Connect with us

Oregon

Founder of Oregon nonprofit embezzled $837K meant for disaster victims, AG says

Published

on

Founder of Oregon nonprofit embezzled 7K meant for disaster victims, AG says


PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — An Oregon nonprofit and its founder are being sued by the attorney general for allegedly stealing charitable funds meant to help victims of wildfires, floods and tornadoes.

The lawsuit was filed April 16 in Multnomah County Circuit Court against Cascade Relief Team and its founder Marc Brooks, who is accused of stealing nearly $837,000 in donations and grants to fund personal trips to casinos, strip clubs, Disneyland and more.

“Oregonians donated to this organization because they wanted to help their neighbors recover from wildfires and floods,” said Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield. 

“Instead, that money went into one man’s pocket, spent on casino trips and personal bills while flood and fire victims waited for assistance. We will be sure he is held accountable for every dollar he took.”

Advertisement

Brooks founded the Cascade Relief Team after the Labor Day wildfires ravaged Oregon in 2020, and was vocal about the organization’s work. Late the following year, CRT announced they were traveling to Kentucky to provide tornado relief.

But CRT was never legitimately governed, according to the lawsuit. Board members who were listed on government filings had never seen a financial record or attended a meeting. Brooks himself didn’t even keep records or make any attempts to track the charitable assets he controlled. Instead, he opened multiple bank accounts in CRT’s name, run those dry and rack up excessive fees until eventually the bank closed each account.

CRT reported $48,000 in revenue in 2020 but only $26,195.76 was deposited, according to the lawsuit. In 2021, CRT reported revenues of $941,587, but only $856,000 was deposited. The massive growth in revenue was due mostly to an influx of donations from Oregonians who responded to solicitations for humanitarian assistance. 

The other main source of income for CRT was a contract with the Oregon Department of Human Services, which reportedly provided CRT a list of Oregonians who were eligible for and in need of assistance. They paid CRT $60 an hour and reimbursement for expenditures to provide Oregonians in need with social service and wraparound support from November 2022 to June 2023, but chose not to renew the contract due to concerns over CRT’s governance.

In 2023, the Oregon State Fire Marshal awarded CRT a $100,000 grant to remove trees and debris from the Echo Mountain, Riverside, Beachie Creek, Almeda, Bootleg and Holiday Farm fires. CRT had previously outlined its plan for the money on its Facebook page, but removed it upon receiving the money. Because the grant required a workplace and regular progress reports, OSFM tried to contact CRT regarding the plan and any updates, but their email address no longer worked. To date, OSFM has been unable to confirm whether CRT performed any of the work.

Advertisement

In another instance, the Red Cross granted CRT $326,000 to assist Kentucky tornado victims, but the money landed in an account that was already significantly overdrawn. As a result, nearly $17,000 of the grant money meant to help disaster victims went to cover overdraft fees incurred by Brooks’ mismanagement. He used the remaining $309,000 to start his own business, according to the complaint.

Brooks allegedly used charitable funds for his own benefit, including nearly $271,000 in payments to his personal credit cards, loans and bills; more than $116,000 on travel with no connection to disaster relief; $155,000 in loans solicited for CRT’s use, but never deposited into CRT accounts; more than $67,000 on personal expenses such as rent, child support, liquor, strip clubs and jewelry, and more.

CRT reportedly ran out of money in late 2023, and Brooks fired the entire staff. He made no efforts to reach out to its donors or beneficiaries, and he did not distribute any assets to another charity, remove the website or dissolved the corporation, according to the complaint. The IRS revoked its tax-exempt, tax-deductible status. 

The lawsuit asks for Brooks to repay the $836,781.90 lost, permanently dissolve CRT, and that he be prohibited from leading or handling any money for another charitable organization in the future.

Brooks did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court Rejects Appeal of Multnomah County’s Flavored Tobacco Vape Ban

Published

on

Oregon Supreme Court Rejects Appeal of Multnomah County’s Flavored Tobacco Vape Ban


The Oregon Supreme Court on Thursday declined to review the Oregon Court of Appeals’ decision upholding Multnomah County’s ban on flavored tobacco and nicotine products.

Legal challenges have so far delayed the ordinance from taking effect since it was passed four years ago. It was not immediately clear when the ban would go into effect.

“Flavors are one of Big Tobacco’s biggest tricks to hook the next generation of Oregonians on their deadly products,” Christina Bodamer, who leads the Western states region of the American Heart Association, said following the court’s decision.

The Board of County Commissioners originally approved the ordinance banning flavored tobacco and nicotine products in December 2022 to take effect Jan. 1, 2024. But the ordinance hit a roadblock: a court challenge by the 21+ Tobacco and Vapor Retail Association of Oregon, e-cigarette retailer No Moke Daddy LLC, and vape shop owner Paul Bates.

Advertisement

It has been working its way through the state court system since. The Multnomah County Circuit Court upheld the ban in September 2023. The state Court of Appeals continued the pause on implementation February 2024, before upholding the ban in an April 2025 decision. The Supreme Court’s denial of review marks the end of the saga.

The Supreme Court rejected a challenge to a similar restriction in Washington County in May. That now sets up both ordinances to go into effect, which will together ban flavored tobacco and nicotine for one-third of Oregonians. A similar ban failed in the Oregon Legislature in 2025, dying in committee.

Tobacco use is the top cause of preventable death and disease in Oregon, according to the Oregon Health Authority. More than 8,000 Oregonians die from tobacco use each year.

Supporters of the ban argue that flavored tobacco acts as a gateway for underage use. According to Flavors Hook Oregon Kids, a coalition of more than 60 organizations that support the ban, 81% of Oregonian kids who’ve used tobacco started with flavored products. And flavored products are much more popular among kids and young adults than older adults, OHA says.

Richard Burke, executive director of the 21+ Tobacco and Vapor Retail Association of Oregon, tells WW the group is disappointed that the Supreme Court did not take up the case. He argues that banning flavored tobacco “has effectively granted a monopoly to the black market,” where flavored products are often laced with more dangerous substances.

Advertisement

“We agree with the goal of keeping these products out of the hands of minors,” Burke says. “But this is an overcorrection that will result in unintended consequences as has been shown by attempts to institute flavor bans in other parts of the country.”

Willamette Week’s reporting has real-life impact that changes laws, forces action by civic leaders, and drives compromised politicians from public office.

Support WW.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon joins multistate lawsuit seeking to block Warner Bros.-Paramount merger

Published

on

Oregon joins multistate lawsuit seeking to block Warner Bros.-Paramount merger


Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield and attorneys general from 11 other states filed a lawsuit Monday seeking to block Paramount Skydance Corp.’s proposed $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, arguing the merger would reduce competition and ultimately raise costs for consumers.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges the merger violates the Clayton Act by substantially lessening competition in the film and television industries.

California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York and Washington are the other states involved in the lawsuit.

The coalition said it is prepared to seek a temporary restraining order if the companies do not pause the deal as the case moves forward.

Advertisement

“If this massive corporate merger is allowed to go through, Oregonians will pay the price – through higher bills, fewer jobs, less choice at the box office, and fewer editorial voices,” Rayfield said in a press release on Monday. “Despite the federal regulators rubber-stamping this bad deal, we’re stepping up to protect families, small businesses, and Oregon’s film industry.”

READ ALSO | Warner Bros shareholders back $81B Paramount takeover in preliminary vote

According to the lawsuit, the combined company would control nearly one-third of U.S. theatrical film distribution and basic cable programming. The states argue the merger would eliminate competition between two of Hollywood’s five major film distributors and two of the nation’s five largest basic cable companies.

The complaint alleges the merger would reduce competition in theatrical film distribution, blockbuster movie releases and licensing basic cable television channels.

The filing follows Oregon’s investigation into the proposed merger. In early July, Rayfield asked a Multnomah County judge to compel Paramount to produce records the state said it had sought since June, including documents related to the company’s lobbying of the White House and U.S. Department of Justice.

Advertisement

“Paramount has already shown that they think they’re above the law by refusing to comply with Oregon’s investigation,” Rayfield said. “This litigation is the next step to protect Oregonians before irreparable harm is done.”

The U.S. Justice Department isn’t challenging the deal — and instead released an unusually lengthy statement in support, maintaining a Paramount-Warner combo would “increase competition across the media and entertainment ecosystem, with benefits for American consumers and workers,” according to a report from the Associated Press.

In a statement sent out on Monday, Paramount said the lawsuit “distorts settled antitrust law” and maintained its merger would create a “stronger competitor against dominant streaming and technology platforms who have harmed the market for theatrical exhibition and jobs in the entertainment industry.” Paramount went on to say it will “vigorously defend” the transaction.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

East Evans Creek Fire grows to 3,154 acres

Published

on

East Evans Creek Fire grows to 3,154 acres


Firefighters working the East Evans Creek Fire about seven miles west of Shady Cove continued making progress overnight, but predicted windy conditions are expected to test fire lines as crews push to strengthen containment.

The Oregon Department of Forestry’s Southwest Oregon District said the fire was estimated at 3,154 acres as of Sunday, July 12, with 0% containment.

Fire activity increased Saturday evening as gusty winds, dry fuels and steep terrain contributed to more active fire behavior. Coordinated ground and aerial suppression efforts limited significant growth, with air tankers used extensively to slow the fire’s spread and helicopters making water drops to cool hotspots and support firefighters in difficult terrain.

On Sunday morning, crews took advantage of more favorable conditions created by an inversion and moderate overnight relative humidity recovery. Firefighters are working to strengthen containment ahead of critical fire weather expected from Sunday into early next week. Winds were expected to gust up to 30 mph Sunday afternoon, with elevated fire weather concerns continuing through the weekend and the potential for thunderstorms on Monday. Aerial suppression operations were expected to be limited Sunday morning by the inversion but remain available as visibility improves and conditions allow.

Advertisement

Structural resources remained in place to protect threatened residences, with structural firefighters focused on protecting homes and critical infrastructure and improving defensible space around threatened properties. Wildland firefighters continued working at the fire’s edge where possible. In areas of extreme and steep terrain, crews also opened alternate lines from previous fires as a precaution in case direct line construction along the fire’s edge is not possible.

The fire started Friday afternoon at 2:41 p.m. after a car crashed into a power pole, sparking dry vegetation, according to ODF. The Jackson County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the cause of the crash.

Evacuation notices remained in effect Sunday for areas surrounding the fire, issued by the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office and Emergency Management.

Level 3 – Go Now: JAC-148A. All residences adjacent to East Evans Creek Road from 19385 through 21899 are included, along with residences at 21612 Antioch Road and 21615 Antioch Road.

Level 2 – Be Set: JAC-016, JAC-124, JAC-147 and JAC-148B.

Advertisement

Level 1 – Be Ready: JAC-003, JAC-004, JAC-017, JAC-026, JAC-036, JAC-109, JAC-126 and JAC-149B.

Evacuation areas can be seen on a map through genasys.com. Users can plug in their address and see whether they are within an evacuation zone.

An evacuation shelter for residents and domestic pets was established at Hanby Middle School, 806 6th Ave., Gold Hill.

Horses can be taken to The Expo at 21 Penninger Road, Central Point, but owners are asked to call 541-776-7206 first to confirm space is available. The Josephine County Fairgrounds can take pigs, goats and smaller animals at 1451 Fairgrounds Road, Grants Pass.

For livestock sheltering assistance, call 541-776-7206.

Advertisement

Traffic was closed to the public on East Evans Creek Road at Meadows Road. Officials asked the public to avoid the fire area to allow firefighters and heavy equipment to operate safely.

A temporary flight restriction was in place for the fire area daily, 24 hours a day, until further notice. Officials warned that flying a drone near or around a wildfire is illegal and can interfere with firefighting operations.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending