Connect with us

Oregon

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block

Published

on

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block


The Trump administration’s use of federal law to take control of state National Guard units and deploy them to Oregon and Illinois has triggered a wave of legal challenges that now test the limits of presidential authority in domestic security.

In Oregon, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently blocked the deployment to Portland, finding after a three-day hearing that the administration failed to meet the statutory requirements of § 12406 and violated the Tenth Amendment.

Newsweek contacted the DOJ and the office of the governors of Illinois and Oregon for comment via email outside of normal office hours on Monday.

Why It Matters

The escalating court battles over President Trump’s federalization of National Guard units in Illinois and Oregon matter because they will determine how far a president can go in deploying military forces inside the United States without state consent.

Advertisement

At stake are the limits of presidential authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, the ability of states to control their own Guard units and the degree to which courts can review a president’s judgment in domestic security matters.

The outcomes will set precedent not just for these disputes, but for how future administrations respond to protests, unrest and conflicts with state governments.

What To Know

Oregon At The Center Of The Fight

Oregon is now the central battleground in the fight over President Trump’s authority to federalize and deploy National Guard units under 10 U.S.C. § 12406.

After a three-day hearing, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently enjoined the administration from deploying any federalized Guard troops to Portland, holding that the President’s actions violated both § 12406 and the Tenth Amendment.

Advertisement

In the government’s emergency stay request now before the Ninth Circuit, federal officials portray Portland as a sustained security crisis, asserting that immigration facilities had “come under coordinated assault by violent groups intent on obstructing lawful federal enforcement action,” and arguing that “violence and threats of violence recurred more-or-less continuously,” including incidents where protesters “started fires,” “assaulted officers” and “hurled mortars at the facility.”

Oregon officials sharply dispute that rationale.

Oregon Governor, Tina Kotek is on record as saying: “I think it’s incredibly dangerous to take our citizen soldiers and to deploy them in our streets, without a real reason. The facts on the ground… do not warrant [this]. There’s not an insurrection. This is not a rebellion. This is not a national security threat,”

She added: “This is a fundamental issue for our democracy, about what the control and authority of the president is, and what the court says it is. The rule of law has to hold,” saying: “This is not a factual need on the ground in Oregon… This is an unlawful militarization of our troops here.”

However, Attorney General Dan Rayfield welcomed the ruling, saying, as per Statesman Journal: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” and insisting that the decision “made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

National Guard In Limbo As States Push Back

Even after the injunction, the Guard remains caught between state and federal authority.

About 200 members of the Oregon National Guard will remain under federal control, as reported by Oregon Capital Chronicle, but cannot yet be deployed to Portland, “…the effect of granting an administrative stay preserves the status quo in which National Guard members have been federalized but not deployed,” the judges wrote.

The Oregon standoff, however, has also drawn national scrutiny.

In an October 7 letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, members of Congress warned that cross-state deployments for domestic policing “violate the rule of law” and “set a dangerous precedent that states can police one another’s communities.”

Advertisement

Illinois Case Echoes Oregon—But On Narrower Grounds

Illinois faces a similar but narrower dispute. Unlike Oregon—where the administration attempted to bring in out-of-state Guard units—the Illinois case involves only the attempted federalization of the Illinois National Guard.

The Seventh Circuit is reviewing the administration’s appeal after a district court temporarily blocked federalization of the Illinois National Guard, finding “insufficient evidence of rebellion or a danger of a rebellion” and insufficient evidence that the President was “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The court of appeals wrote that “the facts do not justify the President’s actions in Illinois under § 12406.”

Illinois has also presented evidence that local police effectively managed protests near an ICE facility, including an ICE official’s email noting that agents “had not needed to interact with any protesters at all” because state and local officers “were handling everything.”

Advertisement

Across both states, the administration continues to argue that the President’s determinations under § 12406 deserve extraordinary judicial deference.

In a November 10 supplemental brief to the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General’s office asserted that the term “regular forces” refers to “the civilian forces with whom the President regularly executes the relevant laws,” and insisted that courts cannot “second-guess the Commander in Chief’s judgment.”

With appellate proceedings active and the Supreme Court weighing the meaning of “regular forces,” the legal boundaries of presidential power in domestic military deployment remain unsettled and consequential, according to Washington Examiner.

What People Are Saying

Donald Trump/the White House said, as per Military Times: “I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary.”

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” adding “The district court’s ruling made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

J.B. Pritzker. Governor of Illinois, October 4, 2025, said: “For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control.”

What Happens Next

Appellate courts in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits—and likely the Supreme Court—must now decide whether President Trump can continue federalizing and deploying National Guard units over state objections, leaving troops in a suspended status while states pursue additional legal challenges and the administration presses its argument for broad presidential discretion under 10 U.S.C. §12406.

The outcomes will determine if deployments resume, remain blocked or trigger a broader constitutional ruling on the limits of federal power in domestic security.



Source link

Advertisement

Oregon

Oregon turns to Peyton Woodyard, Zach Grisham to fill secondary gaps for Peach Bowl

Published

on

Oregon turns to Peyton Woodyard, Zach Grisham to fill secondary gaps for Peach Bowl


ATLANTA — Oregon’s options for who to rotate in at safety and nickel in the Peach Bowl are finite, but not inexperienced.

Peyton Woodyard has 22 tackles and an interception as a backup this season. The sophomore is the next player behind starting deep safeties Dillon Thieneman and Aaron Flowers and could also play nickel behind Jadon Canady in the Peach Bowl against No. 1 Indiana.

Woodyard was UO’s only freshman defensive player not to redshirt last season. Though he fell behind Flowers and Lopa prior to the season, he’s still prepared to play a significant role, which could come in Friday’s College Football Playoff semifinal.

“You’d have more concern if you had a guy that wasn’t preparing like he wasn’t a starter,” defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi said. “But that’s the way he prepares. I’ve got the faith that we’re not going to put somebody out there that we don’t trust. … I don’t think if he’s out there competing for us, I wouldn’t hesitate one bit to put (him) out there.”

Advertisement

No. 5 Oregon lost Kingston Lopa and Daylen Austin to the transfer portal since the start of the playoff.

Walk-on Zach Grisham (44) and Woodyard (30) have the most snaps at nickel behind Canady and Austin. Woodyard has played 171 snaps this season, but just one in the Orange Bowl when Canady came out for a play. He played three snaps at deep safety during the October 11 game against Indiana.

Grisham has nine tackles in 11 games, splitting time between defense and special teams. He came in for the last defensive play in the Orange Bowl.

Lupoi called Grisham “an absolute baller” for the effort he brings to the field.

The Ducks may need to rely on one or both for a few snaps in the biggest game of the season.

Advertisement

“(Woodyard) brings a lot of range and he’s really smart,” Flowers said. “A really vocal leader. Great tackler. I feel super comfortable playing out there with him. Zach, he’s a man of the game. He knows every position; he knows star, safety. He’s really quick, really good man coverage.”

No. 1 Indiana (14-0) vs. No. 5 Oregon (13-1)

  • When: Friday, January 9
  • Time: 4:30 p.m. PT
  • Where: Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Atlanta
  • TV: ESPN
  • Stream: You can watch this game on DIRECTV (free trial) or with Sling (a Sling day pass to watch this game and more is just $4.99). Streaming broadcasts for this game will be available on these streaming services locally in Oregon and Washington, but may not be available outside of the Pacific Northwest, depending on your location.



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

CFP Semifinals Preview, Picks: What to Expect in Oregon-Indiana, Ole Miss-Miami

Published

on

CFP Semifinals Preview, Picks: What to Expect in Oregon-Indiana, Ole Miss-Miami


Two powerhouse matchups. One step away from the national championship.

After a longer wait between games in the first two rounds of the College Football Playoff, we should have two fantastic games in the semifinals, and Vegas thinks so, too.

Miami (Fla.) and Ole Miss go head-to-head fresh off their stunning upsets over Ohio State and Georgia, respectively, in the quarterfinals. Indiana and Oregon, meanwhile, will meet up in the Peach Bowl in a game that I’m really excited about.

Advertisement

So, let’s dive into what I think will happen in each game, and who I have winning to advance to the national championship game. 

Fiesta Bowl: No. 10 Miami (Fla.) vs. No. 6 Ole Miss

When I first started watching film of this matchup, the first thing I thought of — and Miami fans are going to love this, because the last thing they want is me picking Miami after picking against the Hurricanes in the first two rounds — is that this Ole Miss team resembles the SMU team it lost to. 

By the way, it’s an SMU team I just spent time around during the Holiday Bowl and I had a conversation with SMU head coach Rhett Lashlee about Miami. We both talked about how dominant Miami is on the offense and defensive lines — that defensive line is excellent. But one thing SMU was able to do was utilize tempo on offense. So, a quicker tempo to try and tire those pass rushers while getting the ball on the perimeter as much in the first half as possible. Once the pass rushers got tired in the second half, it was easier for SMU to play offense and and it took advantage of that. 

Well, Ole Miss can do that. I think Trinidad Chambliss is a better quarterback than SMU’s Kevin Jennings. Ole Miss can run the ball with Kewan Lacy. The Rebels can get on the perimeter and Chambliss can create. He’s wonderful at creating. He was so good against Georgia, buying time, showing off his strong and accurate arm. 

Miami takes on Ole Miss in the Fiesta Bowl 🔥

So, at first blush, I liked Ole Miss in this game and the question for me was whether it would be able to hold up at the line of scrimmage. But that’s not the main question for me with this game. The main question of this game is who is coaching for Ole Miss? I cannot believe we’re in this situation where the head coach of a team playing in the semifinal is saying, “Well, I don’t really know what’s going on with the offensive coaching staff.” Are we kidding? What in the world is going on? In what world are we operating? 

Advertisement

This is what I find so frustrating about this situation. This moment is meant to be so special for the players. It should be about Chambliss, Lacy and all these players who’ve put themselves in a position to win the national championship. Yet, they’re not being given the best possible opportunity to do that. This is not a coach’s moment.

Now, we’re talking about whether Ole Miss offensive coordinator Charlie Weis Jr. is back to game plan for the offense? I think Weis should’ve stayed at Ole Miss in the first place, but he followed Lane Kiffin to LSU and is still working with the Rebels through the CFP. Weis proved that he can call plays and that he doesn’t need to be under Kiffin in the win over Georgia. But now we’re sitting here and we don’t know what’s going on with Ole Miss’ offensive coaches. They should be there to build, implement, execute and call the game plan. It’s not just about who’s there on Thursday, it’s about who’s there the last seven or eight days. What should’ve happened in this situation was Kiffin allowing those coaches to remain in Oxford in a full capacity until the end of Ole Miss’ CFP run. 

Miami takes down Ohio State, Indiana rolls Alabama, Georgia stunned by Ole Miss & Oregon advances

Because of that, it has made me rethink what I believe will take place in this game. What I know about this game is that Miami has something that it can rely on, and it’s at the line of scrimmage on both sides. The offensive line with tackle Francis Mauigoa and the run game with running back Mark Fletcher Jr. have allowed Miami to not put quarterback Carson Beck in a position where he needs to throw the ball on third-and-long. How many times was he able to pick up a first down on a first-and-manageable? He had huge pickups with his feet, and he hasn’t needed to throw the ball 150 yards so far in this playoff. If Miami can control the tempo and line of scrimmage in this game, it’ll have a great chance to win this game.

On the flip side, it’s about corralling Chambliss if you’re Miami’s defense. If he can create, who knows how many points Ole Miss can score? This is a very good Ole Miss offense and it’s led by a quarterback who can force a lot of problems. 

What do I think is going to happen? The quickest way to be defeated is to be distracted, and Miami fans, I’m sorry to do this to you, but I’ve got to go with the Canes.

Advertisement

Pick: Miami (Fla.) 30, Ole Miss 24 (Miami -3.5)

Peach Bowl: No. 5 Oregon vs. No. 1 Indiana

This is going to be one heck of a game, and we’ve already seen these two teams go head-to-head. We saw Indiana beat Oregon in Eugene in an incredible game that was tied in the fourth quarter before the Hoosiers pulled away with an incredible drive from Fernando Mendoza. 

Let me talk a little bit about Indiana. You’re here because you love this sport like I do, but there are things that can be frustrating and there’s one thing that’s frustrating with this Indiana team. There’s an overlooking of Indiana that’s happening right now across the country. The reason I know that is that Indiana’s résumé is the best résumé in all of college football, without a doubt. Indiana’s the most tested team in the country. The Hoosiers are 14-0 and have handled everybody. They have only given up more than 15 offensive points one time this year, and that was in a game on the road against Penn State. Indiana has only given up more than one touchdown in two games. This is the team that’s so sound, mistake-free and just absolutely bludgeoned Alabama.

Oregon faces Indiana in a Big Ten CFP semifinal 🔥

If you listen to some of the loudest voices, you get a sense that they think anyone can win the national championship. But if this Indiana team had any other logo, we would all be talking about whether this is the best team we’ve ever seen in college football. Yes, I know I’ve been guilty of this as well with the way I talked about Ohio State earlier this season, but no team in the history of our sport has ever gone 16-0. Granted, that’s a scheduling thing, but Indiana has a chance to do that and it’s been one of the great defensive teams we’ve had in a long time. 

So no, this isn’t a wide-open playoff. Indiana and Oregon are the odds-on favorites to win it all by a wide margin because of how tested they’ve been. That’s specifically the case for Indiana, which beat three teams that played in the CFP quarterfinals. No other team can say that. This team stands on business as the best team in college football.

Advertisement

To that end, there are four tight games Indiana has played this year. If you’re Oregon, you’ve got to mimic those tight games. Oregon understands that blueprint because it played in one of those games. The blueprint isn’t simple, but in every one of those games, a few things happen. One of them is attacking Indiana’s strengths and making it work to succeed. The first area I would go after is Indiana’s run game. In all four of its close matchups, Indiana ran for less than 4 yards per carry. You have to do that just to remain in the game. When Indiana is able to run the ball efficiently, it’s almost unstoppable on third down. Indiana had the No. 1 third-down offense in college football because it’s in short-yardage situations. 

Second, Oregon has to find a way to score in the red zone, and I’m not talking about field goals. One of the things that goes unnoticed with Indiana is how elite its defense has been and how strong its red zone defense is. Indiana is No. 1 in the country in red zone touchdown percentage against at 26%. It’s a low number that we haven’t seen in several years. Oregon was 0-for-3 in scoring red zone touchdowns in the first matchup. 

Indiana adds Josh Hoover and Nick Marsh from the transfer portal 👏

Lastly, Oregon has to play cleanly against this Indiana team. Indiana plays clean and doesn’t make mistakes. Indiana is ice-cold, no mistakes, to quote Ice Man from “Top Gun.” Maybe we should start calling Curt Cignetti Ice Man because Indiana is phenomenal at limiting penalties and turnovers. Indiana posted the third-fewest penalties per game this season and has only committed eight turnovers so far. Indiana’s turnover margin is plus-18, which is tied for first in the nation. 

Those are three things Oregon needs to do just to be in the game late. Even then, that might not be enough because Indiana might be the most clutch team in college football. The Heisman Trophy winner, Fernando Mendoza, was clutch in all four of Indiana’s tight wins this year. 

This Oregon team is no slouch, though. What Dan Lanning has built at Oregon can’t be overstated. Oregon is 38-4 in the last three years, losing to Washington twice (played for national championship in 2023), Ohio State (won national championship in 2024) and Indiana earlier this year. This is a great program that’s deep and strong at almost every position. It just happens to be going against a team that’s suffocatingly good. 

Advertisement

Indiana dominates Alabama, Are they the new powerhouse of college football?

When Oregon’s offense gets its chances, quarterback Dante Moore has got to capitalize. Oregon can’t have mistakes and miscues. Lanning is going to have to manage a really great game because if you miss a chance against Indiana, there’s a good chance the Hoosiers are going to win the game. 

If there’s one team that can do it, though, it would be Oregon. If you take away sacks, Oregon ran the ball for 4.8 yards per carry in its first matchup against Indiana. That’s the best way to protect Moore. We saw Ohio State quarterback Julian Sayin and Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson struggle against Indiana when their respective teams didn’t run the ball efficiently and early in down sets. 

I can talk all day about this game, but I’ve got to make a pick. I’ve got Indiana winning and covering, although this will be a phenomenal game. 

Pick: Indiana 27, Oregon 21 (Indiana -4.5)

Joel Klatt is FOX Sports’ lead college football game analyst and the host of the podcast “The Joel Klatt Show.” Follow him @joelklatt and subscribe to “The Joel Klatt Show” on YouTube.

Advertisement

Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!

 





Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon women score the last 14 points to beat No. 21 USC 71-66

Published

on

Oregon women score the last 14 points to beat No. 21 USC 71-66



Ehis Etute scored a career-high 17 points and grabbed 13 rebounds, and Oregon scored the last 14 points to beat No. 21 Southern California 71-66 on Tuesday night.

Oregon (14-3, 2-2 Big Ten) scored the first 12 points of the fourth quarter but USC answered with a 8-0 spurt and led 66-57 with 4:46 to play. Etute scored the next three points and Ari Long then hit three straight 3s. Katie Fiso capped the scoring with a pair of free throws with 17 seconds left. Londynn Jones missed a 3-pointer for the Trojans to end it.

Long and Fiso combined for 17 fourth-quarter points and Etute added seven points to go with five boards.

Advertisement

Fiso finished with 14 points. Long and Mia Jacobs chipped in with 11 apiece for the Ducks.

Kara Dunn scored 21 points for USC (10-5, 2-2). Jazzy Davidson added 14 points, 13 rebounds and five assists.

Dunn scored 12 points with a pair of 3s in the first quarter as the Trojans jumped out to a 23-9 lead and led 37-21 at the break.

Up next

Oregon: Hosts No. 15 Michigan State on Sunday.

USC: At Minnesota on Sunday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending