Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho Stop ordinance seen as progress for cyclists, supporters say | Jefferson City News-Tribune

Published

on

Idaho Stop ordinance seen as progress for cyclists, supporters say | Jefferson City News-Tribune


Jefferson City is on pace to see a nearly 65 percent increase in pedestrian and cyclist crashes in 2026 versus 2025, but a new ordinance passed Monday by the Jefferson City Council may help curb that trend.

The Jefferson City Council agreed to pass “Idaho Stop Laws” in Jefferson City, allowing bicyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs and stop lights as stop signs. The ordinance comes as Jefferson City has suffered 11 non-motorist crashes through the first four months of 2026, according to data provided by the Jefferson City Police Department in late April, including a fatal cyclist-car collision on April 21 that took the life of Richard Roebben.

The city saw a total of 20 non-motorist-involved crashes in 2025. At its current rate, it would see about 33 non-motorist-crashes by the end of 2026.

While some city officials are nervous about the new law and the learning curve for Jefferson City drivers, advocates told the News Tribune they believe it will make the city safer for cyclists and less frustrating for drivers.

Advertisement

Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah and Washington have all adopted laws allowing cyclists to yield at stop signs. Arkansas, Idaho and Oklahoma also have laws allowing cyclists to treat red stop lights as a stop sign.

Arkansas state Sen. Missy Irvin, R-Mountain View, co-sponsored Arkansas’ Idaho Stop law when it passed in 2019. She said the law has benefits beyond increased pedestrian safety — it serves as a boon to Arkansas’ cycling tourism and engagement on natural cycling trails, a feature it shares with the Show Me State.

“We’ve seen just an incredible increase in cycling. I think it was just looking at what was happening in other states and working with … cyclist enthusiasts that really wanted to be proactive as possible,” Irvin said. “I think we were being more preemptive and just kind of following what other states have done in response so that we can be proactive in our approach.”

According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data, bicyclist crashes in Idaho fell by 14.5 percent the year after the law’s adoption in 1982. Delaware in 2017 passed a law that includes the stop-sign-as-yield provision, but did not change rules for red lights. Bicycle crashes at stop-sign intersections in Delaware fell by 23 percent in the 30 months after its passage, according to the NHTSA.

Irvin added that the law is a boon for rural cyclists as well as city cyclists, allowing bike riders to roll through rural roads where motorists wouldn’t expect a cyclist, and spend less cumulative time in harm’s way.

Advertisement

Missouri law allows cyclists to proceed through an intersection with a red light if it’s clear that the traffic signal cannot detect the bicycle and therefore will not change unless there is more weight on the sensor.

The city ordinance states a cyclist may proceed through a stop sign after yielding to pedestrians and vehicles. A cyclist may also stop at a red light and then proceed through without waiting for a green light after yielding to pedestrians and vehicles.

Community feedback

The lone dissenting vote came from Ward 5 Councilman Shane Kampeter, who said he has concerns that drivers would not know about the new ordinance and thus result in more crashes. Lt. Jason Payne of the Jefferson City Police Department also voiced concerns about having more crashes for the same reason.

Andy Besselman, a local cyclist, submitted the original request to the city’s Transportation and Traffic Commission and said he doesn’t expect many drivers would even need to know about the new ordinance. He said cyclists typically only roll through stop signs if there are no vehicles around and added the goal of the ordinance was to eliminate any fear of receiving a ticket for not stopping at a stop sign.

Advertisement

In Besselman’s experience with other cyclists, he said, he doesn’t expect any cyclist to run a stop sign if there is a vehicle approaching.

“Rule No. 1: If there’s a car coming, don’t go,” Besselman said.

Since a cyclist is more vulnerable on the road than somebody in a vehicle, Besselman said most cyclists are already aware of their surroundings.

Besselman said a lot of cyclists have already been practicing the “Idaho Stop” for a while now anyway. Besselman bikes to work every morning and said it’s often safer to roll through an intersection if he knows there are no other vehicles approaching and there is no risk of being hit by a car.

He said he’s heard of other cyclists getting “rear-ended” by a vehicle after sitting at a stop sign and being unable to get back up to speed quick enough.

Advertisement

“So for me, it was always just personal safety,” Besselman said.

He added this ordinance should also keep traffic moving because drivers will not have to wait for the cyclist to get up to speed before proceeding themself.

He added that cyclists do not have to follow the Idaho Stop Law. If a cyclist is more comfortable coming to a complete stop at a stop sign and waiting for a green light, Besselman said, they should do what feels safest.

At the City Council meeting on May 4, Kampeter said he thinks people don’t actually know many of the laws governing cyclists on the road.

Nathan Nickolaus, interim city attorney, said drivers and cyclists should defer to Missouri’s driver’s manual. The 2025 “Driver Guide” from the Missouri Department of Revenue has a section on sharing the road with mopeds and bicycles. That section states crashes with bicyclists occur most often at intersections due to drivers not noticing the cyclist.

Advertisement

The guide states cyclists have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle operator, and that cyclists should ride with traffic and try to stay as close to the right side of the road as possible.

For drivers who want to pass a cyclist, the driver guide states motorists should give the cyclist a full lane width.

“Do not squeeze past these road users. The bicycle is generally a slow-moving vehicle and this may require you to slow down. Wait for a clear stretch of road before passing a cyclist in a lane too narrow to share,” reads the driver guide.

Besselman said drivers should treat cyclists like “any other vehicle,” and drivers should only pass cyclists if they would also pass a car in the same location.

The next step

Advertisement

The most awkward part of the ordinance, a pedestrian and cyclist safety advocate said, will be the limited scope of the law. If a cyclist were to leave Jefferson City limits, the law would no longer apply to them.

However, the Capital City can serve as a model and leader in bicyclist safety for the rest of state, said Jackson Hotaling, director of policy and programs with Missourians for Responsible Transportation, a non-motorist activist and advocacy group.

“We’re already seeing our bordering states starting to implement these laws,” Hotaling said. “Particularly in Arkansas, there’s so many people that are living right up on the border with Missouri. … A lot of folks on the Arkansas side are probably going to assume that exists within Missouri, and that’s up to the state of Missouri to respond accordingly.”

“I think that having the City of Jefferson’s ordinance as a model will be beneficial for other municipalities in the state,” he added. “… Ultimately, I think it could be a reasonable goal to look at this as an ordinance for the state of Missouri as well.”

Irvin, whose Senate district comprises the northern Ozark region of Arkansas, and thus shares many roads and cycling routes with the Southern region of Missouri, said she’d like to see the state work toward its own Idaho Stop law and was willing to work across state lines to help.

Advertisement

“If you’re trying to be more friendly towards cyclists and take advantage of these (shared) resources, then I think it’s just better to have some consistency with your laws,” Irvin said.

Irvin added that smaller cities would benefit greatly from countywide ordinances to ensure uniform laws across the area. The Cole County Traffic and Safety Advisory Board last met on April 30 and did not discuss any bike safety ordinances. It is slated to next meet on July 16, according to the Cole County website.

Even if neither the state nor the county follow up on Jefferson City’s ordinance, Hotaling said the passage of the law and the support of City Council represent meaningful progress for non-motorists in Jefferson City.

“I just want to applaud the City Council for making this consideration and taking it upon themselves to do the research to get there,” said Hotaling, who spends much of his time cycling in the city. “To be able to have a beautiful downtown and have place that’s enjoyable and safe to walk and bike around, I think it can really inspire a lot of folks in smaller towns and suburban areas to think about what that might look like when they do visit the Capitol.”

News Tribune file
From left, 15-year-old August Newlon and 17-year-old Finley Beyke check for traffic before crossing an intersection on Saturday, April 25, 2026, in downtown Jefferson City.
News Tribune file  Finley Beyke, 17, crosses an intersection Saturday, April 25, 2026, while traveling on High Street in Jefferson City.
News Tribune file
Finley Beyke, 17, crosses an intersection Saturday, April 25, 2026, while traveling on High Street in Jefferson City. “I think they should put more bike lanes and more bike signs,” Beyke said about improving safety for cyclists. “There are a lot of cars that don’t care.” Beyke said his father was struck by a motorist while cycling.



Source link

Advertisement

Idaho

Idaho Falls City Council delays vote on proposed alcohol ordinance – Local News 8

Published

on

Idaho Falls City Council delays vote on proposed alcohol ordinance – Local News 8


IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.

The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.

However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.

The proposed ordinance would:

Advertisement

1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.

2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.

3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.

4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.

Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.

Advertisement

“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”

But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.

“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”

At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.

“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.

Advertisement

But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.

“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”

The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.

Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.

For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho attorneys rebuff DOJ threat to prosecute Secretary of State in voter roll dispute

Published

on

Idaho attorneys rebuff DOJ threat to prosecute Secretary of State in voter roll dispute


A simmering dispute between Idaho’s top elections official and the U.S. Department of Justice escalated this month after federal officials warned Secretary of State Phil McGrane about possible prosecution tied to non-citizens voting in Idaho.

The Justice Department sent a letter earlier this month threatening McGrane with prosecution. The warning came amid a broader conflict between the Trump administration and McGrane, whom the administration has sued over his refusal to provide unredacted voter rolls to the federal government.

Idaho’s chief of civil litigation, James Craig, responded on July 10. In a letter first reported by the Idaho Statesman, Craig pushed back on the federal warning, writing, “Insinuations of criminal violations of the federal election laws are not well taken,” and asking the department to “stop threatening your friends in Idaho.”

Craig also requested that the lawsuit against McGrane be dismissed and criticized the Justice Department for sending its letter directly to McGrane rather than to the Idaho attorney general’s office.

Advertisement

The attorney general’s office said the state has already referred 15 cases of possible non-citizen election violations to the Justice Department but is not aware of any of them being prosecuted. Craig’s letter ends by asking the department to do so.



Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Property Taxes are Here to Stay

Published

on

Idaho Property Taxes are Here to Stay


The Idaho Legislature won’t eliminate property tax next year. My bold prediction. There will be a few bills introduced, a lot of chatter on talk radio and online, and then action will be kicked down the road. If it looks like a winner in the 2028 Election, it’ll sail through in session a few weeks before the 2028 Primary. Wet an index finger and raise it in the air. Then vote.

As an old Libertarian (with a capital L), I’m familiar with the basic argument. If you own it, why do you have to pay rent? The answer always comes back to, “It’s the best system we have to fund local governments”. Forms have been in place since colonial times, even if scattered geographically. The idea gained steam in the years after the Civil War when a handful of economists blamed property ownership for growing poverty in cities. Property accrued value as space became a premium. So-called reformers believed the tax would balance economic inequality, and appealed to noblesse oblige.

Your Taxes Get Sprinkled Like a Good Rain

I live in Twin Falls County, where we have 78 taxing districts that rely on the current system. If you ask what can replace it, you’re called a Republican in name only (RINO) by compatriots. Obviously, not everything funded by the tax is a waste. First responders and snow plows come to mind. It makes me think of the calls to gut the federal government, but while maintaining Social Security and Medicare. The former makes up nearly a quarter of the budget. Medicare is only 14 percent, but additional health spending brings the tab to another quarter. Historian Niall Ferguson grew up in Scotland, and he summed up Great Britain a couple of weeks ago. People want more, not less, welfare spending. Are we different?

Before anyone in Boise wipes out property tax, legislators need to consider what voters want to stay, and how to fund it otherwise. If they don’t, they’ll see a backlash at the ballot box. Just because I say I want taxes reduced, I didn’t mean the programs that benefit me! The answer won’t be available over 90 days next year.

Advertisement

More than 20 years ago I hosted a weeklong series on tax alternatives. Among the proposals we examined were Flat Tax, Fair Tax, and Automated Payments Tax. People are most familiar with the first. Everyone pays a flat percentage. Say 12 to 15 percent. Of income, I guess. Of course, we need to define income. Professor Gad Saad is leaving Canada for a job in the United States and has to pay an exit tax based on his estimated assets. Estimated is the dirty word! That’s left to bureaucrats.

This Requires Study and Gaming Outcomes

Go ahead and adopt the flat tax, and please the conservatives, however. Many people, even on the right, have paid very little when it comes to present income confiscation. See how they react when they get a wake-up call. The Fair Tax is a national sales tax of 23 percent. Or it was the percentage proposed 20 years ago. That sounds large, but when you consider your overall tax burden right now, if it replaced what currently exists, you would be better off. This isn’t to say that local governments wouldn’t institute their own taxes. If you live in a blue state or city, that’s a given. Proponents argue that citizens have the option of not paying taxes if they choose not to buy. Obviously, you need to buy some things, unless you’re destitute and living exclusively on handouts.

Automated Payments Tax (APT) is a 1 percent charge on every transaction. A company buys steel to build trucks; it pays 1 percent on the steel. And on every other purchase. The dealer buys the truck for his lot and pays one percent. You buy from the dealer and pay one percent. An economist at the University of Indiana told me it would cover the federal budget. We had that conversation in 2005, when the national debt wasn’t even a quarter of what we see today. None of these plans address the debt, but if state and local governments are creative, maybe we can find something that replaces property taxes.

What we’ll get is a commission from the politically connected who’ll meet once a month for bagels and orange juice. In three years, they’ll provide a solution that works best for them.

Highest Gas Taxes By State in the U.S.

Here are the top 10 states for gas taxes.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending