Connect with us

Utah

Defensive Effort Fuels Utah's 74-67 Over No. 17 Kansas

Published

on

Defensive Effort Fuels Utah's 74-67 Over No. 17 Kansas


SALT LAKE CITY—In their first-ever meeting at the Jon M. Huntsman Center, Utah pulls off the 74-67 upset over the No. 17 Jayhawks!

It was perhaps the best 40-minute performance by Utah this season. The effort level was pretty consistent and though there were significant scoring droughts, the Utes battled all game long.

Gabe Madsen led the Utes with 24 points on 7-of-18 shooting, as well as 5-of-5 from the line. Ezra Ausar added 12, and Jake Wahlin finished with 10 as the only other players in double-figures.

However, it was Utah’s defense that really made the difference in this one. for Kansas, as they ended the game 22-of-54 from the field. Hunter Dickinson was an inefficient 4-of-12 from the field for 12 points.

Advertisement

Starters for Utah against Kansas

Craig Smith stuck with the same starting five, which were as follows:

Mike Sharavjamts, Gabe Madsen, Jake Wahlin, Ezra Ausar, and Lawson Lovering.

First Half, Runnin’ Utes Vs. Jayhawks

The opening minutes were some of the strong minutes out of Utah this season. It started with a high-low action that started with a Lawson Lovering dish to Ezra Ausar for layup. Gabe Madsen knocked down a 3-pointer on the next possession. Two possessions later, Jake Wahlin knocked down a 3-pointer. Utah then got a defensive stop that led to a transition opportunity where Mike Sharavjamts threw a lob to Ausar, who properly threw it down with authority.

Utah jumped out to a 10-3 lead, which forced Bill Self to take an early timeout. After the break, Kansas then scored a but Gabe Madsen responded with his second 3-pointer of the game to give Utah a 13-5 lead at the first media timeout.

15:44 – After the break, Kansas got going a little bit. AJ Storr knocked down a 3-pointer, Flory Bidunga added a pair of free throws, and Hunter Dickinson added a dunk. It was 16-12 in Utah’s favor, then Jake Wahlin knocked down a much-needed 3-pointer to give Utah a 19-12 advantage at the second media timeout.

Advertisement

11:32 – Miro Little knocked down a 3-pointer, his first shot attempt of the game. On the next possession, Keanu Dawes hustled for two offensive rebounds before getting fouled on a putback attempt. He went to the line and converted both attempts. On the next possession, Dawes found Caleb Lohner underneath for an easy one. Lastly, Madsen knocked down a 3-pointer after missing one, and Lohner collected the miss. That gave the Utes a 29-19 edge at the third media break of the game.

8:25 – Kansas just continued to play their game and chip away at Utah’s lead. Utah added another Madsen 3-pointer but then went scoreless for over three minutes. That allowed the Jayhawks to trim Utah’s lead to 32-30 at the final media timeout.

Utah lost the aggressiveness they were playing with for the first 12 minutes of the game. As Kansas cut into the lead, the offensive execution became more and more unsettled. Utah scrambled for scoring opportunities instead of executing the offense like they had been.

3:46 – Unfortunately, the Utes were scoreless for five when Kansas tied it up, 32-32. Fortunately, the final two minutes, Utah found some offense with Ausar and Little combining for seven points to take a 39-37 lead into the locker room.

Second Half – Utah 39, Kansas 37

After Kansas scored five early points, Utah would go on a bit of a run. The Utes clamped down on the defensive end, which sparked some opportunities on the other end. Madsen and Sharvajamts each notched a steal that led to direct points in transition. Utah would go on a 10-3 run to rebuild a 52-45 edge by the first media timeout.

Advertisement

15:10 – Utah would continue to build their lead, as they got it to 58-49. Hunter Erickson knocked down a 3-pointer, Ausar went 1-of-2 from the line, and Lohner added a big layup through contact. As the two teams were exiting the floor for the second media timeout, Bill Self was whistled for a technical. Madsen converted the free throws after the break to give Utah a 60-49 lead.

11:37 – Utah would unfortunately go cold from the field for the next four minutes. A couple of misses and then a pair of turnovers allowed Kansas to claw their way back. By the next media break, the Jayhawks had it down to 60-54.

7:07 – After the timeout, Kansas’ David Coit knocked down a 3-pointer to cut it to 60-57. Then, a couple of possessions later, Bidunga got a layup to go to trim the lead down to one. Utah just continued to settle for bad shots, and their scoring drought extended to over six minutes.

Finally, after seven scoreless minutes, Ausar finally got a jump hook to roll over the rim and fall. That gave Utah a 62-60 lead at the 4:20 mark of the game and after a defensive stop and Kansas defensive foul, the Utes held onto that lead into the final media break.

3:31 – After the break, the Utes played with tremendous effort. They hustled for offensive rebounds, which led to a pair of free throws for Wahlin, which he converted to give Utah a 64-60 edge. Lovering was fouled and went to the line for two, but missed both.

Advertisement

Then, Utah forced a Kansas turnover, as Wahlin intercepted an entry pass to Dickinson. Utah brought it the other way and eventually, Madsen found himself open for a 3-pointer, which he converted to give Utah a 67-60 lead, and also become the school’s all-time leader in 3-point makes.

After free throws from Sharavjamts, Madsen, and Erickson, the Utes hold onto their upset bid and knock off the Jayhawks 74-67!

UP NEXT – Kansas State Vs. Utah

It’ll be a quick turnaround for the Runnin’ Utes this weekend as they’ll get just one day to prepare for Kansas State, who will come into the Jon M. Huntsman Center on Monday, Feb. 17, for a 7 p.m. (MST) tip-off on ESPN2. Roxy Bernstein will be joined alongside Sean Farnham as to call the action as Utah and Kansas State square off for the first time since Nov. 25, 1983 – a 63-53 affair in favor of the Utes in Rosemont, Ill., at the Tribune Classic.

Steve Bartle is the Utah insider for KSL Sports. He hosts The Utah Blockcast (SUBSCRIBE) and appears on KSL Sports Zone to break down the Utes. You can follow him on X for the latest Utah updates and game analysis.

Take us with you, wherever you go.

Download the new & improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. You can stream live radio, video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah Jazz’s Direction for the No. 2 Pick Is Becoming Clear

Published

on

Utah Jazz’s Direction for the No. 2 Pick Is Becoming Clear


The Utah Jazz are just hours away from the 2026 NBA Draft to determine who will be their franchise’s next cornerstone piece to add into their exciting core with their second-overall pick on the board.

And in the lead-up to the Jazz’s selection, there’s been tons of buzz surrounding who will be the one landing at that No. 2 slot. Between AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, and Cameron Boozer, each has seen various connections to Utah as being the guy they’ll end up with.

However, as we continue to get closer to when the Jazz are on the clock, we’re starting to get some clearer intel on who their selection ultimately might be. And in reality, it might just be a two-man race, rather than three.

Advertisement

Darryn Peterson Remains in the Driver’s Seat at No. 2

ESPN‘s Jeremy Woo recently released his final 2026 mock sorting out how each of the draft’s 60 picks are going to go. When it came to the Jazz, the pick would be none other than Kansas guard Darryn Peterson; someone that Utah has reportedly shown “strong interest” in leading up to the draft.

If Peterson ends up going first to the Washington Wizards, though, AJ Dybantsa seems like the most likely outcome for the Jazz at two.

“Sources say the Jazz have shown strong interest in Peterson throughout the process, and the expectation from rival teams has been that Utah will pick whichever of Peterson or Dybantsa falls to them,” Woo wrote.

Advertisement

“Peterson’s initial decision to only visit Washington was more reflective of his confidence in his security as a top pick and desire to hear his name called first.”

Advertisement

Despite the noise that had surrounding Peterson, his canceled workout, and any possible disinterest in landing with Utah, that buzz has since been shut down in the days leading up to Tuesday night’s first round.

Not only did Peterson confirm he has met with the Jazz before coming to New York following his canceled draft workout, but he also made it clear at Monday’s media day that he’s not dodging any team that’s willing to select him.

That, of course, would include the Jazz. So no worries on that front.

But even if Peterson does end up going ahead of the Jazz’s slot in what would be a surprise pickup for the Wizards at the first pick, Utah’s decision looks like it could be a relatively simple one. BYU’s AJ Dybantsa would be sitting up for grabs, and would be an ideal fit on the wing to Utah’s two-guard spot for the future.

Advertisement

Jan 24, 2026; Columbia, Missouri, USA; Kansas Jayhawks guard Darryn Peterson (22) looks to pass against BYU Cougars forward AJ Dybantsa (3) during the first half at Mizzou Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images | Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images

So if Woo’s intel is a sign of anything, it seems like, even with the appeal that might be had in Duke’s Cameron Boozer as a potential option at number two, he’s looking more and more like the odd man out when it comes to being the guy for Utah.

Both Peterson and Dybantsa have a projected ceiling that tops what Boozer brings to the table, and fits better with this current Jazz core as their future two-guard. In a draft where all three prospects are seen as franchise-changing talents, those factors might just be what’s narrowly separated the top two as the targets to watch for Utah.

Advertisement

All of the chatter that’s ensued before the draft surrounding who the Jazz are going to take with their highest pick on the board in over 40 years will officially come to an end Tuesday night. But with the time quickly approaching before that decision becomes final, the writing might be on the wall for who they’ll be landing on.

Advertisement

Be sure to follow Utah Jazz On SI on X for daily Utah Jazz news, rumors and analysis!

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Inside Utah’s facial recognition system: How police use the technology

Published

on

Inside Utah’s facial recognition system: How police use the technology


Utah law enforcement agencies are increasingly using facial recognition technology to identify criminal suspects, but state law limits its use to specific circumstances and imposes some of the strictest safeguards in the nation.

Under Utah law, facial recognition technology may only be used for certain law enforcement purposes, including felony investigations, violent crimes, threats to human life, and efforts to identify deceased, incapacitated or at-risk individuals.

The technology recently came under scrutiny in the case of Brad Johnston, who faced a felony charge related to the vandalism of an Uber driver’s vehicle after a facial recognition match linked him to the case. Johnston maintained he was not involved.

“The only way I can describe it was just terrifying,” Johnston said.

Advertisement

MORE: Facial recognition AI misidentifies Utah man in felony vandalism case

The match was generated from surveillance video taken from inside the Uber ride, but Johnston insisted investigators had identified the wrong person. After months of court proceedings, the case was ultimately dismissed.

According to the most recently available data, Utah law enforcement agencies submitted 1,191 facial recognition requests between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. Of those, 706 resulted in probable matches, a rate of about 59%.

State law requires all facial recognition requests to be processed through the Utah Department of Public Safety.

Tanner Jensen, chief of investigations for the department, said requests from law enforcement have increased over the past five years.

Advertisement

Jensen said the system will analyze biometric data and measurements and two people manually review each image submitted for comparison. The process results in one of two outcomes: a possible match or no result. Once findings are returned to the requesting agency, the department’s involvement ends.

“If they do both feel like the match is viable, they’ll send that to the officer for further investigation with a disclaimer that this is an investigative lead and not necessarily something that’s part of the evidence,” Jensen said.

Most identifications are generated through comparisons with a driver’s license photographs. Jensen said biometric characteristics remain consistent over time, but human review is still critical.

“You may get a percentage below 90%, but that’s not to indicate that that’s not the individual,” Jensen said. “Or you may get a percentage that’s above 90% and we still don’t feel confident that that would be the individual. It really comes down to the human-in-the-loop aspect.”

Retired Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank said law enforcement agencies have adapted quickly to emerging technologies, much as they did when body-worn cameras were introduced.

Advertisement

“The technology is just moving so fast and furious,” Burbank said. “One of the things is the availability of AI to analyze a large database.”

Burbank said strong policies must guide the use of technology in policing.

“We need to ensure, again, is this policy sound for the public or is it just good for policing?” he said.

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

How would Keaton Wagler fit with the Utah Jazz? – KSL Sports

Published

on

How would Keaton Wagler fit with the Utah Jazz? – KSL Sports


SALT LAKE CITY — Although likely not in contention for the Utah Jazz with the No. 2 overall pick, Illinois guard Keaton Wagler is a name to remember in this year’s draft cycle.

As somewhat of a late-bloomer, Wagler dazzled with his offensive game in just one season with the Fighting Illini. But would the combo guard fit well with the Jazz?

Below is a full breakdown of his game, strengths, weaknesses, and potential fit in Utah.

Keaton Wagler: NBA Draft Snapshot

School: Illinois
Position: Guard
Age: 19

2025–26 stats

Advertisement
  • 17.9 points
  • 5.1 rebounds
  • 4.2 assists

Shooting splits

  • 44.5% FG
  • 39.7% 3PT
  • 79.6% FT

Strengths

  • Positional size
  • Shooting & shot-making
  • Creation & pace

Weaknesses

  • Defense
  • Athleticism
  • Strength

What Makes Keaton Wagler A Top Prospect In The NBA Draft?

The projected top ten in the upcoming draft is littered with guards, especially once you get past the first four. Of those guards, Wagler has arguably the best positional size.

Standing at 6-foot-6 with an unconfirmed wingspan of 6-foot-9, the Illinois freshman burst onto the scene with his smooth offensive game.

Maybe most impressively about Wagler is his ability to control the pace and tempo with the ball in his hands, a trait mastered by superstars in the NBA like Luka Doncic and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.

Wagler demonstrated plenty of craft and control to get to his spots on offense, and he was just as prolific when it came to finishing the play.

He shot a blistering 39.7 percent on threes with a 59.6 true shooting percentage, both of those marks around or above the 80th percentile in college basketball.

It got to the point where other teams opted to foul Wagler instead of letting him pick apart their defense. He finished the season with 11 free throw attempts a night (89th percentile), and he shot a respectable 79.6 percent from the stripe.

When he wasn’t scoring or getting sent to the line, Wagler showed decent playmaking chops, dishing out 4.2 assists per game with a very solid 2.4 assist-to-turnover ratio.

His passing game is at a base level right now. He has the ability to find the open man and make the right play, but there weren’t many eye-popping, “How did he see that?” passes across his 37 games with the Fighting Illini.

Advertisement

There is a real argument for Wagler as one of the best shooters in the class. He has a lot to flesh out on both ends, but having the jumpshot as a fallback keystone skill could be very important for his development.

As a best-case scenario, Wagler could be a do-it-all combo guard offensively whose length lends him to be a passable perimeter defender. Think 18-5-5 averages with the ability to pop off for 30 points with five made threes on any given night.

Advertisement

Why Drafting Keaton Wagler Is Somewhat Of A Gamble

Wagler is somewhat of a late bloomer physically. It was reported that he stood at 5-foot-8 as a high school freshman and joined the Illinois program at a measly 168 pounds.

The silver lining is that he put on 14 pounds in just one summer of training on campus. With the assistance of an NBA strength training regimen, it is fair to project growth in that area.

Also, despite being outmatched physically most nights, Wagler showed no hesitation in driving into traffic and throwing his body around. Although he finished the season with zero dunks, and just one attempt.

Often, he struggled when the opposing team had either a daunting rim protector or physical point of attack defenders.

As could be expected, his lack of strength and athleticism showed most on the defensive end.

With 1.3 stocks per game and just about average advanced defensive metrics, it’s unclear how much blame can be placed on the fact that he is underdeveloped physically.

He has great feel and basketball IQ on offense. Optimistically, that could eventually extend to the defensive end. But reality could see him evolve into a mostly one-sided player.

How Would Keaton Wagler Fit With The Utah Jazz?

From a positional and skillset view, Wagler could fit in well with the Jazz. As an off-guard, he could slide in as the two alongside Keyonte George, while also not interfering with the loaded frontcourt rotation.

He would likely come off the bench for the first few seasons of his career, with the opportunity to join the first five as he grows and matures.

Advertisement

It is worth noting that two of Utah’s recent first-round picks, Cody Williams and Ace Bailey, also came in needing to put on weight. Williams struggled early, while Bailey had enough offensive talent to negate the clear need for physical progression.

As the Jazz move toward playoff contention, the path for development isn’t as unobstructed as that of other teams in the lottery. Still, Wagler would have ample opportunity to become an effective rotational piece with enough time to make the necessary improvements.

Chandler Holt is a Utah Jazz insider for KSLSports.com and co-host of the Jazz Notes podcast. Follow Chandler on X for Jazz and NBA updates.

Take us with you, wherever you go.

Download the new & improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. You can stream live radio, video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending