Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Grading every pick in 49ers' 2024 NFL draft class

Published

on

Grading every pick in 49ers' 2024 NFL draft class


The 49ers wound up picking eight times in the 2024 NFL draft, and their selections helped solidify the idea that they’d pursue both immediate and long-term help for their roster.

Most of their picks fall in a similar bucket where they could certainly contribute right away, but it’s easier to see paths to playing time down the road. We issued grades for all of the picks, which we’ll get to momentarily, but it’s important to note these grades have more to do with the general philosophy of the pick and how a player at a given position fits with the roster. Of course, it comes with some projection. That’s part of the whole draft process. However, we’re neither propping up the players as successes nor condemning them as failures based on our grades.

Let’s dive in:

Wide receiver wasn’t the biggest need for the 49ers, but it was certainly something they needed to address in this year’s draft. Pearsall didn’t have the highest ceiling of the WRs left at the 31st pick, but there aren’t many holes to poke in his game. He’s a quality route runner and a good athlete who could be a really good WR2.

Advertisement

Grade: B

This pick was a bit of a head-scratcher given how the 49ers haven’t really prioritized cornerback in the draft before this year. Green’s measurables aren’t outstanding, but the fact he shut down players like LSU WR Malik Nabers (No. 6 overall pick in the 2024 draft) and posted 14 pass breakups without elite size or athleticism is a testament to how good he is in coverage. It remains to be seen whether his aggressive style can come without too many flags. He’ll also have to prove he can hang with NFL athletes. His upside projects him as a very good starting CB in the NFL though and he’ll have an inside track to a starting job in Year 1.

Grade: B

Advertisement

The 49ers needed to add offensive line help. They found a versatile player like Puni via trade up in the third round, and really got the type of player they would’ve gotten had they reached in Rounds 1 or 2. Instead they stayed patient and identified a good tackle prospect who will likely kick to guard in the pros. He started a full season at left guard and left tackle for the Jayhawks, and he should get opportunities to push for a starting job at both right guard and right tackle. At worst he’s a developmental depth piece with experience at multiple positions.

Grade: B+

This is a really fun pick for the 49ers in part because they won’t need Mustapha to start in Year 1. He’s a well-built strong safety who flies downhill to lay the lumber as a tackler. It’s not often ball carriers get away from him. There’ll be some feeling out as far as what roles he can fill in San Francisco’s secondary, but he projects as a long-term starter for them alongside Ji’Ayir Brown. In Year 1 he should be a dynamite special teams contributor.

Advertisement

The grade here gets docked some because San Francisco sent two fifth-round picks to the Jets to jump up to No. 129 overall. There’s a question mark about the positional value as well given how much success the 49ers have had finding RBs later on Day 3 or in undrafted free agency. Guerendo can flat out play though. He brings electric speed and really good balance through contact. His college production was pretty limited though and he started only one game because of three separate injuries in three consecutive years when he was at Wisconsin. The ceiling for Guerendo is very high, but it’s uncertain exactly what his role will be in a crowded backfield which is a problem when the club traded up to snag him.

Grade: C+

Another wide receiver was an interesting move for the 49ers, and it indicates they’re not super confident in a lot of their receiver depth long-term. Jauan Jennings’ future is uncertain since he could head to unrestricted free agency next offseason, and neither Danny Gray nor Ronnie Bell are slam dunks to make the roster. Cowing can definitely play and his speed is evident when he pulls away from defenders. His 5-8, 168-pound frame may limit him to slot work in the NFL though. He worked a lot on underneath routes for both UTEP and Arizona which may help him in his quest for snaps. At least for now though he has a ton of players in front of him and the 4th-round pick may not have a ton of avenues for playing time if Jennings winds up staying long-term.

Advertisement

This late-round choice feels a tick redundant with the Puni pick back in Round 3. Not that a team can ever have too many offensive linemen, but Kingston doesn’t really have a natural position after starting at four of five spots in college. That versatility is good, to be sure, but he’ll likely stick as an interior offensive lineman long-term. An offensive tackle would’ve been a better spot to take a flier on. Perhaps the 49ers’ coaching staff believes he has starting-caliber upside.

Grade: C-

This was a nice way to end a solid draft for the 49ers. Bethune could contribute on special teams right away as a reserve LB, or he could land on the practice squad as a developmental piece for a 49ers LB room that could undergo some changes in the next couple of seasons.

Grade: B

Advertisement



Source link

San Francisco, CA

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock

Published

on

What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock


Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.

Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”

Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?

Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.

Advertisement

Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.

The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.

People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026

Published

on

Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026


Welcome to our running tally of Election Night results. Or, as this is California, well beyond tonight, as results continue to trickle in.

The first batch of results should arrive at 8:45 p.m., with three more to follow tonight. The Department of Elections has the breakdown.

San Francisco is voting in three special elections, for District 2 and District 4 supervisors and for a Board of Education member. Both supervisor races are referendums on housing, especially District 2, while the main backdrop of the D4 race is all the hot feelings around the fate of the Sunset Dunes Park (nee Great Highway).

The winners of all three special races will have to compete again in November for their seats.

Advertisement

Keeping it local, SF is also voting on four ballot measures. Prop A is for a bond to pay for an emergency water-system. B is for term limits. C and D are dueling measures related to the “overpaid CEO” tax. (Links go to our reporting on each race or issue; or click here for our Election 2026 page.)

Vote local, think national: Which two candidates will advance to the November election to replace Nancy Pelosi?

Statewide races include the primaries for governor, education superintendent, lieutenant governor, and much more.

Polls close soon. If you haven’t voted yet, find your polling station here.

Tuesday, June 2, 5:40 p.m.

Two and a half hours until our polls close. Before we go down the local rabbit hole, a reminder that other states have primary action today: New Jersey, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Montana.

Advertisement

Why does it take so long to get results in California? CalMatters has you covered on that story. We shouldn’t expect a call tonight on the governor’s race.

The last big election was November 5, 2024. (Remember?) Ten days later, there were still races to call in San Francisco.


Advertisement

So if you’re waiting for the pundits (and maybe even us) to tell you What It All Means, you might have to wait a while.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco voters to decide on dueling measures on Top Executive Pay Tax changes

Published

on

San Francisco voters to decide on dueling measures on Top Executive Pay Tax changes


San Francisco voters weighed in Tuesday on two competing measures that seek to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, with one of the measures also including a change to the Gross Receipts Tax.

Should both measures pass, the one with the most votes will take effect, according to the propositions’ legal text.

Currently, the measures state that most businesses with San Francisco gross receipts up to $5 million are exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax. And businesses that use more than half of their city payroll for in-house administrative and management services pay an Administrative Office Tax instead of a Gross Receipts Tax.

The Top Executive Pay Tax is a tax some large businesses pay if their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median pay of their San Francisco employees. Businesses that have city gross receipts up to $5 million and are not subject to the Administrative Office Tax are exempt.

Advertisement

Proposition C

Proposition C states it would increase the number of businesses that could be exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax and would stop any further increases to the “Top Executive Pay Tax” after a final rate bump.

The proposed measure says it would raise the Gross Receipts Tax exemption ceiling to $7.5 million. The $7.5 million ceiling would also apply to the Top Executive Pay Tax exemption.

As for changes to the Top Executive Pay Tax, Proposition C states it would implement the 2028 tax rate increase in 2027, but then stop any future increases.

Supporting Proposition C are Rodney Fong, CEO of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, and Chris Wright, senior vice president of Advance SF, an organization of companies, which includes Bank of America, OpenAI, Waymo, the SF Giants CEO and others.

Fong and Wright, in their argument for the measure, say giving businesses more tax breaks would help keep more employees on payroll and would give companies the ability to “contribute to city services in a predictable and balanced way.”

Advertisement

Critics of Proposition C, such as the San Francisco Tenants Union, slam the measure as “billionaire-backed” and argue it would kill the Top Executive Pay Tax and would hand out more tax breaks to businesses at a time when the city is in a budget deficit and faces cuts to essential services.

Proposition D

Proposition D also seeks to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, which is collected from some large businesses where the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to other employees.

If approved, the measure would change the calculation of the tax using the compensation of all employees, not just employees based in San Francisco. Top Executive Pay Tax rates would also be increased for San Francisco gross receipts and payroll.

Supporters have billed the measure as a way to counteract federal cuts to Medicaid. A report by the City Controller’s Office said the measure could result in $250 million to $300 million in additional revenue.

“Proposition D is the solution to our budget deficit. It asks large corporations — not small businesses, not working families — to contribute a little more,” supporters said in the city’s official voter guide.

Advertisement

The measure has the backing of most of the Board of Supervisors, along with labor unions and Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

Opponents, including Mayor Daniel Lurie and state Sen. Scott Wiener, have argued Proposition D would negatively impact the city’s recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“San Francisco is already one of the most expensive cities in the country to live and do business. Adding extreme and unpredictable tax increases risks driving employers away just as we are trying to bring jobs, workers, and foot traffic back downtown,” said Supervisor Matt Dorsey in the city’s voter guide.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending