Hawaii
Hawaii island mayoral candidates tackle many issues at forum | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Hawaii County’s two remaining mayoral candidates took potshots at each other in between setting out their own policy plans at a forum on Saturday.
The event, hosted by the Big Island Press Club at the Hilo Yacht Club, saw Mayor Mitch Roth and challenger Kimo Alameda respond to an array of questions covering subjects ranging from the Hawaii County budget to the Thirty Meter Telescope.
The questions below were posed by a panel of three, including the Hawaii Tribune- Herald’s John Burnett. Save for a “lightning round” of short, one-sentence answers, the candidates were given three minutes to answer each question.
Question: Will you commit to a similar forum with news media within nine months of taking office? What other steps will you take to improve transparency?
Answers: Roth quickly said “absolutely yes” to a future forum and added that his administration has been hiring more public information officers for different county agencies, including Civil Defense and Parks and Recreation. Meanwhile, he said the county’s websites are gradually being updated to include more pertinent information, while the county has contracts with the apps Everbridge and Kahea to improve communications with the public.
Alameda, meanwhile, specifically said he wants to make the county budget open to the public for review, saying that “there’s no hide-and-seek in government.” He said Kauai has a similar setup, and lamented that certain government expenses are left for the media to uncover, rather than being open and transparent.
This led to a prolonged back-and-forth throughout much of the forum. Roth took time during an answer to another question to respond to Alameda, saying the county’s budget is already available to the public online and remarking that it’s “kind of scary that it’s almost less than a month and a half (until the election) and you haven’t looked at the budget.”
Alameda, in turn, responded later, saying the county’s available fund balance is not visible online.
Q: The Big Island is losing residents, particularly Native Hawaiian residents. How will you take steps to reverse this trend?
A: Alameda said Hawaiians have increasingly felt unwelcome in their own home, experiencing discrimination and disparities in available services compared with residents who moved here from out of state.
“We still have a racial divide, and I believe I can bring people together, because I’ve lived on both sides,” Alameda said. “So if you want to bring Hawaiians back, you’ve got to bring them back to a place they remember — not this animosity between cultures, between districts.”
On the other hand, Roth said he believes the most important way to bring people back and keep them on the Big Island is the development of more housing. He said his administration has been hard at work developing an affordable housing development pipeline, which has more than 8,100 housing units in development.
Once again this statement led to a sniping match during future questions. Alameda later said he does not believe that 8,100 units are truly being developed, saying his family in the construction industry is only scraping by with insufficient work to sustain them.
Roth countered later by stating that those 8,100 projects do exist, with information about each one publicly available on county websites.
Q: Many Big Island small businesses have had to wait six months to a year for permits that allow them to open. What will you do to fix this?
A: “The permitting system isn’t perfect right now, I’ll be the first one to admit it,” Roth said. “But we are getting better at making sure that people can get permits.”
Roth said that some reports of the permitting system’s deficiencies have been overstated: Specifically, he said Alameda has previously claimed that there are 3,000 permit applications that haven’t even left the county’s intake process. That number, Roth said, is actually 280, and he added that the county has continued to improve its efficiency.
But Alameda said he did not believe several of Roth’s claims, explaining that he has permit applications that have been stuck for months. He said his family members in construction are unable to do their jobs because they are “held hostage” by the overbearing permit system.
Alameda proposed a provisional approval for all pending permit applications with minimal need for review, saying a simple checklist confirming basic information like the site address and tax map key should be sufficient.
“The county does not take liability for any of the permits; the architect does,” Alameda said. “So why are we slowing it up?”
Q: Do you believe in diversifying the island’s economy beyond tourism and, if so, how?
A: While Alameda said the county cannot rely on tourism alone, he acknowledged that the industry contributes about one-fifth of the island’s economy. Therefore, he said he would focus on regenerative tourism in an effort to bring in a less exploitative type of tourist.
“I think we could be the sports capital of the United States. This is where sports teams would like to come. We should be able to have the World Series here,” Alameda said. “We’re also the health capital. People should come here for health tourism. … This is the place for healing — just look outside, that’s healing right there,” he went on, pointing out the Yacht Club windows at the Honohononui Bay.
Roth agreed about the need for a different type of tourist and suggested a brand of tourism more respectful of Hawaiian culture.
“Japan has over 3 million hula dancers,” Roth said. “And those hula dancers don’t only study hula, they study Hawaiian culture, and when the Japanese tourists come here, they focus a lot on playing by the rules.”
The mayor also touted the county’s Destination Management Action Plan, which he said focuses on building tourism around the island’s communities, rather than vice versa.
Meanwhile, Roth said, the county could look to energy to wean itself off of tourism, noting the Big Island’s partnership with Namie, Japan, and Lancaster, Calif., to develop hydrogen infrastructure. He added that the county will soon issue a request for proposals from energy agencies for ways the county can generate its own energy rather than importing it.
Q: Was federal money earmarked for COVID-19 hazard pay? If so, where did it go? If not, why not? And what would Alameda have done differently?
A: Roth denied that there were any federal funds earmarked for hazard pay for county workers during the pandemic. He went on to say that county workers remained healthy throughout the pandemic — “We had nobody that died who was working at the county and got COVID on the job,” he said.
The mayor continued, saying that the county prioritized spending federal funds offering financial relief for other Big Island residents who were more severely affected by COVID-19, such as rent assistance programs and small-business grants.
Roth also took a wild potshot at Alameda, claiming that the Bay Clinic Health Center — of which Alameda was CEO at the start of the pandemic — had financial problems around 2020, which necessitated its eventual merger with the West Hawaii Community Health Center and Alameda’s departure from the executive position in 2022.
Alameda said Roth’s claim was “so far from the truth,” saying he initiated the merger and that Bay Clinic’s finances were healthier right before the merger than they had been when he began working there.
As for the hazard pay issue, Alameda said the county has a contractual agreement with the Hawaii Government Employees Association to provide hazard pay, which his administration would honor if elected.
“Mitch, you had the healthiest island because your county workers made it healthy,” Alameda said. “You made them essential, forced them to go to work; they were the ones marking the tape for 6 feet apart; they were the ones giving everybody masks; they were the ones making sure everything was sanitized. And then you come back and say, ‘You wasn’t at risk’? No way.”
Q: Does the pandemic continue to affect the island?
A: Both candidates agreed that the county continues to feel reverberations from COVID-19, both positive and negative. Alameda said keiki who spent years isolated during the pandemic are having lingering mental health effects but also that it forced people to improve their technological literacy and online connectivity.
Q: What influence does the mayor have on decisions regarding land leases for the Thirty Meter Telescope and Pohakuloa Training Area?
A: Roth said his office can advocate for certain courses of action but cannot make decisions regarding those issues. However, he said his office advocated for greater communication between TMT and the Native Hawaiian community, which has led to improved dialogue between both parties.
Regarding PTA, Roth said the county can and should ask for more than a $1 lease, but made an ominous addendum.
“We are closer to World War III right now than anytime in our past,” Roth said. “And when you talk to the military about this, their big fear is the Pacific.”
Alameda challenged Roth’s position, saying the mayor was pro-TMT in 2019 and that any improved bargaining position the county has regarding TMT or PTA is the result of pressure caused by opponents of those projects. He added that the mayor should sit on the Maunakea Stewardship and Oversight Authority himself, rather than delegating the role as is currently the case, with County Managing Director Doug Adams on the authority board.
Q: What can be done to reduce the island’s homelessness problem?
A: Alameda began by downplaying the state’s 2024 Homeless Point in Time Count, a favored statistic of Roth’s that shows a 28% decrease in homelessness from the previous year. That report, Alameda said, has a large margin of error that doesn’t reflect the reality of the situation.
Instead, he said the county should conduct outreach and pay attention to mental health issues among the homeless and almost homeless, adding that as a licensed psychologist, he is ideally suited to do so.
Roth said the county is, in fact, conducting homeless outreach, having awarded more than $10 million to various groups that are meeting with and providing treatment to homeless people. He touted recent and upcoming county homeless shelters including the overnight shelter at the Hilo Salvation Army, and added that, regardless of the usefulness of the Point in Time Count, it is “not debatable” that Hawaii County saw the state’s biggest decrease in homelessness in the past year.
Questions from the candidates
The final questions were posed from one candidate to the other. Roth asked Alameda what county spending decisions he would have made differently and how he would pay for them.
Alameda said the county could be bolder in seeking additional revenue, suggesting that short-term vacation rentals could be taxed at resort rates or that the county’s fees for rezoning applications be scaled based on the appraised value of the property in question.
Alameda asked Roth about the Hilo Wastewater Treatment Plant, challenging him about when the aging facility will be rehabilitated and whether there is a plan for if the plant fails before it is fixed.
Roth affirmed that county Civil Defense and the Department of Environmental Management have plans for if the treatment plant should fail.
He went on to say that the county has restructured its plan to refurbish the facility and has received three bid proposals in the past month — the lowest of those was about $337 million.
The mayor added the county is about to apply for a bond to help pay for the project, and touted the county’s high bond rating.
Lightning round
Midway through the forum was a “lightning round,” where candidates were given simpler questions to answer in just a few words. The most significant of those questions were as follows, with answers paraphrased for readability.
Q: What potential natural disaster worries you the most?
Roth: Now that Mauna Loa has already erupted, tsunami.
Alameda: Fire, because we’re not prepared for one.
Q: Do you believe there is corruption in the county government?
Roth: Not at the top, no.
Alameda: Yes (Alameda referred to an incident where a county housing official embezzled millions from the county, likely a reference to Alan Scott Rudo, who took nearly $2 million in bribes and kickbacks in a housing credit scheme that fraudulently awarded more than $10 million in housing credits between 2014 and 2021; Roth quipped that this did not happen under his administration).
Q: Should Hawaii County be split into two counties?
Roth: No.
Alameda: Maybe, if we can’t guarantee equitable treatment for all parts of the county.
Hawaii
Virus to fight coconut rhinoceros beetle shows promising results – West Hawaii Today
Every other day inside a lab on the third floor of the St. John Plant Science Laboratory building on the University of Hawaii at Manoa campus, doctoral student Kristen Gaines opens up a refrigerator full of beetle larvae, hoping to find them dead.
“When I see a dead one, it’s still pretty gratifying,” she said.
Gaines is a research assistant investigating a virus to kill the coconut rhinoceros beetle, also referred to as CRB, which is decimating Oahu’s coconut and palm trees. After years of trying to eradicate the beetle, the problem has grown to a full infestation, with thousands of trees dead because of the pest.
The virus Gaines is testing is a variant of the oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus, referred to as OrNV, which was discovered in the 1960s by German scientist Dr. Alois Huger, according to a 2022 report by researchers from New Zealand and Samoa. The virus, which Huger isolated after he killed healthy beetles by feeding them ones that had died of the virus, was the first time Samoa was able to successfully manage the pest after its introduction in 1910 from a Sri Lanka cargo vessel.
Preliminary results from her testing are promising, Gaines said. She’s observed larvae die after contracting the virus both by injection and naturally from deceased larvae. Most recently, she said, three out of four larvae died after she placed them inside a bin with a dead infected specimen.
Lack of testing facilities
Several East Asian and Pacific island nations have used the virus or variations of it to manage CRB for decades. While there is plenty of research that confirms the virus’ efficacy against the pest, there has been little research on how the virus may affect native beetles, such as the Kauai stag beetle, according to UH principal researcher Michael Melzer.
Other island chains that used the virus against CRB had economies more dependent on palm oil where the potential benefits of releasing the virus outweigh the risks or did not have native insects to worry about, Melzer said. The virus is host-specific, meaning it doesn’t mutate to infect other types of creatures, so the main concern is its effect on native beetles and similar insects.
Despite the beetle arriving in Hawaii in 2013, the state did not receive a permit to test the virus until April due to the lack of facilities where the tests could be safely administered and contained, said Jonathan Ho, plant quarantine branch manager for the state Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity.
He said the CRB invasion on Oahu reached the point where it was “all over the place,” and it wasn’t feasible to spray or inject every coconut tree on the island and properly dispose of all the green waste.
“At that point, at the landscape level, biocontrol was the only real realistic solution to mitigate the threat of CRB,” Ho said. “We weren’t going to spray or treat our way out of it.”
He added that despite its efficacy elsewhere in the Pacific, adequate testing is crucial to protect Hawaii’s environment and ensure the right virus strain is being utilized.
Melzer said federal funding the state received to respond to the CRB threat changed from an eradication focus to containment around 2020, ultimately leading to the development of the containment lab and procedures in order to score a federal permit to import the virus and begin testing on larvae.
A near ‘eureka’ moment
The entry to the colony lab, where Tomie Vowell, a member of the research support team, rears beetles for experiments on request, is a secure, pitch-black room that serves as a bridge between the lab and the hallway.
If a beetle were to escape — one never has, according to Melzer — it would get confused in the darkness. A single light in the corner would be turned on to attract the beetle so it could be recaptured.
“We basically just don’t want that virus leaving the lab, because we don’t know what impact it might have on both native or beneficial insects in Hawaii,” Melzer said.
From the dark room is a door that leads to the lab, where there are four locked refrigerators with beetles at different life stages in various labeled containers.
CRB eggs resemble small white balls. Once hatched, the tiny, pale grubs grow up to 2-1/2-inches long with a strong, black exoskeleton adorned with a rhinoceros-like horn and fuzzy underbelly. Their natural life cycle from grub to adult is typically a year, Vowell said.
Melzer traveled to Palau to get the virus strain the island nation had used successfully to combat the beetle, and brought it back to Hawaii.
In a separate lab, Gaines dresses in full protective gear before injecting the virus into CRB larvae. The infected larvae become lethargic as their gut becomes inflamed.
Gaines said the first time she suspected a larva exhibiting symptoms had died of the virus, it was “not quite a eureka moment, but close to it.”
It can take two to four weeks for larvae to succumb to the virus, Melzer said, while infected adults live longer but ultimately become too lethargic to eat and starve to death.
He said the virus is effective because the beetles live long enough to spread the infection to others but in the end die themselves within weeks.
‘It’s already too late’
If everything goes to plan, Melzer estimates the virus could possibly be released into the wild within two years. Ho said the timeline is dependent on state and federal regulatory processes.
For some landscapers, the window for effective CRB containment has long closed.
“It just sucks because there’s a lot that could be done,” said Brent White, owner of Lush Palm Landscapes. “Maybe you should just let that thing (the virus) go out now and kill the beetles. It’s already too late. The North Shore is already gone. All the trees on the North Shore are going to be cut down pretty soon, they’re all going to be gone. There’s no saving it now — sorry, too late — which is really sad.”
White said he’s turned to treating his palm trees nightly with essential oils, which has helped keep his trees alive, but takes a lot of labor.
“It’s still so hard,” he said. “The minute you stop treating, the beetles come back and attack the tree. It’s just really sad that it’s growing out of control and there wasn’t proper mitigation methods in the beginning to stop it from happening.”
Chance Correa, owner of Malama Aina Landscape and Masonry Design, and Daniel Anthony, founder of nonprofits Hui Aloha ‘Aina Momona and Aloha Organic, agree.
The two employ Korean organic farming techniques to combat the beetle.
“In two to four years, we could lose every coconut tree,” Correa said. “There might not be coconuts to farm. It’s that bad.”
Aloha Organic uses a sulfur mixture to deter the beetle, Anthony said, along with nutrients to feed the trees.
“We noticed that the healthier your tree was, the more resilient it was to the beetle,” he said.
Anecdotally, Anthony’s methods have worked. During a visit Thursday, the residential property he’s been treating monthly in Kaaawa had plenty of coconuts in its trees, while a next-door neighbor’s trees showed evidence of beetle damage.
For both Correa and Anthony, coconuts are part of their culture that helped their ancestors survive for centuries.
“It’s life or death for us, for our culture, for our community,” Anthony said.
The two also share concerns about the long-term effects of chemical use on the trees and the fruit they produce.
More testing planned
Existing recommendations from the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity to combat CRB include chemicals, organic options such as fungi and physical barriers such as netting. Ho said that while he has not heard of sulfur successfully deterring the beetle and it hasn’t been formally studied, any organic option that can be replicated would be welcome.
Basal oil is another organic option to repel beetles, according to the agency’s website.
Ho said the process for a pesticide to get approval for use against CRB does not necessarily require the same type of rigorous testing on its effects on native species that a bio-agent such as the virus does. But, he explained, both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the state have labeling processes for use as a pesticide.
He added that the chemicals listed on the agriculture department’s website are labeled as being usable and then tested by either UH or a survey response to test efficacy.
Other than treating palm trees, Ho said the best way to manage CRB until a successful bio-agent is approved is to manage green waste and prevent breeding.
In the meantime, Melzer and Gaines plan to begin testing the virus against native species and potentially bring in a different strain from another affected area to build a virus “library.”
Melzer said he also hopes to get a permit to test on adult beetles, which so far has not been approved due to the risk of the winged insects escaping by flight.
“We rear CRB for research purposes and we’ve never lost an adult out of there,” he said. “We’re hoping to convince them that we’re never going to lose an adult over here.”
If a permit is not obtained, Melzer said, UH will have to look at better bio-containment facilities so it can finish the testing process.
“Everyone recognizes how important it is that we have these facilities, not even just for CRB, but for other things in the future,” he said. “CRB will not be the last impactful invasive species in Hawaii.”
Hawaii
Hawaii: A Kingdom Crossing Oceans review – a feather-filled thriller full of gods, gourds and ghosts
Relations between Britain and the Pacific kingdom of Hawaii didn’t get off to a great start. On 14 February 1779 the global explorer James Cook was clubbed and stabbed to death at Hawaii’s Kealakekua Bay in a dispute over a boat: it was a tragedy of cultural misunderstanding that still has anthropologists arguing over its meaning. Cook had previously visited Hawaii and apparently been identified as the god Lono, but didn’t know this. Marshall Sahlins argued that Cook was killed because by coming twice he transgressed the Lono myth, while another anthropologist, Gananath Obeyesekere, attacked him for imposing colonialist assumptions of “native” irrationality on the Hawaiians.
It’s a fascinating, contentious debate. But the aftermath of Cook’s death is less well known – and the British Museum’s telling of it, in collaboration with indigenous Hawaii curators, community leaders and artists, reveals a surprisingly complex if doomed encounter between different cultures.
Cook isn’t mentioned in the wall texts or portrayed in the show, but his ghost is everywhere in the objects he and his men brought back to Britain. And what marvels they are. Before Cook’s voyages the peoples of the Pacific, connected with each other by epic canoe crossings that linked the Polynesians from Hawaii and Easter Island to Tahiti and New Zealand, created cultural forms that we now call art. Giant pink feathered faces of gods with mother-of-pearl eyes grimace and gurn while a club embedded with tiger shark teeth combines beauty and menace. Bowls carried by naked figures on their backs embody how Hawaiian chiefs and monarchs were feasted and respected.
Monarchy is at the heart of this show, a common language shared by the otherwise chalk and cheese Hawaiians and Britons. After the death of Cook, which was heartily regretted on both sides, Hawaii learned, as it were, to speak British and assert its equality with a “modern” state. It worked, for a while. In 1810 King Kamehameha I sent a magnificent, feathered cloak to George III, with a yellow diamond pattern on red – on loan here from the Royal Collection which still owns it. The king apologised that he was too far away to support Britain in the Napoleonic Wars but expressed friendship – and could Britain help if Hawaii was attacked by France? The Hawaiian cloak is wittily juxtaposed here with a glittering jewelled costume worn by George IV at his coronation: idiosyncratic customs existed on both sides of the world.
Forget Cook, the show suggests: remember King Liholiho. In 1824 he and his Queen Kamamulu set out on a journey that reversed all those British “discoveries”. They set sail for Britain laden with gifts, hitching a lift on a whaling ship (the story would be even better if they’d gone by outrigger canoe). George IV seems to have been touched by the greetings from across two oceans because he received the Hawaiians in 1824 with diplomatic honours. They were seen in the royal box at the theatre and portrayed by artists. Typically cartoonists were less generous – Cruikshank portrays the depraved George IV with his arms around a tattooed Polynesian. They also visited the British Museum where they could not have missed three of its most stunning exhibits, the feathered faces of gods brought back by Cook’s team from Hawaii which are known to have been on display at that time.
The Hawaiian treasures retrieved from the British Museum’s stores are remarkable – they should have a permanent gallery to themselves. You can’t stereotype them: the fierce gaze of a martial-looking god with a chunky wooden body seems modernist, which is no coincidence because Pacific sculptures helped inspire modernism. I mistook one of the feathered godheads with its almost caricatural eye for a contemporary artwork. It was collected by Cook.
These wonders are not reliquaries of a dead culture. There’s a perfectly preserved 18th-century dance rattle, or ‘uli’uli, brought back from Cook’s third voyage, a gourd from which purple, red and white feathers sprout and radiate. A video shows Hawaiian dancers using a modern recreation of the same instrument. To Hawaiians the artistic masterpieces their ancestors made are bearers of memory, instruments of identity.
This exhibition is a celebration of Hawaii and a defence of museums with global collections. The almost miraculous preservation of delicate, fragile artworks made with feathers, teeth, wood and bark for almost 250 years is surely to the British Museum’s credit, as is this way of seeing them as embodiments of living culture.
How does the story end? The king and queen of Hawaii gave their lives for cultural diplomacy: they both died of measles in London in 1824. George IV honoured them by sending their bodies home on a Royal Navy ship. Hawaii successfully persuaded Britain and Europe it was a nation state, with a monarchical government they could do business with – so Britain kept its greedy hands off this one place. In the end it would be the US that seized Hawaii, colonised it and eventually made it the 50th state. The objects here are weapons in a continuing cultural resistance. Look out for that shark-toothed club, Mr President.
Hawaii
Community memorial service for Kazuo Todd today in Hilo – West Hawaii Today
The funeral procession for deceased Fire Chief Kazuo Todd with pass-in-review for Hawaii Fire Department firefighters took place Saturday morning at HFD Administration in the County Building on Aupuni Street in Hilo.
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology6 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoAnti-ICE protest outside Dallas City Hall follows deadly shooting in Minneapolis
-
Delaware3 days agoMERR responds to dead humpback whale washed up near Bethany Beach
-
Dallas, TX1 week agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Iowa6 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Montana2 days agoService door of Crans-Montana bar where 40 died in fire was locked from inside, owner says
-
Health1 week agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits