Connect with us

Oregon

On Challenge to Trump, Oregon Will Wait for Supreme Court

Published

on

On Challenge to Trump, Oregon Will Wait for Supreme Court


Oregon will not follow the lead of Colorado and Maine and bar Donald Trump from its primary ballot for now. Without ruling on the merits of a challenge to the former president’s candidacy, the state Supreme Court said Friday it will wait for the US Supreme Court to make its decision on the matter, CNN reports. That did not please Free Speech for People, the advocacy group that filed a lawsuit on behalf of five voters seeking Trump’s removal. “Waiting until the US Supreme Court issues its order only compresses the time that the Oregon Supreme Court may have to resolve the issues that may remain,” the group said in a statement.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign approved. “President Trump urges the swift dismissal of all remaining, bad-faith, election interference 14th Amendment ballot challenges,” he said. Like challenges elsewhere, Oregon’s centered on the wording of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says government officials who engage in insurrection after taking an oath to uphold the Constitution are disqualified from office. The Oregon suit was filed after Secretary of State Lavonne Griffin-Valade said she lacks the authority to keep Trump off a primary ballot, only a general election ballot, per CBS News.

Advertisement

The Oregon court said the US Supreme Court’s ruling “may resolve one or more contentions” in the voters’ suit. Oregon’s chief justice wrote that the challengers can file a new lawsuit if the US Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t address all of their arguments, per the New York Times. Oregon’s primary is May 21, and election officials say the names on the ballot must be set by March 21. Oral arguments in a case involving Colorado’s primary ballot are scheduled in Washington for Feb. 8. (Read more Donald Trump 2024 stories.)





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over $114K

Published

on

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over 4K


PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A former Oregon corrections officer received a lifetime hunting ban on Wednesday after pleading guilty to several poaching-related charges.

Christopher Mason, 49, of Umatilla, was sentenced in two separate court cases to 24 months of probation and 300 hours of community service. He was also fined over $114,000 and was required to forfeit his firearms.

Multiple big game hunting items were seized from Christopher Mason’s possession (OSP)

Oregon State Police said they began investigating Mason in 2024 after receiving information that he had been poaching big game animals.

“In February 2025, OSP served a search warrant, and multiple big game animals and firearms were seized as evidence. Sixty-seven criminal charges were referred for prosecution,” officials said. “The charges spanned multiple counties.”

Advertisement

Mason pleaded guilty to four counts of unlawful take of buck deer and three counts of unlawful take of black bear on June 18. In a separate case on June 26, he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, unlawful possession of a silencer, unlawful possession of multiple wildlife and unlawful take of mule deer.

“This is another example of serial poaching which rises to the level of felony conduct based solely on the repeated poaching conduct and impact of one individual on Oregon’s game mammals,” prosecutor Jay Hall said. “The conduct across the several counties amounts to one of the highest damage amounts done to Oregon wildlife by any singular actor.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4

Published

on

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4


With national firefighting resources already stretched to their limits, statewide fire restrictions remain in effect for all Bureau of Land Management public lands throughout Washington and Oregon, with some local regions also implementing additional emergency closures.

As the Independence Day holiday weekend approaches, officials warned that people responsible for starting wildfires could face up to $100,000 in fines, 12 months in prison, and liability for all firefighting suppression costs.

SEE ALSO | Washington braces for earlier wildfire season due to low snowpack: ‘Worse than normal’

“There are serious consequences for starting a wildfire, including fines and possibly imprisonment, which we hope everyone can avoid through careful choices,” said Josh O’Connor, Northwest Geographic Area Fire Chief for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service. “We have already experienced excruciating loss this season. I cannot stress the gravity of the situation enough. Please help protect our firefighters and communities.”

Advertisement

Officials urged visitors to research their destinations in advance, noting that local restrictions can determine when power tools may be used, what kinds of stoves or campfires are allowed, and what safety equipment is required.

The BLM said the following items remain strictly prohibited on all BLM lands in Oregon and Washington: fireworks and sky lanterns; exploding or metallic targets; tracer or incendiary devices; and steel component ammunition, including core or jacket.

“Lighting a firework or leaving a smoldering campfire creates significant wildland fire risk. Under the right conditions, they easily start wildfires,” said Kim Prill, BLM Oregon/Washington acting state director. “Don’t risk it. Let’s work together to prevent every wildfire possible.”

More information on seasonal fire restrictions and fire closures is available HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.

Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.

Advertisement

“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.

“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.

SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots

Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.

Advertisement

Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.

“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.

According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.

“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.

She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”

Advertisement

Oregon leaders respond

House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.

The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.

In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”

“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.

KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.

Advertisement

The governor’s office had not responded by publication.

Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.

“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.

She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending