Connect with us

Montana

Owner of Montana's largest newspaper settles suit for giving personal information to Facebook

Published

on

Owner of Montana's largest newspaper settles suit for giving personal information to Facebook


BILLINGS – More than 1.5 million subscribers, comprising many Montana residents, could be part of a class-action settlement by the state’s largest newspaper company, Lee Enterprises, for sending personally-identifying information to the parent company of Facebook in order to target content, including advertising.

According to a settlement reached in a federal court in Iowa, where Lee Enterprises is headquartered, the company will pay $9.5 million for releasing personal information to Meta without customers’ consent.

Lee owns five daily newspapers in Montana, including The Billings Gazette and Missoulian, among its 85 daily newspapers across the country.

In addition to the class-action lawsuit settlement, Lee has also reported that it will likely be financially impacted due to a recent cybersecurity ransomware attack, reports the Daily Montanan. Also, a private investor who has recently been critical of the management team after it projected profits, but instead saw a loss of $17 million,says he wants to purchase the company.

Advertisement

Facebook settlement

As part of the court filing, the company says it doesn’t agree with all the conclusions, but is settling the class-action lawsuit, which could reach more than 1.5 million current or past subscribers. According to its most recent 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as of Sept. 29, 2024, Lee reported that had a combined 1.1 million print and digital subscribers.

It also reported that 51% of its revenue comes from digital advertising in February 2025.

The court filings say that Lee voluntarily installed an invisible online tracker from Meta/Facebook that allowed the disclosure of a “Facebook Identification Number” to the social media giant. That, the group of plaintiffs said, violated federal law that guarantees privacy protection. The goal of the software, according to the lawsuit, was to build profiles of the Lee subscribers or content users “with the hope of improving the effectiveness of advertising targeting those users.”

If the deal is approved by the court, former and current subscribers who were affected would be sent a class-action settlement notice and be eligible for a portion of the amount, which will be estimated to be around $5.7 million for the approximately 1.5 million people — or around $3.80 per person. For subscribers or customers with an invalid email address, postcards may be sent.

In court documents, Lee and a group of plaintiffs agreed to settle the dispute, saying that a protracted lawsuit could take years and millions to resolve. Furthermore, Lee maintains that it did nothing wrong, although other companies who used such tracking tools have been found liable for using the same technology that discloses personal information.

Advertisement

Ransomware attack

It is not the only piece of bad financial news for the newspaper company based in Davenport, Iowa. In SEC filings earlier this month, it announced that a ransomware attack on the company that shut down some printing and electronic edition publications, as well as threatened to release sensitive financial information, was likely to have a material impact on the company’s bottom line.

On March 6, Lee confirmed the attack, which began on Feb. 3. Hackers encrypted many of the “critical applications” the company used while “exfiltrating” or taking financial data. Lee said that many of the company’s functions have been restored, but that the business processes of the company have been delayed.

“Additionally, certain back-office functions remain delayed including billing our clients, collections, and payments to vendors. We anticipate the business processes to be fully restored in the coming weeks,” the company said.

Lee confirmed it had cybersecurity insurance, and also that its sole lender, Berkshire-Hathaway Finance, had waived an interest payment as well as lease payments, which the newspaper company said added $3.7 million of additional capital.

As of Friday, many of the Lee publications still had notices on their websites that warned customers of problems, delays or interruptions.

Advertisement

New owner?

Even as courts and cyberattacks were occupying headlines about Lee, on Thursday, the chain of newspapers also reported that a billionaire investor who had recently purchased a chunk of the publicly traded stock had submitted a letter to the company’s board of directors wanting to purchase the company outright.

Hoffmann Companies, which owns a diverse number of companies including dairies, investment properties and manufacturing facilities, says it wants to buy Lee Enterprises. The same company has recently purchased an interest in the Dallas Morning News, as well as purchasing former Lee-owned newspapers in California, including the Napa Register. In a letter to Lee’s board, David Hoffmann said that other hedge-fund investors have not been concerned with the journalism of the company, rather just squeezing profits from the newspapers.

“We believe this commitment represents a sharp contrast to other potential acquirors such as non-local hedge funds and investment firms primarily concerned with increasing profits over jobs, local concerns, and the power of quality journalism,” the letter said. The letter and a news story about the offer was published on Lee newspaper websites on Thursday.

Hoffmann is already Lee’s second-largest shareholder. Lee currently has nearly $450 million in debt, largely from the acquisitions of other newspapers that has more than doubled the company’s reach. In its most recent earnings report, Lee’s profits were down year-over-year, but it did note that digital revenue has now eclipsed print revenue, a sign that the Hoffmann interest letter noted.

After news of the potential deal broke, Lee stock shot up nearly $1 per share and as of Friday, the value of Lee stock hovered around $10.66 a share, a 6% increase in value.

Advertisement

Editor’s note: The reporter of this story was formerly a Lee employee from 2004 to 2020. 

Billings Gazette selling downtown building





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

State budget draft passes initial House vote with bipartisan support

Published

on

State budget draft passes initial House vote with bipartisan support


Bipartisan support propelled Montana’s next state budget through an initial vote in the House on a 60-39 margin Wednesday, putting an initial stamp of legislative approval on approximately $16.6 billion of spending for the two-year financial cycle that starts July 1.

While some state spending will be authorized by other bills or existing laws, the budget bill, traditionally numbered House Bill 2, represents the single largest spending measure lawmakers will consider this year, funding agency programs and initiatives intended to serve residents across the state.

As debate on the budget bill opened on the House floor Wednesday, House Appropriations Chair Llew Jones said he was pleased with where the measure stands.

“It represents a balanced, responsible, and sustainable budget,” Jones said.

Advertisement
Rep. Llew Jones, R-Conrad, speaking to House lawmakers in November 2024. Credit: Mara Silvers

Democrats, most of whom voted for the bill, struck a lukewarm tone, with House Minority Leader Katie Sullivan, describing it in a press briefing following the floor debate as “OK.”

The current bill spends about $7,300 per resident per year, with 44% of its spending coming from federal funding rather than tax dollars collected at the state level. Another 22% comes from special-purpose revenues such as hunting license fees, and most of the remainder will be pulled from the state General Fund, which is filled primarily with income tax dollars.

Because of the budget’s size and complexity, lawmakers typically split it into five sections as they work through its pieces. Here’s how the budget stands following Wednesday’s debate section by section:

The Legislature’s catch-all budget section includes spending for agencies such as the Department of Administration, Department of Revenue, the governor’s office and the Legislature itself. Those and similar agencies represent a relatively small slice of the budget pie, at 10% of spending.

Among the expenditures included in this portion of the budget are $229,000 to help the state Commissioner of Political Practices improve its semi-functional lobbyist database and $400,000 to improve the legislative website.

Advertisement

Lawmakers voted 60-39 Wednesday to remove $12.9 million a year that had been allocated to the governor’s office for a recruitment and retention fund for state employees. Supporters had argued the money, which would have been administered by the governor’s budget director, would have provided state government resources to help maintain staffing for hard-to-fill positions like engineering and health care roles. Critics argued that agencies have other ways to address their staffing needs and worried about centralizing that authority with the governor’s office as opposed to distributing it across agencies.

The health and human services portion of the budget includes more than $7 billion in total spending for programs under the Department of Public Health and Human Services. That amount, 44% of the overall state budget, includes about $5 billion in federal funding. 

Major health spending in the budget includes more than $100 million in additional funding for operations and bed space at the Montana State Hospital, a 3% rate increase for Medicaid and community service providers and $111 million for the department’s information technology systems.

Some of those spending items were added to the budget by a bipartisan group of lawmakers as it was reviewed by the House Appropriations Committee last week. Fiscal conservatives made several attempts Wednesday, most of them unsuccessful, to wind those increases back, pushing to remove funding for a 14% rate increase for vocational rehabilitation trainers; more than a million dollars toward increasing in-state psychiatric bed capacity; and $2 million in transfers from the state’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) account to food banks and after-school programs.

Several of those amendments were drafted at the request of Rep. Bill Mercer, R-Billings. Speaking about the additional funding for food banks and after-school programs, Mercer called the TANF fund “a bit of a shiny object” but urged lawmakers to resist reallocating dollars that come with strict requirements from the federal government.

Advertisement

“There are many recipients of those benefits or those programs that are not TANF-eligible,” Mercer said. “We have no way of ensuring, from a compliance perspective, that the individuals that are actually benefiting from those dollars are TANF-eligible.”

Democrats criticized the attempts to cut that funding, as well as other Republican belt-tightening measures.

Most of the Republican-sponsored cost-cutting amendments failed by margins of more than 20 votes. The one successful amendment, brought by Rep. Ed Buttrey, R-Great Falls, struck a shift for hospital taxes that Buttrey described as unnecessary. 

Democrats also made unsuccessful attempts to add money to the health and human services portion of the budget, including additional funding for vocational rehabilitation staffing, special clinics that evaluate and diagnose children with disabilities, and community crisis beds. Those amendments failed on narrower margins than those brought by Republicans.

Agencies funded through this budget section include Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, the Montana Department of Transportation, the Department of Livestock, the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and the Department of Environmental Quality. This section represents 18% of the overall budget.

Advertisement

The budgets for most of those agencies are supported by state and federal collections funneled into specific programs and initiatives, as opposed to money from the state General Fund. Such collections include hunting and fishing license sales, permitting fees for regulated industries, revenue from timber sales and mineral leases, and taxes on gas, marijuana, guns and ammunition.

Rep. Jerry Schillinger, a Republican from Circle who worked on the natural resources and transportation budget section, argued that the agencies that maintain Montana’s highways, manage its public lands and wildlife, and administer its environmental regulations have been “impacted pretty heavily” by tourism, recreation and the state’s swelling population.  

The version of the budget bill endorsed by the House on Wednesday includes $3.8 million for mine reclamation, $1.1 million for a veterinary lab at Montana State University, IT support for water management databases, and 23 new FWP positions, seven of which are game wardens.

It also includes 10 new positions dedicated to bridge upgrades at a cost of $2 million, an additional $3.5 million for operating and repairing water storage projects, and four positions tied to the state’s effort to encourage competition in the meatpacking industry. Both FWP and DEQ asked for and received a funding bump for additional legal staff totaling about $824,000. 

Rep. Marilyn Marler, D-Missoula, introduced an amendment to support in-person hunter education programming. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers urged support for a “suffering” volunteer-assisted program that has become heavily reliant on online instruction. Marler’s amendment passed the chamber 58-40. 

Advertisement

The House voted down three amendments seeking to reduce funding for additional transportation engineers, a federal electric vehicle initiative developed under the Biden administration and inflationary increases FWP requested for the department’s flagship publication, Montana Outdoors magazine.

The Montana budget’s public safety section includes the state Department of Justice, as well as state prisons managed through the Department of Corrections and the state’s court system, which handles both criminal cases and civil litigation. It also includes Montana’s utility regulation board, the Public Service Commission. Combined, those and other public safety agencies represent about 7% of the state budget.

Notable inclusions in the current public safety budget include $1.7 million to add two new judges in Yellowstone County.

Several parts of the public safety budget drew significant debate on the House floor Wednesday. Among them was a successful motion to add money to the budget for hiring two additional railroad safety inspectors under the auspices of the Public Service Commission.

Democrats also made unsuccessful motions to strip out $1 million a year in litigation funding included in the DOJ budget, add more money for the Office of the State Public Defender, and cut about $12 million a year for housing 360 state inmates at for-profit prisons in Arizona and Mississippi.

Advertisement

Republicans defended the out-of-state prison placements by arguing they are the best option for relieving prison overcrowding until the state can build additional publicly owned facilities.

At $3.5 billion in expected spending, education represents about 21% of the overall budget. About three-quarters of that money  is flagged for Montana’s Office of Public Instruction and the public K-12 school system it oversees. 

Among the notable changes are a $53 million inflationary increase to the state’s share of school funding and $109 million to increase starting teacher pay through House Bill 252. Better known as the STARS Act, HB 252 has so far drawn strong bipartisan support and is backed by Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte along with various statewide education agencies. The proposed OPI budget also features a $5.5 million reduction by eliminating the TEACH Act, a precursor to HB 252 that will likely be preempted by the new measure. Other alterations included $5 million to help implement revised statewide math standards and $2 million in one-time funding for OPI’s languishing database modernization project, which to date has largely been paid for with now-expired federal COVID-19 relief money.

The education budget also includes $754 million for the agency that oversees Montana’s universities, as well as funding for the Montana State Library and the Montana School for the Deaf and the Blind, among others. Many of those portions of the budget feature modest increases to existing operations. A few exceptions include $122,000 to help recruit and train educational interpreters at MSDB, and $2.2 million to expand the university system’s “One-Two-Free” program to community and tribal colleges, which covers the cost of up to three college courses for dual-credit students on those campuses. 

Fiscal hawks led by Rep. Terry Falk, R-Kalispell, made two unsuccessful attempts to trim education funding via floor amendments Wednesday. The first amendment proposed cutting $2 million from a state assistance program to help local school districts pay off debt, and the second sought to eliminate $180,000 in funding for an administrative position directing oversight of state-owned university buildings. Falk withdrew the first after resistance from Rep. David Bedey, R-Hamilton. His second amendment was rejected on a 70-28 vote, with Rep. John Fitzpatrick, R-Anaconda, calling it “penny wise, pound foolish.”

Advertisement

The budget bill started its life in the form of Gianforte’s November budget proposal, which was picked apart by budget committee lawmakers over the first half of the session before being voted to the floor by the House Appropriations Committee last week.

Following Wednesday’s floor vote, the budget bill faces a final vote in the House before advancing to the state Senate, where it will undergo further consideration and more rounds of amendments. The House and Senate must agree on the budget’s final form before returning it to the governor for his signature.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Montana law on bathrooms assigned to sex at birth is on hold

Published

on

Montana law on bathrooms assigned to sex at birth is on hold


MISSOULA — In a significant legal development, a group of plaintiffs has secured a temporary restraining order against the state of Montana concerning the controversial House Bill 121 — also known as the “bathroom bill.”

Missoula District Court Judge Shane Vannatta issued the order.

House Bill 121 would restrict bathroom access to sex assigned at birth. The law was signed into effect by Governor Greg Gianforte on March 27.

The plaintiffs allege that the newly adopted legislation violates their constitutional rights under the Montana Constitution.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs allege that the law infringes upon their rights to equal protection, privacy, and due process, particularly in relation to transgender and intersex individuals.

A preliminary injunction hearing is set for April 21, 2025; arguments will be presented regarding whether the law should remain in force.

In the meantime, the state is temporarily restrained from enforcing the provisions of House Bill 121 until a ruling is made.

Montana law requires people to use bathroom aligned with gender at birth

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana State among the top three military-friendly schools in the nation

Published

on


For the fifth consecutive year, Montana State University’s efforts to support student veterans have been recognized with a designation as a top-10 military-friendly school in a nationwide survey through the website Militaryfriendly.com.

MSU ranked third in military-friendly schools in the survey’s Tier 2 research institution category. The university has consistently placed top 10 in the rankings for the past five years and has also received recognition for being a military spouse-friendly school.

Now in its 22nd year, the Military Friendly Schools list is considered the premier nationwide rank…



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending