Connect with us

Hawaii

Sandwich Isles Communications Broke The Law When It Cut Services To Hawaiian Homelands

Published

on

Sandwich Isles Communications Broke The Law When It Cut Services To Hawaiian Homelands


The Public Utilities Commission must now decide how to remedy the situation.

Sandwich Isles Communications violated state laws and its obligations to its customers when it cut telephone and broadband services earlier this month without ample warning and is likely to face penalties for abandoning its services, according to testimony Monday before the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission.

Sandwich Isles’ President Al Hee was in the hot seat for much of Monday’s six-hour hearing to determine if the company broke the law when it gave its customers just a week’s notice that service could be terminated in late May. Its customers were given even less notice when services were actually cut in early June.

State and federal laws as well as Sandwich Isles’ certificate of authority, which allow it to operate in the state, require at least 30 days notice.

Advertisement

“There’s no doubt that we did not conform with the certificate of authority,” Hee said in his closing arguments.

Sandwich Isles Communications president Al Hee answers a question during a PUC hearing Monday, June 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)
Sandwich Isles Communications President Al Hee admitted to violating state rules but disputes that its entirely the telecommunications company’s fault. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)

The impact to Hawaiian homeland beneficiaries in Kahikinui on Maui and Puukapu on Hawaii island were particularly significant. They are far from areas that have cell service, and the shutdown of telephone services presented safety issues when households were unable to contact emergency services.

Hee argued that state and federal authorities should have been aware of the impending shutdown because Sandwich Isles has been losing money for at least the last four years. He blamed decisions made by the state Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to allow other carriers to operate on homesteads, thereby shrinking Sandwich Isles’ customer base.

State regulators and attorneys for the consumer advocate didn’t seem to buy that.

“There’s a lot of finger pointing going on, but I don’t hear a lot of accountability for this error,” Scott Boone, a state attorney representing the consumer advocate, said.

The PUC is expected to issue a written order that lays out what penalties, if any, Sandwich Isles will face and what the next steps will be to address the ongoing service disruption, PUC Chairman Leo Asuncion said.

Advertisement

Hee argued that the Hawaiian Homes Commission, and not the PUC, has jurisdiction in a case like this involving a provider on Hawaiian homelands. He also contended that the rules the commission was operating under didn’t apply to a company like Sandwich Isles, which was initially created to be the only company that serviced homesteads in rural areas.

But over the years, DHHL opened the way for other telephone and broadband providers to hook up people on homelands. Hee believes that lead to the financial ruin of his company.

PUC holds a hearing for Sandwich Isles Communications Monday, June 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)PUC holds a hearing for Sandwich Isles Communications Monday, June 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)
Al Hee, far left, faced probing questions and had what were at times heated exchanges with lawyers representing the state consumer advocate as well as public utilities commissioners.(Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)

The company defaulted on more than $130 million in federal loans, and a federal court entered a monetary judgment against it in 2020. That same year, the Federal Communications Commission fined Hee $50 million for violations related to fraud, charges that sent Hee to federal prison in 2016.

But what really did in Sandwich Isles, according Hee, was a recent bid by Hawaiian Telcom to acquire the conduits that bring connectivity to homes without also acquiring the equipment necessary to actually plug in those households. Because that equipment is still owned by Sandwich Isles, the company had a duty to provide services to its customers despite its financial straits.

Waimana Enterprises, Sandwich Isles’ parent company, also put in a bid for the conduits but lost to Hawaiian Telcom. Under questioning by commissioners, Hee implied that Sandwich Isles and Waimana are no longer responsible for people on homelands.

“If no one is truly interested in doing it other than Sandwich Isles and Waimana, that’s not our kuleana,” Hee said. “We’re not the people responsible for those Hawaiians out there that don’t have services. We were the solution.”

Advertisement

Boone’s questions focused on public safety concerns DHHL raised in written responses to the PUC’s subpoenas. Some households may not be able to dial 911 because their landlines and internet are down and they are out of the range of cell service.

Boone asked Hee if anyone at Sandwich Isles researched which of their customers would still have access to internet if their phone lines were cut. Hee said the company had not.

“We terminated service because we ran out of money. We didn’t research anything,” Hee said.

Hee said several times during the hearing that he wasn’t able to provide specific answers because he did not participate in the day-to-day operations of Sandwich Isles. All of its remaining 25 to 30 employees were terminated June 1, according to Hee.

Under questioning from Boone, Hee said the areas he knew that had lost voice services included Kahikinui on Maui, Puukapu on Hawaii island, parts of Molokai, and areas of Kauai. Hee also said that DHHL offices as well as Sandwich Isles’ other clients like the U.S. Coast Guard and Target still have service because of contractural obligations with those entities.

Advertisement

Caroline Ishida, the PUC’s chief counsel, wanted more specifics on where there are service outages, as well as where households may still have connectivity because they were not automatically disconnected yet.

“Does anyone out in the world know where those services are if you don’t know?” Ishida asked.

“I don’t know,” Hee said.

PUC commissioner Naomi Kuwaye addresses Sandwich Isles Communications president Al Hee during a hearing Monday, June 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)PUC commissioner Naomi Kuwaye addresses Sandwich Isles Communications president Al Hee during a hearing Monday, June 17, 2024, in Honolulu. (Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)
PUC commissioners Naomi Kuwaye and Colin Yost focused on Sandwich Isles’ obligation to notify customers well in advance of cutting services.(Kevin Fujii/Civil Beat/2024)

Ishida also asked if Sandwich Isles would refund customers who still paid their bills even while their services were down.

“Absolutely, no question about it,” Hee said.

The interactions between Hee and the PUC heated up once the commissioners had their turn to ask questions.

Advertisement

In one exchange, Hee said Sandwich Isles could restart services if the PUC could ensure it starts gaining revenue.

“If we order you to restart service, do you have the financial and personnel and technical capacity to perform that restart of service?” Commissioner Colin Yost asked.

“As long as that order has money attached to it, yes,” Hee said.

Commissioner Naomi Kuwaye pressed Hee on how much financial assistance Sandwich Isles’ parent company, Waimana Enterprises, is able to provide the beleaguered telecommunications company. Hee said Waimana’s financial support has already been in the millions.

Both Kuwaye and Yost asked repeatedly why Sandwich Isles did not notify its customers in advance that they would lose service, and asked Hee if he understood that Sandwich Isles’ certificate of authority required that.

Advertisement

“That’s what you got, and there are rules established that govern what happens under a COA. You are not disputing that,” Yost said.

“I am not disputing that,” Hee replied.



Source link

Hawaii

Tourist accused of hurling rock at endangered Hawaiian monk seal was trying to protect sea turtles, lawyer says

Published

on

Tourist accused of hurling rock at endangered Hawaiian monk seal was trying to protect sea turtles, lawyer says


The defense attorney for a tourist from Washington state accused of hurling a coconut-sized rock at an endangered Hawaiian monk seal says his client was trying to protect sea turtles and has since been physically assaulted, threatened and doxed.

Igor Lytvynchuk, 38, of Covington, Washington, is scheduled to appear in U.S. District Court in Honolulu Wednesday on charges of harassing and attempting to harass a protected animal.

Earlier this month, a witness recorded what prosecutors say was a video of him throwing the rock at a Hawaiian monk seal at a Maui beach. He later made arrangements to surrender in the Seattle area as special agents with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were seeking to arrest him, prosecutors said.

The video drew widespread condemnation and demands for prosecution in Hawaii, including from Maui’s mayor. Scientists identified the seal as an adult male known as “R404,” NOAA said.

Advertisement

Igor Mykhaylovych Lytvynchuk is charged with harassing a protected animal, the U.S. attorney’s office in Honolulu said.

Department of Justice


According to prosecutors, a state Department of Land and Natural Resources officer investigated a report of Hawaiian monk seal harassment in Lahaina, the community that was largely destroyed by a deadly wildfire in 2023. A witness showed the officer video of the seal swimming in shallow water while a man watched from shore.

The video showed Lytvynchuk throwing the rock, directly at the seal, narrowly missing its head, prosecutors said in a criminal complaint.

Advertisement

Maui resident Kaylee Schnitzer, 18, told HawaiiNewsNow she witnessed the incident while taking photos nearby.

“What he was picking up was like a rock the size of a coconut,” Schnitzer said. “It wasn’t no small rock. It was the size of a coconut. And he threw it right, directly aiming towards the monk seal’s head.”

When a witness confronted Lytvynchuk, he said “he did not care and was ‘rich’ enough to pay any fines,” according to the complaint.

Afterward, a man “brutally assaulted” Lytvynchuk, his defense attorney Myles Breiner told The Associated Press. Lytvynchuk declined to file a police report on the assault, the attorney said.

Breiner explained his client had been to Hawaii previously and was familiar with sea turtles, but not Hawaiian monk seals. Lytvynchuk is a fisherman and thought the seal was an aggressive sea lion, the lawyer said.

Advertisement

“So his response was not to hurt this monk seal, but to get it away from the turtles,” Breiner said.

The incident shows NOAA must do more to educate the public about protecting Hawaiian monk seals, Hawaii’s U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat, said in a statement.

Since the video surfaced, Lytvynchuk has faced death threats and doxing, including receiving a package at his home containing what appeared to be feces, Breiner said.

He said his client is being treated unfairly because he’s a white outsider. “The vast majority of attacks on monk seal and turtle are by locals,” he said.

Lytvynchuk is charged with violations of the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

Advertisement

Hawaiian monk seals are a critically endangered species. Only 1,600 remain in the wild.

“The unique and precious wildlife of the Hawaiian Islands are renowned symbols of Hawaii’s special place in the world and its incredible biodiversity,” U.S. Attorney Ken Sorenson said in a statement. “We are committed to protecting our vulnerable wild species, in particular, endangered Hawaiian monk seals.”

If convicted, he faces up to one year in prison for each charge. He also faces a fine of up to $50,000 under the Endangered Species Act and a fine of up to $20,000 under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

In 2016, a man was seen on video appearing to beat a pregnant Hawaiian monk seal in shallow water.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hawaii

‘Tesla Road Rage Driver’ sentenced to seven years in prison after attacking mother and daughter in Hawaii

Published

on

‘Tesla Road Rage Driver’ sentenced to seven years in prison after attacking mother and daughter in Hawaii


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A man dubbed the “Tesla Road Rage Driver” was sentenced to seven years in prison in connection with a violent road rage attack in Hawaii.

Nathaniel Radimak was sentenced Thursday in connection with a 2025 attack involving a mother and her 18-year-old daughter in Honolulu.

Radimak, who has prior convictions tied to road rage attacks against motorists, acknowledged his actions during sentencing.

Advertisement

“I take accountability. I just feel bad about it,” Radimak said, according to Hawaii News Now. “It shouldn’t have happened, but I really need a certain kind of treatment that is being prolonged and farther away. It’s not helping me, but I take accountability.”

TESLA ROAD-RAGE DRIVER ALLEGEDLY ASSAULTS TEEN, MOM IN HAWAII MONTHS AFTER PRISON RELEASE

Nathaniel Walter Radimak, 39, was convicted of attacking several female drivers on Southern California roads. (Fox News)

Radimak was charged with one count of unauthorized entry into a motor vehicle and two counts of third-degree assault. He pleaded no contest earlier this year.

Judge Clarissa Malinao said during sentencing that Radimak had failed to seek necessary medical care and continued using illegal substances while on parole for previous convictions.

Advertisement

“His history of violence is propensity for violence, and defendant’s voluntary intoxication and discontinuation of medication increase the risk of his dangerousness to self and to the public,” Malinao said. “These findings also demonstrate and reinforce that the defendant is indeed a danger to the safety of the public.”

WATCH: ROAD RAGE SUSPECT DRAGS MOM OUT OF VEHICLE, BODY-SLAMS HER ON PAVEMENT

Nathaniel Walter Radimak is identified by police as a driver involved in road rage incidents while driving a Tesla in California. (California Highway Patrol)

Radimak, 39, was charged after allegedly assaulting an 18-year-old woman and her 35-year-old mother during an incident on May 7, 2025, according to the Honolulu Police Department.

Police said the teen was parking downtown when she saw a gray Tesla drive past her.

Advertisement

The two allegedly exchanged words before Radimak got out of the vehicle and assaulted both victims before fleeing the scene, police said. Authorities said he was driving a 2022 gray Tesla with Oregon license plates.

MOTORIST ARRESTED AFTER ALLEGEDLY TRYING TO RUN DRIVER OF TESLA OFF THE ROAD AT HIGH SPEEDS: REPORT

Honolulu police arrested Nathaniel Radimak following a reported road rage assault involving a mother and daughter.

Radimak was arrested by Honolulu police the following day.

The arrest came just months after Radimak was released from prison after serving less than a year of a five-year sentence tied to a series of violent road rage attacks in Southern California.

Advertisement

He was sentenced in 2023 after pleading guilty to assault, vandalism, elder abuse and making criminal threats.

Fox News Digital previously reported that Radimak was known for driving a Tesla and using a pipe to attack the vehicles of his victims, including multiple women.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation previously said Radimak received 424 days of credit for time served while awaiting sentencing in the earlier case.

Fox News Digital’s Pilar Arias and Louis Casiano contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Hawaii offers support after Gabbard resigns to focus on husband’s health – The Garden Island

Published

on

Hawaii offers support after Gabbard resigns to focus on husband’s health – The Garden Island






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending