Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Morning Report: Council Narrowly Overrides Some – Not All – Mayoral Vetoes

Published

on

Morning Report: Council Narrowly Overrides Some – Not All – Mayoral Vetoes


The San Diego City Council narrowly voted Monday to override some but not all of Mayor Todd Gloria’s moves to reverse changes to the city’s budget that the Council approved earlier this month.

After an initial failed attempt to bat back all of the mayor’s proposed line-item vetoes, a six-member majority voted to accept Gloria’s push not to count on $3 million in projected revenue from digital billboards the city doesn’t now have to balance the budget. 

They also nixed a plan to hire a new chief operating officer who would take back duties that the mayor has taken on since he fired ex-top city bureaucrat Eric Dargan. 

Other Council concessions: The 6-3 majority also voted not to restore Arts, Culture and Community Festivals grant funding that community leaders rallied to bring back and to partially reduce funding for stormwater projects and new Fire-Rescue positions meant to increase the city’s brush fire prevention efforts.

Advertisement

What a Council majority wouldn’t change: The City Council is sticking by revenue assumptions for paid parking at Balboa Park and at the San Diego Zoo, and for credit card transaction fees on parking meters. It’s also sticking with its plan to move staffers now in the Office of Race and Equity into the Office of the Independent Budget Analyst and to hire a new director. The budget the City Council approved also called for the elimination of two high-level city bureaucrats known as deputy chief operating officers who typically oversee multiple city departments and functions, two city communications positions and two management positions in the police and compliance departments.

Councilmembers Jennifer Campbell and Stephen Whitburn rejected these proposed changes while Vivian Moreno, who also rejected the budget the City Council approved on June 10, said she couldn’t support either proposal unless the city dramatically increased funding for stormwater projects.

What the mayor is saying: Gloria wants you to know that if things don’t pan out with budget projections, it’s the City Council’s fault.

“While the Council has now chosen to partially override certain vetoes, I remain concerned that these actions could still weaken our ability to stay on stable financial footing,” Gloria wrote in a statement shortly after the City Council vote. “If their assumptions don’t hold, they’ll be responsible for the fallout: midyear cuts, layoffs, facility closures, brownouts, and broken promises to the communities we all serve.”

What the Council’s saying: Council President Joe LaCava said immediately after the budget vote that he stands ready to schedule votes on budget changes as needed – and ahead of quarterly budget updates if necessary.

Advertisement

Before and during Monday’s vote, some councilmembers criticized the mayor’s line-item vetoes and argued Gloria was failing to respond to the demands of both the City Council and community members who spoke up at budget hearings. 

Another Big COO Vote Coming Today

Former Chief Operating Officer Eric Dargan during a press conference at the O Lot Safe Sleeping site on the edge of Balboa Park and near the Naval Medical Center on Oct. 20, 2023. / Photo by Ariana Drehsler

Last month, our Lisa Halverstadt broke the news that the city’s former top bureaucrat, who Mayor Todd Gloria belatedly said he fired for cause, had reached a tentative $146,000 settlement with the city.

Today the City Council is set to vote on that proposed settlement, which is larger than the three months of severance that ex-COO Eric Dargan sought when he was abruptly dismissed in February.

The proposed settlement follows Dargan’s March discrimination lawsuit against the city alleging that Gloria reneged on a pledge to pay him three months’ severance after a dismissal – and an admission by Gloria’s office that he was fired rather than laid off.

In a report to the City Council about the proposed settlement, Assistant City Attorney Travis Phelps rejected the notion that the city was admitting it had mishandled the situation.

Advertisement

“The settlement is a business decision and the result of a compromise and dismissal of the litigation proceedings and is not an admission of liability by any party,” Phelps wrote. “(The) city and its representatives specifically disclaim any liability or responsibility to (the) plaintiff.”

Reminder: Under the city’s strong mayor form of government, a chief operating officer reporting to the mayor has typically overseen day-to-day city operations. After Dargan’s firing, Gloria took on that role in addition to his mayoral duties. The City Council has been skeptical of how this is working, hence an initial budget move to try to force Gloria to hire a replacement for Dargan. Gloria successfully batted back that change during Monday’s second City Council budget vote. 

County Supe Votes to Watch Today

County supervisors are set to vote today on a proposed $8.6 billion budget.

The Union-Tribune noted that county officials pitched closing a projected $139 million shortfall by reducing capital spending and eliminating 190 positions, most of which are in the county’s Health and Human Services Agency.

The county board’s two Democrats last week highlighted county staff projections that the Trump administration-backed “Big Beautiful Bill” could cost the county $286 million annually.

Advertisement

On that note: Today, Democratic Supervisors Terra Lawson-Remer and Monica Montgomery Steppe will propose a plan to have county staff do a deeper dive on potential impacts and propose strategies to address those new costs, including potentially dipping into county reserves or seeking grants.

Refresher: The two Democrats’ proposal to make it easier to dip into the county’s large reserve fund failed earlier this year. The District 1 supervisors’ race will tip the political leanings of the county board, meaning the county is more likely to tap into its reserves if Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre is elected and likely kill it if Chula Vista Mayor John McCann wins the seat.

One more county vote: Supervisors Montgomery Steppe and Republican Joel Anderson are each more quietly proposing to spend up to $20,000 each from their office budgets to attend a six-day September Global Policy Leadership Academy field study on mixed-income housing in Vienna, Austria.

In a joint board letter, the two supervisors write that their participation in the LeSar Development Consultants trip will support county efforts to “increase affordable housing supply, reduce homelessness, and pursue sustainable development.”

“By authorizing this travel, the board will support Supervisor Anderson and Supervisor Montgomery Steppe in gaining valuable insights and learning best practices that can inform San Diego County’s efforts to increase affordable housing supply, reduce homelessness, and pursue sustainable development,” the letter reads.

Advertisement

What the supes are saying: Anderson declined to comment on the item, which will for now appear on the county’s consent agenda which is generally approved with little discussion. A spokesperson for Montgomery Steppe shared a statement that reiterated points in the board letter.

“Supervisor Anderson and Supervisor Montgomery Steppe were both invited to participate in this field study as panelists, sharing insights from San Diego’s housing efforts while learning from Vienna’s internationally recognized housing model,” spokesperson Ariel Gibbs wrote.

Do you live or work in North County?  

Subscribe to the North County Report. Every other Wednesday, our Tigist Layne will bring you news about the issues that matter most in your community, from housing and homelessness to local elections.  

In Other News 

The Morning Report was written by Lisa Halverstadt and Andrea Sanchez-Villafaña. It was edited by Andrea Sanchez-Villafaña.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Diego, CA

Love and scares: San Diego couples tie the knot at haunted chapel wedding

Published

on

Love and scares: San Diego couples tie the knot at haunted chapel wedding


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — This Halloween, the San Diego County Clerk’s office transformed into a haunted chapel of love for its second annual Halloweddings. Costumed officiants, creepy vows, and spooky decorations set the scene for couples ready to say “I do” in true Halloween style.

For Angela Tran and Phillip Ona, Halloween has always been special. On Friday afternoon, it wasn’t just about candy and costumes, it was their anniversary, and they decided to make it extra memorable.

“We wanted a silly way to get legally married,” Angela said. “Our anniversary is around Halloween, and we had so much fun putting this together.”

Dozens of couples took part in the Halloween-themed ceremony, hosted by the County Clerk’s Office, exchanging vows like:

Advertisement

“Dear friends, we have been summoned here today for the hauntingly joyful wedding of Angela to her boo Phillip.”

County Clerk and Commissioner of Marriages Jordan Marks says events like Halloweddings are about making love less stressful and more memorable:

“People want a great time to celebrate. What better day than Halloween? Now couples get to do that for their entire lives every Halloween.”

No appointments. No long waits. Just walk in, get your marriage license, and tie the knot.

“Halloween is filled with some of the greatest love stories of all time,” Marks added. “Today, people get to pledge their undying love and say ‘I doo’ to their boo.”

Advertisement

For some couples, the theme got extra creative.

“We’re vampires. I don’t know if you bit me, we both have blood,” laughed Angela.

Beneath the darkness, the only thing truly immortal was their love.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

City Staff Spent $6 million More on Rentals Without Council Approval. Councilmembers Want Answers

Published

on

City Staff Spent  million More on Rentals Without Council Approval. Councilmembers Want Answers


A year ago, San Diego city auditors found that staff spent millions more on rental equipment for city departments than what councilmembers approved. But the auditors couldn’t find who OK’d the additional spending.  

Over the last month, councilmembers have demanded answers from city staff after an audit found that a contract with Herc Rentals increased by more than $6 million without approval from the City Council.  

“I had asked on the dais on Oct. 6 where the $6 million had come from that was taken from the general fund and increased unlawfully to the Herc rental contract,” Councilmember Marni von Wilpert said during an Oct. 20 City Council meeting. “I’m still waiting for an answer.”  

The city has a contract with Herc Rentals to rent trucks, forklifts and other equipment and services. This equipment is used by city workers across several departments responsible for park maintenance, public safety and more.  

Advertisement

For fiscal year 2020, councilmembers approved spending up to $14.3 million on rentals. The contract now allows spending up to $65.5 million.  

City law requires the City Council to review and approve certain changes to city contracts. The Council is required to approve new contracts over $3 million and all adjustments to contracts over $200,000. 

The city auditor found that didn’t happen in 2023. That year, staff adjusted the Herc Rentals contract in October by $4 million and then again in December by $2.7 million. Other adjustments made to the contract were approved by the Council.  

The city auditor’s team said departments didn’t know whether their contracts needed Council approval.  

In a statement, Ombretta Di Dio, spokesperson for purchasing and contracting, said the contract was adjusted “to pay outstanding invoices and allow departments access to rental equipment and vehicles to address operational needs, with the intent of obtaining retroactive approval.” 

Advertisement

She said rental equipment and vehicles supported critical operations to the city. When some city vehicles were out for repair or missing parts, they used Herc rentals to help in emergency situations like the 2024 floods.  

The city auditor gave Voice of San Diego the list of every transaction with Herc Rentals from 2019 to 2024. The transactions are from dozens of departments like public utilities, homelessness strategies and solutions, and transportation.  

Di Dio said departments have “flexibility within their approved budget to manage non-personnel costs… When overages occur in one area, they are typically offset by savings in another—ensuring that operations continue without disruption.” 

According to the 2024 audit, “when contract alterations are brought to Council late, it puts pressure on Council’s approval responsibility. As a result, Council’s ability to provide meaningful oversight may be reduced if there is not time to consider other vendors without disrupting critical services.”  

In other words, when contracts are brought late to the City Council it limits their role and authority to make sound decisions on the contracts. Think of it like making charges to a shared credit card. Each department is charging to the credit card, unaware of how much other departments are spending on it too. Then, Council has to deal with the bill. 

Advertisement

Say a department spent more than $50,000 on rental vehicles. They have a better chance of getting that approved by Council if they bring it late, because, well, they have already spent it and now they owe Herc.  

So, Council might feel pressure to approve the action to adjust the contract so they can ensure Herc gets paid. But they don’t know if the departments have that money budgeted, they just know they owe Herc.  

Councilmembers either vote no – and risk interrupting services – or vote yes and continue to meet the demands for rental equipment across departments.  

The Herc contract is an example of these pressures. The Council recently approved an additional eighth amendment to increase the amount in July. The Council voted to increase the contract with the condition that they want to see a specific audit on it. 

“I think one of the things I struggle with sometimes is who will bear the consequences if these contracts aren’t approved,” said Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera during the Council meeting on Oct. 6.  

Advertisement

“I think this is what puts us in a particularly difficult position as councilmembers… it is typically rank and file everyday employees who are doing the work.” 

It’s unclear why the city is spending so much with Herc. A spokesperson with the city said the transportation department received a mid-year adjustment in FY25 to account for increased needs so that other departments’ needs were not reduced.  

The city auditor is planning to do an individual audit on the Herc contract and any other vehicle contracts. 

“We will begin the audit in the near future,” said City Auditor Andy Hanau. 

Claudia Abarca, director of purchasing and contracting, said they implemented eight recommendations of the 13 made by the city auditor in the last year. One of these recommendations includes updating the Council approval threshold and clarifying alterations for goods and services contracts.  

Advertisement

Still, councilmembers are frustrated and looking for answers.  

“Do you realize we had a budget fight this past year for over $4.5 million in which the mayor vetoed it and we overrode the veto?” said Councilmember Von Wilpert during the Council Meeting on Oct. 6.  

“Somebody had to use a city computer and make that adjustment unlawfully. It’s against the municipal code to do that, so who did that?” 

Councilmember Raul Campillo also chimed in to ask if the city disciplined the employees who made the illegal adjustments. Abarca said they did.  

“I’m really hopeful that’s what happened here, because this wasn’t a few dollars over,” said Councilmember Campillo. “This was several million dollars over.” 

Advertisement

Abarca said that city departments were behind on payments and in a deficit of what they owed Herc. She said her staff was directed to make the unauthorized adjustments when they ran it up the chain of command.  

“I don’t know that it went to the mayor himself, I know I did bring this up to the DCOO (deputy chief operating officer) and we’ve been working on this contract for quite some time,” said Abarca. “We’ve done several refinements on how we are monitoring and actually managing the spend for each department to ensure we don’t get to this place again.”  

Abarca added they have not altered any contracts above $200,000 without it coming forward to the City Council since 2023. 

It’s still unclear who is directly responsible for the contract changes, and where each department pulled money from their budget to pay Herc. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Opinion: The jury is in — Cabrillo was a Spaniard

Published

on

Opinion: The jury is in — Cabrillo was a Spaniard


Sept. 28 was the 483rd anniversary of the arrival of the Spanish explorer Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo aboard the San Salvador at what we now call San Diego Bay. The San Salvador was the first European sailing vessel to reach the California coast.

Cabrillo National Monument was established in 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson. The Cabrillo/Spanish connection was prevalent in the original plans for Cabrillo National Monument, which were formulated in 1913.

Twenty years later, a fabricated shift began that asserted Cabrillo was Portuguese. The first reference to Cabrillo being Portuguese, as it relates to the Cabrillo National Monument, occurred in 1934. The first mention of the name João Rodrigues Cabrilho — note the different spelling of the final name — did not appear until 1935 and has never been verified as authentic. 

The iconic statue at Cabrillo National Monument was commissioned by the Portuguese Secretariat of National Propaganda in 1939. Two bronze plaques displayed at the monument referring to Cabrillo as a Portuguese navigator were gifted by the Portuguese Navy in 1957 and 1988. The addition of the statue and plaques was not approved by Congress nor the director of the National Park Service, as required by federal statute.

Advertisement

In 2015, renowned Canadian historian and expert on 16th century Central America, Wendy Kramer, Ph.D., while conducting archival research, discovered several thousand pages of manuscripts with legal documents written by official scribes. Numerous documents were signed by Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo stating that he was a native of the Spanish village of Palma de Micer Gilio, now known as Palma del Río, Córdoba, Spain. Kramer was researching information about Guatemala in the 1520s and 1530s. Her findings were published in 2016 in The Journal of San Diego History.

Kramer’s paper — “Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, Citizen of Guatemala and Native of Palma del Rio: New Sources from the Sixteenth Century” — was peer reviewed by several historians including Carla Rahn Phillips, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota, and Harry Kelsey, the former chief curator of history at the National History Museum of Los Angeles County and research scholar at the Huntington Library. 

Robert Munson, former Cabrillo National Monument historian, verified and agreed with the historians’ peer review. Local historians Iris Engstrand and Molly McLain, then co-editors of “The Journal of San Diego History,” agreed with Kramer’s conclusion.

An April 25, 2018, letter from Cabrillo National Monument Superintendent Andrea Compton to the House of Spain acknowledged and accepted Kramer’s finding that Cabrillo was born in current-day Palma del Río, Córdoba, Spain.

Despite overwhelming evidence and scholarly acceptance, the Cabrillo National Monument refuses to affirm that Cabrillo was of Spanish birth. In fact, after Kramer’s findings, the Cabrillo National Monument inexplicably changed the birthplace of Cabrillo on its website from Spain to “the Iberian Peninsula.” 

Advertisement

Why does the National Park Service promote the inaccurate history that Cabrillo may have been born in Portugal? Even Portugal did not recognize Cabrillo as a native on the famous Monument of the Discoveries (Padrão dos Descobrimentos) in Lisbon.

Why does the National Park Service refuse to update the information it disseminates to the public on its website, wayside exhibit and brochures? Why does it reference the name João Rodrigues Cabrilho when that person does not exist in the history of California? This name is a fake created by the government of Portugal and the Portuguese in California. Read the history of California.

The House of Spain in San Diego’s YouTube channel shows a short video about the Cabrillo National Monument history. 

Where is any similar historical research and peer review acceptance of the Portuguese claims?  Answer: There is none.

Latin American history experts with whom I have consulted unanimously agree Cabrillo was Spanish. They unanimously agree there is no reliable evidence supporting the position that Cabrillo was Portuguese.

Advertisement

The National Park Service needs to be honest in telling the story of Cabrillo. Give all visitors the objective truth. 

Benayas is president of House of Spain in San Diego and lives in San Diego. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending