Connect with us

Oregon

3 Key Numbers from Illinois Basketball’s Win Over Oregon

Published

on

3 Key Numbers from Illinois Basketball’s Win Over Oregon


No. 22 Illinois (10-3, 2-1 Big Ten) traveled to Eugene and put an absolute thrashing on No. 9 Oregon (12-2, 1-2 Big Ten), taking down the home team 109-77 – good for the widest margin of victory by a visiting team against a top-10 opponent ever.

Scorching-hot shooting (57.5 percent from the field) led the Illini to their massive triple-digit night as the Ducks’ usually solid defense (68.7 points allowed per game) offered little resistance against an endless rain of threes and layups.

On defense, Illinois held the Ducks to 30-for-69 shooting from the field (43.5 percent), but something less than the usual effort and focus was required (and may have been applied) on an evening when the offense was firing on all cylinders.

Here are a few key digits that offer further insight into how the Illini were able to pull off the historic win:

Advertisement

The Illini needed this. A 15-for-33 showing from three-point range (45.5 percent) against Chicago State was encouraging, but the Cougars are a winless mid-major. Shooting 16-for-29 from three (55.2 percent) on the road against a top-10 team? That’s how a team gets its confidence back. Also worth noting: After a 5-for-25 stretch from beyond the arc, forward Ben Humrichous went 4-for-7 against the Ducks en route to a season-high 18 points. And no, there’s no expectation that either Humrichous or Illinois as a whole can maintain a three-point shooting mark above 50 percent. But if the Illini can hover closer to 40 percent than 30 percent, they will be well-positioned to make a competitive run for the Big Ten title.

Although the shooting has been inconsistent on a game-to-game basis, Illinois has been rock-solid on the boards all year – and that didn’t change Thursday. The Illini outrebounded the Ducks 43-31, now having won the battle of the boards in every game this season but the home loss to No. 1 Tennessee. Against Oregon, Illinois got a big night on the glass from Tre White – who posted the quietest 20 points and 11 rebounds you’ll ever encounter – while Tomislav Ivisic added eight and Kasparas Jakucionis six. The Illini need to continue their rebounding domination against the bigger, more athletic competition of the Big Ten. If the Ducks game was any indication, that shouldn’t be a problem.

Through 12 games, Illini coach Brad Underwood and his staff had been keeping the rotation pretty tight, with only Will Riley, Dra Gibbs-Lawhorn and Morez Johnson Jr. getting regular, significant minutes off the bench. But that changed on Thursday, and after the performance of Jake Davis, the change could become permanent. Davis – uniform No. 15 – is a Mercer transfer who, after entering the game with 14 points on the season, nearly doubled it with 12 points on 5-for-6 shooting from the field against Oregon. None of that was garbage-time production, by the way. All of Davis’ scoring came in the first half, when the margin was still within single digits and the outcome was still anyone’s guess.

3 Big Takeaways From Illinois Basketball’s Win Over Oregon

Illinois Basketball Rains Threes on Oregon in Record-Breaking Blowout

Who Is Neel Ganta, Illinois Basketball’s New Director of Player Personnel?





Source link

Advertisement

Oregon

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over $114K

Published

on

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over 4K


PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A former Oregon corrections officer received a lifetime hunting ban on Wednesday after pleading guilty to several poaching-related charges.

Christopher Mason, 49, of Umatilla, was sentenced in two separate court cases to 24 months of probation and 300 hours of community service. He was also fined over $114,000 and was required to forfeit his firearms.

Multiple big game hunting items were seized from Christopher Mason’s possession (OSP)

Oregon State Police said they began investigating Mason in 2024 after receiving information that he had been poaching big game animals.

“In February 2025, OSP served a search warrant, and multiple big game animals and firearms were seized as evidence. Sixty-seven criminal charges were referred for prosecution,” officials said. “The charges spanned multiple counties.”

Advertisement

Mason pleaded guilty to four counts of unlawful take of buck deer and three counts of unlawful take of black bear on June 18. In a separate case on June 26, he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, unlawful possession of a silencer, unlawful possession of multiple wildlife and unlawful take of mule deer.

“This is another example of serial poaching which rises to the level of felony conduct based solely on the repeated poaching conduct and impact of one individual on Oregon’s game mammals,” prosecutor Jay Hall said. “The conduct across the several counties amounts to one of the highest damage amounts done to Oregon wildlife by any singular actor.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4

Published

on

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4


With national firefighting resources already stretched to their limits, statewide fire restrictions remain in effect for all Bureau of Land Management public lands throughout Washington and Oregon, with some local regions also implementing additional emergency closures.

As the Independence Day holiday weekend approaches, officials warned that people responsible for starting wildfires could face up to $100,000 in fines, 12 months in prison, and liability for all firefighting suppression costs.

SEE ALSO | Washington braces for earlier wildfire season due to low snowpack: ‘Worse than normal’

“There are serious consequences for starting a wildfire, including fines and possibly imprisonment, which we hope everyone can avoid through careful choices,” said Josh O’Connor, Northwest Geographic Area Fire Chief for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service. “We have already experienced excruciating loss this season. I cannot stress the gravity of the situation enough. Please help protect our firefighters and communities.”

Advertisement

Officials urged visitors to research their destinations in advance, noting that local restrictions can determine when power tools may be used, what kinds of stoves or campfires are allowed, and what safety equipment is required.

The BLM said the following items remain strictly prohibited on all BLM lands in Oregon and Washington: fireworks and sky lanterns; exploding or metallic targets; tracer or incendiary devices; and steel component ammunition, including core or jacket.

“Lighting a firework or leaving a smoldering campfire creates significant wildland fire risk. Under the right conditions, they easily start wildfires,” said Kim Prill, BLM Oregon/Washington acting state director. “Don’t risk it. Let’s work together to prevent every wildfire possible.”

More information on seasonal fire restrictions and fire closures is available HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.

Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.

Advertisement

“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.

“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.

SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots

Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.

Advertisement

Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.

“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.

According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.

“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.

She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”

Advertisement

Oregon leaders respond

House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.

The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.

In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”

“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.

KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.

Advertisement

The governor’s office had not responded by publication.

Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.

“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.

She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending