Seattle, WA
Law Land Lines: Property Law and the Transformation of Seattle’s Terrain – The American Surveyor
Scripture envisages a time when “Each valley shall be lifted up/ each mountain and hill made low / and the uneven floor shall turn into degree .…” (Isa. 40:4 (RSV).) Whereas the which means of this prophecy is sort of one other story, the imagery matches one surveyor’s mission to rework Seattle on the flip of the 20 th century.
Seattle was established on the hills and tidal mud flats alongside the japanese shore of Elliott Bay, a pure deep-water port in Puget Sound. Fed by a Mount Rainier glacier, the Duwamish River carried timber and coal to Elliott Bay for commerce. The area was blessed with pure sources, however common flooding on the low-lying wetland stymied building, and the steep rise landward was seen as a hindrance to a viable business heart.
We’ll use the backdrop of Seattle’s twenty-year marketing campaign to chop down hills and fill tidelands for instance authorized ideas affecting actual property, amongst them constitutional takings, particular profit assessments, and the obligation to shore up your neighbor’s land generally known as lateral assist.
R. H. Thomson
The surveyor who introduced his dream to fruition was Reginald Heber Thomson (1856-1949), born to a religious, well-to-do household in Indiana. Perched above the Ohio River, their house’s commanding views of woodland and the riverfront metropolis of Madison might have knowledgeable Thomson’s perceptions of the interaction of nature and civilization, and, as he himself noticed, “the causes of metropolis progress.”
Exerting a robust affect on Thomson was his father Samuel, a math professor on the Presbyterian Hanover Faculty and a preacher and biblical literalist. (He strove to reconcile the rising science of geology with Genesis holy writ in an 1857 lecture.)
Thomson was additionally formed by the Progressive Period and would turn into one in all its main apostles. Along with social and political change, this era is thought for the pursuit of science and engineering to beat hurdles, which the journal Science embraced in 1901 because the dream of “directing the nice sources of energy in Nature for the use and comfort of Man” (Croes, 14(342), 83).
In 1884, Thomson grew to become Seattle’s metropolis surveyor and 7 years later King County surveyor. The subsequent yr, Seattle appointed him metropolis engineer. Along with eradicating hills, Thomson is essentially credited with different Herculean achievements for town, together with its water provide pipeline, sewer system, the straightening of the Duwamish River for industrial use (as we speak a Superfund web site), and the ship canal connecting Lake Washington with Puget Sound.
The Regrade Plan
Recounting his work with a railroad survey social gathering in Washington state, Thomson wrote of “the boldness this crew had in Seattle’s future” amongst their banter. Including his personal far-seeing two cents, Thomson recollected difficult them with: “How will individuals in a single finish of town be capable to do enterprise with these within the different finish, with such hills and deep valleys between them?”
Within the days of horse-drawn transport, steep grades disrupted journey, bodily dividing town and making it pricey to pump water to houses. As metropolis engineer, Thomson was a tireless advocate to Seattle’s politicians and residents for regrading the hills. For every particular person mission, the method required a petition signed by a majority of affected property house owners and a metropolis council ordinance, just like the one “offering for the development of Jackson Avenue and different streets within the metropolis by grading and regrading the identical.” (Gerard, 73 Wash. 519 (1913).)
In accordance with Thomson’s plan, town excavated solely the grid of roads, whereas landowners bore the price of bringing down their very own intervening tons—ideally on the similar time and utilizing the identical contractor (Wilson, 2009). Harnessing the ability of the Cedar River, water cannons disintegrated the hills, and their constituent alluvium was channeled downhill to reclaim the tidelands, creating 27 new metropolis blocks.
Authority to Regrade
Though the regrades garnered widespread assist, some little doubt questioned the very energy asserted by town to decrease the streets and oblige the inhabitants to regulate correspondingly. (Reportedly “town used eminent area to bully recalcitrant residents” (Klingle, 2007).) However simply because the regulation sometimes allows native governments “to open [originally] and preserve in restore streets, lanes, alleys, and so forth.,” that very same municipal perform consists of “the ability to change the grade or change the extent of the land on which the streets … are laid out,” the U.S. Supreme Court docket beforehand held. (Smith v. Corp. of Washington, 61 U.S. 135 (1857).)
The query results in property regulation’s abiding discourse: the stress between particular person rights and the larger good. In Smith, the Court docket denied a declare stemming from the regrade of Ok Avenue in Washington, D.C. There the Court docket dominated that the “plaintiff might have suffered inconvenience and been put to expense in consequence of such motion; but … personal pursuits should yield to public lodging.”
Whereas authorized challenges didn’t put a cease to Seattle’s regrading, the regulation did entitle landowners to compensation for sure losses, equivalent to buildings impaired or destroyed in the middle of the work. As a result of every property was distinctive, the extent of restitution relied on the feasibility of whether or not “buildings could be lowered [in situ,] or moved off the premises and moved again after the tons have been lower all the way down to the regrade, [or] whether or not they have been a complete loss.” (In re Jackson Avenue, 47 Wash. 243 (1907).)
What saved such compensatory damages to a minimal (and have become a factual situation for the courts) was the inevitability {that a} new business district would improve land values. The regulation permitted town to offset the financial damages by the demonstrable advantages of leveling the grade, “for if the market worth of the property … will likely be enhanced by the development, there would, manifestly, be no pecuniary loss, and subsequently no authorized harm.” (Metropolis of Seattle v. Bd. of House Missions of Methodist Protestant Church, 138 F. 307 (ninth Cir. 1905).)
A Seek for Goal
Thomson’s path to the Pacific Northwest was not a straight line. After finishing his research at Hanover, together with “particular programs in surveying, chemistry, and geology,” Thomson moved to California the place his father had accepted a place as headmaster of a Christian faculty in Sonoma County. Throughout his 4 years in California, he taught at his father’s college and labored as a surveyor together with his brother, together with mapping a subdivision of the Rancho Tzabaco (Wilson).
Biographer William Wilson reckons that Thomson’s upbringing instilled in him a sure advantage tinged with church doctrine. In a simile Thomson wrote in his autobiography, biblical resurrection offers rise to self-improvement: “[I]t is critical for us to be crushed for service in order that we might rise once more into a brand new life and to a brand new magnificence, because it was for the rock to be crushed that it’d show itself within the flower.” Whereas the tenor is private, the motion evokes a panorama remodeled. In Seattle, Thomson discovered a metropolis not but totally shaped; a land the place he would possibly present his promise.
Particular Profit
The concept of rising property values did greater than cut back town’s legal responsibility for damages. It justified requiring landowners to contribute to the price of regrading with a “particular evaluation” levied towards the affected parcels. A particular evaluation is a technique of financing public enhancements that differs from a normal tax in that it applies solely to particular land. Examples of its software embrace streets and sewers and different
native enhancements which can be appurtenant to particular land and convey a profit considerably extra intense than is yielded to the remainder of the municipality.… A legitimate particular evaluation … is merely compensation paid by the property proprietor for the improved worth of his land.
(Heavens v. King County Rural Library Dist., 66 Wash.2nd 558 (1965).) The existence of a profit is evidenced by “the distinction between the honest market worth of the property [before and] after the particular advantages have connected.” (Id.) Whereas the quantity to be levied is every property’s “proportionate share of the price of the development.” (In re Metropolis of Seattle, 66 Wash. 327 (1911).) A metropolis might not levy an evaluation larger than the particular profit accruing to that property.
Within the case of the Seattle regrades, a panel of eminent area commissioners heard knowledgeable testimony and established the parcel assessments, which have been then confirmed or modified by town council. The assessments have been topic to judicial evaluate. (Id.)
Difficult Assessments
Along with divining greenback value, the bewildering difficulties concerned mapping the exact “zone of profit”: why one lot must be assessed and the subsequent one not; and distinguishing between what to think about a particular profit, versus what facet of the regrade benefited the general public typically and therefore ought to pretty be borne by normal fund income. (Id.; see In re Taylor Ave., 149 Wash. 214 (1928) (the courtroom held sure assessments for the regrade of Seattle’s Denny Hill had been “mounted on a essentially improper foundation [because any] advantages as do accrue are clearly normal advantages and the property is just not chargeable therefor”).)
These judgment calls and valuations have been inexact, to say the least. “No questions come to this or some other courtroom,” stated the state Supreme Court docket, “that contain such entanglements and issues as do these evaluation circumstances. They can’t be resolved by reference to equation or theorem.” (66 Wash. 327.)
The courtroom quoted one of many evaluation commissioners who admitted, “The damages or advantages can’t be found out.” And this from the trial choose: “Justice in its summary sense is unimaginable.” Strikingly resigned, the excessive courtroom stated, “All we are able to hope for, then, is that no larger injustice is completed to at least one than to a different.”
Taking or Tort
The regulation attracts distinctions when figuring out the authorized rights at stake, and the outcomes may be consequential. We depend on courts to “decide into which class a given case might fall.” (Wong Kee Jun v. Metropolis of Seattle, 143 Wash. 479 (1927).)
Wong Kee concerned harm to property from town’s regrading. The lawsuit alleged that chopping into the hill, with out offering adequate slope or shoring, precipitated plaintiff’s neighboring land and enhancements to slip into the void. The shoddy excavation violated the rule “that the proprietor of land has the best to the lateral assist from the adjoining soil.” Thus, if one “removes the soil from his personal land as to deprive the adjoining proprietor of [that land’s] pure assist,” he’s chargeable for the ensuing harm. (Id.) A jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and town appealed.
The query for the state’s excessive courtroom was whether or not this hurt was an unconstitutional “taking” of plaintiff’s property or ought to extra appropriately be thought-about a tort: a wrongful act on the a part of town, on this case performing the work negligently or carelessly. The plaintiff argued it was a taking. Property harm from public works, even unintentional, can definitely be dominated a taking, as when flooding from a storm sewer offers rise to a declare that the federal government has in impact used personal property for a public objective (i.e., a retention pond) with out compensation. (See Bunch v. Coachella Valley Water Dist., 15 Cal.4th 432 (1997).)
For causes that can turn into obvious, town argued the declare was a tort. Torts are primarily creatures of state regulation, which suggests legislatures can procedurally restrict their availability. One frequent method lawmakers do that is with claim-filing necessities, which have a tendency to scale back the tort danger publicity for native governments.
Earlier than suing a metropolis, these legal guidelines mandate {that a} potential plaintiff first try an administrative declare for damages, often inside a comparatively brief time after the hurt happens (30 days in Wong Kee). If not rejected, the declare offers town an opportunity to proper the improper or make a calculated payout, if solely to keep away from litigation. A failure to well timed file a declare will stop courts from reaching the deserves of the lawsuit, and, within the case of Wong Kee, would have barred reduction. However this procedural hoop might not intrude with the best earthly rule in American regulation, which requires compensation for property taken.
A Simply Outcome
The courtroom’s process in Wong Kee was to use takings or negligence regulation. Specializing in carelessness as the reason for the slide favored the negligence conclusion: “[W]hen town blindly and willfully proceeds by cause of such inadequacy of plan to wreck personal property, it’s performing tortiously.”
However in “look[ing] additional for the dividing line,” the courtroom was reluctant to permit town its self-serving desire: “[T]o accomplish that could be to benefit from its personal improper, which is abhorrent to well-established authorized ideas.” This value-laden language is an instance of ethical reasoning, a judicial strategy to decision-making that locations on the fore the Structure’s core convictions, equivalent to the best to property. In Wong Kee, the courtroom clearly sought to guard the person and guarantee a simply final result. The courtroom stated town “can not plead a willful improper [a tort] to defeat a simply declare [a taking].” Accordingly, the courtroom affirmed the award of compensation beneath the Structure. (U.S. Const. amend. V.)
Gridlocked
It’s evident from his lengthy profession as a public servant that Thomson valued using engineering know-how to enhance his metropolis and the lives of its individuals. Over the previous century, our society has turn into much less single-minded relating to altering the atmosphere. However even when the regrading of Seattle’s hills was underway, an editorial posed a honest imaginative and prescient: that town, with its “magnificent pure web site, [was missing] an ideal alternative to put out its streets to evolve with the pure options” (Klingle).
The author was plainly referring to decisions in street alignments. Seattle’s roads unremarkably adopted a strict grid sample, unwaveringly reflecting the platted sectionalized land with out heed to the severity of the grade. Whereas roads attentive to contours could be longer, they’re designed for mild incline and might encourage a way of concord with nature. It’s onerous to think about the havoc to non-public property being any worse had town elected to revamp its streets moderately than get rid of its hills.
As our respect for the pure atmosphere and consciousness of our place inside it evolve, the story of Seattle’s regrades offers cause for pause earlier than pushing on to remake the world in our picture (alluding to Gen. 1:26).
Bibliography
Matthew Klingle, Emerald Metropolis: An Environmental Historical past of Seattle (Yale Univ. Press, 2007).
R.H. Thomson, That Man Thomson (Univ. of Washington Press, 1950).
William H. Wilson, Shaper of Seattle: Reginald Heber Thomson’s Pacific Northwest (Washington State Univ. Press, 2009).
Seattle, WA
Report: Cowboys request interview with Seattle assistant Leslie Frazier
The Cowboys have requested an interview with Seahawks assistant head coach Leslie Frazier, Todd Archer of ESPN reports.
They have an interview scheduled with former Jets head coach Robert Saleh for later this week, per Archer.
If both interviews are in person, that would satisfy the Rooney Rule and allow the Cowboys to make a hire at any point thereafter.
Frazier was the head coach of the Vikings from 2011-13 after taking over as interim coach for the final six games of 2010. He went 21-32-1. This is his first interview request in this hiring cycle.
Frazier, who began his NFL coaching career in 1999, was the Bucs’ defensive coordinator (2014-15), the Ravens’ secondary coach (2016) and the Bills’ defensive coordinator (2017-22) after his stint with the Vikings. He was out of the league in 2023 before Mike Macdonald hired him in Seattle before this season.
Jerry Jones’ eight previous hires for the Cowboys have been either former head coaches and/or have a tie with Jones. Frazier and Saleh both have previous head coaching experience.
Seattle, WA
Sara Nelson Restarts the Debate About Allowing More Housing in SoDo – The Urbanist
A bill introduced by Seattle Council President Sara Nelson this week is set to reignite a debate over allowing housing on Seattle’s industrial lands and the future of the SoDo neighborhood. The industrial zone in question is immediately west and south of T-Mobile and Lumen stadiums, abutting the Port of Seattle. That debate had been seemingly put to rest with the adoption of a citywide maritime and industrial strategy in 2023 that didn’t add housing in industrial SoDo, following years of debate over the long-term future of Seattle’s industrial areas. This bill is likely going to divide advocates into familiar old camps during a critical year of much bigger citywide housing discussions.
The idea of allowing residential uses around the south downtown stadiums, creating a “Maker’s District” with capacity for around 1,000 new homes, was considered by the City in its original analysis of the environmental impact of changes to its industrial zones in 2022. But including zoning changes needed to permit residential uses within the “stadium transition overlay district,” centered around First Avenue S and Occidental Avenue S, was poised to disrupt the coalition of groups supporting the broader package.
Strongly opposed to the idea is the Port of Seattle, concerned about direct impacts of more development close to its container terminals, but also about encroachment of residential development onto industrial lands more broadly.
While the zoning change didn’t move forward then, the constituency in favor of it — advocates for the sport stadiums themselves, South Downtown neighborhood groups, and the building trades — haven’t given up on the idea, and seem to have found in Sara Nelson their champion, as the citywide councilmember heads toward a re-election fight.
“There’s an exciting opportunity to create a mixed-use district around the public stadiums, T-Mobile Park and Lumen Field, that prioritizes the development of light industrial “Makers’ Spaces” (think breweries and artisans), one that eases the transition between neighborhoods like Pioneer Square and the Chinatown-International District and the industrial areas to the south,” read a letter sent Monday signed by groups with ties to the Seattle Mariners and the Seattle Seahawks, labor unions including SEIU and IBEW, and housing providers including Plymouth Housing and the Chief Seattle Club. And while Nelson only announced that she was introducing this bill this week, a draft of that letter had been circulating for at least a month, according to meeting materials from T-Mobile Park’s public stadium district.
Under city code, 50% of residential units built in Urban Industrial zones — which includes this stadium overlay — have to be maintained as affordable for households making a range of incomes from 60% to 90% of the city’s area median income (AMI) for a minimum of 75 years, depending on the number of bedrooms in each unit. And units are required to have additonal soundproofing and air filtration systems to deal with added noise and pollution of industrial areas.
But unlike in other Urban Industrial (UI) zones, under Nelson’s bill, housing within the stadium transition overlay won’t have to be at least 200 feet from a major truck street, which includes Alaskan Way S, First Avenue S, and Fourth Avenue S. Those streets are some of the most dangerous roadways in the city, and business and freight advocates have fought against redesigning them when the City has proposed doing so in the past.
The timing of the bill’s introduction now is notable, given the fact that the council’s Land Use Committee currently has no chair, after District 2 Councilmember Tammy Morales resigned earlier this month, and the council has just started to ramp up work on reviewing Mayor Bruce Harrell’s final growth strategy and housing plan. Nelson’s own Governance, Accountability, and Economic Development Committee is set to review the bill, giving her full control over her own bill’s trajectory, with Councilmembers Strauss and Rinck — the council’s left flank — left out of initial deliberations since they’re not on Nelson’s committee.
As Nelson brought up the bill in the last five minutes of Monday’s Council Briefing, D6 Councilmember Dan Strauss expressed surprise that this was being introduced and directed to Nelson’s own committee. Strauss, as previous chair of the Land Use Committee, shepherded a lot of the work around the maritime strategy forward, and seemed stunned that this was being proposed without a broader discussion.
“Did I hear you say that we’re going to be taking up the industrial and maritime lands discussion in your committee? There is a lot of work left to do around the stadium district, including the Coast Guard [base],” Strauss said. “I’m quite troubled to hear that we’re taking a one-off approach when there was a real comprehensive plan set up last year and to be kind of caught off guard here on the dais like this, without a desire to have additional discussion.”
On Tuesday, Strauss made a motion to instead send the bill to the Select Committee on the Comprehensive Plan, chaired by D3 Councilmember Joy Hollingsworth. After a long discussion of the merits of keeping the bill in Nelson’s committee, the motion was shot down 5-3, with Councilmembers Kettle and Rinck joining Strauss. During public comment, members of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters specifically asked for the bill to say in Nelson’s committee, a highly unusual move.
Nelson framed her bill Tuesday as being focused on economic development, intended to create more spaces that will allow small industrial-oriented businesses in the city. Nothing prevents those spaces being built now — commercial uses are allowed in the stadium overlay — but Nelson argued that they’ll only come to fruition if builders are allowed to construct housing above that ground-floor retail.
“What is motivating me is the fact that small light industrial businesses need more space in Seattle,” Nelson said. “Two to three makers businesses are leaving Seattle every month or so, simply because commercial spaces are very expensive, and there are some use restrictions for certain businesses. And when we talk about makers businesses, I’m talking about anything from a coffee roaster to a robot manufacturer, places where things are made and sold, and those spaces are hard to find. […] The construction of those businesses is really only feasible if there is something on top, because nobody is going to go out and build a small affordable commercial space for that kind of use”
Opposition from the Port of Seattle doesn’t seem to have let up since 2023.
“Weakening local zoning protections could not come at a worse time for maritime industrial businesses,” Port of Seattle CEO Steve Metruck wrote in a letter to the Seattle Council late last week. “Surrendering maritime industrial zoned land in favor of non-compatible uses like housing invokes a zero-sum game of displacing permanent job centers without creating new ones. Infringing non-compatible uses into maritime industrial lands pushes industry to sprawl outward, making our region more congested, less sustainable, and less globally competitive.”
SoDo is a liquefaction zone constructed on fill over former tideflats and is close to state highways and Port facilities, but not particularly close to amenities like grocery stores and parks. The issue of creating more housing in such a location will likely be a contentious one within Seattle’s housing advocacy world.
Nelson’s move may serve to draw focus away from the larger Comprehensive Plan discussion, a debate about the city’s long-term trajectory on housing. Whether this discussion does ultimately distract from and hinder the push to rezone Seattle’s amenity-rich neighborhoods — places like Montlake, Madrona, and Green Lake — to accommodate more housing remains to be seen.
Ryan Packer has been writing for The Urbanist since 2015, and currently reports full-time as Contributing Editor. Their beats are transportation, land use, public space, traffic safety, and obscure community meetings. Packer has also reported for other regional outlets including Capitol Hill Seattle, BikePortland, Seattle Met, and PubliCola. They live in the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Seattle.
Seattle, WA
Critics say SPS capital levy will result in 'mega schools' and school closures
SEATTLE – When voters send back their ballots in February, they’ll be deciding on replacing two Seattle Public Schools levies that are expiring in 2025.
The district relies on local voter-approved levies like those to help pay for operations and to fund building construction and repairs.
What they’re saying:
While the year’s operation’s levy hasn’t had much pushback, critics say the capital levy is causing controversy, including concerns it will lead to school closures.
Some of those affiliated with the Save our Schools group say the capital levy is also prompting concerns that it will lead to “mega schools.”
“Seattle Public Schools has 106 schools. We have facility needs we are going to place before the voters,” said Richard Best, Executive Director of Capital Projects, Planning and Facilities of Seattle Public Schools.
School officials say there could be serious consequences for students if two propositions fail to pass February 11.
“That would be, I won’t say catastrophic, but there will be declining systems that could have consequential implications in that, when we do implement that system repair, it costs more,” said Best.
The operations levy would provide schools with $747 million, replacing the last EP&O levy approved in 2022.
It wouldn’t reduce the deficit, but would continue a current funding source, for things like salaries, school security, special education and multilingual support staff.
This was a breakdown that SPS provided of the operations levy online:
Operations Levy Details 2026-2028
- Proposed Levy Amount: $747 million
- Levy Collected: 2026–2028
- Replaces: Expiring EP&O Levy approved in 2022
- Current tax rate is 63 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value.
The second proposition, the $1.8 billion Building Excellence Capital Levy, would provide money for building projects and technology.
This was a breakdown of that proposition by SPS:
Building Excellence VI Capital Levy Details
- Proposed Amount: $1.8 billion
- Capital Projects Funding: $1,385,022,403
- Technology Funding: $$414,977,597
- Estimated Levy Rates: 93 cents to 79 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value
- Levy Collected: 2026-2031
A parent who didn’t want to share his name for privacy reasons told us he was concerned about the school closure plan that was scrapped last year, and wondered if the situation was “sustainable.”
Critic Chris Jackins belies the capital levy, as written, could result in the closure of schools.
“This is a continuation of an effort to close more schools,” said Jackins.
He wrote the statement in the voter pamphlet arguing against proposition 2. He says it would allow the construction of “mega schools,” which will in turn be used to then close more schools.
“On the capital levy, they have two projects which will create two more mega-sized schools, they are both scheduled at 650 students. They both cost more each, more than $148 million,” he said. “They are continuing their construction to add even more elementary school capacity when they say they have too much. It doesn’t make sense.”
The district’s website reads that major renovations and replacement projects would include replacement of at least one elementary school in northeast Seattle.
“The two schools they are talking about, one they didn’t name, so nobody knows, and one is Lowell, which is an existing school, but they are planning to destroy most of it and make it much larger,” Jackins said.
“I have worked designing schools since 1991 and since that period, I have never designed a school smaller than 500 students,” said Best. “We use a model for 500 students, which is three classrooms per grade level.”
Best explained further.
“The term is not ‘mega schools.’ We design schools to be schools within schools. You have a first-grade cohort, maybe 75 or 100 students. They stay together. Middle schools are 1,000 students. Those are very common throughout the state of Washington.”
Best says school closures aren’t on the table right now, but may be revisited at some point.
“We are going to engage in the conversation about schools, school capacity, looking at elementary schools, our focus right now is getting these two levies passed,” he said.
Meantime, Jackins is asking people to vote down the capital levy, and then to ask that it be resubmitted in a form that uses the funds to fix up existing schools in order to keep them open.
The ballots are expected to go out to voters around January 22. The election is set for February 11.
The Source: Information from this story is from Seattle Public Schools officials and the Save our Schools group.
BEST OF FOX 13 SEATTLE
Washington sees record eviction filings in 2024: ‘Not just an isolated incident’
New 2025 laws that are now in effect in WA
Good Samaritan saves mom from road rage incident in WA
Here’s when you’ll need REAL ID to go through US airport security
REI exits ‘Experiences’ businesses, laying off hundreds of employees
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.
-
Technology7 days ago
Meta is highlighting a splintering global approach to online speech
-
Science5 days ago
Metro will offer free rides in L.A. through Sunday due to fires
-
Technology1 week ago
Las Vegas police release ChatGPT logs from the suspect in the Cybertruck explosion
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies’ Review: Thai Oscar Entry Is a Disarmingly Sentimental Tear-Jerker
-
Health1 week ago
Michael J. Fox honored with Presidential Medal of Freedom for Parkinson’s research efforts
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: Millennials try to buy-in or opt-out of the “American Meltdown”
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Pacific Palisades Wildfire Engulfs Homes in an L.A. Neighborhood
-
World1 week ago
Trial Starts for Nicolas Sarkozy in Libya Election Case