Connect with us

Nevada

Nevada Democrats push again for universal free school meals statewide

Published

on

Nevada Democrats push again for universal free school meals statewide


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Despite a gubernatorial veto two years ago, Democratic lawmakers are once again advocating for a bill that would provide free school breakfast and lunch to every student in Nevada.

The bill — Assembly Bill 268 — initially called for $86 million over the next two years to ensure every student in the state who wanted a breakfast or lunch at school could get one. But under an amendment, that amount will be reduced to $33 million over the biennium.

The reason for the change, according to bill sponsor Assemblywoman Sandra Jauregui, D-Clark County, is that Clark County and eight other Nevada counties already provide free school meals to students under a formula related to a region’s overall income.

Watch School meals will be free again for all CCSD students in 2023-2024 school year

Advertisement

School meals will be free again for all CCSD students in 2023-2024 school year

But Jauregui said that some schools in Washoe County and in rural Nevada don’t provide universal meals, and that she and co-sponsor Assemblywoman Shea Backus, D-Clark County, want to close the gap.

“Whether this bill passes or not, we who are a part of Clark County School District are going to be fine, because our students are going to be fed,” Jauregui said. “But that is not OK. It’s not enough. It’s not acceptable that students in Washoe County or other rural school districts will have students who will go to school hungry, It’s our duty to care for all students in Nevada.”

Advertisement

Not everyone agrees, however.

Two years ago, Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo vetoed a nearly identical bill, Assembly Bill 319, which would have allocated $43 million for school meals. In his veto message, Lombardo argued that food is wasted, most students were already eligible for school meals and other state funds were available for meals.

Nevada Democrats have relentlessly criticized Lombardo for his veto ever since, forcing the governor to defend himself, including in an August letter to parents. In that letter, Lombardo pointed out the huge education budget approved in the 2023 Legislature, the fact that 80.6% of students are already eligible for meals in nine Nevada counties (including Clark), and that parents can still fill out an application for free meals under certain circumstances.

“Unfortunately, there has been an increase in misinformation about the availability of free school meals ahead of the 2024-2025 school year,” Lombardo wrote. “Much of the misinformation stems from partisan attacks over my veto of Assembly Bill 319.”

“I think most Nevadans would agree that politics has no place in our school cafeterias,” Lombardo said.

Lombardo spokeswoman Elizabeth Ray declined to say whether the governor would veto the measure. She said he would review the bill if it’s passed by the Legislature and make a decision then.

Advertisement

But Lombardo could be in a political dilemma, with his re-election campaign looming next year. If he vetoes AB 268, he’ll face renewed criticism from Democrats over allowing some northern and rural students to go hungry at school.

On the other hand, if he signs the bill this year after having vetoed a similar bill two years ago, he opens himself to criticism that he changed his mind because of the coming election, not on the merits of the issue.

Lombardo’s party is opposed to the bill: Several Republican representatives spoke against AB 268 at a hearing on Monday morning.

“It is not the government’s place to assume the responsibility to feed children with taxpayer funds, particularly since this is universal with no means testing, the state is spending money where there is no need to do so,” said Jim DeGraffenreid, the Republican National Committeeman from Nevada.

Even in counties that offer free meals, not every student takes advantage of the option. Brad Keating, assistant superintendent of the Clark County School District, said 85,236 breakfasts were served last week, along with 165,331 lunches and 8,872 dinners.

Advertisement

The district currently has an enrollment of about 309,000 students currently.

Keating and Jauregui said that food that is not used at lunch is offered to students to take home for dinnertime, reducing the waste of food.

In addition to the universal meal bill, a second bill may be brought that would set aside additional funds in the event that the federal government cuts funds to the school districts in Nevada that currently provide free meals. If the funds continue, that set-aside money would not be used.

The bill has until April 11 to leave the Ways & Means Committee.

Do you have a question about the Nevada Legislature, politics or government? Write to us using the Ask Steve link on our website.

Local News

Advertisement

Ask Steve: Your questions about politics, elections and government in Nevada





Source link

Nevada

Nevada SPCA brings adoptable pet to spotlight on Furever Home Friday

Published

on

Nevada SPCA brings adoptable pet to spotlight on Furever Home Friday


Gov. Sisolak, health officials urge those who can help to join Battle Born Medical Corps

Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak along with the state health officials urged Nevadas to those who can help to join Battle Born Medical Corps. Nevada Department of Health and Human Services and the Nevada Health Response Center joined to call on health care providers and health care administrations to assist in the state’s COVID-19 pandemic response. Gov.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada’s unwritten rules (and what we wish the unwritten rules were)

Published

on

Nevada’s unwritten rules (and what we wish the unwritten rules were)


play

There’s a debate over on Reddit right now about how dogs should be kept on leashes around town, on trails, or anywhere in public that’s not a dog park.

I should clarify: When I say “debate,” I mean that several users have created posts about how dogs should be kept on leashes, and almost every response is 100% in agreement.

Advertisement

Go ahead and look at the posts; nobody’s putting together a spirited defense of letting their pets run around licking strangers and pooping on nature. With that kind of general consensus, I’d want to say that leashing our dogs is one of Reno-Sparks’ “unwritten rules.”

Except for two things: One, this rule is very much written (see Chapter 95.220 of the Washoe County Code: “Owners must have animals leashed no more than 6 feet in length and under immediate control at all times.”)

And also: The phrase “unwritten rules” implies that everyone goes along with it without even thinking. But we’ve all interacted with dog owners on local trails, letting their giant furballs knock over toddlers or chase goslings through the wetlands.

“Aw, he’s just a big puppy!” they’ll say, followed up with a halfhearted, “Down, Barnaby.”

Advertisement

Clearly, leashing dogs is not an unwritten rule because it’s constantly being broken. A true unwritten rule for hiking trails would be something that rarely ever gets broken, like “wear pants at all times.” Really, the leash thing is more like a wish list for society, alongside such things as:

  • Don’t mow before 8 a.m.
  • Signal your turns and lane changes.
  • Merge when you see a lane closure ahead, not at the last minute. (Yes, make all your arguments about how last-minute merging saves space. It all amounts to “I’m going to cut ahead of everyone else and pretend that it’s for the greater good.”)
  • If you’re driving a large vehicle, park at the far end of the lot.
  • Several more things about driving, actually.

But let’s move on. I’ve been wracking my brain to think of actual “unwritten rules” for Northern Nevada that outsiders might not grasp right away, and I didn’t come up with many. But here goes:

It’s not rude to keep your favorite spots a secret, even from friends and family: Got a favorite local park or Lake Tahoe beach? You’re not even required to tell your own mother about it, because word will get out and everything will be ruined. We value our personal space, and the community is too small to keep anything under wraps.

Side note: You can’t do this with businesses, because you need your burrito spot to stay crowded and busy. If nobody goes to your secret hot springs, it’s not going to suddenly go out of business and turn into a vape shop.

Advertisement

On Tahoe beaches, you can claim one beach towel’s worth of space per person, and that’s it: If word gets out about your favorite beach, you’ll have to start your day battling for a parking spot (bonus unwritten rule: You can’t reserve a parking spot by standing in it.)

The slightly less annoying ― but still difficult ― territory battle will be on the beach itself. Everyone but you will have a pop-up tent, several coolers and some sort of sound system. But societal convention dictates that any group can only claim the square footage of one beach towel per person, and leave ample space to walk between their beach site and the next one over.

Twenty minutes is a long drive in Reno-Sparks, but four hours is completely reasonable if you’re heading out of town: Recent transplants from more urban places like the Bay Area or Las Vegas will drive for 45 minutes to get to the one Target they like best. Around here, that sounds like hell.

On the other hand, driving for several hours to go see ichthyosaur skeletons or attend a Basque festival or go to a Giants game is completely reasonable. I can’t explain why this is. It might have something to do with hatred of stoplights.

Settle in a bit before complaining about outsiders: Yes, we know you just got here, and you want to prove your worthiness by complaining about Californians or Southern Nevadans, because that’s our local sport.

Advertisement

On average, we’re not nearly as closed off as people say; only about one-quarter of Nevadans were actually born here, so most of us know what it’s like to be the new kid. But at least wait until you’ve unloaded the last box from your U-Haul before you start griping about how new arrivals are pricing everyone out.

You, on the other hand ― you, the person reading this article right now! ― know a lot more unwritten rules for Northern Nevada. Either that, or you have ideas on what should be unwritten rules. Send them my way at bmcginness@rgj.com, and we’ll debate all of them next week.

Guys, we’re bringing back Shopko

What lost places in Reno-Sparks should we bring back? That’s the question I posed last week; here’s what you said:

Let’s start with department store ShopKo, which had the highly underrated slogan, “Say hello to a good buy.” We had three ― on South Virginia, Mae Anne and Oddie Boulevard. Lauri Ferguson wrote in to compliment the selection, and noted “their products lasted too.” Sadly, the entire chain disappeared nearly a decade ago, so bringing them back might be the heaviest lift ever.

Advertisement

“Bring back Famous Murphy’s,” wrote E. Pollard. “Can’t believe it ever closed and was then bulldozed and has been an empty dirt lot for more than 25 years.”

For the record, it’s actually been 18 years since it closed and 11 years since it was bulldozed, but the point stands.

“The purpose of the demolition is to make way for a new development being planned at this site,” developers told the RGJ in 2015. Anyway, it’s still an empty lot.

And finally, I had lamented over the lost Century Theaters dome on South Virginia, but Kurt Kinder mentioned one even more venerable, but equally lost: the Granada Theater, which originally opened in 1916, burned down in 1953 and reopened in 1954. It was torn down in 1997 and is now the site of the Palladio.

Advertisement

Brett McGinness is the engagement editor for the Reno Gazette Journal. He’s also the writer of The Reno Memo — a free newsletter about news in the Biggest Little City.

Subscribe to the newsletter right here. Consider supporting the Reno Gazette Journal, too.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada veterans exposed to radiation, toxic chemicals near recognition under new bill

Published

on

Nevada veterans exposed to radiation, toxic chemicals near recognition under new bill


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Nevada veterans who say they were exposed to radiation and toxic chemicals at the Nevada Test and Training Range are one step closer to getting recognized and help.

Senator Jacky Rosen and Congresswoman Susie Lee are introducing an updated “Forgotten Veterans Act,” now renamed the Sergeant Dave Crete Forgotten Veterans Act, to force the Defense Department to document contamination on the range and identify every service member who served there.

Veterans say years of classified work have kept them from proving their exposure and getting VA benefits, even as they deal with cancer and other serious illnesses.

Under the bill, the Pentagon would have to formally list the range as contaminated, unmask where veterans served the VA, and clear up a path for them and their families to qualify for care and compensation.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 KVVU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending