Montana
FCS Championship: NDSU Spoils Another Historic Montana State Season
On Saturday night, the Montana State football account shared a video of MSU players swarming and celebrating with quarterback Tommy Mellott in the hotel lobby after he returned from winning the Walter Payton Award.
The vibes were immaculate.
The responses and comments to the video were aplenty, talking about how this Bobcat team was different, a truly special squad ready to accomplish greatness in the FCS championship game in two nights, a team of destiny, and some “Cats by 90” type of responses as well.
The video was another moment of things just lining up for MSU to win its first national championship in 40 years. From Mellott’s magical play as everyone’s favorite Montana son, to Brent Vigen not getting swayed by FBS openings, to how MSU had built itself up over the years to finally get to this moment, to finally reach the FCS mountaintop after a multi-season climb that ended in tough tumbles.
If not now, then when?
It was all leading up to a legendary day for the state of Montana.
And then … NDSU happened.
The Bison — an underdog in the spread (+4.5) and most predictions (even from FCS coaches who know what they’re seeing) — beat the Bobcats 35-32 Monday night to win their 10th FCS national championship.
NDSU took a commanding 21-3 lead into halftime. But MSU made a valiant comeback, making it a 21-18 deficit with two straight touchdowns in the third quarter. The Bison made it a 2-score game again, then MSU made it 28-25, then NDSU made it a 2-score game again, and then MSU made it 35-32 with 1:09 to go but couldn’t recover the ensuing onside kick.
It was a fun finish after a jarring first-half domination by the Bison. The FCS title game needed some late-game drama after three straight years of decisive results.
After a two-season “drought,” the Bison have reclaimed their FCS throne, continuing one of the most impressive runs in college football history. The true meaning of a program lives in Fargo.
“A pretty incredible journey started with a group of seniors that decided after a team meeting to get together and just what are we going to do?” NDSU head coach Tim Polasek said after the game. “They chose to stay. And once again, there’s a lot of evidence with our program, we’re running a football program, but those that stayed will be champions.”
Cam Miller was a gamer tonight, as he’s been all season. He completed 19/22 passes for 199 yards and two touchdowns while rushing 18 times for 121 yards and another two scores.
But all eyes were on Montana State entering this game. Was it finally their time? It seemed so, which makes this a crushing loss for MSU. And it was a business-as-usual and an OK-make-room-for-another-trophy win for NDSU.
“We came here with one expectation,” Vigen said postgame. “I know it stings a lot for these guys, for these seniors in particular that have laid such a foundation for our program. They’ve certainly built upon the seniors before them, but the success they’ve had, been through a lot of ups and some downs. Obviously this is a low point. You end up rattling off 15 victories and you can’t finish it off, this is not how we wanted this day to end. But I know the program’s much better for their efforts.”
Polasek is a very likable guy. The players are likable. NDSU fans, while brash and confident online, are some of the nicest humans when you talk to them in person. But NDSU is the villain in the FCS. That’s the reality when you’ve won this many titles. It’s less about you, and more about your success. The Kansas City Chiefs have gone from a likable team to a squad many are sick of. Same thing with Golden State in the 2010s.
And boy did NDSU play the villain part well on Monday.
It was supposed to be a historic day in Montana, a state that loves its football teams like the Frisco area loves its Cowboys. It was supposed to be a movie-like sendoff for several Montana seniors who learned their lessons in past playoff defeats to build themselves into a national championship team. It was supposed to be Mellott’s statue-building performance as one of, if not the most notable players in the state’s history. It was supposed to be a full-circle moment for MSU to finally topple NDSU.
And then … NDSU happened.
Maybe it’s because us FCS followers want new storylines. Something different. Maybe some were trying to wish an MSU win into existence and talk themselves into it being a likelihood. Maybe because this year’s NDSU team isn’t quite on the same level as all-time Bison teams like 2013, 2018, or 2019, we subconsciously think the Bison aren’t as good as they actually are. “This is an all-time Montana State team going up against one of NDSU’s least talented teams” was a common thought. But maybe this NDSU team was also really really good and our memories of the all-time Bison teams deceive how we evaluate more current NDSU rosters. Maybe there’s just something about this NDSU program where it rises up and plays its best in the biggest moment.
And the Bison reminded us who they are once again.
“The standard is the standard, and the expectation is the expectation,” Polasek said.
Every FCS fan base besides, of course, NDSU (and maybe Montana) wanted the Bobcats to win. It was a feel-good moment other fan bases were ready to celebrate. Instead, the Bison told the rest of the FCS, “Remember who we are.” The amount of dirt shoveled on their dynasty was probably enough to make a new road from Fargo to Frisco.
And then … NDSU happened.
It’s the Bison’s FCS once again.

Montana
Apparent AI Glitch in Filing by Montana Public Defender, Recent Congressional Candidate
Everyone makes mistakes, even experienced professionals; a good reminder for the rest of us to learn from those mistakes. The motion in State v. Stroup starts off well in its initial pages (no case law hallucinations), but is then followed by several pages of two other motions, which I don’t think the lawyer was planning to file, and which appear to have been AI-generated: It begins with the “Below is concise motion language you can drop into …” language quoted above.
Griffen Smith (Missoulian) reported on the story, and included the prosecutor’s motion to strike that filing, on the grounds that it violates a local rule (3(G)) requiring disclosure of the use of generative AI:
The document does not include a generative artificial intelligence disclosure as required. However, page 7 begins as follows: “Below is concise motion language you can drop into a ‘Motion to Admit Mental-Disease Evidence and for Related Instructions’ keyed to 45-6-204, 45-6-201, and 4614-102. Adjust headings/captions to your local practice.” Page 10 states “Below is a full motion you can paste into your pleading, then adjust names, dates, and styles to fit local practice.” These pages also include several apparent hyperlinks to “ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws,” “ppl-ai-fileupload.s3.amazonaws+1,” and others. The document includes what appears to be an attempt at a second case caption on page 12. It is not plausible on its face that any source other than generative AI would have created such language for a filed version of a brief….
There’s more in that filing, but here’s one passage:
While generative AI can be a useful tool for some purposes and may have greater application in the future, when used improperly, and without meaningful review, it can ultimately damage both the perception and the reality of the profession. One assumes that Mr. Stroup has had, or will at some point have, an opportunity to review the filing made on his behalf. What impression could a review of pgs. 12-19 leave upon a defendant who struggles with paranoia and delusional thinking? While AI could theoretically one day become a replacement for portions of staff of experienced attorneys, it is readily apparent that this day has not yet arrived.
The Missoulan article includes this response:
In a Wednesday interview, Office of Public Defender Division Administrator Brian Smith told the Missoulian the AI-generated language was inadvertently included in an unrelated filing. And he criticized the county attorney’s office for filing a “four-page diatribe about the dangers of AI” instead of working with the defense to correct her mistake.
“That’s not helping the client or the case,” Smith said, “and all you are doing is trying to throw a professional colleague under the bus.”
As I mentioned, the lawyer involved seems quite experienced, and ran for the Montana Public Service Commission in 2020 (getting nearly 48% of the vote) and for the House of Representatives in Montana’s first district in 2022 (getting over 46% of the vote) and in 2024 (getting over 44%). “Его пример другим наука,” Pushkin wrote in Eugene Onegin—”May his example profit others,” in the Falen translation.
Thanks to Matthew Monforton for the pointer.
Montana
Your guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV
Montana
Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026
HELENA — You probably have goals and plans for 2026—the Montana Department of Agriculture does too.
“We’re really focusing on innovative agricultural practices,” Montana Department of Agriculture director Jillien Streit said.
It’s no secret that agriculture—farming and ranching—is not easy. There are long days, planning, monitoring crops and livestock, and other challenges beyond farmers’ and ranchers’ control.
(WATCH: Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026)
Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026
“We have very low commodity prices across the board,” Streit said. “We still have very high input prices across the board, and we have really high prices when it comes to our equipment, and so, it’s a really tough year.”
But innovation, including new practices, partnerships and technology use, can help navigate some of those challenges.
“We can’t make more time and we can’t make more land, so we need to start putting together innovative practices that help us maximize what our time and land can do,” Streit said.
Practices range from using technology like autonomous tractors and virtual fencing—allowing rangers to contain and move cattle right from their phones—to regenerative farming and ranching.
“It is bringing cattle back into farming operations to be able to work with cover cropping practices to invigorate the soil for new soil health benefits,” Streit said.
The Montana Department of Agriculture is working to help producers learn, share, and collaborate on new ideas to work in their operations.
The department will share stories of practices that work from farms and ranches across the state. Also, within the next year or so, Streit said the department is hoping to roll out technology to help producers collaborate.
“(It’s) providing a communication platform where people can get together and really help each other out by utilizing each other’s assets,” she said.
While not easy, agriculture is still one of Montana’s largest industries, and Streit said innovating and sharing ideas across the state can keep it going long into the future.
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO5 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers