Connect with us

Nevada

New high school start times could be coming in Nevada

Published

on

New high school start times could be coming in Nevada


The Nevada State Board of Education approved draft language Wednesday for a new regulation that would eventually require all high schools to begin classes no earlier than 8 a.m.

Draft language will go to the state’s Legislative Council Bureau. Then, a regulation will come back to the board and a regulation hearing will be held to get public feedback.

Students and parents have voiced concerns about how most Clark County School District high schools start around 7 a.m. Proponents say research shows early start times are associated with academic and safety issues, as well as a lack of sleep for teenagers.

Board President Felicia Ortiz said the board is “not making a sweeping decision” or forcing districts to comply immediately, and is providing the opportunity for options and waivers.

Advertisement

“The intent of this is to ensure that our kids are first and foremost in all of our decisions,” she said.

Ortiz said the change will ensure students’ safety and their mental health.

But school district superintendents statewide say decisions should be made at a local level. They’ve also raised concerns about effects on busing, extracurricular activities and student work schedules.

The Clark County School District will take all steps — including litigation — on the issue, General Counsel Luke Puschnig said during a public comment period.

It’s clear the Nevada Legislature has not authorized the Nevada Department of Education to make “this type of sweeping change,” he said.

Advertisement

Puschnig said he sent a letter Aug. 14 to the department asking for the legal arguments it will use to establish start times and hasn’t received a response.

If a regulation is eventually adopted, requirements would apply to all school districts and public charter schools. A gradual implementation would start during the 2024-2025 school year.

Draft regulation language says that districts and charter schools with campuses that start classes before 8 a.m. “must provide alternative options to families and students.”

“These options shall be aimed at addressing the potential negative impact of early start times on student health, well-being, and academic performance,” according to the draft.

If approved, 25 percent of schools within each district and charter school must offer alternative start time options during the 2024-25 school year.

Advertisement

Each year, an additional 25 percent of schools would be added until all schools comply with the regulation.

The state is also proposing a waiver system for those who face “unique challenges” in changing their start time. A waiver application would be due by Nov. 15 to the State Board of Education for the following school year.

Applications must demonstrate a “compelling need for non-compliance” and include a plan to address the challenges, according to the draft.

The proposal would require each district and charter school with early start times to conduct a survey of individual school communities to gather feedback. They’d also have to submit a yearly report to the state.

The State Board of Education first started talking about potential changes to school start times in late 2022.

Advertisement

The topic has come up at a few meetings and three public workshops were held this spring.

Board member comments

Board member and Eureka County School District Superintendent Tate Else said he’s concerned about unintended consequences.

He said he doesn’t think anyone is opposed to the data and research, but there are so many other factors to consider and work through.

He also said that it’s challenging to get accurate and quality survey data, noting the state needs to be careful about how to do that related to start times.

Advertisement

Board member Mike Walker, an elementary school principal in Dayton and a Carson City School Board trustee. said the regulation will impact elementary schools.

He also expressed concerns about student safety and noted that “transportation is a huge issue” for districts.

Board member Maggie Carlton said she still has concerns and isn’t thoroughly convinced about the change. She also said she was disappointed in the attendance at some of the public workshops.

But Carlton said she’ll support draft regulation language moving forward in order to get people to pay attention to the issue and how to solve the problem for children.

Public comments

Advertisement

The board heard about 30 minutes of in-person and written public comments about proposed regulation language.

Those in opposition included the Clark County School District, Charter School Association of Nevada, and school district superintendents in Carson City and Humboldt County.

The Nevada Psychological Association and two juniors from Silverado High School in Las Vegas expressed support.

Contact Julie Wootton-Greener at jgreener@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2921. Follow @julieswootton on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Nevada State Parks fully implementing Sand Harbor’s day-use reservation system

Published

on

Nevada State Parks fully implementing Sand Harbor’s day-use reservation system


After last year’s trial run went successfully, Nevada State Parks is moving forward with full implementation of the day-use reservation system at Sand Harbor State Park.

The implementation begins on April 15th.

The day-use system is designed to protect the park’s natural beauty and resources, while making the experience better for visitors.

Advertisement

The reservations will be required daily during peak season, which runs from April 15 until October 15.

Anyone entering Sand Harbor by auto between the hours of 8:00 a.m.—when the park opens—and 10:30 a.m. are required to have a reservation. After 10:30, any unclaimed reservation spots will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.

The reservations are set up in a three-tiered system to ensure fairness in the process:

  • Tier One includes 200 day-use reservations that are available 90 days in advance.
  • Tier Two has 100 day-use reservations and are available 30 days in advance.
  • Tier Three holds 50 day-use reservations that can be reserved seven days in advance.

Reservations for visitors starting April 15 will be made available this Wednesday, January 15.

All visitors are encouraged to grab their spots as early as possible to ensure access during the busy season.

Reservations must be made through the Reserve Nevada website. Park entrance fee is $10 for vehicles registered in Nevada, and $15 for out-of-state vehicles.

Advertisement

A $5 fee is added to all reservations except day-of.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Gov. Lombardo appoints Andrew Coates as incoming Nevada State Public Defender – Carson Now

Published

on

Gov. Lombardo appoints Andrew Coates as incoming Nevada State Public Defender – Carson Now


Governor Joe Lombardo announced Monday his appointment of Andrew Coates as the incoming Nevada State Public Defender.

Coates currently serves as Deputy General Counsel in the Office of the Governor. Prior to his current role, Coates served as the Nye County Public Defender and handled numerous criminal cases across rural Nevada.

“I’m honored by Governor Lombardo’s appointment, and I’m committed to ensuring that the Nevada Department of Indigent Defense Services upholds the highest standards of legal representation for those in need,” said Andrew Coates. “Access to justice is a fundamental right, and I will work tirelessly to make sure that right is protected for every Nevadan.”

“Andrew has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to the rule of law and to serving Nevadans,” said Governor Joe Lombardo.  “His experience as both a public defender and state legal advisor makes him uniquely qualified for this role. I am confident Andrew will guide the office with integrity and ensure that all Nevadans receive fair representation under the law.” 

Advertisement

Coates will begin his appointment on January 21, 2025.  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

2024 one of the deadliest years on Nevada roads on record

Published

on

2024 one of the deadliest years on Nevada roads on record


Last year proved one of the deadliest on Nevada roads, with 412 deaths resulting from vehicle crashes.

The 412 traffic deaths in 2024 resulted from 377 crashes involving a fatality, according to an annual report from the state Office of Traffic Safety. That makes 2024 the fourth-deadliest year on record, according to state records dating back to 1991 and tracked by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

As is the case each year, the top contributing factors to fatal crashes were speeding and impairment, according to the state.

The Nevada Office of Traffic Safety’s internal tracking of crashes reveals that between 50-60 percent of those who die in road crashes have an impairing substance in their system, according to Anita Pepper, spokeswoman for the office.

Advertisement

The deadliest year on record was 2006 with 431 deaths. The next deadliest year was 2005 with 427; followed by 2022 with 416; 2024 with 412 deaths; and 395 in 2004 rounds out the five deadliest years.

“Unfortunately, the numbers are trending very high,” Pepper told the Review-Journal. “We are almost back to where we were in 2022, and it’s devastating to see that the number is climbing.”

Last year’s total is an increase of nearly 6 percent compared with 2023’s total of 390 traffic deaths.

In Clark County, traffic deaths rose nearly 14 percent in 2024, with 293 deaths compared with the 258 seen in 2023.

Increasing safety

Advertisement

Clark County’s Office of Traffic Safety, which was founded in 2022, is focusing on re-evaluating its priorities when it comes to roads, deep-diving into data,and looking at sections of roads and intersections that need to be improved.

“At some point there will be a document that is the Safe Streets for All Action Plan for Southern Nevada,” Clark County Office of Traffic Safety Director Andrew Bennett told the Review-Journal. “We’re focusing a great deal of resources on that.”

Erin Breen, director of UNLV’s Road Equity Alliance project, said a lot can be done to increase the safety of all road users, but she said only a few leaders have the will to stand up and explain what needs to be done.

“Because the average driver sees the change as detrimental to their commutes, and getting places fast is a way of life here, unfortunately, it’s the leading contributor to fatalities too,” Breen said.

With speed continually a top factor in fatal crashes, Breen said curbing that is the easiest way to reduce road deaths. She noted that it wouldn’t be cheap, but it is the easiest and most effective way to make Nevada roads safer.

Advertisement

“Changing how fast drivers are comfortable traveling would add to the safety and comfort of those on foot, bike or mobility device,” Breen said. “Narrowing travel lanes on arterial roads, with further reductions at intersections would slow drivers down and assure that the crashes that do happen would be less severe. It would also allow for protected bike lanes and wider sidewalks for those traveling under human power.”

Part of the county’s action to create the Safe Streets for All Action Plan includes overlaying crash and citation data with speed involvement to paint a picture of the Las Vegas Valley’s roads.

“That might have disproportionate representation of crashes and high-injury crashes,” Bennett said. “That will paint a picture countywide, including our rural communities in that as well. That’s the bigger picture, smaller picture I think we’ve done more and continue to work with individual neighbors and businesses in the community, places of interest, whether it be schools or parks, ensuring that we have the ability to listen to the people that are using our road networks.”

Vulnerable road users

Traffic fatalities among vulnerable road users, which includes pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, saw some of the latest increases in the state and in the Las Vegas Valley.

Advertisement

Motorcyclist deaths rose an alarming 28 percent in the state, going from 64 in 2023 to 82 last year. In Clark County, motorcyclist deaths jumped 22 percent in 2024 compared with the year prior, going from 50 in 2023 to 61 last year. Washoe County, which includes Reno, saw a nearly 63 percent increase in motorcyclists’ deaths, from eight in 2023 to 13 in 2024.

“I can say that speed was a big factor in our increase. A lot of the time speeding motorcyclists were their own cause of death, but so many times they were aided by drivers turning, mostly on permissive flashing yellow arrows, which are great for moving cars, terrible for saving lives,” Breen said.

Bicyclists also saw an increase in fatalities, going from 14 in 2023 to 15 in 2025, a 7 percent increase in the state and increasing from 10 to 11 deaths in Clark County, a 10 percent jump.

Pedestrian deaths in the state rose by nearly 5 percent, going from 107 in 2023 to 112 in 2024. In Clark County, pedestrian deaths rose by 14 percent, with 95 deaths last year, up from the 83 seen in 2023.

“In 2023, the state reached over 100 pedestrian fatalities for the first time, we came dangerously close just in Clark County (this year),” Breen said.

Advertisement

Breen noted that during the Great Recession, when fewer people were driving, only 29 and 30 pedestrian fatalities occurred in 2009 and 2010, respectively. That number increased to a then-all-time high in 2017 at 78 fatalities, a number that then was topped in both 2018 and 2023, with 83.

“Our population increase isn’t the issue, people who drive far too fast and completely focused on themselves is a problem,” Breen said.

Deaths tied to vehicle occupants not wearing a seat belt dipped slightly with 64 in 2024 compared with 68 in 2023, a nearly 6 percent drop in the state. Clark County saw a nearly 10 percent decrease, going from 41 last year to 37 in 2024.

Personal choices

Even with all the messaging, educating and engineering from state and local officials occurring in relation to roads, the key aspect to increasing safety is choices made by each individual driver, Bennett said. Even though many believe that speeding will get them to their destination quicker, in traffic, data suggests otherwise.

Advertisement

“We need to have an honest conversation with out community,” Bennett said. “There’s report after report that shows that speeding 10-12 mph over the speed limit doesn’t result in you getting to your destination any quicker. Speeding isn’t worth it. Nothing delays traffic like a fatal crash. We’re trying to balance moving our community safely and effectively, but making sure that safety is part of that conversation.”

Contact Mick Akers at makers@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2920. Follow @mickakers on X. Follow @mickakers on X. Send questions and comments to roadwarrior@reviewjournal.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending