Connect with us

Oregon

Fury as man who took his mother’s severed head to supermarket and stabbed grocer is ruled sane enough to be released into a residential community treatment facility

Published

on

Fury as man who took his mother’s severed head to supermarket and stabbed grocer is ruled sane enough to be released into a residential community treatment facility


A decision that could see an Oregon man who took his mother’s severed head into a supermarket be released into a community treatment facility has sparked fury. 

Joshua Webb, 43, has lived at the Oregon State Hospital in Salem since he pleaded guilty except for insanity in the killing of his mother, 59-year-old Tina Webb, and the stabbing of a grocery store employee in 2017.

Following the gruesome act, psychiatrists for both the prosecution and defense diagnosed Webb with schizophrenia and psychosis at the time of the murder. 

They said Webb had hallucinations, delusions and spoke to and heard voices in his head despite taking anti-psychotic medication for a year.

Advertisement

But Dr. Karl Mobbs, a forensic psychiatrist involved in Webb’s treatment for the past 18 months, argued that he should be transferred from the state hospital to a 16-bed residential treatment facility called Lifeways McNary Place.

Joshua Webb, 43, pleaded guilty except for insanity in the killing of his mother, 59-year-old Tina Webb, and the stabbing of a grocery store employee in 2018

He has lived at the Oregon State Hospital in Salem ever since, but a doctor now says he is well enough to be transferred to a residential treatment  facility

He has lived at the Oregon State Hospital in Salem ever since, but a doctor now says he is well enough to be transferred to a residential treatment  facility

He advocated for Webb’s ‘conditional release,’ telling the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board on Wednesday that Webb now accepts the need to take medication, the Oregonian reports. 

The doctor said he avoids conflict with other patients and takes part in classes and ‘therapeutic opportunities’ more often than other patients.

Webb has done so well, Mobbs said, that he now lives in the lowest security level at the psychiatric hospital – with roughly the same restrictions he would encounter at Lifeways McNary Place, and has privileges that include working in a greenhouse on the hospital grounds.

‘Mr. Webb has been doing well for several years,’ he told the five-member board in a virtual hearing, as Webb sat next to him in a room at the state hospital.

Advertisement

But a woman who identified herself as the daughter of Mike Wagner, a supermarket employee Webb stabbed multiple times, opposed the transfer.

‘I do believe in the justice system as well as rehabilitation to some extent,’ she said, according to the Oregonian.

‘However, due to the violent and horrific crimes committed on that day, I just don’t believe justice has been served.

‘It’s a terrifying thought to think anyone capable of those actions on that day would be able to be released from any kind of custody,’ she added.

Webb carried his mother’s head into the Harvest Market Thriftway, drank a soda, then attacked Wagner without warning.

Advertisement
Webb carried his mother, Tina's head, left, into the Harvest Market Thriftway, drank a soda, then attacked a supermarket worker without warning

Webb carried his mother, Tina’s head, left, into the Harvest Market Thriftway, drank a soda, then attacked a supermarket worker without warning

Oregon Department of Justice lawyer Elisabeth Warner also urged the board to keep Webb at the state hospital – pointing to what she said was a documented lack of empathy and an apparent reluctance to apologize for his crimes.

But Mobbs said it’s hard for Webb to talk about the horrifying violence he committed on May 14, 2017. 

‘I have managed to talk to him about it privately and I do see that he has empathy around what’s happened,’ he said, though he admitted that Webb’s empathy is ‘probably on the lower end of normal.’

Still, he insisted Webb was ‘extremely ill’ when he acted violently ‘and so he feels that on the other side of the table that people would understand that it was his illness that caused him to act that way.’ 

Warner, though, said she was unmoved.

Advertisement

‘My concern is that removing Mr. Webb from the structure and familiarity of the hospital could lead to more harm than good for everyone involved in this case.’

Scott Healey, the first assistant for the Clackamas County District Attorney, also opposed the move – calling Webb’s spree of violence extraordinary.

‘This particular individual shouldn’t be released on any type of conditional release at this time,’ he said. 

Webb admitted to killing his mother, dismembering her body and killing his dog

Webb admitted to killing his mother, dismembering her body and killing his dog

Prosecutors have said Webb had problems with his vision and lived at home so his parents could care for him.

In the weeks before the brutal slaying, his mother had confided that Webb ‘had been doing weird things lately’ and was ‘losing his mind,’ court papers say.

Advertisement

The odd behavior only escalated, with Webb believing his girlfriend was trying to kill him and injecting him with an unknown substance and that Fox TV ‘owned him.’ 

He also told his girlfriend that a black box in the garage contained a device that was recording him, and complained of feeling like a squid was sucking onto the back of his head two months before the murder.

By Mother’s Day 2017, surveillance footage from Harvest Market Thriftway showed Webb running into the store with his mother’s head and large knife.

Bystanders managed to detain the then 36-year-old until police arrived on the scene.

Webb later admitted to killing his mother, dismembering her body and killing his dog.

Advertisement

He also confessed to killing his dog and later stabbing Wagner, though he never gave a motive for the brutality.



Source link

Oregon

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.

Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.

Advertisement

“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.

“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.

SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots

Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.

Advertisement

Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.

“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.

According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.

“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.

She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”

Advertisement

Oregon leaders respond

House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.

The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.

In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”

“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.

KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.

Advertisement

The governor’s office had not responded by publication.

Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.

“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.

She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon leaders celebrate, slam Supreme Court ruling on trans athletes

Published

on

Oregon leaders celebrate, slam Supreme Court ruling on trans athletes


play

States can ban transgender women and girls from competing on female sports teams, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in a June 30 ruling celebrated by Oregon’s Republican candidate for governor and criticized by Democrats.

The decision is another setback for the LGBTQ+ community from the high court, which has issued a series of recent rulings against transgender Americans.

Advertisement

The court said West Virginia’s and Idaho’s bans on female transgender athletes do not violate either the Constitution or a federal law barring sex discrimination in education.

Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said schools “may determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex.”

“Separate sports teams for biological males and biological females are reasonable,” he wrote.

In a partial dissent that was joined by her two liberal colleagues, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said she would have given the student challenging West Virginia’s law a chance to show that the ban should not apply to her.

“In opting otherwise, the majority extends great sympathy to those it favors: the young cisgender girls and women who play sports,” she wrote. “Because the majority, however, inflicts a hardship on those it disfavors without giving them the fair and full opportunity the Constitution requires to litigate their contentions, I respectfully dissent.”

Advertisement

Twenty-seven states have passed similar bans, saying they are trying to ensure fairness and address safety concerns for non-transgender women. Similar proposals have not been successful in Oregon.

The transgender students who challenged the laws said hormone therapy and other medical treatments they’ve taken have blocked any physiological advantages from being born male. The laws, they said, should not apply to them for that reason.

The students were also banking on a landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision protecting transgender employees from workplace discrimination.

But since that unexpected 6-3 decision by a conservative court, the justices have often ruled against transgender Americans. That includes their 2025 decision that states can ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors.

Advertisement

Sen. Christine Drazan, Oregon Republican gubernatorial candidate, celebrates ruling

Oregon Republicans have proposed legislation to ban transgender students’ participation in sports.

Sen. Christine Drazan, R-Canby, who will face off against Gov. Tina Kotek in November, raised the issue during an April Republican gubernatorial debate.

“We’ve got to get politics off of our sports fields. No more boys in girls’ sports, no more men in girls’ locker rooms,” Drazan said.

Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Scio, and Chris Dudley, who unsuccessfully ran for the Republican Party’s gubernatorial nomination, promoted similar stances while campaigning.

Drazan issued a statement June 30 in support of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Advertisement

“This ruling is a victory for fairness, common sense and for the progress achieved by generations of women who fought for and earned the right to compete,” Drazan said. “Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field.”

Drazan said she’s always supported women’s right to compete and as governor would do everything she could to ensure girls can have a chance to compete.

Diehl also thanked the court for the ruling on social media, saying in part, “this ruling upholds Equal Protection and clarifies Title IX does not force male athletes onto girls’ teams.”

OSAA reviewing ruling, Oregon Democrats speak against court decision

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports and other extracurriculars in Oregon, said it was reviewing the ruling with its legal team.

OSAA’s policies allow students to participate on the team that aligns with their gender identity.

Advertisement

“The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed,” a spokesperson said in a statement to the Statesman Journal. “The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes.”

Kotek’s office did not provide comment by deadline.

Two Democratic state representatives issued statements against the justices’ decision.

“Today’s ruling is a devastating departure from decades of civil rights progress. By inviting discrimination, the court has empowered a coordinated effort to push transgender people out of public life altogether. We cannot go backwards on the road to inclusivity,” Rep. Jules Walters, D-West Linn, said.

Rep. April Dobson, D-Happy Valley, similarly criticized the ruling and said she would fight to defend Oregon’s laws.

Advertisement

Kyndall Mason, executive director of Basic Rights Oregon, a nonprofit group that advocates for LGBTQ rights, said in part the group wants to “assure Oregonians that trans kids are still allowed to play in our state.”

Anastasia Mason covers state government for the Statesman Journal. Reach her at acmason@statesmanjournal.com or 971-208-5615.



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Baker County was 1st official jurisdiction in Eastern Oregon – La Grande Observer

Published

on

Baker County was 1st official jurisdiction in Eastern Oregon – La Grande Observer


Baker County was 1st official jurisdiction in Eastern Oregon

Published 9:00 pm Monday, June 29, 2026

Although Native Americans had lived in what became Northeastern Oregon for millennia, when the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776, the better part of a century would pass before settlers began to start towns in the region.

Tens of thousands of immigrants rolled through the area, following the Oregon Trail, starting in the 1840s.

Although their destination was the trail’s end at Oregon City, and ultimately a farm in the Willamette Valley, eventually some retraced the ruts to the northeast corner of Oregon, which became the nation’s 33rd state on Feb. 14, 1859, while others halted their wagons in the valley of the Powder or Grande Ronde river, or in the Columbia Basin on the west side of the Blue Mountains.

Advertisement

The first post office in Eastern Oregon actually predates the state. The Umatilla post office was established on Sept. 26, 1851, although it was closer to present-day Echo than to the city of Umatilla. The post office closed just a year later.

The region’s first official jurisdiction was Baker County, which the Oregon Legislature carved out of Wasco County on Sept. 22, 1862.

That was prompted by the region’s first gold rush, which followed Henry Griffin’s discovery of gold in a gulch, a few miles southwest of what would become Baker City, on Oct. 23, 1861.

Just five days after designating Baker County, on Sept. 27, 1862, lawmakers shrunk Wasco County even more by creating Umatilla County.

Two years later, on Oct. 14, 1864 — apparently a busy day in Salem — the legislature added two more counties in Grant and Union.

Advertisement

Grant County was made of parts of Umatilla and Wasco counties, while Union County was originally part of Baker County.

On Oct. 14, 1887 — it’s not clear why Oct. 14 seems to have been 19th century lawmakers’ favorite day to create counties — the legislature designated a chunk of eastern Union County as Wallowa County.

In many cases, such as Umatilla, post offices were started before towns were incorporated.

And most cities in the region were settled years, or even decades, before they were incorporated.

People were living in what became Baker City, for instance, in 1863, but the city was platted in 1865 and incorporated in 1874, eight years after the post office was established.

Advertisement

La Grande was already a town when it was incorporated in 1865.

And two cities — Umatilla and Canyon City — were incorporated even earlier, in 1864.

Incorporation dates for other cities in the region:

Pendleton: 1880

Hermiston: 1907

Advertisement

Heppner: 1887

Boardman: 1921

Milton-Freewater: 1950 (Milton, 1873; Freewater, 1890)

Enterprise: 1889

Elgin: 1891

Advertisement

Echo: 1904

Haines: 1909

Halfway: 1909

Huntington: 1891

Imbler: 1922

Advertisement

Ione: 1903

Irrigon: 1957

Island City: 1904

John Day: 1901

Joseph: 1887

Advertisement

La Grande: 1865

Lexington: 1903

Long Creek: 1891

Mount Vernon: 1948

North Powder: 1903

Advertisement

Pilot Rock: 1911

Prairie City: 1891

Richland: 1917

Stanfield: 1910

Sumpter: 1901

Advertisement

Summerville: 1885

Union: 1878

Unity: 1972

Wallowa: 1899

Weston: 1878

Advertisement

Athena: 1904



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending