Connect with us

Montana

Montana commission recommends $30M+ in ARPA spending for health care initiatives

Published

on

Montana commission recommends M+ in ARPA spending for health care initiatives


HELENA — A state advisory committee has finalized its suggestions on methods to spend greater than $30 million in federal American Rescue Plan Act funding for well being care initiatives.

At a gathering Friday, the ARPA Well being Advisory Fee backed six proposals from the Montana Division of Public Well being and Human Companies. DPHHS director Charlie Brereton mentioned their focus was on “one-time-only” funding alternatives.

One of many greatest deliberate expenditures could be $15.5 million to help the state and native public well being workforce and knowledge programs. That features cash to proceed county and tribal public well being positions created by ARPA funding that was set to run out subsequent June – eight epidemiologists and about 13 illness intervention specialists, public well being nurses and different positions. The funding will now lengthen them by November 2027.

Advertisement

The Affiliation of Montana Public Well being Officers supported the proposal, saying public well being departments have struggled with workforce capability, and the addition of ARPA funding had helped them rebuild that.

Some Republican lawmakers on the fee opposed the plan, saying they had been involved it was basically creating everlasting positions that the state would possibly finally should pay for.

“This was the entire narrative the entire time that the Legislature was anxious about, planting a seed we’re going to should water afterward,” mentioned Rep. Matt Regier, R-Kalispell.

Brereton mentioned DPHHS has made clear to native governments that this funding is for a restricted time, however the federal authorities might effectively present continued funding sooner or later.

“There could be no expectation, definitely below my management right here at DPHHS, that the state would put forth basic fund {dollars} to proceed these positions,” he mentioned.

Advertisement

The fee additionally voted to authorize one other $14.4 million to a program that gives COVID-19 testing sources for colleges and little one care amenities in order that they’ll stay open for in-person providers.

Final yr, the fee made about $18 million obtainable for this initiative. Up to now, colleges have solely used about $5.2 million of that.

Brereton mentioned federal guidelines closely restricted what different choices that they had for spending this cash. He mentioned the CDC allowed it to be expanded to little one care after it was initially open solely to Ok-12 colleges, however they rejected a number of different requests for extra flexibility. He mentioned DPHHS needed to be able to spend the complete quantity obtainable in case of an surprising want.

In a single case, leaders had been capable of redirect unused funds. The fee authorized shifting $2.5 million to supply one-time $1,250 funds to help about 2,000 kids in non permanent foster care placements. Leaders mentioned individuals caring for youngsters concerned with the Little one and Household Companies Division have been hit notably onerous by inflation.

The cash had initially been put aside for households that obtain Supplemental Vitamin Help Program advantages, to encourage people to get new or improved employment. DPHHS distributed slightly below $129,000 to 186 households by that program. Brereton mentioned that they had exhausted their efforts to attach eligible households with the profit, together with contacting all SNAP recipients and following up instantly with those that appeared to qualify.

Advertisement

Rep. Mary Caferro, D-Helena, mentioned she was grateful for the foster care help proposal, and she or he hoped the state would proceed the potential for elevating foster care funds.

“It’s onerous to place a greenback quantity on the worth of investing in kids who’ve been abused or uncared for,” she mentioned.

Different suggestions the fee endorsed Friday embody:

  • $1.2 million for the State Public Well being Laboratory to improve its tools for testing for COVID and different illnesses, and to conduct wastewater testing to watch illness tendencies.
  • $866,000 to help Montana Space Companies on Getting older, create a strategic plan for senior facilities and practice medical insurance counselors to work with Native Individuals.
  • $121,000 to help the workforce at Montana’s 4 Facilities for Impartial Dwelling, which serve individuals with disabilities.

As with all ARPA advisory fee suggestions, Gov. Greg Gianforte should give last approval earlier than the cash is formally allotted.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Plaintiffs from landmark Held case file constitutional climate case against Trump, federal agencies

Published

on

Plaintiffs from landmark Held case file constitutional climate case against Trump, federal agencies


Twenty-two young Americans, 10 of whom prevailed in the Held v. Montana constitutional climate case, are suing the Trump administration over its climate and energy policies.

The plaintiffs argue in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday that by dismantling climate protections and working to “unleash” American energy, the executive branch is violating the separation of powers clause in the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs also argue that the president’s executive orders are threatening their rights to life and liberty.

The lead plaintiff in the litigation is Eva Lighthiser, a 19-year-old Livingston resident who also was a plaintiff in a constitutional lawsuit that challenged Montana’s permissive approach to approving fossil fuel projects. Lighthiser is joined by Rikki Held and eight other plaintiffs from the Montana litigation, as well as a handful of young Americans from Hawaii, Oregon, Florida and California.

During a seven-day bench trial in 2023, the Held lawsuit focused an international spotlight on Montana and its unique constitutional guarantee of a “clean and healthful environment,” which the district court — and later the Montana Supreme Court — interpreted to include a “stable climate system.”

Advertisement

The federal lawsuit Lighthiser and her co-plaintiffs filed on May 29 challenges three executive orders that Trump issued during the first three months of his second term in the White House. The plaintiffs argue that the orders have suppressed climate science and slowed the transition to renewable energy sources in favor of fossil fuels, “thereby worsening the air pollution and climate conditions that immediately harm and endanger Plaintiffs’ lives and personal security.”

The plaintiffs are asking the court to invalidate the executive orders and direct Trump and the 11 federal agencies listed as defendants not to implement or enforce them.

“President Trump’s EOs falsely claim an energy emergency, while the true emergency is that fossil fuel pollution is destroying the foundation of Plaintiffs’ lives,” the 126-page filing reads. 

In a press release about the lawsuit, Lighthiser described Trump’s fossil fuel directives as a “death sentence for my generation.”

“I’m not suing because I want to — I’m suing because I have to,” said Lighthiser, who plans to pursue environmental studies in college. “My health, my future, and my right to speak the truth are all on the line. [President Trump is] waging war on us with fossil fuels as his weapon, and we’re fighting back with the Constitution.”

Advertisement

In an email to Montana Free Press on Thursday, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers defended Trump’s energy agenda.

“The American people are more concerned with the future generations’ economic and national security, which is why they elected President Trump in a landslide victory to restore America’s energy dominance. Future generations should not have to foot the bill for the lefts’ radical climate agenda,” Rogers wrote. 

In addition to enumerating the climate harms plaintiffs have reported, including wildfire-related and heat-induced visits to the emergency room, diminished career opportunities, property damage spurred by extreme weather events and a loss of cultural and recreational traditions, the complaint outlines tensions between Trump’s executive orders and the missions of congressionally authorized agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

One of the executive orders named in the lawsuit directs federal agencies to identify and rescind actions that place an “undue burden” on the “identification, development or use of domestic energy resources — with particular attention to oil, natural gas, hydropower, biofuels, critical mineral and nuclear energy resources.” Another directs executive branch agencies to use emergency powers to facilitate energy companies’ access to federally-owned energy resources and the infrastructure required to transport and process them. The third focuses on the development and prioritization of coal-fired electricity.

In the Held v. Montana case, the Montana Supreme Court directed the state to develop a system for inventorying and disclosing greenhouse gas emissions associated with large projects seeking state-issued permits. This spring, the Montana Legislature adopted a framework that state agencies like the Montana Department of Environmental Quality can use to quantify greenhouse gas emissions.

Advertisement

Many of the same attorneys who argued the Held v. Montana case are representing the plaintiffs in this litigation, including Roger Sullivan of Kalispell. Three of the plaintiffs’ attorneys in the case work for Our Children’s Trust, an Oregon-based nonprofit focused on climate litigation that spent the better part of a decade fighting the federal government in the Juliana v. United States lawsuit, a federal constitutional climate case that concluded earlier this year in the government’s favor.



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life results for May 28, 2025

Published

on


The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at May 28, 2025, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 28 drawing

23-27-32-35-59, Powerball: 11, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from May 28 drawing

03-11-35-43-47, Lucky Ball: 11

Advertisement

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from May 28 drawing

04-06-08-33-35, Star Ball: 05, ASB: 02

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from May 28 drawing

04-09-20-21, Bonus: 14

Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from May 28 drawing

14-30-41-48-69, Powerball: 12

Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Montana Cash numbers from May 28 drawing

09-14-27-44-45

Check Montana Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
  • Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.

Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network.

Where can you buy lottery tickets?

Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER, Call 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 18+ (19+ in NE, 21+ in AZ). Physically present where Jackpocket operates. Jackpocket is not affiliated with any State Lottery. Eligibility Restrictions apply. Void where prohibited. Terms: jackpocket.com/tos.

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Deer ticks, Lyme disease carriers, found in Montana

Published

on

Deer ticks, Lyme disease carriers, found in Montana


Laura Lundquist

(Missoula Current) Montana appears to have a new invasive species, and this one could come with a few nasty parasites.

The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services announced last week that three blacklegged ticks, also called deer ticks, have been found in eastern Montana over the past year. While the ticks aren’t necessarily pleasant, the real problem is that they’re known to carry Lyme disease, in addition to several other parasites that can infect people and animals.

The first blacklegged tick was found in Dawson County around Glendive earlier in 2024. A man found the tick on his hunting dog and sent it to the Montana State University Extension’s Schutter Diagnostic Lab, where diagnostician Marni Rolston identified it. Rolston collaborated with scientists at the National Institutes of Health’s Rocky Mountain Laboratory in Hamilton to confirm the identification.

Advertisement

“This discovery is incredibly important because it greatly expands the geographic range of the blacklegged tick, a carrier of the pathogen that causes Lyme Disease,” said Bob Peterson, an MSU entomologist in a release. “The implications of finding this tick in Montana cannot be overstated.”

In the fall of 2024, two more ticks were found in Sheridan County in far northeast Montana, an area popular for bird hunting, and DPHHS, along with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, confirmed they were blacklegged ticks.

The percentage of blacklegged ticks that are infected with Lyme disease ranges from none to more than 50% of a population, depending on the area and life stage. Lyme disease infection occurs mostly in the northeastern, mid-Atlantic, and north-central United States, according to the CDC. Blacklegged ticks found in most areas of the southeastern United States are almost never infected.

Lyme disease can produce a wide range of symptoms, depending on the stage of infection. These include fever, rash, facial paralysis, an irregular heartbeat and arthritis.

No pathogens were found on the ticks in Montana, according to the DPHHS. But their presence means Montanans should be alert, particularly in Dawson and Sheridan counties, said Devon Cozart, DPHHS vector-borne disease epidemiologist.

Advertisement

“The presence of this new type of tick in the state could mean that Montanans have an increased risk of exposure to diseases that weren’t previously a threat in Montana,” Cozart said in a release. “These ticks could have been carried into the state by a host animal, or they could be active and reproducing here – we just don’t know yet. We will be conducting further investigations this spring.”

Blacklegged ticks are not native to Montana. Research indicates they survived the Ice Age in the southeastern U.S. and then steadily expanded northward during the 20th century, spurred by reforestation, a warming climate and animal hosts moving north. In addition, blacklegged ticks have subsequently been spreading west, followed by the lone star tick.

Research has shown that several species can serve as migration vectors for ticks, including deer and migratory birds. People can also factor in, because they move animals around, including horses and dogs. In recent years, the number of nonresidents using eastern Montana to train their dogs in the winter and hunt in the fall has surged. Just like ticks can be carried into your house, one or two ticks could hitch rides to Montana on nonresident dogs from the hotbeds of Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin.

If anything, dog owners should be concerned because pets can get Lyme disease too. In most cases, a tick must be attached for more than 24 hours before the Lyme disease bacterium can be transmitted, according to the CDC. If you remove a tick within 24 hours, you can greatly reduce the chances of you or your pets getting Lyme disease.

According to the CDC, the established populations currently closest to Montana are in the eastern portions of the Dakotas and throughout Minnesota. A November 2023 CDC scientific review concluded that, because black-legged ticks have established in counties in the far eastern parts of Nebraska and the Dakotas, “it is reasonable to assume that (blacklegged ticks) invaded in recent decades from the eastern neighboring states of Minnesota and Iowa.”

Advertisement

The map showing tick presence could change to include Montana if researchers find more ticks. To that end, DPHHS is launching a citizen-scientist program and is requesting the public’s help in tick surveillance, especially in Dawson and Sheridan counties. Anyone who thinks they have found a blacklegged tick is encouraged to fill out this online form.

Montana is home to the Rocky Mountain wood tick and the American dog tick, which can also spread diseases such as Rocky Mountain spotted fever and Colorado tick fever. These ticks tend to be brown and are much larger than the dark-red deer tick.

Contact reporter Laura Lundquist at lundquist@missoulacurrent.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending