Connect with us

Nevada

Air Force Veteran Tells the Story of Hidden Health Risks at Nevada Test Site

Published

on

Air Force Veteran Tells the Story of Hidden Health Risks at Nevada Test Site


Dave Crete was sitting around with some fellow Air Force veterans he worked with almost three decades prior on the Nevada Test and Training Range when they broached the topic of tumors.

It was an unexpected conversation among the eight, but an enlightening one, said Crete, who found out six of his former crewmates had undergone tumor removal procedures. The Las Vegas resident said doctors had found more than 20 lipomas on him, including one that was the size of a grapefruit and surgically removed from his back.

The issues even extended to their families, with wives becoming sick, reporting multiple miscarriages or giving birth to children with defects or illnesses, Crete said.

He discovered the common thread between all these medical complications was exposure to radiation while working at the Nevada Test and Training Range.

Advertisement

Though veterans can usually get benefits to help with costs assumed from injuries related to service, Crete and many of his former crewmates can’t because their jobs were classified, meaning they can’t prove to the government that they were exposed to radiation.

Now, he’s working with federal lawmakers and producing a documentary to raise awareness about this group of impacted veterans.

“Our challenge is this: We’re a group of people that exists that nobody knows about, that nobody knows what we did, and nobody knows about where we worked,” Crete said. “It’s the only way I could figure out to effectively tell people our story and let them see it because there’s no Twin Towers; there’s no plane crash; no ship (got) sunk; there’s nothing to tie our story to, and so we have to create it, and that’s what we’ve been doing, creating a vehicle, if you will, to help us tell our story.”

Crete began the work in 2023 after forming his nonprofit The Invisible Enemy, a Las Vegas-based organization advocating for the thousands of military personnel that worked on the Nevada Test and Training Range and have been affected by exposure to toxic radiation.

The 2.9-million-acre Nevada Test and Training Range — formerly the Nevada Test Site — was established northwest of Las Vegas after World War II as a military testing site for nuclear weapons and now serves as “the largest contiguous air and ground space available for peacetime military operations,” according to Nellis Air Force Base.

Advertisement

Many people commonly refer to part of the range as Area 51, rumored to house top-secret U.S. military equipment and operations.

Crete worked at the Nevada Test and Training Range for four years, ending his service in 1987. He remembers testing being done near the gate where he was stationed. At the time, he and his crew members “didn’t know that’s what you could see,” he said, and were completely unaware of the issues that would follow them due to radiation exposure even when their service ended.

Crete said he would usually work for days at a time — sleeping, eating and drinking water while on the test site — and then go home to his wife, unknowingly bringing his contaminated clothing to be washed.

After discovering at the reunion how many veterans from the Nevada Test and Training Range ended up sick, Crete went digging for answers and found an environmental assessment of the Tonopah Test Range dated December 1975. It was conducted by the Department of Energy and Sandia National Laboratories.

The 89-page document stated that “The impacts of normal operation of the Tonopah Test Range consist of scarring of the land by roads and shrapnel impact, the use of resources and energy, noise, debris, some scattered toxic or radioactive materials, and economic effects on nearby communities.”

Advertisement

Three areas of the test site had been contaminated with plutonium from tests carried on in 1963, but the report stressed that “there is no indication of migration of this surface contamination outside the (site’s) fence, let alone outside the Range; nor is there any indication that this plutonium has entered significantly into local biological systems or food chains.”

“What they decided was that the benefits to national security, the benefits to having a prolific nuclear force, outweighed the future environmental liabilities … the government decided that the juice was worth the squeeze, and none of us knew,” Crete said. “You just never thought that the government would have actually put you somewhere knowing that eventually there was a good chance you were going to end up sick.”

Crete said he had since been in contact with “hundreds and hundreds” of veterans, with more than half reporting some sort of serious health condition among them or their families.

To raise awareness of the plight these veterans have faced, Crete decided he wanted to create a movie. He made an account on film industry website IMDb and began emailing those who were affiliated with projects like the 2023 “Oppenheimer” movie and the 2023 “Downwind” documentary.

He eventually received a response from a camera operator for “Downwind,” who connected him with the documentary’s directors, Mark Shapiro and Douglas Brian Miller. Crete then hired Backlot Docs — the feature documentary production company co-founded by Shapiro and Miller — to create the film.

Advertisement

“The Invisible Enemy” first fundraiser took place in late 2023 and filming began the same year to produce an 11-minute short titled “The Invisible Enemy: Hidden Sacrifice.” It took them three months from conceptualizing to completing the documentary, Crete said, and was uploaded to YouTube this past June.

Crete’s activism hasn’t stopped there.

The Invisible Enemy organization has been working with lawmakers, like U.S. Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., to craft legislation that would help those exposed to radiation at the Nevada Test and Training Range get medical benefits.

On Sept. 16, 2024, Amodei and U.S. Rep Susie Lee, D-Nev., introduced the Presumption for Radiation or Toxin Exposure Coverage for Troops (PROTECT) Act in the U.S. House of Representatives, which would have provided medical care for veterans exposed to radiation and other toxins at the Nevada Test and Training Range by setting a “presumption of exposure” to these toxins starting in 1972.

The bill would have established that anyone who worked at the Nevada Test and Training Range during or after 1972 was presumably exposed to radiation or other toxins. It would cover those not included in Executive Order 13179, which was signed by former President Bill Clinton in 2000 to compensate civilians, their survivors and Department of Energy employees exposed to radiation.

Advertisement

“A quick look at the facts shows that this group of veterans were in serious need of additional support as a result of their service,” Amodei said in a September statement. “As with every veteran, those serving at (the test site) during the determined time frame are entitled to care for illness and injury sustained in the line of service to our nation. I’m glad to lead the charge on this and will continue to push until this change is actualized.”

The House proposal never came to a vote and died with the end of the 118th Congress. It would need to be reintroduced in the new session of Congress.

Crete, who travels to Washington every few months to advocate for the cause, believes they’ll be granted a hearing by Congress this year.

U.S. Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., in 2023 introduced the Providing Radiation Exposed Servicemembers Undisputed Medical Eligibility (PRESUME) Act to support veterans exposed to toxic radiation by prohibiting the secretary of Veterans Affairs from requiring evidence of a specific dose of radiation to determine whether someone is a radiation-exposed veteran.

Under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) established in the 1990s, civilians who contracted cancer and other specific diseases from exposure to radiation can receive compensation without having to go through testing required by the Veterans Affairs, said Shane Liermann, deputy national legislative director for the nonprofit organization, Disabled American Veterans.

Advertisement

A veteran must provide proof of on-site participation, radiation dose estimates from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and a medical opinion supporting that their disease was caused by radiation exposure to receive entitlement for what Veterans Affairs considered “presumptive diseases” caused by radiation exposure.

But Crete claims that he and other veterans working at the Nevada Test and Training Range can’t even prove they were there due to their classified work, which leaves them unable to get any federal support.

Titus, in a statement, said “radiation dose estimates have historically been unreliable, leaving many exposed veterans unable to obtain the compensation they have earned.”

“In the course of their service, like anyone on the battlefield, veterans at the Nevada Test Site put themselves in harm’s way in service to our country. We cannot continue to leave any of them behind. The bureaucratic barriers to care could be easily fixed through my legislation,” Titus in 2023. “Our country’s atomic veterans helped win the peace during the Cold War, and they must be able to access the highest standard of care available.”

Titus’ bill was last referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs on Nov. 8, 2023. It never came to a vote.

Advertisement

Crete’s next moves will be to continue working with Nevada’s congressional delegation to draft and introduce legislation and create a full-length documentary for “The Invisible Enemy.”

He’ll show the short documentary at film festivals in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and New Jersey in the coming months. Meanwhile, filmmakers continue to gather footage for the longer feature.

The Invisible Enemy is also accepting donations on its website and fundraising through film showings in cities like Cleveland and New York. Crete said he would “speak to anybody and everybody that will listen, so I can tell our story, so that we can get the men and women what they need.”

“We all understand there’s risk, but it’s not reasonable to think that you’re going to be stationed out in the desert in Nevada and have a life-threatening illness, simply because that’s where you slept at night. And that’s what we’re trying to recognize and have the government recognize,” Crete said. “We got to participate in the coolest thing going that the military had, and I believe that there is a way to tell the story of this group of people and what they did and what we accomplished without violating our security. But it’s a story I just truly believe needs to be told, the good and the bad.”

___

Advertisement

(c)2025 the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.)

Visit the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.) at www.lasvegassun.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Story Continues

© Copyright 2025 Las Vegas Sun. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Nevada

‘Winnemucca Day’ helps fuel Backus, Wolf Pack to 58-40 win over Utah State

Published

on

‘Winnemucca Day’ helps fuel Backus, Wolf Pack to 58-40 win over Utah State


RENO, Nev. (Nevada Athletics) – Nevada Women’s Basketball returned to Lawlor for the first game of 2026, hosting Utah State.

The Pack picked up its first conference win of the season with the 58-40 victory over the Aggies.

Freshmen showed out for the Pack (5-9, 1-3 MW) with Skylar Durley nearly recording a double-double, dropping 12 points and grabbing nine rebounds. Britain Backus had five points to go along with two rebounds and a season high four steals.

Junior Izzy Sullivan also had an impactful game with 17 points, going 6-for-11 from the paint and grabbing five boards. She also knocked down Nevada’s only two makes from beyond the arc, putting her within one for 100 career threes.

Advertisement

The Pack opened up scoring the first four points, setting the tone for the game. It was a close battle through the first 10 as Utah State (6-7, 2-2 MW) closed the gap to one.

However, Nevada never let them in front for the entire 40 minutes.

Nevada turned up the pressure in the second quarter, holding Utah State to a shooting drought for over four minutes. Meanwhile, a 5-0 scoring run pushed the Pack to a 10-point lead.

For the entire first 20, Nevada held Utah State to just 26.7 percent from the floor and only nine percent from the arc, going only 1-for-11.

For the Pack offense, it shot 48 percent from the paint. Nevada fell into a slump coming out of the break, only scoring eight points.

Advertisement

It was the only quarter where the Pack was outscored.

The fourth quarter saw the Pack get back into rhythm with a 6-0 run and forcing the Aggies into another long scoring drought of just under four and a half minutes.

Durley had a layup and jumper to help with securing the win.

Nevada will remain at home to face Wyoming on Wednesday at 6:30 p.m.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

EDITORIAL: Nevada’s House Democrats oppose permitting reform

Published

on

EDITORIAL: Nevada’s House Democrats oppose permitting reform


Politicians of both parties have promised to fix the nation’s broken permitting system. But those promises have not been kept, and the status quo prevails: longer timelines, higher costs and a regulatory maze that makes it nearly impossible to build major projects on schedule.

Last week, the House finally cut through the fog by passing the Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act. As Jeff Luse reported for Reason, the legislation is the clearest chance in years to overhaul a system that has spun out of control.

Notably, virtually every House Democrat — including Reps. Dina Titus, Susie Lee and Steven Horsford from Nevada — opted for the current regulatory morass.

The proposal addressed problems with the National Environmental Policy Act, which passed in the 1970s to promote transparency, but has grown into an anchor that drags down public and private investment. Mr. Luse notes that even after Congress streamlined the act in 2021, the average environmental impact statement takes 2.4 years to complete. That number speaks for itself and does not reflect the many reviews that stretch far beyond that already unreasonable timeline.

Advertisement

The SPEED Act tackles these failures head on. It would codify recent Supreme Court guidance, expand the projects that do not require exhaustive review and set real expectations for federal agencies that too often slow-walk approvals. Most important, it puts long-overdue limits on litigation. Mr. Luse highlights the absurdity of the current six-year window for filing a lawsuit under the Environmental Policy Act. Between 2013 and 2022, these lawsuits delayed projects an average of 4.2 years.

While opponents insist the bill would silence communities, Mr. Luse notes that NEPA already includes multiple public hearings and comment periods. Also, the vast majority of lawsuits are not filed by members of the people who live near the projects. According to the Breakthrough Institute, 72 percent of NEPA lawsuits over the past decade came from national nonprofits. Only 16 percent were filed by local communities. The SPEED Act does not shut out the public. It reins in well-funded groups that can afford to stall projects indefinitely.

Some Democrats claim the bill panders to fossil fuel companies, while some Republicans fear it will accelerate renewable projects. As Mr. Luse explains, NEPA bottlenecks have held back wind, solar and transmission lines as often as they have slowed oil and gas. That is why the original SPEED Act won support from green energy groups and traditional energy producers.

Permitting reform is overdue, and lawmakers claim to understand that endless red tape hurts economic growth and environmental progress alike. The SPEED Act is the strongest permitting reform proposal in years. The Senate should approve it.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

McKenna Ross’ top Nevada politics stories of 2025

Published

on

McKenna Ross’ top Nevada politics stories of 2025


The Silver State was plenty purple in 2025.

Nevada has long had a reputation for its libertarian tilt. Nowadays, partisanship leads many political stories. In top state government and politics stories of the year, some political lines were blurred when politicians bucked their party’s go-to stances to make headlines, while other party stances stayed entrenched.

Here are a handful of the biggest stories out of Nevada government and politics in 2025.

Film tax credit saga returns for parts 2 and 3

A large-scale effort to bring a film studio to Southern Nevada was revived — and died twice — in 2025. Sony Pictures Entertainment and Warner Bros. Discovery, who were previously leading opposing efforts to build multi-acre studio lots with tax breaks, joined forces in February to back one bill in front of the Nevada Legislature. They were joined by developer Howard Hughes Corp. in a lobbying push throughout the four-month session, then once again during a seven-day special legislative session in mid-November.

Advertisement

The renewed legislation drew plenty of praise from union and business leaders and created an unlikely coalition of fiscal conservatives and progressives on the left against it. Proponents said the proposal would help create a new industry for Nevada, creating thousands of construction and entertainment industry-related jobs. Opponents criticized the billion-dollar effect it would have on the state’s general fund as a “Hollywood handout.”

In the end, the opposition won out. It passed the Assembly 22-20 in the last week of the regular session and received the same vote count during the special session — though six members switched their votes.

The state Senate voted on the proposed Summerlin Studios project only during the special session, where it failed because 11 senators voted against it or were absent for the Nov. 19 vote. Several lawmakers called out the intense political pressure to pass the bill, despite their concerns of how the subsidies would have affected state coffers.

Democrats fight to strengthen mail-in voting

The movement to enshrine mail-in voting in Nevada also stretched through both 2025 legislative sessions, as well as a federal Supreme Court case.

Democratic lawmakers sought to establish state laws around voting by mail, including about the placement of ballot boxes between early voting and Election Day and the timeline in which clerks had to count mailed ballots received after polls closed.

Advertisement

Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, D-Las Vegas, proposed a compromise with Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo through a bill expanding ballot drop box access in the run-up to Election Day and implementing voter ID requirements, but Lombardo vetoed the bill.

Democrats found a way during the special session, however. In the final hour before the session’s end on Nov. 19, Senate Democrats introduced and considered a resolution to propose enshrining mail-in voting in the Nevada Constitution via a voter amendment. The resolution must past the next consecutive session before it can go on the 2028 general election ballot.

This all comes as the U.S. Supreme Court weighs a case that could affect Nevada’s existing law that allows ballots postmarked on Election Day to be counted as late as 5 p.m. four days after Election Day.

Cyberattack on Nevada cripples the state for weeks

Nevada state government was crippled for four weeks in the late summer and fall when a ransomware attack was discovered in state systems in August.

Many state services were moved off-line to sequester the IT threats, leading to 28 days of outages after the Aug. 24 discovery of the ransomware attack. Those included worker’s compensation claims, DMV services, online applications for social services and a background check system.

Advertisement

According to the after-action report, a malicious actor entered the state’s computer system as early as May 14. The threat actor had accessed “multiple critical servers” by the end of August. State officials emphasized that core financial systems and Department of Motor Vehicle data were not breached by the hackers.

The state did not pay a ransom, according to officials. Instead, it worked with external cybersecurity vendors to deal with incident response and recovered about 90 percent of affected data. That costed about $1.5 million for those contracts and overtime pay.

Budget woes leave state in status quo limbo

Financial uncertainty clouded Nevada state government throughout the year as the impact of federal purse-shrinking, uncertainty around the effect of Trump administration tariffs and the reduced tax revenue from a tourism slump persisted throughout 2025.

Nevada lawmakers passing the state’s two-year budget cycle were put in a tight spot when economic forecasts projecting state revenue were downgraded during the legislative session and ultimately passed a state budget that avoided funding multiple new programs.

Contact McKenna Ross at mross@reviewjournal.com. Follow @mckenna_ross_ on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending