Connect with us

Denver, CO

Office properties to see ‘a spreading of value’ this cycle, Denver assessor says

Published

on

Office properties to see ‘a spreading of value’ this cycle, Denver assessor says


Denver Assessor Keith Erffmeyer speaks at BusinessDen’s “The Future of Office Event” on Sept. 10, 2024. (Matt Geiger/BusinessDen)

The Denver official tasked with valuing the city’s real estate said Tuesday that office building valuations will likely bifurcate this cycle, with top-tier properties holding steady while less-desirable properties see significant declines.

“I think we’ll see a spreading of value unlike I’ve ever seen in Denver, going all the way from downtown to the Tech Center — Cherry Creek seems to be immune to anything, so that might not happen here — but that’s kind of what we’re looking at, is really a two- if not three-tier market,” Assessor Keith Erffmeyer said.

Erffmeyer made the comment at BusinessDen’s “The Future of Office” event, where he and five real estate executives discussed the office sector’s status and outlook. The event was held at the Clayton Hotel & Members Club in Cherry Creek.

Advertisement

County assessors in Colorado value real estate every two years, and the figure directly translates to what an owner pays in property taxes. New valuations go out in May of odd years, and are based on the two-year period ending the previous June. The next notices of valuation will go out in May 2025.

This is the third valuation cycle since the pandemic hit in 2020. But Erffmeyer noted the previous two cycles had few data points to go off when valuing office properties.

“In 2021, our data value was June of 2020, so we were barely three months into the pandemic at that time,” he said. “And frankly, we didn’t know what the world was going to look like, what offices were going to look like, what schools were going to look like, what anything was going to look like. We did our best, quite frankly, to take the sales that preceded Covid and adjust them down for the uncertainty, the risk.”

P4221484

The 24-story Denver Club building at 17th and Glenarm sold in late 2022 for $52.80 a square foot. (BusinessDen file)

Advertisement

The next cycle didn’t offer much more, as continued uncertainty around the sector resulted in few building transactions.

That’s changed somewhat in the last couple years. Buildings such as downtown’s Denver Club and The 410 have sold for cheap, while structures at 1401 Lawrence and Platte Street’s Riverview have fetched more respectable sums. The Denver Tech Center is also seeing transactions.

Erffmeyer joined the Denver assessor’s office as an intern in 1994 and assumed the top job in 2014. He noted he’s worked to value properties through the Great Recession and the dot-com bust.

“And this revaluation might be the toughest of all of them, just because there’s so many almost conflicting and just dissonance in terms of what we see in terms of sale prices — just in downtown, much less throughout, in my case, Denver, and, speaking for the other assessors, throughout the metro area,” he said.

“Prime” buildings — which tend to be newer and have top-tier locations — will “probably be just fine in terms of value, maybe even see some increases in terms of value,” Erffmeyer said. But as buildings age, “there comes a tipping point somewhere in there where it’s not a prime building anymore.”

Advertisement

“And that’s when we start seeing this kind of bifurcation,” he said. “I’ve heard falling off a cliff, things like that in terms of value. And we read about sales transactions at less than $100 a foot, which just blows my mind when we have warehouses selling for more than $100 a foot.”



Source link

Denver, CO

Street artist Sabo cited for anti-migrant signs posted around Denver in March

Published

on

Street artist Sabo cited for anti-migrant signs posted around Denver in March


A street artist was cited for violating Denver municipal code after police say he illegally posted signs with phrases like “Migrant hookers” and “Caution Undocumented Democrats” around the city in March.

The Denver Police Department is still investigating similar signs posted around the city on Aug. 29, which targeted Vice President Kamala Harris, included phrases like “Blacks must sit at the back of the bus. Kamala’s migrants sit in the front” and drew condemnation from state and local officials.

No one has been cited or arrested in that case, department officials said Tuesday.

Denver police cited 56-year-old Christopher Balli, also known as “Sabo,” on Thursday on suspicion of violating city code related to posting signs on public or private property. People cited under the statute are “liable for the cost of removal,” according to Denver city code.

Advertisement

The signs posted March 22 were found near West 12th Avenue and North Acoma Streets; West Colfax Avenue and North Broadway; and the 1400 block of Grant Street.

Denver Police Department’s Bias-Motivated Crime Unit also investigated the case, but the Denver District Attorney’s Office determined the case did not meet the criteria for a bias-motivated crime and the case was referred to the Denver City Attorney’s Office, according to the department.

Balli posted a copy of the citation on his Instagram on Thursday and previously shared photos of the street signs posted in March and August.

Sign up to get crime news sent straight to your inbox each day.

Originally Published:

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

DA Linda Stanley to be disbarred over misconduct during Barry Morphew prosecution, state board rules

Published

on

DA Linda Stanley to be disbarred over misconduct during Barry Morphew prosecution, state board rules


Eleventh Judicial District Attorney Linda Stanley will be disbarred for ethical violations on the job, a Colorado disciplinary board ruled Tuesday.

State disciplinary authorities found Stanley made inappropriate comments to the media during the high-profile prosecution of Barry Morphew, did not adequately supervise the prosecution of the case, caused numerous discovery violations, initiated a baseless investigation into the judge on the case and made inappropriate comments to the media in an unrelated case.

“Taken in totality, a majority of the Hearing Board concludes that these ethical violations warrant respondent’s disbarment,” the 83-page disciplinary order, published Tuesday, says.

The decision comes three months after Stanley faced allegations of professional misconduct during a two-week disciplinary hearing in June.

Advertisement

State regulators accused Stanley of making inappropriate comments to members of the media and on a YouTube true-crime show when she prosecuted Morphew for the murder of his wife in 2020, among other misconduct.

Stanley argued her conduct was within the bounds of ethical rules and that the allegations against her were baseless.

The Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, which handles attorney discipline for professional misconduct, brought the allegations against Stanley in October, and the case proceeded all the way to a public disciplinary hearing, which is highly unusual for a sitting district attorney.

Much of the disciplinary hearing centered on Stanley’s handling of the case against Barry Morphew, who she charged with murder in 2021, a year after his wife, Suzanne Morphew, 49, disappeared from the family’s Chaffee County home on May 10, 2020.

Stanley dropped all charges against Morphew in 2022. He has maintained his innocence and is not facing any charges in connection with his wife’s death. State attorneys argued during the disciplinary hearing that the prosecution was a “debacle” because of Stanley’s poor leadership.

Advertisement

Investigators in September discovered Suzanne Morphew’s body in a shallow grave near Moffat, and a coroner later determined her death to be a homicide, finding she died with a cocktail of animal tranquilizers in her body. The investigation into Suzanne’s killing is now being handled by 12th Judicial District Attorney Anne Kelly, since her body was found in that jurisdiction.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Sign up to get crime news sent straight to your inbox each day.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Opinion: A random assault in downtown Denver has me rethinking our approach to homelessness

Published

on

Opinion: A random assault in downtown Denver has me rethinking our approach to homelessness


I heard ranting. The typical homeless-man ranting that we’ve all become accustomed to. I wasn’t scared. I’m used to walking downtown in cities – New York, San Francisco, New Orleans, and Chicago. Why should visiting Denver be any more dangerous?

It was about 6 p.m. on a Wednesday last month when my wife, our friends, and I were walking the five blocks on 15th Street from our hotel, Embassy Suites, to a restaurant on Larimer Square. There’s a little pocket park along the way at Arapahoe Street, and it’s apparently become a hangout for unhoused people.

He was yelling something about someone killing his family. I glanced at him – no dirty look or anything, just a curious glance. He was crossing 15th toward our side of the street. I turned back and continued walking. I know that 99% of unhoused people are harmless to strangers. I guess I wasn’t prepared for the other 1%.

I felt something hit the back of my neck, and it knocked me to the ground. I heard my glasses rattle across the pavement. I’d somehow caught myself a bit with my elbows and arms, so my head didn’t hit the concrete. Splayed out on the sidewalk, I heard my wife and our friends yelling, then asking if I was OK, and then they were helping me up. I got to my knees, then my hands, then I was sitting on a bench. I was dazed, and I couldn’t respond. Was I OK? I had no idea.

Advertisement

It turned out – according to surveillance video and witnesses – the guy had stormed up behind me and punched me full-force on the back of my neck. He then walked back across the street and stood watching and yelling at us. We were in front of a bank, and the security guards ran out to help.

EMTs arrived and checked me for a concussion. I was OK. Two scrapes on one arm and one on the other where I hit the ground, and I couldn’t move my neck to the left. Denver Police arrived and spoke with me, then they went to speak with him, and that’s when he decided to run. The police caught him, we did an ID, and he went to jail. I went to our hotel room.

And that bothered me.

The officer asked me, three times I think, “Do you want to press charges?”

Do I want to press charges? What I want is for no one else to get hurt. I’m a 55-year-old guy in good health. What if I’d been 75? What if I’d been a child? What if I hadn’t caught myself and had hit my head on the concrete? What if my attacker had carried a knife?

Advertisement

Do I want to press charges? What I want is for the guy to get help with the addiction or mental health crisis that he’s having. What I want is for him not to be living on the streets. What I want is for someone to fix this.

Because I’m angry.

I’m not angry at the guy who attacked me. (Not anymore, now that I’ve calmed down a bit.)

I’m angry at you. I’m angry at me. I’m angry that we have collectively created and sanctioned a society that is unsafe. Unsafe. If I as a visitor to Denver can be attacked in broad daylight on a nice street, unprovoked, by an unhoused man, then we are unsafe. We have failed; I have failed you, and you have failed me. And we have all failed that man whose psychosis or drug-induced delusion or whatever demons he’s dealing with led him to attack a stranger.

I’m no expert on homelessness, but it’s nothing new to me. Formally, I’ve worked in soup kitchens and volunteered with a Room in The Inn shelter program. Informally, I’ve shared meals with homeless folks and taken people to motel rooms in the middle of winter.

Advertisement

But the last several years, I’ve been surprised to see how bad the situation has become, and it’s become increasingly difficult for me to call any of this OK: Entire sections of public parks in Queens abandoned to become urine-soaked campgrounds. Blocks of roadside RVs becoming permanent lodging along the railroad tracks outside San Francisco. And now this, in Denver of all places.

I have sympathy for those on both sides of this issue as cities grapple over rules that would ban sleeping on the streets. But after what just happened, I have to agree: We need to ban living on the streets. We need a ban, and, in tandem, we need the resources to fix the situation that we’ve created. We need adequate public housing for those sidelined by our high-stakes economy. We need forced re-institutionalization for those mentally ill who cannot take care of themselves. And we need free drug treatment for the victims of our pharmaceutical piracy and our ridiculously failed war on drugs.

If cities can’t afford these solutions, the state and federal government certainly can. If we’re going to let this continue, why do we even have governments?

It should be safe for visitors to walk in Denver and every other city’s downtown. Parks should be for playing children. Everyone should be housed. And we should never be blindly accustomed to the ranting of homeless people.

Chris Smith is a 30-year journalist and is currently editor of Clarksville Now in Clarksville, Tennessee.

Advertisement

Sign up for Sound Off to get a weekly roundup of our columns, editorials and more.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending