Connect with us

Colorado

What comes next for Colorado’s health insurance programs for immigrants?

Published

on

What comes next for Colorado’s health insurance programs for immigrants?


During Joe Biden’s presidential administration, Colorado took bold steps to expand health coverage to immigrants living in the state, regardless of their legal status.

Tens of thousands of people took advantage of those programs to gain coverage for themselves or their children. The hope of supporters is that this will lower the uninsured rate in Colorado since immigration status can be a major barrier to obtaining health coverage. Providing access to coverage for primary and preventive care could also reduce the amount the state spends paying for emergency care for uninsured noncitizens who have a health crisis.

But now, the long-term fate of those programs is unclear — and not just because of potential threats from Donald Trump’s administration. While an executive order issued Wednesday could affect one of the programs, state budget woes could also have an impact.

So what might come next for these programs? Here are some answers.

Advertisement

What are these programs?

The coverage expansions largely come through two programs.

One is called OmniSalud, and it connects people with private health insurance. Many immigrants are not eligible for federal insurance subsidies offered to people who buy coverage on their own. OmniSalud addresses that by offering state-funded subsidies to people not eligible for federal subsidies.

The program works in conjunction with the state’s insurance exchange, Connect for Health Colorado, but it does not use the exchange’s platform. Instead, Colorado created an entirely new exchange called Colorado Connect to handle the sign-ups.

For 2025, more than 13,000 people signed up for coverage through Colorado Connect, including 12,000 who signed up to receive subsidized coverage through OmniSalud. (Because of funding limitations, OmniSalud enrollment is capped, but people can still buy unsubsidized coverage.)

The website for OmniSalud, Colorado’s program that provides health. insurance subsidies to people regardless of immigration status, on Feb. 20, 2025. (John Ingold, The Colorado Sun)

The second program is called Cover All Coloradans, and it rolled out only at the start of the year. The program allows children and pregnant women to receive Medicaid coverage regardless of their immigration status.

Advertisement

That program has now enrolled more than 11,000 people.

Colorado is among a handful of mostly Democratic-controlled states that offer coverage to children regardless of immigration status. But many states, including several run by Republicans, have extended federal programs to cover pregnant women.

Do these programs share immigration information with the federal government?

The answer here is complicated — mostly no but sometimes yes.

Colorado law generally prohibits state agencies from asking about immigration status or from sharing identifying information for the purposes of immigration enforcement.

For OmniSalud, the use of a separate enrollment platform means the data is stored separately from the state’s main insurance exchange and is not shared with the federal government. The OmniSalud application does not ask about immigration status, said Kevin Patterson, the CEO of Connect for Health Colorado.

Advertisement

For Cover All Coloradans, the application is the same as what is used for anyone else applying for Medicaid. That application does ask about immigration status.

Attendees gather in the West lawn during a rally in protest of mass deportations Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2025, at the Colorado State Capitol. (Alyte Katilius, Special to The Colorado Sun)

But Colorado doesn’t always pass that information on to the federal government. The portion of the program for kids is entirely state-funded, so there is no federal match of funds for those enrollees.

“If there is not a match for an individual, their information will not be shared,” Marc Williams, a spokesperson for the state Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, wrote in an email. The department administers Medicaid in the state as well as the Cover All Coloradans program.

But the state does for now receive matching funds from the federal government to help pay for the care for pregnant people regardless of immigration status as well as for another program that covers emergency services. In that case, personal information, including immigration status, would be shared with the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which is also known as CMS.

“Historically, CMS has used the information only for the purpose of determining eligibility,” Williams wrote.

Does the latest Trump executive order end Cover All Coloradans?

On Wednesday, Trump issued an executive order attempting to end federal benefits for people living in the country without documentation, as well as to crack down on so-called sanctuary policies at the local level.

Advertisement

“My Administration will uphold the rule of law, defend against the waste of hard-earned taxpayer resources, and protect benefits for American citizens in need, including individuals with disabilities and veterans,” Trump stated in the order.

How this will impact Medicaid programs nationally and in Colorado, though, is unclear.

The federal money that helps pay for coverage for pregnant people on Cover All Coloradans comes through a Medicaid companion program called the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP. States can choose to participate in CHIP’s From-Conception-to-End-of-Pregnancy Option. So far, 23 states have done so, including Republican-controlled states such as Texas and Tennessee.

Federal Medicaid dollars can also be used to help pay for emergency care for people in the country illegally. Every state has some form of such an emergency Medicaid program.

The executive order doesn’t spell out which programs are affected. Instead, it says that the head of each federal agency must “identify all federally funded programs administered by the agency that currently permit illegal aliens to obtain any cash or non-cash public benefit, and, consistent with applicable law, take all appropriate actions to align such programs with the purposes of this order.”

Advertisement

Williams, the Colorado Medicaid spokesperson, wrote in an email that state officials are evaluating the order.

“Like other executive orders, this order directs action by federal agencies and we’re awaiting guidance from CMS,” he wrote.

In this March 12, 2008, photo, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents patrol for undocumented immigrants in Utah County Jail in Spanish Fork, Utah. ICE has received three proposals for a new detention facility for its operations in Salt Lake City, but none of the proposals would be built in Utah. (Francisco Kjolseth/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP)

Could the feds use health information to target immigrants who are undocumented?

Experts The Colorado Sun consulted said it may be technically possible but it’s not necessarily likely.

Immigration authorities trying to get Colorado agencies to cough up enrollee information would enter a legal morass.

“Federal law doesn’t require that state agencies or private companies share information with immigration officials,” César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor at Ohio State University (previously at the University of Denver), who specializes in immigration enforcement law, wrote in an email.

“A federal law bars Colorado from refusing to share information about a person’s citizenship or immigration status with (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), but that law only applies to information that the state already possesses and Colorado law has barred state officials from asking for this information since 2022.”

Advertisement

García Hernández said, while it’s possible that immigration authorities could obtain a court subpoena or search warrant requiring the state to hand over enrollee information, it would be unusual.

“ICE rarely does that,” he wrote.

What about information shared with federal Medicaid officials?

Historically, the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has had a policy against using health information for enforcement purposes.

Matthew Lopez, an attorney and the director of state advocacy for the National Immigration Law Center, said the federal Medicaid agency “has pretty strong restrictions on how Medicaid information can be shared.” 

“We’re pretty confident that the way that it’s carried out now is consistent with federal laws regarding privacy within the Medicaid program,” Lopez said.

Advertisement

That doesn’t mean the Trump administration won’t try to change those protections, but Lopez said he hasn’t heard of anything so far suggesting it will. Still, he said, he understands why immigrants and immigrant-rights groups are nervous.

“This exists in the context of everything else that’s happening,” he said. “This is an administration whose immigration actions are designed to sow chaos and fear.”

Will the programs survive?

OmniSalud and Cover All Coloradans face uncertain futures, but for different reasons.

OmniSalud is funded out of something called the Colorado Health Insurance Affordability Enterprise, which gets its money from a fee on health insurers, as well as from a large, annual federal grant. (Colorado is still waiting on its promised grant from the feds for 2025 to arrive.)

Colorado Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway said the state amended the “terms and conditions” section of its federal grant in the waning days of the Biden administration to make clear that OmniSalud is not funded by the federal money.

Advertisement

“We obviously knew there would be a concern related to the incoming Trump administration,” Conway said. “It just made sense to take that issue off the table.”

But, with potential changes to health insurance funding at the federal level, Colorado could see smaller grant amounts in the coming years. The federal authorization for the grant is also due to expire during the Trump administration, making it unclear whether it will be renewed. If those federal funds were to go away, Colorado’s health insurance enterprise wouldn’t be able to pay for all the programs it currently supports.

The Joint Budget Committee meets at the Colorado Capitol complex in Denver on Monday, Jan. 6, 2025. (Jesse Paul, The Colorado Sun)

Cover All Coloradans, meanwhile, faces more challenges. If it survives the Trump administration orders, it could still be a victim of the current state budget crisis. Members of the legislature’s Joint Budget Committee have looked at possibly axing the program, which is expected to cost around $30 million in the coming fiscal year, as a way to close the state’s roughly $1 billion budget shortfall.

Supporters of the program have argued against ending it, though, saying that the program will ultimately save the state money by providing lower-cost preventive care up front and avoiding more costly emergency care down the road.

“The impact of capping or pausing this program,” state Medicaid director Adela Flores-Brennan told the JBC last month, “is that we will further strain the safety net.”

Advertisement

Type of Story: News

Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.



Source link

Colorado

‘We couldn’t do this in another place’: Horror film looks to make Southern Colorado the next Hollywood

Published

on

‘We couldn’t do this in another place’: Horror film looks to make Southern Colorado the next Hollywood


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (KKTV) – It’s commonly understood that many of the best blockbusters are made in Southern California but a group of local filmmakers wants to prove Southern Colorado can be a destination for both aspiring and established auteurs.

Shooting began in Fountain this spring on ‘Devil In The Trunk’, a new horror film set in Colorado’s eastern plains.

“Devil In The Trunk is about a small-town woman who encounters a mysterious traveler driving this car right here who claims to have the actual devil trapped in the trunk of her car,” executive producer Leon Kelly said. “As you can imagine, when the devil comes to your small town, terrible and dangerous things can happen.”

Director, writer, and producer Evan Alderson said they wanted to make the film as Colorado as possible.

Advertisement

“We ended up finding a local Colorado writer, and we ended up collaborating to come up with this idea that could act as a love letter to Colorado,” he said.

While Colorado may be most famous for its soaring mountain peaks, Kelly said the plains were a much more fitting setting.

“It’s both beautiful and dangerous at the same time,” he said. “One of the underlying themes is the desolation and the loneliness and how vulnerable some folks can be in small towns and out in rural areas.”

Kelly said not only is the film meant to showcase Colorado’s natural beauty, but also to showcase the talent of the people who live there.

“It’s a proof of concept, to show that we have not only the talented people but the infrastructure that can support really high-quality, independent films,” he said. “We know we’ve got great filmmakers here, we know we have really talented craftspeople here, but they don’t necessarily have the opportunities to work on something like this on this scale that’s a narrative film.”

Advertisement

With the Sundance Film Festival set to make its debut in Boulder in 2027, Kelly said people are asking new questions about what Colorado can do for those looking to tell stories on the big screen.

“Can Colorado become a hub? Can that be a place, a destination where others come? Can that be a place where our own filmmakers can come into their own?” he said.

Alderson said once the film is finished they will put it out on the film festival circuit, and even look for distribution.

“That will look like a theatrical release, potentially, in an ideal world, or it will be straight to streaming services like Amazon, Hulu, that type of stuff,” he said.

Copyright 2026 KKTV. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Victim shot in the face takes the stand in second day of Colorado trial for Brent Metz

Published

on

Victim shot in the face takes the stand in second day of Colorado trial for Brent Metz


The now 19-year-old victim, who Brent Metz is accused of shooting in the face, took the stand in Metz’s trial Thursday. Metz, a former town of Mountain View councilman, was in the second day of his trial hearings.

CBS

Advertisement


The teenager, who has recovered well physically from the shooting back in September of 2024, told the story of what led up to the shooting, then said he blacked out for a period after he was shot.

The young man, Jack (CBS Colorado is not sharing the victim’s last name) said he and his younger friend went to ask for permission to take pictures at a scenic home near Conifer. At first, they parked outside the gated driveway and tried to figure out how to contact someone there. They then hopped a low fence and went up to the house. 

Jack said he had difficulty locating a front door on the home, but the large property also had a garage and barn. They heard music coming from the barn, which is a common practice for people with animals to leave music playing to calm animals while away.

“We decided to knock on the barn door and then after a couple a minutes we decided to go back down the driveway,” Jack said in court. 

The two friends went back over the fence and moved the car to a spot not blocking the driveway along the right-of-way at the road. Minutes later, Brent Metz drove up in his black GMC pickup truck, blocking their car in. Metz got out. Jack testified that he raised his hands at some point, a claim the defense questioned in cross examination. He related that he was getting out to try to greet the person getting out of the truck.

Advertisement

“I just (got) the door open I kind of turned to open my door and then turned to get out, and I saw someone get out, and then it was black,” Jack said. 

The victim soon awoke bleeding and injured. “I looked down and I thought I was going to die. So I said that a couple times,” Jack testified.

“My mouth was on fire and it felt like my upper lip was gone, and I could taste little fragments,” Jack told the court. Jack’s friend and Metz tried to help him out of the car.

“The one who shot me was trying to help me get out of the car.”

Soon after, Metz left his side.

Advertisement

“He helped me sit down, and then he walked away,” Jack said.

“I started to realize I needed to stay as calm as I could, and when I got out of the car, I sat down, but I was very anxious,” Jack recalled.

Later, the victim had to have surgery in order to have the bullet fragments removed from his face. One of the fragments was more than an inch in size. He had trouble breathing through his right nostril due to the injuries to his nose. His eye was blackened for a long time, and a tooth was shattered.

Jack did not remember Metz saying much.

The testimony followed hours of testimony from a gun testing expert who looked at the weapon at the request of the prosecution. Derek Watkins is an engineer who said he has seen many claims of weapons not working properly.

Advertisement

“My experience is that, if you manufacture a firearm, at some point in time, it’s going, you’re going to run across the claim that it behaves in a defective manner,” Watkins said.

Metz’s defense is centered on a claim that the Sig Sauer P320 he had fired on its own without Metz pulling the trigger.

“There was nothing about the gun through the testing or through the examination of the components indicating it would function any other way than it was designed and left the factory,” Watkins said.

The defense had little luck getting Watkins to agree the gun could fire on its own, but did try to point out to the jury in questions that Watkins has previously testified in civil litigation about the gun’s integrity on behalf of the manufacturer.

The case continues Friday when it could wrap up. Metz faces four charges, the most serious of which is second-degree assault, but also two menacing charges and one of illegal discharge of a firearm.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Catholic Colorado: The Semiquincentennial in the Centennial State

Published

on

Catholic Colorado: The Semiquincentennial in the Centennial State


On the cusp of the United States’ 250th anniversary and Colorado’s 150th, the Centennial State and its Catholic witnesses show modern Catholics a path forward.

The Cathedral Basilica of the Immaculate Conception in Denver, completed in 1912, has stood as a visible symbol of the Catholic faith in Colorado for over a century. (Photo: Archdiocese of Denver Archives)

Colorado celebrates its own 150th anniversary this year, as the rest of the country marks 250 years since the founding of the United States. The two milestones bear an interesting connection. In the very year of independence, one of the most important explorations of Colorado was undertaken by two Franciscan friars: Francisco Atanasio Domínguez and Silvestre Vélez de Escalante.

Faith Crosses the Rockies

Advertisement

While the importance of the Domínguez-Escalante Expedition should not be overestimated — it didn’t lead to any settlements and mostly focused on Utah — it nonetheless symbolizes the coming of the Christian faith into Colorado. Their expedition traces the path the Church followed into the Rockies, initially coming up from the south, to be met later from the East by miners. Leaving Santa Fe in the very month independence was declared, the two friars and their companions crossed into the modern-day boundaries of Colorado at the beginning of August 1776. They were not the first Spaniards to enter the territory of the Ute and Arapahoe tribes north of Nueva Mexico — Juan de Oñate was in 1598, and they also relied on the previous expeditions of Rivera — but the friars opened up more regular access to it as they laid the foundation for the Santa Fe Trail that would lead from New Mexico to Southern California.

The friars found in Colorado beautiful mountain vistas, remarking that it was cold even in the summer, as well as dangerous canyons and abandoned settlements in the Mesa Verde area. Their journal remarks: “We traveled a league and turned west through very pleasant narrow valleys with woods, very abundant with pastures, with different blooms and flowers.” (The Domínguez-Escalante Journal, translated by Fray Angelico Chavez, University of Utah Press, 15). Focusing on possible mission sites more than a continental passage, they insisted to all their companions that they should not “have any purpose other than the one we had, which was God’s glory and the good of souls” (40). Their desires would take 110 years to come to fruition with the founding of the first Catholic mission to Native Americans in Colorado, St. Ignatius, on the Southern Ute Reservation in Ignacio, Colorado, in 1886.

From Frontier Territory to Catholic Settlement

Catholic life was slow to arrive in Colorado compared to other parts of the nation, especially given the early settlement of New Mexico not far to the south. The Spanish were never able to create permanent settlements in Colorado, with one failed attempt near Pueblo in 1787. This is where 1776 regains its significance, even for the Church’s development in the region. It was only after the United States annexed the Southwest following the Mexican-American War in 1848 that Catholic settlement began. From the south, settlers arrived from Taos to establish San Luis on April 9, 1851. Not long after, in 1858, the Pikes Peak Goldrush brought a flood of miners from the East. From this mix of New Mexican settlers, Native missions and Catholic miners, the Catholic Church of Colorado finally emerged.

In 1860, Father Joseph Projectus Machebeuf arrived from Santa Fe and, in the eight years before he became Denver’s first bishop, the energetic priest established eighteen churches. I first encountered him through Willa Cather’s fictional portrayal of him as the character Vaillant in her novel, Death Comes for the Archbishop (and she relied heavily on Machebeuf’s letters for the book). Though primarily set in New Mexico, Cather brings the history of the Church in the Southwest to life through the vibrant, often tense meetings of Natives, Mexicans, newly arrived Americans and the French clergy seeking to unite them into a cohesive whole. It was Bishop Machebeuf who presided over the Church when Colorado became a state in 1876.

Advertisement

A Little-Known Bishop With An Important Lesson

His successor, Bishop Nicholas Matz, likewise came to Colorado as a missionary from France and experienced firsthand the difficulties miners faced in mountain towns, especially as a pastor in Georgetown. Seth Fabian brings this lesser-known figure to life in his new book, The Pilgrim Bishop: The Spiritual Biography of Nichols C. Matz (TAN Books, 2026).

Even after living in Colorado for nearly twelve years and working for the Archdiocese of Denver for six, I didn’t know much about this misunderstood and even controversial bishop, who often lacked support from his clergy. Even in a newly established state, still riding high from its mining operations, Bishop Matz interpreted the events around him with a lens formed by the violent revolutions of the Old World, fearing and overestimating the “potential reach of radical socialists or anarchists” (11).

Bishop Matz’s difficulty in addressing the social question in his diocese points to an ongoing difficulty for both Colorado and the entire nation in this celebratory year marking their founding. Dr. Fabian raises a fundamental question we must consider: “the question of how individual Catholics live their daily lives in a pluralist society” (386).

We have a strong legacy of Catholic settlement across the continent, of our ancestors seeking to consecrate this land to God. In fact, in just a few weeks, on June 11, the U.S. bishops will do so again when they consecrate the nation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. Yet we face pressing challenges that call us to wade into difficult social questions, especially those related to technology and artificial intelligence, as Pope Leo XIV is expected to do in his first encyclical, to be released on May 25. 

Advertisement

Despite the real challenges, if we advance, as Domínguez and Escalante did, seeking “God’s glory and the good of souls” above all else, we can continue our great Catholic legacy and open a path for future generations to follow.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending