Utah
Bill replacing DEI offices in Utah passes committee
SALT LAKE CITY — A bill seeking to replace Diversity, Equity and Inclusion offices on Utah’s public colleges and universities has cleared a committee.
In a 12-2 party line vote, the House Education Committee voted to advance House Bill 261 to the full House of Representatives. But the bill was modified from its original form.
“This bill is focused on removing barriers for all students,” said Rep. Katy Hall, R-South Ogden, who is the primary sponsor of HB261.
In a substitute bill, House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, proposed eliminating the name “DEI” but there are carve outs for such offices to continue doing a lot of their existing work to ensure federal money continues to come in. The bill still advances the concept of equal opportunity “Student Success Centers.” It also still prohibits mandatory trainings “promoting a specific ideology” across all aspects of government and diversity statements in hiring applications.
Rep. Hall said in her presentation to the committee that DEI has come to mean “differential treatment” among some students. She also spoke about academic freedom and a pressure some feel to conform to a particular way of thinking instead of listening to diverse viewpoints.
But Democrats on the committee questioned if there was really a problem, noting that a lot of Rep. Hall’s examples of problems on Utah college and university campuses were anecdotal. They also questioned claims of excessive spending on DEI initiatives. A fiscal analysis prepared for the Utah State Legislature found roughly $10 million spent on it out of higher education’s $2.8 billion budget.
In a lengthy public comment period, people weighed in with sometimes personal stories. Some said DEI initiatives helped them and gave them resources as they felt alone and in need of support as first-generation, immigrant students. Others said they didn’t need that help and felt DEI was discriminatory in and of itself.
Groups like the NAACP’s Salt Lake Branch and the Utah Black Chamber of Commerce spoke out against the proposed legislation. House Minority Leader Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, said she benefited from DEI initiatives when she attended college.
“Just because I have a different opinion doesn’t mean my existence is divisive,” she said.
Rep. Hall said she wanted her bill to include all.
“I hope this sends a strong message that we care about equality, opportunity for all students,” she said.
The bill will now go to the full House of Representatives for a vote.
Utah
Pair of Utah Jazz Veterans Emerging as Trade Candidates
With just under a week to go until the NBA trade deadline arrives, the Utah Jazz are beginning to see a few names around their roster pop up in the some rumors as potential movers in the coming days.
As of late, two veteran names have come to the forefront as the most likely names to be shipped off before the deadline: Kevin Love and Kyle Anderson.
NBA insider Andy Larsen of the Salt Lake Tribune recently broke down the current situations revolving around the Jazz’s deadline plans and what could be in store for both Love and Anderson, circling the pair as perhaps the two most likely players to be traded from Utah before February 5th.
“Fellow veterans Kyle Anderson and Kevin Love are less in the Jazz’s plans moving forward, though, and could be moved if the situation made sense…” Larsen wrote. “Anderson has played well when on the court for Utah, but has frequently found himself out of the rotation as the Jazz prioritize youth.”
“The 37-year-old Love, meanwhile, is an impending free agent making $4 million this season. He also has played relatively well in his infrequent minutes for the Jazz. These players aren’t expected to have significant league interest, but the Jazz could make a deal similar to that of the one they made last season, when they sent veterans Drew Eubanks and Patty Mills to the Clippers in exchange for P.J. Tucker’s contract and a second-round pick.”
Kevin Love, Kyle Anderson Could Be Jazz’s Most Likely Deadline Movers
Both Love and Anderson have been productive veterans when given a role in the rotation for the Jazz, albeit in spotty minutes throughout the first half of the season.
However, with both not a part of the Jazz’s long-term timeline, combined with their contractual status of becoming free agents as soon as this summer, the two become obvious players to watch as guys who could be sent on the move before that trade deadline buzzer sounds.
The possible hurdle when dealing one or both of Love and Anderson for the Jazz centers on generating interest around them.
As Larsen notes, not a ton of teams are exactly chomping at the bit to land a 32-year-old veteran forward or a 37-year-old big on expiring deals. Especially with many teams looking to cut down on their total salary rather than adding to it, an addition of a $9.2 million salary on the books from Anderson might not be much of a coveted asset on the trade market.
But as proven from last season’s Patty Mills and Drew Eubanks deal with the LA Clippers, all it takes is one interested team to offer a worthwhile package to the Jazz worth accepting for that swap to come to fruition. Even if the incoming package is just a couple of future seconds, such a return could be worth pulling the trigger on.
Utah’s front office is certainly sniffing around for similar opportunities to strike upon this season, but that could be easier said than done.
Maybe Love and Anderson will be the next names to join the list of Jazz trade deadline movers since their rebuild kicked off, but Utah’s front office will have until February 5th to find the right package to do so.
Be sure to bookmark Utah Jazz On SI and follow @JazzOnSI on X to stay up-to-date on daily Utah Jazz news, interviews, breakdowns and more!
Utah
Alex Jensen calls out Utah basketball’s selfishness following loss to Oklahoma State
Utah men’s basketball head coach Alex Jensen isn’t mincing words anymore.
A week after saying his team “quit” down the stretch of a double-digit loss to BYU, the Jensen delivered another brutally honest assessment of the Runnin’ Utes following their 81-69 loss to Oklahoma State on Saturday.
“We were very selfish tonight,” Jensen said during his postgame press conference. “I thought we were getting better at that, but we were individually very selfish.”
Jensen’s group was neck-and-neck with the Cowboys for a majority of their Big 12 tilt at the Huntsman, until another late-game collapse costed Utah (9-12, 1-7 Big 12) another opportunity at earning a league win.
Despite a stretch of miscues, the Runnin’ Utes found themselves down by three with just over 6 minutes left in regulation. They struggled to find the bottom of the net the rest of the way, though, leaving the doors open for the Cowboys to grow their lead to double-digits inside the final 2 minutes.
Utah’s offense stalled, in part, because of a lack of ball movement. The Runnin’ Utes didn’t have an assist in the final 6:40 of regulation and finished the game with 11 dimes total, tied for their third-fewest in a game this season. Utah went 3-for-11 from the field after falling behind, 62-59, with 6 minutes left in regulation.
“Too many guys are in their own world,” Jensen said. “Too many guys started the game thinking about just scoring.”
“There’s other ways to be selfish: guys not talking, guys not being ready to shoot. Players win games, not coaches, and the players can’t do it unless they do it together.”
Utah looked less than prepared to defend Cowboys fifth-year guard Anthony Roy, a career 42.8% shooter from 3 who came into Saturday as one of the top outside shooters in the Big 12. The 6-foot-3 Oakland, California, native lived up to his reputation against Utah, as he knocked down five treys in a 26-point performance to lead Oklahoma State.
“We’re not a very good defensive team,” Jensen said. “A lot of times it’s not the scheme; you just got to guard the guy in front of you. I don’t have a solution for that right now.”
The defensive end of the floor continued to be a problem for Utah, which dropped to No. 234 in the country in adjusted efficiency on KenPom.com. Saturday was Utah’s 11th time allowing 80 or more points this season.
Perhaps the only positive Jensen took away from Saturday: the energy inside the Huntsman Center noticeably improved from where it was at the start of the season.
“The crowd was great tonight,” Jensen said. “I’m embarrassed because that was far from the University of Utah team that’s been here for decades. We might lose, but we’re not going to lose that way. So we’re going to work on it and find some different combinations.”
Terrence Brown led Utah with 20 points, marking his 15th such game of the season. Only Andrew Bogut (22) and Keith Van Horn (20) have more 20-point games in a single season in Utah history.
Keanu Dawes added 12 points and 10 rebounds, while Don McHenry had 17 points on 7-for-17 shooting.
The Runnin’ Utes are back in action Wednesday for a home game against Arizona State (7 p.m. MT, CBS Sports Network).
MORE UTAH NEWS & ANALYSIS
Utah
Utah governor signs bill adding justices to state Supreme Court as redistricting appeal looms
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill Saturday that expands the state Supreme Court from five justices to seven as frustration has mounted among Republican lawmakers over a string of defeats before the tribunal.
Advocates for the change argued that it would help improve the court’s efficiency, but legal experts said it could have the opposite effect and set a dangerous precedent at a time of tension between the branches of government. The state’s judiciary did not ask for more justices on the court.
Democrats, who were united in opposition to the bill, called the timing suspicious. The Legislature has been preparing an appeal of a ruling that gave Democrats a strong shot at picking up one of Utah’s four Republican-held congressional seats in the fall.
New justices could be in place when the court decides the fate of the congressional map.
Because the bill received approval from more than two-thirds of legislators, it took effect immediately after the governor signed it, allowing him to bypass a several-month waiting period to start adding justices.
In Utah, justices are appointed by the governor and approved by the state Senate. Justices in many other states are elected.
Most states have five or seven Supreme Court justices, but a few have nine. Cox, a Republican, has said the additions would put Utah in line with other states of its size. He has denied that the policy is politically motivated, noting that Republican governors and senators have made all recent appointments.
Once he fills the new seats, Cox will have appointed five of the seven sitting justices.
Last month Republican lawmakers took authority from state Supreme Court justices to select their own chief justice and gave that power to the governor.
“Seven sets of eyes reviewing the most complex and difficult issues our state has ever faced is better than having only five sets of eyes,” said House Majority Leader Casey Snider, a Republican sponsor of the bill.
John Pearce, who recently retired as associate chief justice, said this month that he doubted the change would make the court more efficient.
“The more sets of comments you have to take into account, the longer the process takes,” Pearce said. “If what the Legislature is hoping to do is speed up the work of the court, it’s going to be counterproductive.”
Two states — Arizona and Georgia — have added justices in the past decade after making similar arguments about efficiency.
In the first few years after Arizona grew its court in 2016, several past and present justices said it made things less efficient because more people had to review opinions before they could be published.
Arizona’s court now issues slightly more rulings per year, while Georgia’s issues slightly fewer than before.
Utah Chief Justice Matthew Durrant told legislators on the opening day of the 2026 session the court had “essentially no backlog” and urged them to add judges to lower courts, where the need is greater. Bill sponsors responded by adding some lower court judges and clerks.
The Utah State Bar has raised concern over the expansion and other proposals that it said would weaken the judiciary’s independence. Among them is a bill that would create a new trial court with exclusive jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges. The governor would appoint three judges who would be confirmed by the Senate.
___
Lee reported from Santa Fe, New Mexico.
-
Massachusetts1 day agoTV star fisherman, crew all presumed dead after boat sinks off Massachusetts coast
-
Tennessee2 days agoUPDATE: Ohio woman charged in shooting death of West TN deputy
-
Pennsylvania7 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Movie Reviews6 days agoVikram Prabhu’s Sirai Telugu Dubbed OTT Movie Review and Rating
-
Science1 week agoLAUSD says Pali High is safe for students to return to after fire. Some parents and experts have concerns
-
Politics1 week agoTrump’s playbook falters in crisis response to Minneapolis shooting
-
Austin, TX3 days ago
TEA is on board with almost all of Austin ISD’s turnaround plans
-
Indiana8 hours ago13-year-old rider dies following incident at northwest Indiana BMX park