Connect with us

Nevada

Nevada voter ID amendment qualifies for November ballot

Published

on

Nevada voter ID amendment qualifies for November ballot


The Nevada Secretary of State’s Office confirmed on Friday that a proposed constitutional amendment to change identification procedures for in-person voting and mail ballots has qualified for the November ballot in Nevada.

The amendment includes provisions that would require voters submitting mail ballots to provide the last four digits of their driver’s license or Social Security number. If passed, the amendment would need to be reaffirmed by voters in 2026 to be permanently adopted into the state constitution.

The voter ID initiative’s qualification followed the verification of approximately 132,000 signatures by county election officials, exceeding the nearly 26,000 valid signatures required from each of the state’s four petition districts.

In May, the Nevada Supreme Court upheld a district court’s decision to deny declaratory and injunctive relief in a challenge to the initiative. The challenge argued that the initiative included an unfunded mandate and had an inadequate description of its effects, but the Court ruled that the initiative did not explicitly require an expenditure and that the description of effect was legally sufficient.

Advertisement

The Repair the Vote political action committee organized the ballot initiative effort, and their president has expressed hope that the initiative would increase voter turnout among those who do not regularly vote.

Chairman of the Nevada Republican Party Michael J. McDonald celebrated the announcement, calling it “a monumental achievement for the people of Nevada.” He added, “The initiative to require photo identification or secure personal information for voting purposes is crucial for maintaining the integrity and transparency of our electoral system.”

Critics, however, claim the measure would harm certain communities. Executive Director of Silver State Voices Emily Persaud-Zamora stated, “The proposed voter ID measure would dramatically change our voting system and complicate voting for individuals in our communities … Voter ID laws disproportionately impact voters of color and do nothing to make our elections more secure.”

The amendment will appear alongside several other measures on the November ballot including initiatives to further enshrine abortion rights, introduce ranked-choice voting and remove language from the state constitution that allows slavery and involuntary servitude as forms of criminal punishment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

LETTER: The future of Las Vegas is hot

Published

on

LETTER: The future of Las Vegas is hot


Your article on the impact of “shattered heat records” was wonderfully thorough, balanced and informative (“Shattered heat records forecast dicey future for Sin City, July 12”). This heat sure is a wake-up call for action, preferably of two kinds:

Adaptation: Yes, “cooling centers” can help, but also adding trees, encouraging reflective surfaces and embracing other countermeasures to urban “heat island” features.

Mitigation: Exploit Nevada’s solar and geothermal gifts to “greenify the grid.” And use the subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act to “electrify everything” (e.g., heat pumps for cheaper air conditioning, induction stoves and electric cars). And push Congress for an international price on carbon pollution … thereby giving the private markets more incentive to clean up their act.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada man gets 65 years for ‘sextorting’ minors on several social media platforms

Published

on

Nevada man gets 65 years for ‘sextorting’ minors on several social media platforms


LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A Sparks, Nevada, man was sentenced on Friday to 65 years in prison after he was convicted in a “sextortion” scheme perpetrated over Omegle, Snapchat, TikTok and Mega social platforms from 2018 to 2021.

James Patrick Burns, 55, “sextorted” multiple minors online, according to a U.S. Department of Justice news release. Burns was already a registered sex offender when he was arrested by authorities.

“During this period, Burns was the most prolific creator of illegal content on these forums,” according to the news release. “He victimized over 100 children, many of whom have yet to be identified. Burns’s offenses came to the attention of law enforcement when the mother of one of his victims saw threats on the victim’s phone and reported what she saw to the police.”

Burns will be required to serve lifetime supervised release if he is released from prison.

Advertisement

He was convicted on March 5 by a federal jury on eight counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, eight counts of coercion and enticement of a minor, and one count each of advertising, receiving, distributing and possessing child pornography.

Burns coerced minors into producing pornography. He was also ordered to pay $82,655.92 in restitution and $21,000 in assessments under the Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act.

The announcement was made by Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri, head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; U.S. Attorney Jason M. Frierson for the District of Nevada; Assistant Director Michael Nordwall of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division; Special Agent in Charge Spencer L. Evans of the FBI Las Vegas Field Office; and Special Agent in Charge Christopher Miller of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Las Vegas.

The FBI-led Northern Nevada Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force, which is comprised of detectives and investigators from the Sparks Police Department, Washoe County Sheriff’s Office, Nevada Attorney General’s Office, and HSI, investigated the case. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office, HSI Chicago Field Office, and local law enforcement around the country provided substantial assistance.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Fed judge tosses GOP challenge to Nevada’s mail-ballot counting rules: They ‘lack standing’

Published

on

Fed judge tosses GOP challenge to Nevada’s mail-ballot counting rules: They ‘lack standing’


LAS VEGAS — Republicans have vowed to continue pressing legal claims against Nevada’s 2021 law allowing the inclusion of mail-in ballots received up to four days after Election Day.

Federal District Court Chief Judge Miranda Du said plaintiffs including the Republican National Committee, the state GOP, the 2024 Trump campaign and Nevada voter Donald Szymanski, a registered Republican, “lack standing to challenge the Nevada mail ballot receipt deadline.”

The plaintiffs had sued Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, Washoe County Registrar of Voters Cari-Ann Burgess, Washoe County Clerk Jan Galassini and Lorena Portillo and Lynn Marie Goya, respectively Clark County’s voter registrar and county clerk. The two counties are the state’s most populous.

Federal District Court Chief Judge Miranda Du said the the state GOP, the 2024 Trump campaign and others “lack standing to challenge the Nevada mail ballot receipt deadline.” nvd.uscourts
The plaintiffs had sued Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar. nvsos

In a 15-page ruling, Du, a 2011 Obama appointee to the federal bench, said none of the plaintiff’s claims demonstrates they “have suffered, or will likely suffer, an injury” if the ballot-counting measure is allowed to stand. The judge said “it does not necessarily follow that mail ballots arriving after Election Day will skew Democratic. And even if later-arriving mail ballots have favored Democrats past elections, it is far from guaranteed that Nevada voters will behave similarly this November.”

Advertisement

She went on, “The Nevada mail ballot receipt deadline does not have an ‘individual and personal’ effect on the voting power of Republican voters; it neither undermines their access to the polls nor disproportionately diminishes the weight of their votes relative to other Nevada voters.” 

Clark and Washoe counties tallied 45,596 mail-in ballots in 2022 voting, the secretary of state’s office reported, with 89% of those arriving the day after Election Day.

It’s unknown how those ballots broke down along party lines, but Nevada Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto defeated GOP challenger Adam Laxalt by 8,000 votes that year.

Republicans believe Nevada, which hasn’t gone for a GOP presidential candidate since 2004, could end up in former President Donald Trump’s column this year and have stepped up voter-integrity efforts, with party chair Michael Whatley saying the Silver State is “absolutely critical” in regaining the White House.

A GOP spokeswoman, Claire Zunk, told Courthouse News the party will appeal.

Advertisement
The plaintiffs include the Republican National Committee, the state GOP, the 2024 Trump campaign. AFP via Getty Images
Clark and Washoe counties tallied 45,596 mail-in ballots in 2022 voting. AP

“Our case fights a Nevada law that shouldn’t be on the books; it breaks federal law and allows mail ballots to be counted after Election Day,” Zunk said. “Rather than letting us fight this in court, a liberal judge unjustifiably dismissed our case. Political parties must be allowed to fight invalid election laws that threaten the integrity of our elections. We are committed to protecting the ballot and we will pursue further legal action in this case.”

The Republicans are not alone in challenging voter issues in the Silver State. Last month, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, joined by two Nevada voters, sued Clark County’s Portillo over rolls showing voters listing a casino, several industrial parks and a topless club as their residential addresses.

That lawsuit, along with a similar one in Washoe County, is pending.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending