Idaho
Idaho lawmakers ready child custody changes for 2026
Idaho legislators gave a preview of how they might want to change the state’s child custody and family law system Monday.
The Child Custody and Domestic Relations Task Force has been meeting for months, allowing Idahoans across the state to share stories about how family courts have affected them.
Several who testified said courts disfavored them because of their Christian background or conservative political beliefs.
Many decried the use of temporary custody orders that can last for months until a final agreement can be reached.
“I feel like we have legalized kidnapping. Justices may not want to hear that,” said Rep. Barbara Ehardt (R-Idaho Falls).
Ehardt said preserving parental rights is her top priority.
“When we legally take that right away when there’s nothing criminal that can be pointed to, I believe that is certainly a disservice by the justices, certainly a disservice by the legislative branch and, I would say, the executive branch also,” she said.
Legal costs rise significantly the longer these cases run.
Those who’ve testified before the task force said they’ve had to take out second jobs, mortgage their homes or sell other assets to cover bills totaling tens of thousands of dollars or more. That money, they said, goes toward paying attorneys, but also other experts for various evaluations.
Sen. Tammy Nichols (R-Middleton), who co-chairs the task force, said she wants to require the separated parents to share in the cost of court-ordered evaluations and experts if one is wealthier than the other.
“I think it does provide that equity so that people are on level playing fields,” Nichols said.
The group also generally agreed that police should enforce custody arrangements if they’re violated. That could require creating a secure database law enforcement could access with the most recent approved court agreement.
The full list of recommendations is expected to be submitted to lawmakers when they gavel into session in January.
Copyright 2025 Boise State Public Radio
Idaho
Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.
The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.
However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.
The proposed ordinance would:
1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.
2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.
3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.
4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.
Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.
“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”
But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.
“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”
At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.
“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.
But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.
“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”
The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.
Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.
For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.
BOISE, Idaho (CBS2) — A simmering dispute between Idaho’s top elections official and the U.S. Department of Justice escalated this month after federal officials warned Secretary of State Phil McGrane about possible prosecution tied to non-citizens voting in Idaho.
The Justice Department sent a letter earlier this month threatening McGrane with prosecution. The warning came amid a broader conflict between the Trump administration and McGrane, whom the administration has sued over his refusal to provide unredacted voter rolls to the federal government.
Idaho’s chief of civil litigation, James Craig, responded on July 10. In a letter first reported by the Idaho Statesman, Craig pushed back on the federal warning, writing, “Insinuations of criminal violations of the federal election laws are not well taken,” and asking the department to “stop threatening your friends in Idaho.”
Craig also requested that the lawsuit against McGrane be dismissed and criticized the Justice Department for sending its letter directly to McGrane rather than to the Idaho attorney general’s office.
The attorney general’s office said the state has already referred 15 cases of possible non-citizen election violations to the Justice Department but is not aware of any of them being prosecuted. Craig’s letter ends by asking the department to do so.
-
Science33 minutes ago
New Winged Robot Can Fly and Swim Like a Puffin
-
Lifestyle57 minutes ago‘The Trojan Teddy Bear’: The promise and peril of childhood in the age of AI
-
Technology1 hour agoGoogle and Epic give up fighting — third-party Android app stores are coming next week
-
World1 hour agoFBI snares an American heir indicted for allegedly bankrolling anti-cop, pro-Hamas communist revolution
-
Politics1 hour agoBiden special counsel’s ‘runaway train’ scooped up sensitive lawmaker info: ‘Abuse of power’
-
Health1 hour ago‘Miracle on the Hudson’ hero Captain ‘Sully’ Sullenberger reveals Alzheimer’s diagnosis
-
Sports2 hours agoAmerican League stars outshine National League in 96th MLB All-Star game
-
Technology2 hours agoBefore you connect another smart TV, tablet or phone, lock it down
