Connect with us

Nevada

Rather than face Nevada high court, Nye County commissioners vote to move judges over weapons order

Published

on

Rather than face Nevada high court, Nye County commissioners vote to move judges over weapons order


Judges concern for security with weapons allowed in hallways, complicated

PAHRUMP, Nev. (KLAS) — Quite than face a possible problem on the state supreme courtroom, Nye County commissioners voted Tuesday to maneuver two district courtrooms from a county complicated to new buildings over a judicial order banning weapons within the county complicated.

In a gathering on Dec. 16, the commissioners unanimously voted to take away a judicial order banning firearms within the Ian Deutch Authorities Complicated, which homes each the Fifth Judicial District Courtroom and the Pahrump Justice Courtroom.

Advertisement

Throughout Tuesday’s assembly, the board unanimously voted to maneuver the district courtroom from the complicated, citing the excessive price of a possible authorized battle.

“Why are we not implementing this and placing the judges of their place?” Commissioner Diana Cox stated. “Why are they allowed to do that after they can put individuals in jail for all times and we will’t do something again?”

The county owns the constructing, however the judiciary runs the courtrooms. Underneath state legislation, the county is required to supply the judiciary with house and pay for utilities.

Only a piece of paper prevented an individual from bringing a firearm right into a Nye County courthouse till the Board of Commissioners voted to take away the ban put in place by judges working within the county-owned constructing. (KLAS)

In 2010, after a number of shootings at courthouses, together with one on the federal constructing in Las Vegas, District Courtroom Choose Robert Lane wrote an order forbidding firearms within the constructing and the courtroom’s different workplace in Tonopah. As a substitute, county workers may apply to hold hid weapons.

The judicial order particularly mentions the “courthouse” and its “courtrooms, chambers, places of work, annexes” and different rooms the place a judicial continuing could also be underway.

Advertisement

The judges’ say to ban weapons, in keeping with the commissioners, doesn’t apply outdoors of their chambers. That features a lot of the constructing, together with the hallways.

Talking with the I-Crew in February, District Courtroom Choose Kim Wanker stated considerations about her security have prompted her to maintain a gun secure on her bench.

“I’m sure it’s an incident ready to occur,” she stated. “It’s not if it occurs, it’s when it occurs.”

There isn’t any safety on the predominant entrance, which results in the district legal professional’s workplace and to the clerk. County commissioners stated they management the halls. A Nevada state legislation provides the management of county buildings to their respective commissioners.

In Clark County, entrances to the Regional Justice Middle, dwelling to the Eighth Judicial District Courtroom and Las Vegas Justice Courtroom, are flanked with safety. The constructing additionally homes the Clark County District Legal professional’s Workplace.

Advertisement
Safety measures, like a $90,000 scanner, sit in storage. The judges stated the county is not going to pay to workers it. (KLAS)

Throughout Tuesday’s assembly, the commissioners overtly mentioned having the order challenged to the Nevada Supreme Courtroom, which they indicated might be a dropping battle.

A county legal professional warned the commissioners taking the difficulty to the excessive courtroom might be pricey, however that shifting the courts to 2 different buildings would additionally naked an unknown price as effectively.

Commissioner Debra Strickland famous Nye County is rising and stated the vote supplied a possibility to maneuver the courtrooms amid an rising workload and inhabitants.

Tuesday’s vote doesn’t have an effect on the Pahrump Justice Courtroom.



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

Nevada vs Boise State: Week 9 College Football Betting Odds, Prediction, Pick

Published

on

Nevada vs Boise State: Week 9 College Football Betting Odds, Prediction, Pick


Week 9 of the college football season continues with some Friday night action as the Boise State Broncos visit the Nevada Wolf Pack in a Mountain West showdown.

The Broncos come into Friday on a two-game winning streak and are a perfect 3-0 in the Mountain West. They are one of just two teams with no losses in the conference and are looking to soldify themselves as the favorite to win the title again.

The Wolf Pack are on the opposite end of the standings in the Mountain West. They are still searching for thier first conference win and are just 1-6 on the season.

Stream Nevada vs. Boise State

Advertisement

If you’re looking to get back in the swing of football season and need some betting advice for Friday’s matchup in Las Mackay, we’ve got you covered.

Here are the latest odds for the game, courtesy of BetMGM.

Nevada vs Boise State game odds:

All college football odds via BetMGM

  • Spread: Boise State -21.5 (-110), Nevada +21.5 (-110)
  • Money Line: Boise State -2000, Nevada +1000
  • Over-Under: Over 51.5 (-115), Under 51.5 (-105)

Nevada vs Boise State prediction, pick:

The Broncos are playing well and have won five of their last six games. Maddux Madsen is playing great at quarterback and the Wolf Pack aren’t going to have any answers for him The line is huge, but the Broncos are that much better than the Wolf Pack and aren’t going to have any problems beating them. They might have this covered in the first half.

Prediction: Boise State 49, Nevada 10

Best Bet: Boise State -21.5, Over 51.5

Advertisement

Nevada vs Boise State channel, start time, streaming:

Time: 10:00 p.m. ET

TV Channel: CBS Sports Network

Live Stream: Paramount+

Get more betting analysis and predictions at Sportsbook Wire.

Contact/Follow @College_Wire on X and @College_Wires on Threads. Like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of college sports news, notes, and opinions.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Miss Nevada USA Mary Sickler, Who Has Alopecia, Ditches Wig in Powerful Onstage Moment

Published

on

Miss Nevada USA Mary Sickler, Who Has Alopecia, Ditches Wig in Powerful Onstage Moment


It was more than just Mary Sickler‘s gown that was sparkling onstage.

As the current Miss Nevada USA took the stage at the Miss USA preliminaries Oct. 22, she decided to leave her chocolate brown wig backstage for the evening wear portion of the competition.

While Mary—who was diagnosed with alopecia universalis in December 2024—first stepped out in a red bikini and a brunette wig for the swimsuit round, she decided to embrace her baldness for her final look. 

Indeed, she dazzled in a jewel-encrusted headpiece that matched her blue and silver form-fitting gown. She completed the look with sparkling teardrop earrings and a smoky makeup look.

Advertisement

Following the powerful onstage moment, the 22-year-old—who was crowned Miss Nevada USA in July—reflected on being the first woman with alopecia to compete in the national beauty pageant.

“This dream has been so many years in the making, and to finally step into this moment feels surreal,” she wrote on Instagram Oct. 22. “I never imagined I would walk that stage in this way, but I always hoped I would do it with confidence, authenticity, and grace.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood? | Pat Hickey

Published

on

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood? | Pat Hickey


play

Recently, two headlines caught my eye. The first: Nevada plans to roll out the Hollywood red carpet with public tax breaks for private studio companies — Sony Pictures and Warner Bros. The other: The University of Nevada, Reno plans a new 400-unit public-private apartment complex near campus for faculty, staff and students.

Advertisement

Both proposals utilize tax-credit financing to incentivize businesses to meet Nevada’s needs.

To my mind, if it becomes a question of what is our most pressing priority, I would pick an affordable supply of homes for our Nevada towns over the lure of Tinseltown coming to our southern desert.

When I think of the future of a Nevada film industry, I don’t see it becoming a blockbuster. Gone is the glamour and dream-like entity that once was embodied by Hollywood. A successful sequel to the magic of movie-making success seems unlikely — whether it’s located in Studio City, California, or Summerlin, Nevada.

The curtain appears have come down on that once glorious period. Like the end of the the Old South’s saga in Hollywood’s “Gone with the Wind,” a bygone era of mystique and dominance is likely no more. 

The slow death of cinemas

Hollywood was once the symbol of creative genius. Movies served as the vehicle for global storytelling. It was the place where human’s dreams were brought to life. Films in local movie theaters were once the crown jewel of the film industry. It’s hardly the case these days.

Advertisement

For me, it’s partly because the two cinemas where Shin and I used to spend Friday nights — dinner and a movie — are now shuttered. Reno’s downtown Riverside Theatre and Lake Tahoe’s Heavenly Cinema have both closed amid declining ticket sales, increased competition from streaming services and changing consumer habits, such as favoring movies at home. More than 1,000 U.S. theater screens have closed since 2019, and total box-office revenue remains well below pre-pandemic levels.

Hollywood’s demise has a lot to do with what has appeared on movie screens in recent times. Instead of creative, bigger-than-life sagas of the human spirit in all its varied forms — in war, peace, romance and even crime — today’s Hollywood films typically rely upon remakes, sequels and prequels of past glories, computer-generated comic book super heroes extravaganzas or horror flicks designed to frighten, or simply disgust. Call me old-fashioned. The fact is, this once avid filmgoer has become just plain disinterested. Many of my younger friends seem much the same, for their own reasons.

Even famed Oscar-winning Hollywood film director Martin Scorsese has soured on all the comic book super-hero types now frequently served-up by today’s bottom-line studios. In an interview with GQ Magazine, Scorsese says, “Superhero movies are “not cinema,” comparing them to theme parks rather than the art form of human emotion and psychological experience. He argues that they prioritize spectacle and commercial interests over artistic expression and that Hollywood’s financial dominance by these “franchise pictures” is pushing other types of films to the margins. The Oscar-winning director went on to say: “Theaters have become amusement parks.”

The last time I checked — some of those theme parks are closing as well.

Advertisement

Is a Nevada film industry a good investment?

In a recent Wall Street Journal story titled “L.A.’s Entertainment Economy Is Looking Like a Disaster Movie,” the newspaper reports: “The entertainment industry is in a downward spiral… Work is evaporating, businesses are closing, longtime residents are leaving and the heart of L.A.’s creative middle class is hanging on by a thread. Hollywood’s downturn has rippled through the region’s economy.”

Which is why some Nevadans believe luring struggling Hollywood film studios here could be a wise pursuit. As reported by The Nevada Independent, a PAC funded with $1 million by a coalition of building trades unions is preparing “to spend big to shape public and legislative opinion to pave the way for film tax legislation” if a special session is convened by the governor.

Incentives to motivate companies to relocate to Nevada have always been a tax tool in the state’s arsenal. A low-tax, limited-regulatory business environment has benefitted Nevada’s growth spurts throughout its history.

Transferable tax credits were a device to bring the Teslas of the world to Nevada. Acting like coupons that could be sold to other companies to help offset a company’s initial investment, they’ve worked effectively to attract major new industries and sports franchises to Nevada — even though libertarian organizations like the Nevada Policy Research Institute have consistently opposed having government “pick winners and losers.” Pick we did in the case of Tesla, and overall, I believe Nevada ended up a winner with the electric-vehicle company that helped usher the state into the era of advanced manufacturing.

I’m not so sure bringing Hollywood studios here would yield the same return on investment. Beyond the turmoil in California’s film industry, other states — such as New York and Georgia, with far larger economies and infrastructure, and nearby New Mexico and Utah — are already far ahead of Nevada in attracting films to be made outside of Hollywood.

Advertisement

While I support the livelihoods of construction workers — whose well-being is tied to the state’s overall health and the ancillary benefits of growth and development — I believe there are more pressing needs and far better opportunities for Nevada than becoming another annex for an on-the-ropes Hollywood.

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood?

Two times, movie studio executives have tried to pass legislation to expand Nevada’s film tax credit program. They hope a Special Session, expected to be called soon, may be their third-time charm.

Should the public, through its elected representatives from both political parties, fail to get on board with the latest “central casting” call from Hollywood executives, I’d recommend another way to get creative.

Like UNR just did.

The national housing crisis manifests in many forms, but most impactful is the severe shortage of affordable housing units. State and local municipalities are increasingly taking action to build and preserve affordable housing. Localities can deploy a wide range of tools and investments: tax abatements and exemptions, tax increment financing, payments in lieu of taxes, public land contributions, low-interest rate loans, voucher deployment and more.

Advertisement

Instead of $1.4 billion over the next 15 years in tax credits for a film studio complex and related businesses, why not use those potential transferable tax credits as an economic development tool to help finance and provide a source of equity to fund construction of housing or rehabilitation for affordable housing for key segments of the economy, such as teachers, medical professionals and seniors. Large industrial partners like Tesla could be incentivized or make good on the “housing and infrastructure” promise Elon Musk made to the region and his own employees.

Better we do things for Nevadans who are already here than for those we hope to migrate here from Los Angeles.

Legendary Hollywood filmmaker Frank Capra (“It’s a Wonderful Life”), once said, “Only the daring should make films. Only the morally courageous are worthy of speaking to their fellow men for two hours, and in the dark”.

Nevada could use a little of that daring and courage. Hollywood may not be the answer. But the housing needs of many of our own families certainly are.

Advertisement

Your thoughts? At: tahoeboy68@gmail.com.

“Memo from the Middle” is an opinion column written by RGJ columnist Pat Hickey, a member of the Nevada Legislature from 1996 to 2016. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending