions

Stage 1 fire restrictions were put into effect for southwestern portions of the state Sunday.

According to a Facebook post from Utah Fire Info, areas in Washington, Kane and Garfield counties are asked to follow fire-safe guidelines such as:

• No campfires or open flames outside of developed campsites, recreation sites and homes with running water;
• No smoking near vegetation or outside in developed areas,
• No equipment use without a spark arrester.

Fires are now completely prohibited in Zion National Park, as Stage 2 restrictions are in effect.

“Use your #Firesense – prevent wildfire starts this summer,” the Facebook post said.

Preventing wildfires

Wildfires can spread quickly, often having major impacts on wildlife and whole communities.

For those wanting more education on preventing wildfires, Utah Fire Sense provides free information and videos outlining dos and don’ts during the summer months.

The organization highlighted the importance of dousing coals completely before walking away from a fire, avoiding dry grass when parking, and checking for potential fire hazards in your line of fire during target practice.

To view Utah’s active wildfires and other restrictions, click here.

Firefighters creating safety zones in Duchesne County ahead of wildfire season

There are widespread expectations for the three FBS programs in the state of Utah this fall.

For BYU, the Cougars are hoping to use an 11-2 season last year to springboard to further success in 2025 and are viewed as one of the favorites to win the Big 12.

For Utah, the Utes are looking to overcome a rare losing campaign and regain their footing as one of college football’s top 25 programs — all with a new offensive identity.

For Utah State, the Aggies are trying to forge ahead and regain some stability under a familiar face — first-year head coach Bronco Mendenhall, who was the coach at BYU from 2005-2015.

Those expectations are reflected in the post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings from Bill Connelly, which were updated last week.

There are three main factors that go into Connelly’s rankings — the returning production for a team, its recent recruiting efforts and the program’s recent history.

Connelly explained that his SP+ rankings “aren’t intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will look like at the end of the year. These are simply early offseason power rankings based on the information we have been able to gather to date.”

What do these post-spring rankings — with the transfer portal closed — say about the 2025 prospects for BYU, Utah and Utah State?

Where does BYU football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

• BYU is ranked No. 27 overall in the SP+ rankings with a 11.5 rating, including No. 29 on offense, No. 30 on defense and No. 10 on special teams.
• The Cougars are ranked fourth among Big 12 teams, behind only Kansas State (No. 18), defending league champion Arizona State (No. 22) and Texas Tech (No. 26).
• BYU is ranked No. 64 nationally in strength of schedule, with nonconference matchups against the ACC’s Stanford (No. 88), the American Athletic Conference’s East Carolina (No. 90) and FCS opponent Portland State (not ranked).
• Connelly said the SP+ rating gives BYU a 7% chance of going 11-1 or better, tied for second in the Big 12 — Kansas State is at 17% and Texas Tech is tied with BYU at 7%, with Arizona State next at 5%.
• The Cougars are 52nd in returning production at 59%, including 38th on offense at 65% and 72nd on defense at 52%.

Where does Utah football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

• Utah is ranked No. 31 overall in the SP+ rankings with an 11.0 rating, including No. 54 on offense, No. 16 on defense and No. 36 on special teams.
• The Utes are ranked sixth among Big 12 teams, behind only Kansas State (No. 18), defending league champion Arizona State (No. 22), Texas Tech (No. 26), BYU (No. 27) and TCU (No. 29).
• Utah is ranked No. 55 nationally in strength of schedule, with nonconference matchups against the Big Ten’s UCLA (No. 51), the Mountain West’s Wyoming (No. 105) and FCS opponent Cal Poly (not ranked).
• The Utes are 17th in returning production at 65%, including 11th on offense at 75% and 60th on defense at 56%.

Big 12 teams in the ESPN post-spring SP+ rankings

• No. 18: Kansas State
• No. 22: Arizona State
• No. 26: Texas Tech
• No. 27: BYU
• No. 29: TCU
• No. 31: Utah
• No. 32: Iowa State
• No. 35: Baylor
• No. 50: Kansas
• No. 52: Colorado
• No. 57: West Virginia
• No. 58: Oklahoma State
• No. 59: Houston
• No. 60: Arizona
• No. 61: UCF
• No. 66: Cincinnati

Big 12 observations from ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings

• The Big 12’s highest-ranked team in the SP+ rankings — Kansas State at No. 18 — is lower than the highest-ranked program from each of the other power conferences, with the SEC having 10 teams ahead of the first Big 12 team, the Big Ten four and the ACC two.
• Half of the the Big 12’s 16 teams are ranked in the top 35. That’s behind the SEC (12 in the top 35) and the Big Ten (nine).
• The Big 12’s lowest-ranked team in the SP+ rankings — Cincinnati at No. 66 — is higher than the lowest-ranked program from each of the other power conferences, including the SEC (Mississippi State, No. 71), Big Ten (Purdue, No. 101) and ACC (Stanford, No. 88).

• The average ranking of Big 12 teams in the SP+ rankings is 42.7, with an average rating of 6.3. By comparison, the SEC has an average ranking of 22.4, with an average rating of 15.3, the Big Ten with averages of a 38.2 ranking and a 9.5 rating and the ACC with a 47.3 ranking and a 5.0 rating.
• The Big 12 has the highest average returning production amongst all FBS conferences, at 61.8%, per Connelly’s numbers.
• The Big 12 is fourth in average strength of schedule rating by conference (0.902), just below the ACC (0.891).

Where does Utah State football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

• Utah State is ranked No. 119 overall in the SP+ rankings with a minus-14.8 rating, including No. 88 on offense, No. 132 on defense and No. 76 on special teams.
• The Aggies are ranked 10th among Mountain West teams, ahead of only Nevada (No. 124) and New Mexico (No. 130).
• Utah State is ranked No. 82 nationally in strength of schedule, with nonconference matchups against the SEC’s Texas A&M (No. 15) and Vanderbilt (No. 55), Conference USA’s UTEP (No. 123) and FCS opponent McNeese State (not ranked).
• The Aggies are 133rd in returning production at 31%, including 135th on offense at 19% and 98th on defense at 43%.

Mountain West teams in the ESPN post-spring SP+ rankings

• No. 33: Boise State
• No. 75: UNLV
• No. 83: San Jose State
• No. 89: Fresno State
• No. 94: Air Force
• No. 97: Colorado State
• No. 102: San Diego State
• No. 105: Wyoming
• No. 108: Hawaii
• No. 119: Utah State
• No. 124: Nevada
• No. 130: New Mexico

Mountain West observations from ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings

• Boise State, at No. 33, is the highest-ranked Group of 6 conference team in the SP+ rankings. The Broncos are 15 spots ahead of the next-highest Group of 6 team, No. 48 Tulane of the American Athletic Conference.
• The AAC has five teams — Tulane, Memphis (No. 53), UTSA (No. 62), Army (No. 67) and Navy (No. 68) — before the second-highest ranked MWC team, UNLV at No. 75.
• Half of the Mountain West’s 12 teams are ranked in the 100s in the SP+ rankings.
• The average ranking of MWC teams in the SP+ rankings is 96.6, with an average rating of minus-8.6.
• The Mountain West’s average rating per school of minus-8.6 is third among Group of 6 conferences, behind the AAC (minus-7.8) and Sun Belt (minus-8.1).
• The MWC has an average returning production of 46.5%, per Connelly’s numbers.
• The Mountain West is seventh in the nation in average strength of schedule rating by conference (0.959) and third among Group of 6 conferences.

EUGENE, Oreg. — Jimmy De Anda drove in three runs with a double and a single, sparking Utah Valley’s 6-5 victory over Oregon in the Eugene Regional on Friday night.

No. 4 seed Utah Valley (33-27) will face second-seeded Arizona in the winner’s bracket on Saturday. Regional host Oregon (42-15) will play Cal Poly in a loser-out game. Arizona defeated Cal Poly 3-2 in Friday’s other game.

Utah Valley’s four-run third inning featured De Anda’s run-scoring double down the left-field line followed by Luke Iverson’s RBI single to right and a two-run single by Mason Strong for a 4-0 lead.

Oregon scored three runs in the bottom of the fourth, getting a two-run home run from Drew Smith and a solo shot by Anson Aroz.

De Anda’s two-run single made it 6-3 in the seventh.

Smith added a solo shot in the eighth, giving him two home runs and three RBIs for the game. With a runner on base and two outs in the ninth he struck out to end the game.

Carston Herman (5-3) got the win and Cooper Littledike earned his sixth save.

Jason Reitz (5-1) took the loss.

___

AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports