Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Chicago and San Diego brace for fight With Trump border czar – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Chicago and San Diego brace for fight With Trump border czar – The Boston Globe


What San Diego and Chicago also have in common are leaders who have vowed to defy Homan by protecting undocumented migrants from deportation. The San Diego County Board of Supervisors voted last month to become what one member called a “super sanctuary” community. In Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson has been reiterating in recent weeks that local law enforcement is prohibited from cooperating with federal immigration officials.

“San Diego better get the hell out of the way. We’re coming,” Homan, told a Republican group this month in Texas. “The Chicago mayor,” Homan continued, “said I am not welcome in Chicago. Well, guess where I am going to be on a day one?”

Advertisement

Trump’s team is planning a big immigration raid in the city starting Tuesday and continuing all week, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the planning.

While experts questioned whether the plans — dubbed Operation Safeguard, according to the New York Times — would differ dramatically from previous major actions by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the signaling right after Trump’s inauguration would be unmistakable.

The Chicago-based National Immigrant Justice Center is advising migrants to consult with an immigration attorney, memorize family phone numbers, establish an emergency contact with their children’s schools and keep all necessary documentation in a secure place.

US Representative Chuy Garcia, an Illinois Democrat, is working with churches and community groups to help immigrants understand their rights if ICE agents come calling.

“There are good reasons to expect that Chicago would be the primary target,” Garcia said. “We can expect ICE, under new leadership starting on Monday, to be targeting high visibility locations, whether it’s factories or possibly larger restaurants.”

Advertisement

While a flurry of executive orders on immigration and the border is expected when Trump takes office Monday, logistical details of the deportation operations have remained shrouded. Homan has signaled he’ll initially focus on deporting violent criminals, a view largely shared by Democratic leaders such as Illinois Governor JB Pritzker.

But Pritzker warned of the negative impact, including on the economy, of Homan’s gung-ho attitude.

“He seems like a blowhard to me, and I know that he’s going to go do things that really do affect people’s lives in a terribly negative way,” Pritzker said in an interview Jan. 14. “He thinks that he’s carrying out something that’s good for the country. But it’s not.”

Trump has threatened to withhold federal funding unless cities and states comply with the administration’s wishes. In Chicago, Mayor Johnson has fired back by vowing to defend his city’s immigrant community.

“I promise you we will not bend or break,” Johnson said after the November election. “Our values will remain strong and firm.”

Advertisement

Other cities are dealing with similar challenges while taking different approaches to the change of administration. New York Mayor Eric Adams, who was indicted on federal corruption charges in September, met with Trump on Friday as an adviser emphasized City Hall’s willingness to work with the new president.

In San Diego, by contrast, the board of supervisors last month approved a policy to bar county agencies from working with federal immigration authorities trying to carry about mass deportations.

“We should be deporting felons, not farm workers,” said Terra Lawson-Remer, one of three Democrats who voted for the measure. “We are very concerned about the specter of mass deportations that will make our communities fundamentally less safe.”

Jim Desmond, a Republican supervisor in San Diego County and the lone dissenter in the vote on the super sanctuary proposal, predicted the measure would have little impact. The county sheriff, Kelly Martinez, downplayed the new policies and said her office will continue to follow California state law.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta underlined that state law already limits when and how local authorities can work with federal immigration agents.

Advertisement

“Here in California we are not going to spend our time, money and resources going backward,” Bonta said at a briefing Friday. “You can be sure that as California’s attorney general, if Trump attacks the rights of our immigrants I will be there. If Trump breaks the law, we will see him in court and hold him accountable.”

It remains to be seen exactly how the threats from Homan and vows of protection from local authorities will play out in the coming weeks and months. It’s also unclear which groups of immigrants the new administration will prioritize for deportation. And federal officials face limits in staffing, money and temporary detention space.

But cities are girding for a showdown amid the uncertainty of how Trump’s crackdown will play out. Restaurants from Texas to Colorado are grappling with the uncertainty around potential deportations.

In Denver, Mayor Mike Johnston has said he’s willing to go to jail in order protect migrants in his community. Homan said he’s willing to put him there if Johnston blocks ICE agents from doing their jobs.

“Look, me and the Denver mayor, we agree on one thing — he’s willing to go to jail, I’m willing to put him in jail because there’s a statute,” Homan said in an interview with Fox News in late November. “And what it says is it’s a felony if you knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien from immigration authorities. It’s also a felony to impede a federal law enforcement officer.”

Advertisement

With assistance from Miranda Davis, Daniela Sirtori and Kate Seaman.






Source link

San Diego, CA

Letters: A selective immigration policy ultimately fails us all

Published

on

Letters: A selective immigration policy ultimately fails us all


How interesting that Donald Trump is deporting Brown people who pay taxes and contribute to our economy (though they will never reap any benefits from those taxes) and instead is using our tax money to import and set up South Africans (none of whom are anything but White) who have never contributed to our economy. Could skin color perhaps have something to do with this policy?

— Nita Herpolsheimer, San Diego



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Did California’s assault weapons ban save lives in San Diego mosque attack?

Published

on

Did California’s assault weapons ban save lives in San Diego mosque attack?


California’s assault weapons ban may have helped limit the ability of two attackers to take lives at the Islamic Center of San Diego last week, according to a prominent gun control organization.

But the executive director of a San Diego gun rights group said the fact the attack even happened is proof the ban failed.

What the two don’t dispute is that the video from the attackers’ livestream shows one of them using a rifle that appears to comply with California’s strict gun laws. While authorities have not confirmed what models of firearms were used in the attack, representatives of the two organizations identified it as a semi-automatic Ruger Mini-14 rifle.

The alleged suspect’s Ruger Mini-14 rifle is seen in this screenshot from a livestream obtained by KPBS of the attack on the Islamic Center of San Diego on May 18, 2026.

KPBS is not publishing the video, which authorities have not released, the names of the two teenage suspects or their writings, where they wrote they were motivated to conduct the attack by a number of sex and race-related grievances. They wore emblems associated with white supremacists and neo-Nazis and lashed out in their writings against women, Jewish people, Muslims and LGBTQ+ people.

Advertisement

They wrote they were inspired by the 2019 attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, that killed 51 Muslims. In their writings, the suspects said they wanted to replicate the Christchurch attack in San Diego.

The attack in Christchurch prompted New Zealand to change its gun laws.

Semiautomatic rifles sold in California have to meet certain criteria that other states don’t require.

The barrels must be at least 30 inches long and may not have collapsible or folding stocks. They cannot have a pistol grip behind the trigger, nor one attached at the forward part of the rifle.

And they cannot have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds.

Advertisement

“From everything I saw from the video, (the rifle) looked like it met those criteria and looked like a very stock firearm that you could purchase at many dealers here in California,” said Steve Lindley, a policy advisor for the Brady Campaign.

Lindley spent almost 30 years in law enforcement, according to his biography. He worked for the National City Police Department and spent eight years leading the Bureau of Firearms at the California Department of Justice.

Lindley said features such as pistol grips make rifles more lethal.

“Over time it makes it easier for the shooter to have the firearm to their shoulder and in their hands,” he said. “Less fatigue, and it lines up a little bit better with your eyesight. The capacity of the magazines and other features on the firearm make it more accurate and easier to use in close quarters.”

The video shows the body cam operator firing the Mini-14 until it appears to jam. He struggles to clear the chamber and appears to remove and reinsert the magazine. He works the bolt, apparently unable to chamber a new round.

Advertisement

As the video continues, he continues to struggle with the bolt of the rifle before giving up, drawing a handgun and stepping outside.

The attackers never made it beyond the lobby, where about 100 schoolchildren and staff were inside the center. Authorities say they were delayed by the three men killed in the attack: Mansour Kaziha, 78, Nadir Awad, 57, and armed security guard Amin Abdullah.

From left to right, Mansour Kaziha, Amin Abdullah and Nadir Awad.

The Islamic Center of San Diego

Undated photos of (left to right) Mansour Kaziha, Amin Abdullah and Nadir Awad.

“Looking at the reality of this, a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun from killing a lot of kids. Full stop,” said Michael Schwartz, the executive director of the San Diego County Gun Owners PAC.

Advertisement

“The assault weapons ban that California has implemented clearly failed — it didn’t stop these two people,” he said.

Schwartz described the features banned by California as “cosmetic” and that the semi-automatic rifles function the same regardless of their stock, grips or magazine size.

“The idea that … the (high-capacity) magazine ban stopped them from getting a high-capacity magazine … there just isn’t any evidence or proof,” he said.

While high-capacity magazines can’t be bought or sold in California, Schwartz said anyone can travel to the next state over and buy as many as they want.

Although the Mini-14 used in the attack is capable of accepting 30 or 40-round magazines, said Lindley, the shooters appeared to only have a California-compliant 10-round magazine.

Advertisement

“If you have ten round magazines, you have ten rounds to shoot before you need to change magazines,” he said. “If you have a 30- or 40-round magazine, you can shoot 30 or 40 rounds before you need to reload.”

That’s important, Lindley said, because when shooters stop to reload, it gives victims time to either escape or attempt to subdue the attacker.

Schwartz said that didn’t affect the Islamic center attack.

“If he had a bigger magazine or he had a pistol grip or whatever, it wouldn’t have changed the outcome of this at all,” he said.

Lindley played a part in crafting more than 100 gun bills, according to the Brady Campaign. He said with so many guns in the United States, authorities can’t stop shootings — all they can do is try to limit the damage.

Advertisement

“We can prevent a lot of victimology by lowering the capacity of the magazines,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Alleged San Diego Gunman Had Violent Obsessions

Published

on

Alleged San Diego Gunman Had Violent Obsessions



Police were so unsettled by one of the teens later accused in the deadly shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego that they took his guns away more than a year before the attack. Court records show Chula Vista police secured a gun violence restraining order against then-high school student Caleb Vazquez in January 2025 after classmates and staff reported he idolized mass shooters, talked about a “day of retribution,” and came to school dressed as mass murderers and the TV serial killer Dexter, per NBC News and KGTV. The school had shared social media posts in which Vazquez praised killers, including those behind a 2011 attack in Norway and a 2019 shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, NBC reports.


Vazquez allegedly admitted an infatuation with mass killings and an idolization of Adolf Hitler and was put on a 72-hour psychiatric hold. His father—initially uncooperative, according to a police affidavit—removed 26 weapons from the home and arranged for therapy before the restraining order was dismissed that March. Just over a year later, police say Vazquez, 18, and a 17-year-old he’d met online killed three people at the mosque—security guard Amin Abdullah, caretaker Mansour Kaziha, and neighbor Nadir Awad—before wounding a landscaper and dying by suicide. FBI officials say writings left behind were steeped in extremist hatred. In the aftermath, community members are questioning how so many warnings failed to prevent the attack and calling for stronger, earlier interventions on mental health and homicidal ideation.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending