Connect with us

Seattle, WA

Seattle at the NHL Trade Deadline: If you Sell, what do you have?

Published

on

Seattle at the NHL Trade Deadline: If you Sell, what do you have?


So! I hope you’ve enjoyed your time off from Kraken hockey, because it’s now coming for you at full force from here until April 18th.

But in the middle of all that, there’s the Trade Deadline.

The Deadline is often the single most important day on the NHL Calendar for a good many teams; it’s when a number of teams take their final opportunity to either shore up their roster and get ready for the playoffs by buying, or selling what positives they have in order to get draft picks, potential unknowns that could blossom into real interesting players for next year. Several teams are already deep in their scouting journeys for potential deadline adds and several more are insinuating that they’re trying to make major moves to try and make the good parts of a disappointing season slightly better, or focus in on what makes them good in the first place without hangers-on.

The Kraken…could be in either of these camps at the moment. Probably both.

Advertisement

Thanks to a rough start, a slightly better winning streak that got them back on target, a revelation at goaltender, and some depth coming up in the clutch; the Kraken are not quite in the playoffs yet, but are a mere 4 points from surpassing Nashville and St. Louis, and 6 points in LA. That is, of course, assuming that Calgary, Arizona, Nashville, St. Louis, and Los Angeles all fail to get points over the next three games. Given that all of them are in similar stations of “Good but deeply, cripplingly flawed”, it’s not out of the ordinary to suggest it’s possible. Whether or not the Kraken can do that? It’s theoretically possible; they’ve gone on a long winning streak before, but it’s never been an easy proposition nor something they can rely on. Particularly considering their achilles heel this year has been finish; the Kraken are about middle of the road in possession stats, but are failing to capitalize on that possession in a way that matters outside of a very specific group of players.

Thus, the problem; it’s entirely possible to look at the sheer number of injuries the team has suffered, the sheer number of cascading issues coming out from the lack of scoring touch, and conclude that this isn’t the year to try and go for it. On the other hand, so many much healthier, farther along teams are currently struggling to maintain their position in the standings; if the Kraken can get it together for another prolonged streak of wins, they could catapult themselves straight into the playoffs and stay there for as long as they want to.

So let’s take stock. Let’s see what the Kraken have to use to make

What the Kraken have to use

Well! As of Friday, February 9th, the Kraken have:

  • $3,813,125 in actual cap space as of right now, which would be 9th highest amount in the league as of right now without the use of LTIR.
  • A projection of $1,410,062 in cap space at the end of the season.
  • The potential to add approximately $6,445,998 at the deadline and remain Cap Compliant.
  • Several veteran players on expiring deals that make them Unrestricted Free Agents at the end of the year, a couple of whom are pretty marquis/important names for the team.
  • Several more veteran players who will be on expiring deals next year who are UFAs.
  • Two extra, open roster spots.
  • All of their first round picks for the next five years.
  • Two extra picks in the middle and late rounds of this upcoming draft (3rd and 7th round, specifically).

All of this is courtesy of CapFriendly, which I will be taking information from frequently here.

Not a bad war chest to start with, especially considering how some teams are handling their cap recently.

Advertisement

What are the Easiest Moves?

Justin Schultz – The “Easiest” option

Justin Schultz has been Seattle’s whipping boy for a fandom that’s had a lot of whipping boys interchangeably all season. Already the oldest player on an old defense, the issues with net-front play and puck security have been a major concern for fans throughout the season; especially now with Ryker Evans waiting in the wings to seemingly take his place for good. Schultz, as a player, may not be perfect, but as a Right-Handed Defenseman, he still carries tremendous value.

So what’re the positives and negatives on a trade of Schultz?

Why they Should Do It:

Schultz’ recent scoring streak has masked what is otherwise a pretty mediocre effort this year. In fairness? The Kraken are not asking Justin Schultz to play 25 minutes a night; that honor is usually relegated to somebody in the top four, but the reality that often follows Schultz is that he’s been caught one time too many on a backcheck, and when points are as valuable as spanish dubloons found on a Florida shoreline…the Kraken really can’t afford veteran experience that also doesn’t come with “canny ability to apply it”. That’s just not what they’re getting from him these days.

Further, the development of Ryker Evans as a potential fill-in is absolutely tantalizing; helped along by the fact that Evans, to put it bluntly, has potentially made him quite expendable. Not a great place to be in the league as a 33 year old.

Advertisement

Mercifully, what he does have, is stuff that time cannot take away from him: which is the fact that he is a defenseman who shoots Right-handed. That is an extremely rare and very valuable asset that just about every team in the league can and will pay through the nose to get their hands on.

That can be quite valuable for the Kraken, especially if it means they can seamlessly slide Evans into Schultz’s place full-time. Further, of all the trades possible to Seattle, this is the one I am certain they will entertain more than the other two UFAs.

Why they Shouldn’t Do It:

Schultz is a solid hand, to be sure; but he’s also not a very sexy option. Just about every team in the league wants depth, and specifically RHD no matter the level of play they’ve seen this year, but Schultz is on a west coast team that has inconsistent efforts on defense, and Schultz is a part of that problem.

That means that while Schultz is available and deeply interesting as a potential trade target…you’re gonna need to juice the offer a little bit. Now granted, Calgary’s trade with Vancouver seems to have upended what a fair trade in 2024 looks like, so it may not take a tremendous amount of juicing, but I think if you’re going to move on from Schultz, a pick or two is probably coming alongside him. If Ron Francis feels like the loss of picks is too much, especially for such a young franchise trying to get younger on-roster…it’s probably not happening.

Alex Wennberg – The Secretly Frugal option

Alex Wennberg has, like a lot of players this year, had a rough time adjusting to the shooting slump. He’s made changes to his equipment, found success as a playmaker, and has indeed begun to found a touch in getting on the scoreboard; it’s still been a rough go for a player who has otherwise been a pretty solid hand for the squids.

Advertisement

The issue the Kraken face with Wennberg is that A) he needs a new contract at the end of the year, and B) he is coming off of what has been an exhausting offseason, and an extremely rough regular season where it’s not 100% clear he’ll reach the 40+ point mark he hit last year…alongside the uncomfortable fact that center in the Kraken organization is an extremely tenuous position.

So the options are thus; move him, or keep him.

Why they Should Do It:

Y’know that “down year” thing I keep hammering?

It’s also true of his possession stats. Previously, Wennberg was maybe a little boring as a playdriver, but extremely strong on the defensive side of the puck. This year?

Advertisement

…Less so.

It’s also manifested a bit on his ability to create possession off the draw; having one of the worst faceoff-%’s on the team, which is pretty galling given that he’s taken more defensive zone faceoffs than just about every other center at any strength you can conceive of. Even Yanni Gourde hasn’t seen the level of defensive zone faceoffs that Wennberg has, and if you’re struggling to make an impact possession-wise and having these kinds of troubles, regardless of how much the coach trusts you on the penalty kill…it is a tough combo.

As such, maybe finding a different home for Wenny isn’t necessarily the worst thing in the world for the Kraken right now; he’s going to be an even 30 by next season, and will have been an otherwise serviceable depth forward the entire time. While that is a noble endeavor and useful in the NHL, that is something the Kraken have a lot of already. Meanwhile, his ability on the power play, as well as his playmaking potential, could be a major boon for teams with deeper forward rosters than the Kraken’s.

Why they Shouldn’t Do It:

The short version is that the Kraken should only do this if you’re basically guaranteeing Shane Wright or another center coming back the other way the exact amount of ice-time Wennberg is getting coming out of the deadline.

Wennberg has had his goal-scoring struggles; this I can absolutely respect the frustrations with his shooting drop. Seattle however, has a dearth of centers that can adequately take his place. Sure, you could simply promote the Gourde line into being the 2nd line, which I mostly support. The reality is that any major vacancies in the center position in the middle lines, regardless of whether or not you “promote from within”, should go to a player who has earned that right, and in my humble opinion…that belongs to Shane Wright.

Advertisement

That is, after all, what you drafted him so highly for, isn’t it? You can’t just trade a guy and assume John Hayden will slot in and everyone moves up a spot, right?

Wright’s been on a tear in Coachella Valley; having 32 points in 41 games, in a scoring race with Max McCormick for team lead in goals, and has been a major part of their rise back into the AHL’s top teams after a slow start. It would be pointless to make him play the sub-15 minutes a night that the third and fourth line provide, and his game is probably better suited setting up guys like Jared McCann and Andre Burakovsky up for scoring chances rather than mucking about trying to get an offensive zone draw with Kailer Yamamoto. Regardless of whether or not he gets caved, his play has indicated that he is acclimating to the professional game nicely, and now that he’s had an entire year to get comfortable, it feels like his time truly is coming, and that’s not just something that I believe, but the organization feels as well; this story about his rise has been front-and-center on the Kraken’s website since a little before the All-Star Break began, and most of it is nothing but effusive praise of his skillset. They’re clearly high on this kid.

But…are they ready to commit to him?

If the Kraken do not believe, at any point, that Shane Wright is ready for day-in, day-out inclusion on the Kraken’s NHL roster, or that they cannot get a center of equivalent ability to Wennberg in a trade, they should not do this. Center depth is already a concern; there’s no reason to make it worse.

Jordan Eberle – The Big Fish

This is the marquis name of Tradeable Seattle Kraken players.

Advertisement

The player with the most known-value to the wider NHL world. The Nuclear Option.

This is also a trade you cannot make unless you are absolutely certain you are going to clean up while doing so. You should, too; because Eberle is still at his age an absolutely dynamic player. A phenomenal playmaker and major part of Seattle’s offense, Eberle is a free agent at the end of the year and inarguably a player that Ron Francis should be trying to get at least a year or two out of by the time the season ends; having dragged his linemates kicking and screaming into being reasonable top 6 options until Ron Francis gave him a partner in crime in that regard in Tomáš Tatar.

The Kraken will almost certainly need Eberle for the here and now. The decision to move on from him as of this moment in time will be a bad one if the

Why they Should Do It:

It will hurt to move on from Ebs, because he’s an absolute monster of playmaking and play-driving. You absolutely should not do this if you think you can go back to the playoffs.

The big question you will have if you decide then to hang onto him, is three-pronged:

Advertisement
  • Is this down-tick in scoring just the result of rotten luck? Or a sign he’s beginning to regress?
  • Can he be this impactful for a number of his middle-to-late 30’s, where a good portion of all NHL players begin to fall off in terms of effectiveness as wear and tear begins to take it’s toll?
  • If you believe the first two are no object for you: He is a Free Agent this upcoming offseason. Can you convince him to come back now that a number of teams will have a modicum of Cap Space with the upcoming boost in the Cap Ceiling?

These are some pretty painful questions to ask, but they’re valuable. Eberle is 33; tied for the oldest player on the team with Justin Schultz and Tomáš Tatar. While it’s definitely a bit odd for a team so young to be so old; Tatar is a pretty clear rental and Schultz is a depth defender: they’re temporary solutions while much younger names in a blossoming prospect system grow into their fully-fledged form. Eberle meanwhile, has been asked to be a major part of Seattle’s offense from day one and has otherwise performed that duty reasonably. Can he continue to do that while going into his hockey twilight years?

Another interesting wrinkle: He’s a Free Agent at the end of the year. The Kraken have plenty of cap space if he wants to be re-signed here, so that’s no issue. The problem that the Kraken face is that they won’t be the only team trying to court him. Much has been made about the NHL’s insistence that the players have made good on their escrow payments, and the four million dollars boost in the Cap Ceiling being promised. The reason for this can be seen right on CapFriendly’s main page; over half the league has less than $800,000 of space to rub together in order to sign a player in projected cap space and are using LTIR; and half of those teams using LTIR could theoretically ice a penalty kill with the bodies they’ve piled up. The money’s good, and a number of teams get much-needed relief from being in Cap Jail.

But with that money, that means Teams can add. That means teams that are in a better spot than Seattle is right now, even at the end of the year, could bid for his services.

I for one love Ebs, and love him wearing a Kraken jersey. I struggle to think, with a Pacific Division so tight, that Ron Francis would be able to both outbid other suitors or get him in on a contract that makes sense for both parties. Ron will have to figure out a contract for Eeli Tolvanen, Kailer Yamamoto…and Matty Beniers at the same time. They are notably, the only rostered UFAs that the Kraken will have this problem with. Losing him for nothing would be catastrophic.

A rental like this for a good number of teams would be huge; he’s a major possession force and would make a good number of teams better by his inclusion. Seattle could very easily facilitate that.

But taking out all the heartless pragmatism of it all…the simple motivating factor behind doing this is manic greed informed by the market, and the market made this trade all the more palatable by starting out with an absolute haul.

Advertisement

Here is the first trade made during this part of the year: the Kuzmenko trade from Vancouver to Calgary. That entailed:

  • A Useful player right now
  • A project prospect that could be useful in the future
  • A first round pick
  • Several lower round picks
  • All for one player from a historic divisional rival(!!!)

Imagine what the Kraken could get if they decided to sell on him now; in a market more than willing than ever to dump every last thing they have for the upcoming year in order to compete now. Boston needs help, and they have players worth taking. So do LA and Anaheim. Some of these teams are making the exact calculations that Seattle are right now.

Some of them are in better spots than Seattle.

Imagine.

Why they Shouldn’t Do It:

So remember when I said “Can he do it while entering his hockey twilight?”

The trend over time, while it is lower than it has been throughout his career…seems to be gesturing towards “yes”.

Advertisement

This is why I referred to this as “The Nuclear Option”. While there are plenty of questions you could ask about Eberle for the future, the Kraken need him and are getting good work out of him in the here and now. This is the drag chute on competing, and settling in on a Top 15 pick; the final month and change of the season effectively being free hockey with no stakes. Unless you can get back a player who is of equal or better value, this is a decision that is made exclusively for the future.

Jordan Eberle is, to put it frankly, one of the best forwards the Kraken have right now, and his lack of points comes almost entirely down to bad shooting luck. He should frankly be scoring more by the way he’s playing in some games. Losing that would frankly put them in a very deep, very dark place that would make the rest of the season…difficult to bear, let’s call it.

D’you want the part of the inaugural season where they didn’t have Matty? This is a good way to get back to that level of ineptitude.

Greed isn’t gonna save you in this case; Don’t Do This.

When should Seattle Make Their Decision To Use Their War Chest?

Within the next couple weeks. The games you see coming out of break? The next couple of weeks specifically?

Advertisement

That’s the Evaluation Period.

While all of these games are going to be viciously competitive, they also run the gamut of playing Playoff Teams, Non-Playoff Teams, and Tweeners. It’s the perfect time to really look at what the Kraken are, not just what they have, and see if it’s feasible for them to take enough points to stay in the hunt for the Wild Card.

The issues Seattle face ultimately come down from one simple problem: it is a chore for them to play offense some nights. They can potentially fix this for the now or for the not-too-distant future by becoming active on the trade market if they wanted to! They could rip valuable draft picks out of teams that are extremely invested in not just making the playoffs, but actively competing in them, and we’ve already seen that several of these teams are willing to pay up big time to do it.

But you need to be absolutely, 100% certain that if you sell, you are going in on being a seller. There is no point to half-assing punting on the rest of the season. That’s what the next two weeks are for; getting a realistic idea if selling is even a wise idea.

But, let’s say they wanted to add, where could they look?

Advertisement

Let’s talk about that next time.



Source link

Seattle, WA

Report: Seattle Mariners a front-runner for Cards’ Donovan

Published

on

Report: Seattle Mariners a front-runner for Cards’ Donovan


The Seattle Mariners have emerged as one of two front-runners in trade talks with the St. Louis Cardinals for utilityman Brendan Donovan, The Athletic’s Katie Woo reported on Saturday.

Drayer: How Polanco’s departure impacts Seattle Mariners’ offseason

Woo reported a league source said trade discussions between the Mariners and Cardinals have been heating up since the Winter Meetings, and that switch-pitcher Jurrangelo Cijntje and outfielder Lazaro Montes – two of Seattle’s top-seven prospects, per MLB pipeline – are two names St. Louis has inquired about, among others.

The Cardinals will not trade Donovan unless they are “blown away” by the return, and it’s believed they are looking for at least two prospects, per Woo’s reporting.

Advertisement

The San Francisco Giants were the other of the two front-runners Woo named. She also said that both the Mariners and Giants remain engaged in talks with the Arizona Diamondbacks about second baseman Ketel Marte.

Can the M’s give up what Arizona wants for a Ketel Marte trade?

Donovan, who will turn 29 next month, has two years of club control remaining. He’s played every position except catcher during his four-year career, with the majority of his time coming at second base and left field. He would figure to mainly factor in at second base and third base for the Mariners, who have young players like Cole Young, Ben Williamson and Colt Emerson vying for time at those positions.

Donovan was a first-time All-Star in 2025, batting .287 with a .353 on-base percentage, .422 slugging percentage, .775 OPS, 32 doubles, 10 home runs and 50 RBIs in 118 games. His 13% strikeout rate ranked in the 92nd percentile of big league hitters and his 13.4% whiff rate in the 95th percentile, per Baseball Savant.

Advertisement

Over four MLB seasons, Donovan has a career .282 average with a .361 on-base percentage, .411 slugging percentage, .772 OPS, 97 doubles, 40 homers and 202 RBIs in 492 games. He won the NL Gold Glove for utility players during his rookie season in 2022.

As for the prospects Woo reported the Cardinals inquiring about, the 22-year-old Cijntje is Seattle’s No. 7 prospect, per MLB Pipeline. The unique pitcher had a 3.99 ERA and 1.22 WHIP while holding opponents to a .207 average, striking out 120 batters and walking 51 in 108 1/3 innings pitched over 26 appearances (23 starts) across High-A and Double-A in 2025.

The 21-year-old Montes is considered to be the best power-hitting prospect in the Mariners’ farm system and is their No. 3 overall farmhand, per MLB Pipeline. The slugging outfielder hit .241 with a .354 on-base percentage, .504 slugging percentage, .858 OPS, 19 doubles, seven triples, 32 home runs, 89 RBIs, 83 walks and 169 strikeouts over 131 games across High-A and Double-A this year. Montes finished tied for third in home runs among minor leaguers across all levels.

The report that the M’s are one of the top contenders for Donovan came on the same day as they lost out on re-signing their top remaining free-agent target, second baseman/designated hitter Jorge Polanco, who reportedly agreed to a two-year, $40 million deal with the New York Mets.

More Seattle Mariners offseason coverage

• Backup catcher target emerges for Seattle Mariners, per reports
• Drayer: Mariners’ plan for 2B and 3B coming more into focus
• Salk: What we know and think about Seattle Mariners’ offseason needs
• Why Nolan Arenado could make sense as a Seattle Mariners trade target
• Drayer: Mariners’ plan for 2B and 3B coming more into focus
• The one move Passan says could make Mariners the AL favorites

Advertisement






Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

WEST SEATTLE CHRISTMAS LIGHTS: As seen from two wheels

Published

on

WEST SEATTLE CHRISTMAS LIGHTS: As seen from two wheels


Tonight’s spotlight lights are courtesy of Al, who sent this photo from a stop during The Beer Junction‘s wassail ride tonight – he says it’s in North Admiral, SW Atlantic between California SW and 44th SW. As for the ride, Al reports 17 people pedaled about six miles:

Advertisement

Wherever and however you find lights worth sharing, westseattleblog@gmail.com – with or without a pic! (To see what we’ve shown already, scroll through this WSB archive!)





Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

How Polanco’s departure impacts Seattle Mariners’ offseason

Published

on

How Polanco’s departure impacts Seattle Mariners’ offseason


The Seattle Mariners’ offseason will not be completed in a nice, neat, run-it-back bow, with reports Saturday morning that Jorge Polanco and the Mets are in agreement on a two-year, $40 million contract.

Drayer: Mariners’ plan for 2B and 3B coming more into focus

The number was stunning, with most industry insiders estimating Polanco would be looking at something closer to $12-15 million per year. Even ESPN’s Jeff Passan, one of the few to estimate Polanco would receive above $15 million per year, was likely to be surprised Saturday morning.

“He’s not getting $20 million a year,” Passan told Seattle Sports’ Brock and Salk on Tuesday. “I think at the end of the day, it’s probably going to be $14-17 million a year. If there are two teams duking it out at the end, maybe it goes up a million a year. It looks like it is going to be a three-year deal, but something along the lines of three (years) for $45-50 (million). I think that’s about right.”

Advertisement

The one move Passan says could make Mariners the AL favorites

The estimated $17 million salary sounded outrageous to the show hosts, but a lot can change this time of year, namely the Mets losing Pete Alonso to the Orioles. In comparison, Polanco is not exactly a splash after the loss of Alonso, but his versatility and offense when healthy (an .821 OPS in 2025) were attractive to the Mets.

Polanco going elsewhere was certainly a possibility – perhaps established as a good possibility when he failed to sign quickly, unlike the Mariners’ No. 1 target of the offseason, Josh Naylor. They were well aware of this with president of baseball operations Jerry Dipoto recently admitting the odds were technically against them with numerous teams involved. The Mariners valued Polanco but were outbid by a team that needed to make a move. So they must move on.

While the Mariners remained engaged in talks with free agents this week, it is the trade market where the most attractive candidates reside, with the Cardinals expected to trade Brendan Donovan and the Diamondbacks making Ketel Marte available.

Donovan and Marte would be great fits on the field and on the salary spreadsheet for Seattle, but they would come at the cost of prospect capital with the Cardinals, and to a lesser extent Diamondbacks, dealing from a position of leverage.

Advertisement

The Cardinals do not have to deal Donovan, who has two years remaining under club control, but his value presents new president of baseball operations Chaim Bloom the opportunity to make a significant early organizational mark.

In the case of Marte, the leverage he brings the Diamondbacks is short-lived as he will become a 10-and-5 player in the first weeks of the season, meaning he will be able to veto any trades at that point.

Can the M’s give up what Arizona wants for a Ketel Marte trade?

On the free agent market, despite reports that agent Scott Boras reached out to the Mariners about third baseman Alex Bregman having some interest in the team, the big-ticket players appear to remain off limits for the Mariners. They have maintained that the door would be open for Eugenio Suárez in the right circumstances. Assuming that would be a one-year deal, that signing seems unlikely to happen. The remaining free agent infielders appear to be more stopgap options of the take-a-chance variety with names like Willi Castro, Luis Rengifo or even Adam Frazier available.

The loss of Polanco and his production at the plate put Dipoto and general manager Justin Hollander in the position where they are going to have to make a gamble. They have a track record of making trades that end up requiring lower-ranked prospects than expected. If that is not the norm this winter, then do they make that painful prospect trade, or trade a starter from the big league roster? Does ownership decide it can make a gamble in expanding the budget for a higher-priced free agent, or does it take the gamble of making smaller moves, essentially staying where they are, seeing how it plays out and attempting to make big moves at the trade deadline once again?

Advertisement

The Mariners and Mariners fans have just been hit with a large dose of uncertainty. In the uncertainty are opportunities, however, and the remainder of the offseason should not be quiet.

More Seattle Mariners offseason coverage

• Backup catcher target emerges for Seattle Mariners, per reports
• Salk: What we know and think about Seattle Mariners’ offseason needs
• Why Nolan Arenado could make sense as a Seattle Mariners trade target
• Seattle Mariners pick two, lose one in minor league phase of Rule 5 draft
• With a tweak, Jose Ferrer could be special in Seattle Mariners’ bullpen






Source link

Continue Reading

Trending