Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Wildlife mystery: Why are gray whales swimming into San Francisco Bay in increasing numbers?

Published

on

Wildlife mystery: Why are gray whales swimming into San Francisco Bay in increasing numbers?


Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Gray whales have been veering off their normal routes along the West Coast and swimming under the Golden Gate Bridge into San Francisco Bay in unprecedented numbers.

Using thousands of photographs of distinctive markings on the whales’ backs to identify them, marine scientists have confirmed that at least 71 different gray whales—and possibly 84 or more—swam into the bay between 2018 and 2023, with some staying for more than two months, raising their risk of being hit by cargo ships, oil tankers or other large vessels.

Advertisement

From 2010 to 2017, only about one or two of the giant marine mammals came into the bay every year. Last year, however, there were at least 16, and in 2019 there were at least 21.

“We think it has a lot to do with the fact that the whales haven’t been getting enough food,” said Bill Keener, a biologist with The Marine Mammal Center, a non-profit group in Sausalito. “They may be weak and resting for a while, or they looking for an alternative food source.”

Some are malnourished, he said.

From 2019 to 2023, 22 gray whales were found dead in or near San Francisco Bay, according to data from The Marine Mammal Center, the California Academy of Sciences and public agencies. Of those, 14 died from unknown causes. Researchers performed studies, called necropsies, on nine of the whales. Six died from malnourishment. Three died from a collision with a ship.

Over the past four years, dead gray whales have been found inside San Francisco Bay off Angel Island, and near Richmond, Rodeo, Hercules, San Leandro, Mountain View, the Port of Oakland, Tiburon, the Berkeley Marina and Martinez.

Advertisement

“They aren’t just near the Golden Gate,” said Keener, who said a slower speed limit for big ships in the bay may be needed. “They are way into the bay, past Angel Island, down to Treasure Island. There’s a lot of ship traffic there.”

Wayward whales have inspired public interest for years.

One lost humpback, nicknamed Humphrey, gained national attention in 1985 and became the subject of children’s books, songs and a movie—drawing crowds of onlookers with binoculars—when he swam into the bay. Humphrey meandered up the Delta to sloughs 25 miles south of Sacramento, staying 26 days before finally returning to the Pacific Ocean as researchers played whale songs from speakers off boats to lure him west.

In 2007, a mother humpback and her calf, nicknamed “Delta and Dawn,” swam into the bay and ventured as far up the Delta as Rio Vista before scientists in boats coaxed them back into the open ocean 10 days later.

There was also a jump in the number of humpback whales that swam under the Golden Gate Bridge pursuing anchovies in from 2016 to 2018. They stayed only a few days each.

Advertisement

But the latest trend with gray whales seems different, researchers say. It could be a sign of stress in the wider population.

The pattern comes amid a big drop in the gray whale numbers off the Pacific Coast in recent years.

Once hunted by whaling ships in the 1800s for their oil until there were only about 1,000 or 2,000 individuals left, gray whales were protected in 1972 when President Nixon signed the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The last whaling company in the United States, the Del Monte Fishing Company, operated at Point Molate in Richmond. It made Kal-Kan dog food out of whales that its crews shot with mechanized harpoon cannons. The company closed in December 1971 as the law was about to take effect.

After whaling was banned in the U.S., numbers of gray whales increased. By 1994, after they reached a healthy population, the Clinton administration removed them from the Endangered Species Act list in what is still considered one of the nation’s major wildlife success stories.

Their population jumped to 27,000 by 2016, according to estimates from NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. But then it fell by at least one third by 2022. Hundreds of malnourished whales began to wash up on beaches in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California and Mexico. Nobody knew why.

Advertisement

Researchers said the die-off from 2018 to 2023, which NOAA called an “unusual mortality event,” was likely due to a shortage of food in the Arctic linked to changes in the amount of sea ice, wind patterns and other factors. Whales eat 3,000 pounds or more of food a day, preferring small, shrimp-like crustaceans known as amphipods, along with worms and other tiny creatures that they scoop from the sea floor.

Last year, gray whale numbers began to rebound to as many as 21,000. NOAA declared an end to the “unusual mortality event” in November. Scientists are watching carefully to see if the change is temporary or permanent.

The roller coaster population—and weird detours into San Francisco Bay—could be related to climate change, or it could be part of the gray whale’s natural population fluctuations, said John Calambokidis, a research biologist with Cascadia Research, in Olympia, Washington.

“What is a natural cycle?” he said. “Is this normal? Or something unusual? The ecosystem in the Arctic has changed very rapidly. That’s one reason this has scientists’ attention.”

One thing is clear: The gray whales coming into San Francisco Bay are heading north as part of their annual migration from Baja, Mexico where they mate and breed, and turning right under the Golden Gate Bridge instead of continuing north to Alaska where they stock up on food during the summer months.

Advertisement

A lot is known about the latest trend because one researcher, Josephine Slaathaug, of the Marine Mammal Center, painstakingly sorted through more than 11,000 photographs of gray whales in San Francisco Bay last year. She built a database, identifying individual whales from photos taken on whale watching boats, the shoreline, and the center’s boats. She showed the animals are most common in March and April, and stayed in the bay between 13 and 75 days.

Slaathaug, a masters student at Sonoma State University, won a prestigious fellowship in April from the National Science Foundation as she expands the study in the coming years. One key question: Will the number of gray whales in the bay go down if their food in the Arctic recovers, and the West Coast population increases?

“We don’t understand all the drivers,” she said. “We have preliminary data. But we do know that with all the ships, the bay is not a very safe place for the whales.”

2024 MediaNews Group, Inc. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Advertisement

Citation:
Wildlife mystery: Why are gray whales swimming into San Francisco Bay in increasing numbers? (2024, June 25)
retrieved 25 June 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-06-wildlife-mystery-gray-whales-san.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

Will New York Giants S Jevon Holland play vs. San Francisco 49ers?

Published

on

Will New York Giants S Jevon Holland play vs. San Francisco 49ers?


The New York Giants will host the San Francisco 49ers at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, on Sunday afternoon in Week 9, where they will look to pick up an upset and get back on the winning track. But they will be without several players, including, potentially, safety Jevon Holland.

Holland, who was inactive in Week 8 due to a neck injury, was limited in practice on Wednesday through Friday with a knee injury.

New York will enter the game banged up, with several players already on injured reserve (IR) and several more ruled out or doubtful: Cornerback Paulson Adebo (knee, out), defensive lineman Chauncey Golston (neck, out), and cornerback Cor’Dale Flott (concussion, out), among others.

Advertisement

Jevon Holland injury update

Holland missed three straight practices with a neck injury last week and was inactive against the Philadelphia Eagles after being listed as doubtful. He proceeded to be a limited participant in all three practices this week, albeit with a knee injury.

“Holland will do stuff today,” head coach Brian Daboll said on Wednesday.

Daboll did not address Holland’s status again the rest of the week. Defensive coordinator Shane Bowen also failed to address the veteran safety.

Holland was officially listed as “questionable” on the final injury report.

Will Jevon Holland play vs. 49ers?

Holland was not made available to reporters this week and doesn’t appear to have conducted any one-on-one interviews. That has prompted questions about his health and how he sustained a knee injury after not playing in Week 8.

Advertisement

The Giants elevated a wide receiver and a linebacker from their practice squad, which would normally be an encouraging sign, but Dan Duggan of The Athletic reports that Holland’s availability in Week 9 is very much in doubt.

Who would replace Jevon Holland in the lineup?

The Giants are thin in the secondary, and Holland was signed this offseason to be one of their anchors. In seven games this season, he has played moderately well, excelling against the run but struggling a bit in coverage.

If Holland is inactive on Sunday, the Giants will be without three of their starters in the secondary, joining cornerbacks Paulson Adebo and Cor’Dale Flott. That is obviously less than ideal for Bowen’s defense.

In Holland’s place would be safety Dane Belton, who would line up alongside Tyler Nubin.

Belton has appeared in eight games (one start) this season, recording 44 tackles (21 solo), four passes defensed, and one forced fumble.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Ruling advances lawsuit against S.F. over arrests during 2023 Dolores Park hill bomb

Published

on

Ruling advances lawsuit against S.F. over arrests during 2023 Dolores Park hill bomb


Skateboarders ride down Church Street at the annual hill bomb event at Dolores Park in San Francisco on Saturday, July 6, 2024.

Jason Henry/For the S.F. Chronicle

A federal court on Thursday granted class-action status to a lawsuit filed by teenagers who say they were unlawfully arrested during the chaotic 2023  hill bomb at Dolores Park, paving the way for more than 100 others to potentially join the case against the city and county.

The ruling allows approximately 113 people — including 81 minors — who were arrested on 17th Street on July 8, 2023, to join the lawsuit first filed by four teenagers in December 2023. The mass arrests concluded a night of general mayhem, marked by fireworks that sparked fires, vandalization of Muni vehicles and confiscation of several firearms around Dolores Park, according to police.

Advertisement

Within the chaos, innocent teenagers were swept up in detentions, the lawsuit argues. Rachel Lederman, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, called the mass arrest of children and youth an “outrageous round-up” where police arrested young adults without probable cause.

Article continues below this ad

“Then, the police held the children and youth outdoors and in vehicles for many hours as darkness fell and the night turned cold and windy,” she said in a statement. “SFPD did not provide them access to a bathroom for up to seven hours forcing desperate children to use a bucket in the street handed out by a neighbor.”

Jen Kwart, spokesperson for the city attorney, defended police, saying Friday that officers exercised appropriate crowd control to protect public safety. The city is looking forward to presenting its case in the coming months, she said.

The ruling was first reported by Mission Local.

Advertisement

Over at least the past decade, the informal competition has often sparked conflict with police. The hill bomb has gained notoriety in recent years after the event led to a death, a traumatic head injury and multiple skirmishes with the police. After 2023’s confrontations and arrests, the hill bomb was relatively calm in 2024 as police barricaded Dolores Street but skateboarders bombed down a different one.

This year, the event did not take place, and was instead replaced by a more formal, structured hill bomb at Twin Peaks, a largely peaceful affair.

Article continues below this ad

Two Muni trains were vandalized during the Dolores Hill Bomb in 2023.

Two Muni trains were vandalized during the Dolores Hill Bomb in 2023.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency 2023

Police were made aware of the 2023 hill bomb three weeks before the event took place, according to the lawsuit. The city sent additional officers to the area and erected barricades on the steepest part of the hill on Dolores Street. The crowd grew to approximately 200 people that night. 

Advertisement

Police said that around 7 p.m., a 16-year-old man spat in a sergeant’s face. Police said the officer was assaulted while trying to detain the teenager and suffered lacerations to his face. Police said that during the arrest, the crowd began to throw ignited fireworks, smoke bombs, glass bottles, and metal cans at officers.

Two Muni light-rail vehicles were vandalized with graffiti, and the crowds refused to disperse and began removing barricades police had placed in the area, police said.

Around 8 p.m., after declaring the crowds an unlawful assembly, officers began making mass arrests. Plaintiffs argue they were trying to leave the area when police began corralling them for detention. 

Article continues below this ad

One 15-year-old said in the lawsuit that she was trying to ride a scooter to a friend’s house and was still detained after telling officers she had nothing to do with the hill bomb.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges officers gave little information to parents who arrived to pick up their kids. Parents waited on the street for hours, and the last child was released from the Mission Police Station at 4:15 a.m., the lawsuit alleges. 

The teens were cited and released for inciting a riot, remaining present at an unlawful assembly and conspiracy, police said.

Police said one minor was sent to the hospital to be treated for intoxication but “there was no other report of injury from the arrests.”

Article continues below this ad

“This dangerous and unlawful behavior put members of the public and our officers at risk of serious injury or worse,” then-police chief Bill Scott said in a statement at the time. “This behavior will not be tolerated in our city.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Waymo pledges donation after beloved San Francisco corner store cat struck, killed

Published

on

Waymo pledges donation after beloved San Francisco corner store cat struck, killed


Editorial Note: The news report in the video player above was produced on Wednesday, Oct. 29, before KRON4 News received a statement from Waymo.

SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — Waymo said it plans to make a donation to a local animal rights organization after a beloved corner store cat in San Francisco’s Mission District was struck and killed by one of its driverless cars Monday night.

According to residents, “KitKat” was the neighborhood mascot who brightened customers’ and residents’ days as they passed by Randa’s Market on 16th Street.

“They would deliver KitKat in a box of KitKats and that’s the box that KitKat chose to sleep in and got his name. (It) caught on very well,” said neighbor Sarah Koohnz.

Advertisement

According to a 311 complaint, a Waymo hit the liquor store’s cat that was sitting on the sidewalk next to the transit lane. The complaint says, “the Waymo didn’t even try to stop and hit the cat at a fast speed. The cat has been picked up by neighbors and taken to the emergency vet with hopes of rescue. Unfortunately, KitKat did not survive.”

Photo: KRON4 News.

“The trust and the safety of the communities we serve is our highest priority,” said a Waymo spokesperson in a statement to KRON4 Thursday evening. “We reviewed this, and while our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away. We send our deepest sympathies to the cat’s owner and the community who knew and loved him, and we will be making a donation to a local animal rights organization in his honor.”

Community members in San Francisco’s Mission District held a vigil Wednesday that was filled with flowers, candles, and pictures of the popular pet. Many are calling for more safety measures to be put in place. The owner was too distraught to talk on camera.

“I just find it disgusting that Waymo has an action in this,” added Koohnz. “I’ve known multiple people that have been hit by those vehicles, myself included, and I just find it disgusting that that’s the way KitKat went.”

“While I’ve been making space for people to keep bringing offerings, I’ve just gotten stories upon stories about how it was their cat,” said resident Margarita Lara, who works next door. “Two different kids of different ages said they grew up with this cat and they cried. One of them brought her big brother.”

Advertisement

Waymo Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana said during an interview at a TechCrunch Disrupt event in San Francisco that robotaxis are safer than human drivers.

When asked about potential fatalities by robots, she said she thinks society will accept it — and that the company worries not about whether it will happen, but when, and they plan for them.

This comes as Uber announces that the San Francisco Bay Area will be the first market for its specially built autonomous taxi, which is expected to launch in late 2026. But those grieving in the Mission would prefer robotaxis break operations.

“The coolest cat in the world,” added Lara. “One of a kind, the Mayor of 16th Street, and we’re never going to have another pet like this. Loved by all.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending