Connect with us

Idaho

Buy Tickets for Idaho vs. Northern Arizona on February 24

Published

on

Buy Tickets for Idaho vs. Northern Arizona on February 24


Saturday’s Big Sky slate includes the Northern Arizona Lumberjacks (10-14, 3-7 Big Sky) meeting the Idaho Vandals (9-14, 3-7 Big Sky) at 4:00 PM ET on ESPN+.

If you’re looking to go to this game in person, head to StubHub or Ticketmaster to buy your tickets!

Idaho vs. Northern Arizona Game Information

Watch college basketball, other live sports and more on Fubo! Use our link to sign up for a free trial.

Advertisement

Buy Tickets for Other Idaho Basketball Games

Rep your team with officially licensed college basketball gear! Head to Fanatics to find jerseys, shirts, and much more.

Idaho Players to Watch

  • Julius Mims: 11.7 PTS, 7.3 REB, 1 AST, 1.1 STL, 1.6 BLK
  • Quinn Denker: 12 PTS, 3.3 REB, 3.4 AST, 0.5 STL, 0.2 BLK
  • D’Angelo Minnis: 9.6 PTS, 2.2 REB, 3.1 AST, 1 STL, 0 BLK
  • Kyson Rose: 6.8 PTS, 2.9 REB, 1.7 AST, 0.3 STL, 0.5 BLK
  • Terren Frank: 7.5 PTS, 3.5 REB, 0.5 AST, 0.7 STL, 0.2 BLK

Catch college basketball action all season long on Fubo!

Northern Arizona Players to Watch

  • Trenton McLaughlin: 16.2 PTS, 3.1 REB, 2 AST, 1.5 STL, 0.3 BLK
  • Carson Basham: 11 PTS, 6.1 REB, 1.2 AST, 0.4 STL, 1.5 BLK
  • Oakland Fort: 10.3 PTS, 3.5 REB, 2.8 AST, 0.8 STL, 0.2 BLK
  • Jayden Jackson: 9.8 PTS, 4 REB, 2 AST, 0.8 STL, 0.2 BLK
  • Liam Lloyd: 6.7 PTS, 4.1 REB, 3.3 AST, 1 STL, 0.2 BLK

Sportsbook Promo Codes

Idaho vs. Northern Arizona Stat Comparison

Northern Arizona Rank Northern Arizona AVG Idaho AVG Idaho Rank
327th 67.1 Points Scored 69.3 293rd
301st 76.5 Points Allowed 70.9 147th
355th 30.2 Rebounds 32.2 337th
342nd 6.5 Off. Rebounds 6.7 333rd
289th 6.3 3pt Made 7.7 152nd
156th 13.5 Assists 12.4 248th
261st 12.3 Turnovers 10.4 88th

Not all offers available in all states, please visit BetMGM for the latest promotions for your area. Must be 21+ to gamble, please wager responsibly. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, contact 1-800-GAMBLER.

© 2023 Data Skrive. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Idaho

“Who writes this stuff?” That's the question about a political mailer critical of the Idaho GOP

Published

on

“Who writes this stuff?”  That's the question about a political mailer critical of the Idaho GOP


BOISE — Mailer critical of the GOP arrives in mailboxes very close to the March 2 caucus. The mailer is anonymous and Take Back Idaho suggests the Secretary of State should look into its legality. That office tells Idaho News 6 the mailer is legal primarily because the caucus a private not public event.

  • Mailer Idaho Bulletin is critical of the GOP and totally anonymous.
  • Such mailers would be improper if distributed within 30 days of a primary according to the Secretary of State.
  • Because the GOP is holding a privately funded caucus, that 30 day rule does not apply and there is no requirement for transparency.

(Verbatim of story that aired is below)

The Idaho Bulletin looks like a mini newspaper of stories critical of the current GOP.

And the group Take Back Idaho says it’s been getting the blame.

“I got that thing too. It doesn’t speak for me.” says Jim Jones with Take Back Idaho, “Take back Idaho got a lot of inquiries and it’s not us.”

Advertisement

Take Back Idaho is a political group that has been trying to move Idaho politics more to the center.

But it is transparent on its website of who is involved.

Jones says the bulletin is not and that’s a problem.

“You know when you put an anonymous thing like that out it raises suspicion I think it’s not appropriate and I’d like to see the Secretary of State take a look at it and see who’s trying to influence policy. “ said Jones.

So, I went to the Secretary of State to ask him if this bulletin is illegal.

Advertisement

“That kind of thing does have to have a disclaimer,” said Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane, “but only in a certain window leading up to an election. That’s 30 days before a primary and 60 days before a general election.”

Notice he didn’t say Caucus. Because that’s a private party event and focused only on the presidential race So, there’s no requirement of transparency.

“What can you -presume from someone who does something political and doesn’t put their name on it? Unfortunately we see a lot of efforts of people to do that or not intentionally, so I think it’s a fair question to be asking.” said McGrane.

However, we all go to the polls May 21 for the state primary and if the bulletin is still circulating then…

“It could be an issue.” said McGrane, “if we get an inquiry we’ll look into it but I can tell you at first blush it meets all the requirements as it stands right now.”

Advertisement

Jones says legal or not, it’s concerning.

“It could b e someone we’ll meaning but it could be someone who’s trying to mislead folks.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho House unanimously approves legalizing fentanyl test strips

Published

on

Idaho House unanimously approves legalizing fentanyl test strips


Idaho lawmakers are one step closer to legalizing fentanyl testing strips.

House members unanimously voted to exempt them under the state’s drug paraphernalia statue Wednesday.

Idaho is one of just a handful of states where it’s a criminal offense to simply possess them. Simple possession of testing supplies is currently considered a misdemeanor, while selling them is a felony.

In 2022, 188 people in Idaho died due to a fentanyl overdose, according to state health officials – roughly half of all overdose deaths recorded that year.

Advertisement

“If we’re able to mitigate just one of those with this product and allowing it to get across the board, we’ve done our job here in this legislature,” said Rep. Marco Erickson (R-Idaho Falls), one of the bill’s co-sponsors.

“Fentanyl is turning up laced in all sorts of places that you wouldn’t expect,” said another co-sponsor, House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel (D-Boise)

“This is a cheap and easy way that people can make sure they’re not being poisoned by fentanyl inadvertently,” Rubel said.

The proposal still needs approval from the Senate and Gov. Brad Little to become law. If adopted, it would take effect July 1.

Copyright 2024 Boise State Public Radio

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court sides with developer in Teton County case – East Idaho News

Published

on

Idaho Supreme Court sides with developer in Teton County case – East Idaho News


BOISE — The Idaho Supreme Court recently ruled on a dispute that has stretched over almost two decades.

In January, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of Teton Creek Resort, LLC, of Wyoming, and Teton County.

The case arises from a dispute regarding a condominium development and dates back to 1995. That’s when a lot in Driggs was approved for Planned Unit Development with up to 16 standalone condominiums.

In 1995, TCR’s lot owned by TCR, LLC, the developer of Teton Creek Resor, was approved for Planned Unit Development with 16 standalone condominiums. However, a dispute arose in 2020 when county officials refused to record the plat, claiming TCR hadn’t submitted necessary documents.

Advertisement

A legal battle ensued, with TCR seeking relief through the courts.

TCR asked the courts to require the county to record the plat. Furthermore, it asked the court to declare the county had violated Idaho Code Title 55 Chapter 15 (the Idaho Condominium Property Act).”

The court upheld TCR’s complaint, declaring the county’s refusal to record the condominium plat a violation of the Idaho Condominium Property Act. The commissioners “didn’t have a valid reason” for doing so, the justices said.

Breach of contract

Although TCR filed this suit in 2020, litigation surrounding the development of the Teton Creek Resort area began when local environmental groups apparently tried to stop the development of the resort by bringing a lawsuit against it.

The Teton County Board of County Commissioners, the Ad Hoc Committee Against Teton Creek Resort, Citizens For Teton Valley, the Community Association for Responsible Planning and TCR reached a settlement agreement in 1996.

Advertisement

In the settlement, the parties agreed to never “raise any claim or objection of any manner whatsoever to the sale, development, zoning, land use plan or any other matter in any way arising from development or attempts to sell and develop the Teton Creek Resort Project,” according to court filings.

In its lawsuit, TCR claimed Teton County had breached the 1996 settlement agreement by refusing to record the plat, effectively blocking the project from moving forward.

The county filed its own motion for summary judgment in response, asking for TCR’s claims for breach of contract to be dismissed.

The court concluded that genuine issues remained in regard to the question of a breach of contract. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending