Colorado
What’s Working: Colorado has a new climate-jobs coalition, as Trump pulls back on green energy
Gathered at a Denver training facility on Logan Street earlier this month, members of several labor unions took a stand. There were the brothers and sisters from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the drivers hailing from Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1001, and the craftspeople from the Colorado Building and Construction Trades Council.
Others joined them and together they announced Climate Jobs Colorado, a coalition to address the growing climate crisis, its impacts on workers and worker inequality. Creating high-quality union jobs lowers costs for working families and builds a clean energy economy that works for Coloradans, they said.
“About a year and a half ago, labor leaders from across our state started discussing what we can do with the triple aim of advancing climate goals, improving our ability to organize and represent workers across the state in the green economy, and combating economic inequality,” Dennis Dougherty, executive director of the Colorado AFL-CIO, told the group. “Now is the time to do something about it, and that is why we are here today.”

A week later, Donald Trump began his second term as president. Over the next few days, Trump signed multiple executive orders that many say will set the United States on “a radically different path” from the Biden administration in terms of environmental directives and departments.
Now to figure out how to move ahead.
“We don’t know what a Trump administration will bring to the table,” said Nate Bernstein, executive director of Climate Jobs Colorado. “But it makes it all the more important that we work at the state level to enact policies that are favorable for Coloradans and for Colorado workers.”
The report
Labor officials were encouraged by a new report from Cornell University’s Climate Jobs Institute. Melissa Shetler, the institute’s senior training and education associate, joined the kickoff.
“We are honored to join you here today in Colorado, and have collaborated with so many of you to develop a plan that reflects Labor’s vision for addressing climate change through equitable clean energy transition,” she said. “This plan and this report emphasize creating good union jobs for Colorado communities, protecting existing workers and ensuring the (green energy) transition benefits frontline, rural and historically disadvantaged communities.”
The report cites warnings from the International Panel on Climate Change that without rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions, the world is on track to warm between 2.7 and 3.6 degrees by the 2030s.
That warming “will give rise to catastrophic impacts not only around the world, but also in Coloradans’ own backyard,” such as the 2021 Marshall Fire, which destroyed over 1,000 homes, killed two people and caused more than $2 billion worth of damage, it says.
And the report gives recommendations for facing this future in the six sectors of energy, manufacturing, transportation, buildings, resilience and adaptation, and workforce development, including:
Climate Jobs Colorado aims to support union workers in climate jobs by pushing to maximize wages, benefits and working conditions and “make sure union members and those who wish to be in the union get a fair shake on the job,” Bernstein said.
Unions are “pushing up the living standards for all workers, and maximiz(ing) the number of members that we have in an industry so we can push up all wages in that industry,” he added. They also collectively bargain “to try to help address the concerns of members, whether it has to do with workplace safety, staffing or making sure they have sufficient resources to do their work.”
Climate jobs in Colorado
Colorado had 77,000 direct clean-tech, climate-tech and related energy jobs as of 2024, according to the state’s Office of Economic Development and International Trade.
From 2017 to 2023, the sector’s total employment grew by 2.2% compared to 1.4% on average for all U.S. states, it says.
According to a Clean Jobs Colorado 2024 report by the national environmental group E2, which advocates for “smart policies that are good for the economy and good for the environment,” Colorado’s renewable generation workforce grew 3.9 percent in 2023 to 18,718 individuals—the seventh largest in the country. It said solar and wind accounted for the majority of the sector’s workforce with 9,017 jobs and 7,880 jobs respectively.
Alissa Johnson, OEDIT’s spokesperson, said climate-related sectors added jobs at a much faster rate than the state’s overall employment, which grew by 2.5 percent.
Trump’s influence already apparent pre-2025
Even before Trump took office, potential for major policy shifts was already threatening the way Colorado operates.
The Colorado Public Utilities Commission passed the 2021 Electric Resource Plan in December 2023 with winning bids for projects capable of creating about 3,500 megawatts of renewable energy.
But one of the issues the PUC discovered was “that none of the projects were under contract because the developers were saying their bids weren’t reliable anymore,” Commissioner Tom Plant said. That’s because “they don’t know what level of tariffs are going to go into place and how it’s going to impact their project costs. What might change is already changing.”

The state regulators allowed for up to 15% movement on bid prices based on changes in federal law, but on Thursday, Plant added, “so far, (Trump) is only talking about (a 10% tariff) on China,” when “during the campaign his rhetoric was more like 60%.”
“On the renewable tax credits, Republicans have indicated that they intend to use the reconciliation process to pass Trump’s tax cuts for corporations, but they have also said they want to shift some of the costs of that from other stuff,” Plant added. “There’s an expectation that they will look at tax credits that were passed under the IRA to do that. One of those tax credits was the renewable tax credit, (and) also EV tax credits.”
On Monday, Trump stalled spending under the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act set to fund 42 environmental projects that could create infrastructure jobs in four states — Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico.
“If federal funding is not provided as promised by these contracts, infrastructure jobs in Colorado would be directly affected, now and in the future,” Johnson said. But “Colorado remains committed to doing our part to ensure the historic investments promised in our state are carried out,” she added.
Trump also for a second time pulled the U.S. out of the Paris Agreement, which could jettison the United States’ Biden-era promise to cut climate pollution by up to 66% within a decade.
Colorado Climate Jobs will be watching Trump’s executive orders related to green energy and how they might impact the new climate jobs union.
“Obviously, President Biden and Congress passed some really landmark legislation with green energy and the Inflation Reduction Act,” Bernstein said. “It also has a lot of incentives to do the right thing on behalf of the workers building those things. And I don’t know if you heard the potential EPA administrator, but he said he believes in diversifying energy,” Bernstein added, referring to Lee Zeldin, Trump’s pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency.
Gov. Jared Polis’ office said in an email they “have not seen any language” on Trump’s national energy emergency declaration, which a Trump administration official told reporters “will unlock a variety of different authorities related to oil, gas and coal production.” But Polis’ office said it “is closely monitoring to determine what impacts, if any, of such an order might be.”
Got a question, story tip or other idea for Colorado Sun rural-economy reporter Tracy Ross? Send her an email at tracy@coloradosun.com.
ICYMI: 17 Colorado environmental projects are in limbo after Trump halts spending from Biden-era law. Coloradans thought they had millions coming their way for environmental projects meant to address drought in the Colorado River Basin. Now, the future is uncertain. >> Read story
Sun economy stories you may have missed

➔ Nonrenewals are fueling Colorado’s growing homeowners insurance crisis. In Colorado, homeowners’ premiums are up nearly 60% in five years. But the state is also dealing with insurers dropping coverage or leaving the state altogether. >> Read story
➔ Vail Resorts boosts pay for patrollers in wake of Park City strike — but union workers must wait. Meanwhile, Crested Butte lift mechanics threaten to strike and Breckenridge employees walk out to protest conditions at company housing >> Read story
➔ How Donald Trump’s return-to-office order will affect the 45,000 federal employees throughout Colorado. According to federal data, most work in-person at the office some or all of the work week. >> Read story
➔ Colorado plans to limit coverage of weight-loss drugs like Wegovy for state employees to save $17M. The decision was made to help balance the state’s budget. At least one state lawmaker who gets GLP-1 treatment is fighting hard to prevent the change. >> Read story

➔ More Colorado PERA benefit cuts “likely” in next two years. Changes to the pension’s demographic assumptions make it likely that PERA’s finances will deteriorate, triggering another round of benefit cuts and contribution hikes under state law >> Read story
➔ With Biden-era consumer protections in jeopardy, Colorado Democrats look to crack down on rental housing fees. The effort got a boost last week from a top Federal Trade Commission official, who sent a letter to Gov. Jared Polis urging the state to target so-called “junk fees” >> Read story
King Soopers union sets first strike vote for Front Range stores, which could involve 10,000 workers. If workers vote to approve a strike, the walkout will involve more stores and employees than the nine-day strike in 2022. >> Read story
Now’s your chance! Support The Sun’s economy reporting. Donate!
Take the poll: What’s so great/terrible about your city?

A week into this reader poll and it’s probably no surprise that more people have criticism than compliments for their city. “Lack of affordable housing in SAFE neighborhoods,” says one respondent from Fort Collins. “Lack of enforcement of minor traffic violations, i.e.: no front license plate,” says another, but from Denver.
“Awful public transportation,” said a Colorado Springs resident, who really enjoys hiking in Cheyenne Canyon.
If you’ve already taken the poll, thanks for your feedback. We’re hoping for more specific highlights (and lowlights) of your current hometown, so feel free to submit another response. We’ll keep it going another week.
Take the poll >> cosun.co/WWcity
Other working bits

➔ Workers at homeless organization vote to unionize. A division of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless voted Wednesday to unionize, with 49 employees in favor and eight opposed. The workers are employed in the nonprofit’s Housing Supportive Services Department. The organization helps people struggling with homelessness.
CCH workers “routinely spoke about the need for higher wages, as they are some of the lowest-paid workers in the field,” said David Fernandez, a spokesman for the Service Employees International Union Local 105, in an email. SEIU has helped organize workers at Urban Peak and Wellpower. “Another major point for this workforce was addressing the high turnover, low employee support, and high caseloads that make the services they provide as frontline staff even more difficult,” he added.
CCH, which employs 850 people, said executives are “committed to working collaboratively with SEIU and the impacted employees through the next phase of the collective bargaining agreement process,” in a statement. >> See vote results
➔ Denver rents decline. That’s according to the fourth-quarter report from the Apartment Association of Metro Denver. In an analysis by Apartment Insights of nearly 250,000 rental units, the average monthly rent dropped $69 to $1,842, compared to a year earlier. “This is the steepest decline in rents in the Denver Metro Area we’ve seen since we began recording rent trends 44 years ago,” Mark Williams, AAMD’s executive vice president, said in a news release. There’s also a growing number of unoccupied apartments, with the vacancy rate at 6.9% — the highest in 16 years. Prices tend to fall when there’s a lot of supply and that’s what’s been happening in the region. More than 33,000 new apartment homes were completed and hit the market in the past two years. >> View apartment report
➔ Coming soon: 88 affordable condos in Glenwood Springs. Housing can be out-of-reach in Colorado’s mountain resort communities like Glenwood Springs, where the median sales price of a condo was $540,000 last month. Expect something more affordable after Habitat for Humanity of the Roaring Fork Valley completes the conversion of an 88-unit apartment complex into condos. The L3 complex is taking applications for deed-restricted one-bedrooms that start at $380,000. Studio units are less. Potential owners must put in some “sweat equity” with Habitat to qualify. The conversion is backed by $23.8 million in financing from FirstBank. >> Details
➔Colorado’s paid family leave tapped by 135,000 workers. And we’re only one year into Colorado’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance, or FAMLI. Payments totaled $687 million in 2024.The average weekly payment was $914. Of those who took leave last year, less than half — or 61,000 — used it to bond with a new child.
The paid-leave benefit, made possible after voters approved the 2020 ballot measure, offers up to 12 weeks of partial pay for workers to take time off to care for a new child, a sick family member or themselves. The program is funded by employers and workers, much like unemployment benefits. At the end of 2024, the FAMLI fund had a balance of $1.235 billion and “remains strong,” according to a spokesperson at the state Department of Labor and Employment. A good chunk of that fund — $1.027 billion — is invested in the state’s treasury pool. >> See FAMLI numbers, read earlier story
Got some economic news or business bits Coloradans should know? Tell us: cosun.co/heyww
Thanks for sticking with us for this week’s report. As always, share your 2 cents on how the economy is keeping you down or helping you up at cosun.co/heyww. ~ tamara & tracy
Miss a column? Catch up:
What’s Working is a Colorado Sun column about surviving in today’s economy. Email tamara@coloradosun.com with stories, tips or questions. Read the archive, ask a question at cosun.co/heyww and don’t miss the next one by signing up at coloradosun.com/getww.
Support this free newsletter and become a Colorado Sun member: coloradosun.com/join
Corrections & Clarifications
Notice something wrong? The Colorado Sun has an ethical responsibility to fix all factual errors. Request a correction by emailing corrections@coloradosun.com.
Colorado
Boebert takes on Trump over Colorado water
Colorado
Colorado attorney general expands lawsuit to challenge Trump ‘revenge campaign’ against state
Attorney General Phil Weiser on Thursday expanded a lawsuit filed to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado to now encapsulate a broader “revenge campaign” that he said the Trump administration was waging against Colorado.
Weiser named a litany of moves the Trump administration had made in recent weeks — from moving to shut down the National Center for Atmospheric Research to putting food assistance in limbo to denying disaster declarations — in his updated lawsuit.
He said during a news conference that he hoped both to reverse the individual cuts and freezes and to win a general declaration from a judge that the moves were part of an unconstitutional pattern of coercion.
“I recognize this is a novel request, and that’s because this is an unprecedented administration,” Weiser, a Democrat, said. “We’ve never seen an administration act in a way that is so flatly violating the Constitution and disrespecting state sovereign authority. We have to protect our authority (and) defend the principles we believe in.”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Denver, began in October as an effort to force the administration to keep U.S. Space Command in Colorado Springs. President Donald Trump, a Republican, announced in September that he was moving the command’s headquarters to Alabama, and he cited Colorado’s mail-in voting system as one of the reasons.
Trump has also repeatedly lashed out over the state’s incarceration of Tina Peters, the former county clerk convicted of state felonies related to her attempts to prove discredited election conspiracies shared by the president. Trump issued a pardon of Peters in December — a power he does not have for state crimes — and then “instituted a weeklong series of punishments and threats targeted against Colorado,” according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit cites the administration’s termination of $109 million in transportation grants, cancellation of $615 million in Department of Energy funds for Colorado, announcement of plans to dismantle NCAR in Boulder, demand that the state recertify food assistance eligibility for more than 100,000 households, and denial of disaster relief assistance for last year’s Elk and Lee fires.
In that time, Trump also vetoed a pipeline project for southeastern Colorado — a move the House failed to override Thursday — and repeatedly took to social media to attack state officials.
The Trump administration also announced Tuesday that he would suspend potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of low-income assistance to Colorado over unspecified allegations of fraud. Those actions were not covered by Weiser’s lawsuit, though he told reporters to “stay tuned” for a response.
Weiser, who is running for governor in this year’s election, characterized the attacks as Trump trying to leverage the power of the executive branch to exercise unconstitutional authority over how individual states conduct elections and oversee their criminal justice systems.
In a statement, a White House official pushed back on Weiser’s characterization.
“President Trump is using his lawful and discretionary authority to ensure federal dollars are being spent in a way that (aligns) with the agenda endorsed by the American people when they resoundingly reelected the President,” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said.
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Colorado
US Fish and Wildlife backed Colorado plan to get wolves from Canada before new threats to take over program, documents show
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service backed Colorado’s plan to obtain wolves from Canada nearly two years before the federal agency lambasted the move as a violation of its rules, newly obtained documents show.
In a letter dated Feb. 14, 2024, the federal agency told Colorado state wildlife officials they were in the clear to proceed with a plan to source wolves from British Columbia without further permission.
“Because Canadian gray wolves aren’t listed under the Endangered Species Act,” no ESA authorization or federal authorization was needed for the state to capture or import them in the Canadian province, according to the letter sent to Eric Odell, CPW’s wolf conservation program manager.
The letter, obtained by The Colorado Sun from state Parks and Wildlife through an open records request, appears to be part of the permissions the state received before sourcing 15 wolves. The agency also received sign-offs from the British Columbia Ministry of Land, Water and Resource Stewardship and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna.
In mid-December, however, the Fish and Wildlife Service pivoted sharply from that position, criticizing the plan and threatening to take control over Colorado’s reintroduction.
In a letter dated Dec. 18, Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik put CPW on alert when he told acting CPW Director Laura Clellan that the agency violated requirements in a federal rule that dictates how CPW manages its reintroduction.
Colorado voters in 2020 directed CPW to reestablish gray wolves west of the Continental Divide, a process that has included bringing wolves from Oregon in 2023 and British Columbia in 2025.
The federal rule Nesvik claims CPW violated is the 10(j). It gives Colorado management flexibility over wolves by classifying them as a nonessential experimental population within the state of Colorado. Nesvik said CPW violated the 10(j) by capturing wolves from Canada instead of the northern Rocky Mountain states of Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, eastern Oregon and north-central Utah “with no warning or notice to its own citizens.”
CPW publicly announced sourcing from British Columbia on Sept. 13, 2024, however, and held a meeting with county commissioners in Rio Blanco, Garfield, Pitkin and Eagle counties ahead of the planned releases last January. The agency also issued press releases when the operations began and at the conclusion of operations, and they held a press conference less than 48 hours later.
Nesvik’s December letter doubled down on one he sent CPW on Oct. 10, after Greg Lopez, a former Colorado congressman and 2026 gubernatorial candidate, contacted him claiming the agency violated the Endangered Species Act when it imported wolves from Canada, because they lacked permits proving the federal government authorized the imports.
That letter told CPW to “cease and desist” going back to British Columbia for a second round of wolves, after the agency had obtained the necessary permits to complete the operation. Nesvik’s reasoning was that CPW had no authority to capture wolves from British Columbia because they aren’t part of the northern Rocky Mountain region population.
But as regulations within the 10(j) show, the northern Rocky Mountain population of wolves “is part of a larger metapopulation of wolves that encompasses all of Western Canada.”
And “given the demonstrated resilience and recovery trajectory of the NRM population and limited number of animals that will be captured for translocations,” the agencies that developed the rule – Fish and Wildlife with Colorado Parks and Wildlife – expected “negative impacts to the donor population to be negligible.”
So despite what Nesvik and Lopez claim, “neither identified any specific provision of any law – federal, state or otherwise – that CPW or anyone else supposedly violated by capturing and releasing wolves from British Columbia,” said Tom Delehanty, senior attorney for Earthjustice. “They’ve pointed only to the 10(j) rule, which is purely about post-release wolf management, and applies only in Colorado.”
More experts weigh in
In addition to the 2024 letter from the Fish and Wildlife Service, documents obtained by The Sun include copies of permits given to CPW by the Ministry of British Columbia to export 15 wolves to the United States between Jan. 12 and Jan. 16, 2025.
These permits track everything from live animals and pets to products made from protected wildlife including ivory.
The permit system is the backbone of the regulation of trade in specimens of species included in the three Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, also called CITES. A CITES permit is the confirmation by an issuing authority that the conditions for authorizing the trade are fulfilled, meaning the trade is legal, sustainable and traceable in accordance with articles contained within the Convention.

Gary Mowad, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife agent and expert on Endangered Species Act policies, said “obtaining a CITES certificate is unrelated to the 10j rule” and that in his estimation, CPW did violate both the terms of the 10(j) and the memorandum of agreement with the Fish and Wildlife Service, because “the 10(j) specifically limited the populations from where wolves could be obtained, and Canada was not authorized.”
Mike Phillips, a Montana legislator who was instrumental in Yellowstone’s wolf reintroduction that began in 1995, thinks “the posturing about a takeover seems like just casually considered bravado from Interior officials.”
And Delahanty says “Nesvik and Lopez are making up legal requirements that don’t exist for political leverage in an effort that serves no one. It’s unclear what FWS hopes to accomplish with its threatening letter,” but if they rescind the memorandum of agreement, “it would cast numerous elements of Colorado’s wolf management program into uncertainty.”
Looking forward
If Fish and Wildlife does as Nesvik’s letter threatens and revokes all of CPW’s authority over grey wolves in its jurisdiction, “the service would assume all gray wolf management activities, including relocation and lethal removal, as determined necessary,” it says.
But Phillips says “if Fish and Wildlife succeeds in the agency’s longstanding goal of delisting gray wolves nationwide,” a proposition that is currently moving through Congress, with U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert’s Pet and Livestock Protection Act bill, the agency couldn’t take over Colorado’s wolf program. That’s because “wolf conservation falls back to Colorado with (its voter-approved) restoration mandate.” And “the species is listed as endangered/nongame under state law,” he adds.
If the feds did take over, Phillips said in an email “USFWS does not have staff for any meaningful boots-on-the-ground work.” Under Fish and Wildlife Service control, future translocations would probably be “a firm nonstarter,” he added, “but that seems to be the case now.”
A big threat should Fish and Wildlife take over is that lethal removal of wolves “in the presence of real or imagined conflicts might be more quickly applied,” Phillips said.

But it would all be tied up in legal constraints, given that gray wolves are still considered an endangered species in Colorado, and requirements of the 10(j) and state law say CPW must advance their recovery.
So for now, it’s wait and see if CPW can answer Fish and Wildlife’s demand that accompanies Nesvik’s latest letter.
Nesvik told the agency they must report “all gray wolf conservation and management activities that occurred from Dec. 12, 2023, until present,” as well as provide a narrative summary and all associated documents describing both the January 2025 British Columbia release and other releases by Jan. 18., or 30 days after the date on his letter. If they don’t, he said, Fish and Wildlife “will pursue all legal remedies,” including “the immediate revocation of all CPW authority over gray wolves in its jurisdiction.”
Shelby Wieman, a spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis’ office, said Colorado disagrees with the premise of Nesvik’s letter and remains “fully committed to fulfilling the will of Colorado voters and successfully reintroducing the gray wolf population in Colorado.”
And CPW maintains it “has coordinated with USFWS throughout the gray wolf reintroduction effort and has complied with all applicable federal and state laws. This includes translocations in January of 2025 which were planned and performed in consultation with USFWS.”
-
Detroit, MI6 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment2 days agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios

