Oregon
Salem divided over whether Oregon should facilitate ICE transfers in state prisons
PORTLAND, Ore. — There’s renewed debate in Salem over whether the state should cooperate with immigration authorities in cases where federal forces are trying to deport people who have finished sentences in state prisons, after Democrats voted down a Republican effort requiring the state to do so.
Republicans shared 2022 DOC data showing nearly 600 of the roughly 12,000 individuals in Oregon Dept. of Corrections (DOC) custody at the time had an active Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer—a request from ICE to turn over an individual before releasing them.
The state currently does not track citizenship status; KATU requested the current number of active ICE detainers on individuals in DOC custody and awaiting the updated number.
The specific question is whether ICE agents should be allowed to arrest an undocumented migrant inside the prison, once their sentence is over, or in the community after they’ve been released.
States like Minnesota and California allow it. In California’s case, the state contacts ICE 10 to 15 days before an individual is released. If ICE agents decide to take custody of the individual, the transfer happens inside a state facility.
California’s data shows that scenario is played out hundreds of time per year.
SEE ALSO | Federal judge hands DHS another court loss, extends tear gas restrictions at ICE facility
Currently, Oregon law does not allow ICE agents inside prisons or permit the state to coordinate pick-ups with ICE inside the facility.
KATU spoke to an Oregon Republican and an Oregon Democrat about the topic.
“It’s not fair to the average Oregon citizen that works here and pays taxes and then doesn’t feel safe in their own state due to our immigration policies,” Republican Rep. Alek Skarlatos said.
“I think before we get to that, we have to build a trust with the federal government and our federal law enforcement,” Democratic Rep. Ricki Ruiz said.
Republican Skarlatos said that while he wants greater cooperation, he’d vote for a bill limiting that cooperation to people convicted of murder and rape.
“You have to make a choice who you’re siding with here: the population of Oregon or illegal heinous criminals, just that group, we’re not even lumping all the illegal immigrants into the same category here,” Skarlatos said.
Ruiz, like many Democrats, is not supportive at the moment of expanded cooperation. He argued for longer detention of people convicted of crimes like rape and murder.
“I’m going to believe if someone breaks the law in the United States, they ought to be held to the extent of the law of the United States, and if there’s a murderer coming out who’s already been convicted of murder or rape and coming out on parole, then we have a problem, and we have to fix it as soon as possible,” Ruiz said.
Recent Pew polling shows the vast majority of Americans support deporting individuals convicted of violent crimes. Republicans argue that shows support for expanded cooperation with ICE.
Ruiz argued the high-profile arrests of American citizens and children and families seeking asylum undercut the argument for cooperating with ICE.
“Say someone is convicted of a crime and they get a 15-year sentence. When that sentence is up and they have a civil deportation process requested against them, should they be handed over to ICE or should they be released and then arrested at some point in the future by ICE?” KATU asked Ruiz.
“I think that requires a very lengthy conversation. My hesitation, I think if you were asking me this question a couple years ago, I’d give you a different answer. But I think now with the tactics that I’ve seen, that’s our government using, I definitely have a lot of red flags,” Ruiz said.
He continued, “But at this moment in time, I’m just, there’s a lot of red flags with how they were operating, and I hope there’s a time and place in where we can have a conversation on accountability and how we can continue to build that trust moving forward.”
“One concern we’ve heard from Democrats is that we’ve seen ICE arrest the wrong people in certain cases. There have been a handful of cases where they’ve arrested American citizens, and there have been very public uses of force that make people uncomfortable. If people see that and are concerned about cooperating with an agency like that, what is your argument to support cooperation there?” KATU asked Skarlatos.
“Again, that’s exactly why we should be allowing ICE into our jail and prisons to arrest people there, so there’s not these violent confrontations. I mean, to me it’s an easy answer there. The more you cooperate, the less likely there is to be an incident like that,” Skarlatos said.
He continued, saying, “I understand we don’t like ICE in the state of Oregon for whatever reason, but I don’t think that’s a reason to allow murders and rapists on the streets with regular Oregon citizens.”
Oregon
Oregon State Police sued for sharing data with immigration agencies
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek responds to heightened immigration enforcement
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek and state legislators spoke Jan. 24 about recent immigration enforcement happening across Oregon. Here’s what Kotek said.
Rural Organizing Project, a statewide nonprofit based in Cottage Grove, filed a lawsuit May 5 against Oregon State Police in Multnomah County Circuit Court, alleging that the agency is violating the state’s landmark sanctuary laws and sharing Oregonians’ personal data with federal immigration agents.
The nonprofit is asking the court to direct OSP not to share information with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other immigration agencies, including driver’s licenses, driver history, driver’s license photographs, vehicle registration data, Social Security numbers and law enforcement records.
ROP claims that federal immigration agencies have repeatedly accessed Oregonians’ information over the past year. They point to two systems OSP operates: the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System and the state’s Law Enforcement Data System.
The complaint said data provided to OSP by NLETS in February showed authorities involved in immigration enforcement accessed Oregonians’ data more than 1.4 million times in the preceding year. ICE alone queried Oregon for the data 176,576 times, the complaint said. Homeland Security Investigations within the Department of Homeland Security queried 21,363 times, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection and DHS accounted for the remainder, the complaint said.
Those numbers do not include all queries of Oregonians’ data, lawyers added, as ICE and HSI agents in Oregon will access the same information separately through the LEDS terminal.
The complaint says OSP has the technical capacity to block immigration enforcement agencies from both systems, but has declined to do so.
U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, and Jeff Merkley, D-Oregon, along with U.S. Reps. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Oregon, and Andrea Salinas, D-Oregon, called on states across the country to stop sharing drivers’ data with federal immigration agencies in a November 2025 letter.
Other states, such as Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and New York, have stopped allowing federal agents to access their residents’ data, according to NLETS testimony to Congress in 2025, the complaint added.
The suit says NLETS provided OSP a spreadsheet listing the specific identification codes ICE uses in late 2025, after an OSP official asked how other states had blocked the agency in the system.
But in February, the complaint said, the agency indicated it would not restrict federal immigration authorities’ access to data via LETS or require federal authorities to use “Reason Codes” that would allow OSP to screen whether the query is for immigration-related purposes.
In a response sent to the Oregon Law Center on Feb. 1, replying to its tort claim notice, OSP said it had taken “reasonable steps” to improve its LEDS agreements with immigration authorities to require compliance with Oregon’s Sanctuary Law. Their letter said terminating the LEDS user agreements, which OSP signed with ICE and DHS in December 2025 and February, would prevent the federal agencies from accessing criminal justice information related to criminal investigations and other governmental purposes.
“If OSP terminated the user agreements, they could be obstructing ongoing criminal investigations,” the letter from OSP said.
OSP also said it did not have the ability to modify the NLETS system.
“Federal agents are storming into our communities, targeting people based on how they look, and disappearing our neighbors,” Martha Ortega, director of Immigrant Centers at Rural Organizing Project, said in a prepared statement. “Oregon State Police are helping them do it. When the state gives our private information to ICE, it is breaking the law and breaking Oregonians’ trust. How many families have been torn apart by Oregon State Police giving their names and photos to federal agents?”
The lawsuit cites testimony in federal court, detailed in a story by The Oregonian, where ICE agents spoke of staking out a neighborhood and randomly running vehicle license plates to find vehicle owners’ names and birthdates for the purpose of immigration enforcement.
“Oregon’s law has clearly prohibited this kind of information sharing for almost 40 years,” said Heather Marek, attorney at Oregon Law Center, which is representing the nonprofit. “Oregonians need Oregon State Police to respect the law and protect their data, immediately and permanently.”
In an email, a spokesperson for Oregon State Police said it would not be making any public comments related to the lawsuit while litigation was pending.
“OSP is committed to following Oregon Sanctuary Laws and has not taken any actions that would violate those laws,” Cpt. Kyle Kennedy added.
But, ROP said in its lawsuit that although the LEDS user agreements prohibit ICE-ERO and HSI from sharing data for immigration enforcement purposes, OSP cannot ensure compliance with the sanctuary laws nor can it reasonably assume compliance given the broader context of the current administration and activity.
More than 6,000 HSI agents have been assigned to immigration enforcement duties, for example, the lawsuit said.
“In the current political and legal context, an agreement to provide resources and information to HSI is an agreement to provide resources and information to support immigration enforcement,” the complaint said.
Dianne Lugo covers the Oregon Legislature and equity issues. Reach her at dlugo@statesmanjournal.com on X @DianneLugo or Bluesky @diannelugo.bsky.social.
Oregon
Oregon spa advertised on escort website, offered commercial sex acts, police say
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Two people were arrested Tuesday on prostitution charges after search warrants were served on both a spa and home in Newport, authorities said.
According to Newport police, the investigation into Amazing Lotus Spa began in March after they learned it was advertising on a prostitution/adult escort website, as well as “alluding to commercial sex acts being offered at the spa.”
During the investigation, officers surveilled the business, and “observed activity inconsistent with the normal business patterns of legitimate massage establishments,” police said.
This led to the obtaining and execution of a search warrant on both the spa and a home located in the 800 block of Northeast Avery Street.
At the spa, investigators found evidence indicating they were operating without a license, police said.
At the 8th Street home, they found large quantities of cash, as well as “evidence related to services allegedly being offered at the spa beyond unlicensed massage activity,” officials said.
Both 63-year-old Jia Hui and 67-year-old Bing Li were arrested and lodged at the Lincoln County Jail on charges of prostitution and practicing of massage without a massage therapist license.
The investigation is ongoing and anyone with information related to this case is encouraged to contact Newport police.
Oregon
Oregon Gov. Kotek, state leaders preview 2026 wildfire season
SALEM, Ore. (KATU) — As Oregon approaches the summer months, Governor Tina Kotek and other state agency leaders are preparing for wildfire season.
On Tuesday morning, Gov. Kotek joined the Oregon State Fire Marshal, the heads of departments like forestry and emergency management, and public utility spokespeople to discuss the 2026 wildfire season.
They will also be taking questions from reporters – you can watch the full press conference here:
The governor and departments that fight wildfires also gave a tour of the equipment they use in the field when battling blazes across the state.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
This is a developing story; updates will be posted as information comes in.
-
New York1 hour agoHis DNA Was Taken After His Arrest at an ICE Protest. Now, He’s Suing.
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoDetroit Grand Prix returns downtown: Speed, sound, and racing action set for May 29–31
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoSan Francisco Giants honor Willie Mays with highway designation on what would have been his 95th birthday
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoBattery case against Dallas Wings guard Arike Ogunbowale closed
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoMiami woman allegedly lured man to luxury condo via Instagram, then robbed him with 2 accomplices
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoDespite progress, Neely and Sweeney say Bruins have a long way to go
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDenver leaders pitch city as host for 2028 Democratic National Convention
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoBryan Woo returns to dominance in Seattle Mariners win – Seattle Sports