Connect with us

Denver, CO

Broncos connected to real estate purchases around Burnham Yard, potential stadium site

Published

on

Broncos connected to real estate purchases around Burnham Yard, potential stadium site


A series of limited liability corporations have purchased at least 13 parcels of land around a potential future Broncos stadium site in Denver since last summer and paid more than $150 million combined to do so.

The transactions, first reported by BusinessDen and later confirmed by The Denver Post, started in August 2024 and have continued through this spring. The plots surround the Burham Yard railyard, a state-owned, 58-acre property in Lincoln Park that is for sale and has many of the hallmarks of a potential stadium site.

The $tadium Game: Inside the lucrative world of Colorado’s pro sports stadiums

At least nine of the LLCs that purchased the properties were created in 2023, and none of the sales were connected to a loan, a review of public documents revealed.

Advertisement

Citing an unnamed source familiar with the real estate deals, BusinessDen reported that at least 10 of the LLCs have ties to the Broncos’ Walton-Penner Family Ownership Group. The Post has not independently verified that connection.

The Broncos declined to comment on specific real estate transactions around Burnham Yard or elsewhere.

“As we’ve previously shared, we are involved in a comprehensive process regarding the future of our stadium,” a Broncos spokesman told The Post. “No determinations have been made as we continue to evaluate several options in and around the Denver metro area.”

Real estate records reveal that these LLCs are not just random corporations with no connective tissue.

The Post found that in at least nine of the transactions — including six plots that sold for a combined $22 million all within two blocks directly north of Burnham Yard — the sale was handled on the buyer’s side by Lea Ann Fowler, a real estate attorney at Hogan Lovells. Fowler previously worked with Broncos general counsel Tim Aragon at the same firm, where he was the managing partner of its Denver office before leaving in 2022 to work for the Walton-Penner Family Ownership Group.

Advertisement

Each of those six purchases was made between August 2024 and January using a variety of LLCs, including Villard LLC, Compass Peak Holdings LLC, Summitt 55 Company LLC and 1396 Canyon Lane LLC.

Just south of the rail yard, Tim Armitage sold his property at 657 North Osage St. in October.

The price — $2.7 million — felt like an above-market deal for the 9,361 square-foot warehouse he owned for five years.

As for the buyer? He has no idea.

“Never met them; never knew a thing about it,” Armitage told The Post on Wednesday. “I didn’t care; it didn’t matter to me. They had the money and I was selling it.”

Advertisement

Another property owner reached by The Denver Post said they couldn’t comment because language included in the contract prohibits talking about the sale.

All of these smaller parcels are set around the 58-acre Burnham Yard, which the Colorado Department of Transportation owns and is currently in the process of selling. It says it intends to do so by next spring.

“The (CTIO) is still conducting due diligence on the most beneficial uses and site preparation to eventually sell the property,” CDOT communications director and special adviser to the executive director Matt Inzeo told The Post on Wednesday.

Burnham Yard is considered a possible site for a new Broncos stadium should they ultimately decide to move from Empower Field at Mile High.

“In terms of the vein of keeping it in urban Denver or close to downtown … I would put a bet that’s where it happens,” Chris Phenecie, a senior vice president at the commercial real estate firm CBRE, told The Post recently.

Advertisement

Several consultants agreed last year that Burnham Yard fits the bill for the type of parcel that works for a professional sports stadium, with one exception.

The yard itself is too small.

For a stadium and an adjacent entertainment district of some kind, anybody wanting to build a stadium there would need to acquire additional land surrounding it.

That can be an expensive proposition, but even working through purchasing multiple plots from various buyers over a long period of time can be worthwhile.

“When you’re talking about a $2 billion venue, land cost does become a drop in the bucket unless you’re really acquiring a prime site,” Erin Talkington, the managing director of RCLCO, a real estate advisory firm whose work includes consulting for sports ownership groups and municipalities on major development projects, told The Post in 2024. “It is one of the reasons why you often see new venues go to areas that have always been somewhat underutilized or in need of reinvestment.”

Advertisement

Recent sales made near Burnham Yard late last year and early this year were averaging close to $300 per square foot of built space. By contrast, the list prices per square foot for four industrial properties in other parts of central Denver that are being marketed averaged closer to $155 a square foot, or about half. That comparison doesn’t account for differences in the amount of land involved in each deal.

Two of the biggest parcels are Denver Water’s 36-acre campus to the west and SRM Concrete, which is wedged between Denver Water and the yard on the north end. Denver Water and Burnham Yard extend south to and beyond the 8th Avenue bridge.

While those plots have not sold recently, several others in the area have. The total purchase price for 13 recent sales around Burnham, according to public records reviewed by The Post and BusinessDen reporting: Nearly $153 million.

The Burnham Yard site, a 58-acre plot of land located between 6th and 13th Avenues and bounded by Seminole Road and Osage Street, is seen in Denver on June 7, 2025. (Photo by RJ Sangosti/The Denver Post)

Acquiring land like this can serve multiple purposes for a professional sports franchise. It can set a club up to build and develop or it can be used to serve as leverage while negotiating with a municipality.

Once a site is finalized, ownership groups are interested in using a stadium as an anchor to any number of kinds of entertainment districts. Such projects are in various states of progress up and down the Interstate 25 corridor from Burnham Yard, with Kroenke Sports and Entertainment set to develop around Ball Arena and the new NWSL franchise coming to Denver setting out to develop Santa Fe Yards to the south.

Advertisement

“Most of the deals that we’ve worked on, incoming owners, their primary question is around venue and the potential upside around the surrounding area,” Edwin Draughan, a director and partner at Park Lane, a sports-focused investment bank, told The Post in 2024. “… There’s only so much additional revenue you can get from the team. But there’s a layer of influence and there’s also a level of just real estate ownership.”

The Broncos’ current lease with the Metropolitan Football Stadium District runs through the 2030 season, though the club has the ability to extend it for five years if needed. Still, the 2030 date does put the team in a position where it has some time and flexibility.

Stadium projects around the NFL tend to take about four years between the time they’re first announced and when the stadium is built and ready for use. That same timeline would put the Broncos within about a year of needing to have a project site approved and announced if they do indeed decide to build new.

Team president Damani Leech said earlier this spring that the club had “a healthy amount of pressure” to move forward in their decision-making process.

“We are not holding ourselves to that to say we absolutely have to have something by that year,” he said. “The components of what happens, though, are real and important. Stadiums typically take about 48 months to build from a construction standpoint. You think about what has to happen from a permitting standpoint and all those things. We’re starting to build out those calendars to get a better understanding of, once you do decide what to do, how long it’s going to take.”

Advertisement

Want more Broncos news? Sign up for the Broncos Insider to get all our NFL analysis.

Originally Published:



Source link

Denver, CO

Projecting Nuggets’ Lineup vs. Spurs If Nikola Jokic Plays

Published

on

Projecting Nuggets’ Lineup vs. Spurs If Nikola Jokic Plays


The Denver Nuggets have just one game left on their regular season calendar before their postseason action gets underway, as they’ll be tasked with a road trip against the West’s second-seeded San Antonio Spurs. And it’ll be a game for Denver where they’ll be without a significant chunk of their regular rotation.

No Jamal Murray, no Aaron Gordon, and neither starter on the wing in Christian Braun and Cameron Johnson will be suiting up in an effort to rest for the postseason. Nikola Jokic is listed as questionable, but is likely to play in order to meet the 65-game minimum required for end-of-season awards.

So, as the Nuggets’ lineup is set to be shorthanded in a night that could decide their final seeding in the Western Conference playoff picture, let’s take a peek at what their makeshift starting five could shake out to be:

Advertisement

PG: Bruce Brown

Mar 29, 2026; Denver, Colorado, USA; Denver Nuggets guard Bruce Brown (11) reacts after a play in the second quarter against the Golden State Warriors at Ball Arena. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images | Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images
Advertisement

While Tyus Jones could fill in as the starting point guard once again as he did against the OKC Thunder, this feels like the right moment for Bruce Brown to take those duties instead; someone who’s started just three games this season, but on pace to be one of 18 players around the league to play in all 82 regular-season games.

Advertisement

It’s hard to roll out an extremely small lineup against a team like the Spurs and hope for overwhelming success. Brown gives the Nuggets some upside in that size department, as well as their overall shotmaking.

SG: Tim Hardaway Jr.

Advertisement

Mar 24, 2026; Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Denver Nuggets guard Tim Hardaway Jr. (10) against the Phoenix Suns at Mortgage Matchup Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Outside of Jokic, Tim Hardaway Jr. is the easiest name to fill into the Nuggets’ makeshift starting five while without four of their regular starters, even while he might be making a last-effort push for those Sixth Man of the Year honors.

If the Nuggets want to pull off an upset victory over the Spurs to continue their lengthy win streak, they’ll have to cash in on a big offensive performance from Hardaway Jr., which could be well within play as he’ll become one of their de facto top options to look for on that side of the floor.

SF: Julian Strawther

Advertisement

Mar 24, 2026; Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Denver Nuggets guard Julian Strawther (3) against the Phoenix Suns at Mortgage Matchup Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Julian Strawther has shifted around the Nuggets lineup more than anyone this year. He’s gone from the end of the rotation to a fill-in starter on the wing, and even a DNP as Denver has gotten healthier towards the end of the season.

Advertisement

This game against San Antonio presents a perfect opportunity for Strawther to get a well-deserved start on the wing next to Hardaway Jr. His shot-making has been at some of the best of his career this season, averaging career-high shooting numbers from the field (46.7) and from three (38.0).

PF: Nikola Jokic

Advertisement

Apr 6, 2026; Denver, Colorado, USA; Denver Nuggets center Nikola Jokic (15) after the game against the Portland Trail Blazers at Ball Arena. Mandatory Credit: Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images | Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images

Advertisement

This is where Nikola Jokic comes in. Against the size that San Antonio presents with an alien like Victor Wembanyama in the frontcourt, coming to match that with a double-big lineup as the three-time MVP slots in at the four could be an ideal setup for this game in particular.

As it concerns Jokic’s availability, if he does play, don’t be shocked if he’s only on the floor for 15 minutes rather than the whole game. That’s all he needs to remain eligible for end-of-season awards, and might be all David Adelman is asking of him.

Advertisement

C: Jonas Valanciunas

Apr 4, 2026; Denver, Colorado, USA; Denver Nuggets center Jonas Valanciunas (17) leaves the court in the second quarter against the San Antonio Spurs at Ball Arena. Mandatory Credit: Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images | Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images

In an effort to try and match the Spurs’ length as best as possible, Jonas Valanciunas fills into the five in our lineup projections to do just that.

Surprisingly, Valanciunas has only started six games throughout his time with the Nuggets, and only one of those showings has been with him paired next to Jokic. But with the implications of Denver being shorthanded, along with their unique matchup of San Antonio, makes for the perfect opportunity to test the fit out once more before their playoff action gets underway next weekend.

Advertisement

Sign up for our free Denver Nuggets On SI newsletter, and get breaking Nuggets news delivered to your inbox daily!



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Championship-caliber defense not enough for Wisconsin to secure NCAA hockey title

Published

on

Championship-caliber defense not enough for Wisconsin to secure NCAA hockey title


LAS VEGAS – Wisconsin had Denver under its thumb, but somehow the Pioneers slipped away.

Denver scored twice in the final 12 ½ minutes to score a 2-1 victory over the Badgers at T-Mobile Arena. The win gave the Pioneers their third national championship in five seasons and their 11th overall, and it came on a night when they were held to a season-low 15 shots on goal.

How did the Pioneers escape with a championship that easily could have been the Badgers’? To get an answer from the UW players, they would need more than the 15 minutes they got in the locker room to regroup before postgame interviews.

Advertisement

The pain they felt, however, needed no explanation.

“I think I’m still a little shocked right now,” senior captain Ben Dexheimer said. “I’m definitely going to settle in in the next few days, but I couldn’t be prouder of this team from the ups and downs throughout the year. I just love every one of those guys in that room.”

Rieger Lorenz and Kyle Chyzowski scored during a 7-minute stretch in the third period for Denver, which closed the season with a 29-11-3 record and a 17-game unbeaten streak.

The Badgers (24-13-2) were also pretty good at the end of the season, winning nine of 12 games to reach their first NCAA final since 2010. UW’s first championship since 2006 proved elusive, but the program defeated three top-10 teams to get to the title game.

Advertisement

It was a heck of a run, just not the greatest finish.

Here are three takeaways from the game.

Badgers defense held up its end of the bargain

The improvement Wisconsin made defensively as the season went on was critical to its run to the title game. The Badgers had some defensive gems in the postseason, but this may be have been their best effort.

Advertisement

They held Denver to two shots in the first period, tying the fewest ever in a championship game, and then allowed just three in the second. The Pioneers’ 15 shots? That was also the fewest ever in a Frozen Four game.

Both Denver goals were hard earned.

On Lorenz’s goal, UW’s Daniel Hauser made the initial save. It was the rebound that got him. And Chyzowski’s game-winner came on an extended possession that, from the UW perspective, felt longer because Hauser lost his stick halfway through it.

“I’d probably say it’s the hardest team we’ve played against all year, just how they were on it,” Denver coach David Carle said. “Their forecheck made it real challenging to be able to break pucks out. We saw it against North Dakota, as well. It was an excellent team on their end.”

A 2-0 lead may have done the trick for UW

For the fourth time in the tournament, the Badgers scored first. Freshman Vasily Zelenov took an outlet pass from Weston Knox through the neutral zone and fired his only shot of the game from just outside the left circle.

Advertisement

The challenge was getting a second goal.

“We needed to in my opinion, get it to two, and we just couldn’t do that,” Badgers coach Mike Hastings said.

Similar to what Hauser has done for UW at times this season, Pioneers goaltender Johnny Hicks, the most outstanding player of the Frozen Four, kept his team in games. He finished the season 16-0-1.

“We were throwing everything we had at the net, but we just couldn’t find a way to get one through,” sophomore Gavin Morrissey said.

Denver’s defenders sacrificed their bodies in win

Wisconsin finished with 30 shots. Denver tallied 31 blocks, 10 better than its previous season best.

Advertisement

It is rare to see a team have more blocks than its opponents has shots in a game. Given UW’s struggle to get a second goal, Maybe if one of those got through  …

“Obviously we only had one, so if I had to ask for something, it’d be one to get by them,” Hastings said. “Their commitment level, just like our commitment level, is at an all-time high when we get to this moment.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Wisconsin hockey vs. Denver: Live updates from the NCAA title game

Published

on

Wisconsin hockey vs. Denver: Live updates from the NCAA title game


LAS VEGAS – One more win and the Wisconsin men’s hockey team brings home a national championship and completes a heck of a postseason run.

The Badgers (24-12-2) face Denver (28-11-3) in the NCAA championship game at 4:30 p.m. Saturday, April 11, at T-Mobile Arena with a chance to bring home their first national championship since 2006.

A win would also give UW its fourth straight postseason win over a higher seed. All those teams were ranked among the top eight in the final USCHO regular-season poll.

Advertisement

With a Wisonsin win  …

The Badgers will sweep the men’s and women’s titles in the same season for the first time since 2006. No other college program has accomplished the feat.

The Big Ten would win its ninth title this school year. Here is the rundown:  Football, Indiana; men’s basketball, Michigan; women’s basketball, UCLA, women’s hockey, Wisconsin; men’s soccer, Washington, wrestling, Penn State; field hockey, Northwestern, and water polo, UCLA.

Check for updates on the UW-Denver NCAA final throughout the day.

Advertisement

Wisconsin-Denver tale of the tape

Scoring offense: Wisconsin 3.71 (fifth nationally); Denver 3.62 (8).

Scoring defense: Wisconsin 2.97 (32); Denver 2.12 (4)

Scoring margin: Wisconsin .74 (14); Denver 1.50 (I5)

Power-play percentage: .265 (6), Denver .188 (37)

Penalty-kill percentage: .722 (58); Denver .818 (23)

Advertisement
play

A look at Wisconsin hockey’s final practice of the season

On the eve of the national championship game, the Wisconsin men”s hockey team went through a short workout at T-Mobile Arena on Friday Apri 10.

Coaching legend offers Mike Hastings advice

After the Badgers defeated North Dakota in the semifinals Thursday, Badgers coach Mike Hastings received a text message from former Boston College coach Jerry York.

“He just said enjoy tomorrow’s practice,” Hastings said. “We always thought it was the best practice of the year and then he put dot, dot, dot, but it was hard to schedule that one.”

Advertisement

Getting to the final possible practice of the season means reaching the national championship game. York coached for 50 seasons. He spent the final 28 at Boston College where he led the Eagles to eight NCAA finals and four championships.

As Hastings planned the team’s final practice of the season, he kept York’s message in mind.

“To me it’s about us having energy tomorrow because we’re going to need a lot of it,” Hastings said. “And so we went out for a short period of time. (The players) had a lot to do with what we were doing with practice.

“I went to the leadership group and said, ‘Hey, here’s some ideas I’ve got. What are you guys feeling?’ And so they ended up putting into that. It was a good 25-minute scheme.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending