Connect with us

Colorado

Supporters of Colorado measure to raise taxes on higher earners begin collecting signatures for 2026 ballot 

Published

on

Supporters of Colorado measure to raise taxes on higher earners begin collecting signatures for 2026 ballot 


Chanting “Tax the rich!” on the steps of the Colorado Capitol Tuesday, a coalition of advocacy groups kicked off their signature gathering effort to place a measure on the 2026 ballot that would raise taxes on higher earners. 

In what supporters are calling a graduated income tax, the measure would eliminate Colorado’s flat income tax rate in favor of a tiered system that would reduce taxes for some of the state’s lowest earners, while ratcheting up taxes on those making $500,000 or more annually. 

“We are giving voters a chance to say ‘Yes’ to cutting taxes for the 97% of Coloradans making less than $500,000 a year, to increasing taxes on only the wealthiest Coloradans and largest corporations and raising $2 billion a year for education, health care and child care,” said Chris deGruy Kennedy, a former state representative and president and CEO of the liberal-leaning think tank Bell Policy Center, who is helping spearhead the policy. 



Conservative groups have already mounted opposition to the proposal, which they attempted but failed to keep from clearing the state’s title board earlier this year. The title board decides whether citizen proposals meet the requirements to be considered on the ballot. 

Advertisement

Colorado is currently one of roughly a dozen states with a flat income tax, and has one of the lowest rates in the country at 4.4%, according to the Tax Foundation



Under the graduated tax proposal, the tax rate would be cut to as little as 3.7% for someone’s first $25,000 of annual income, with income between $25,001 and $100,000 being taxed at 4.2%. Income between $100,001 and $500,000 would still be taxed at 4.4% 

The rate would increase for higher earnings, with income between $500,001 and $750,000 taxed at 7.4%, while an income range of $750,001 to $1 million would be taxed at 7.9%. Income above $1 million would be taxed at the highest rate, 8.4%. 

Supporters say they are preparing for pushback on the proposal. 

The libertarian-leaning Independence Institute pushed against a graduated income tax when it was initially proposed last fall, arguing that the state’s low flat tax rate has made it attractive for businesses, entrepreneurs and skilled workers from across the country. 

Advertisement

The graduate income tax is supported by a consortium of 19 groups, including child and immigrant advocacy organizations, health and anti-hunger groups and local government leaders. Supporters say the measure is needed for Colorado to keep up with demands for social programs at a time when ongoing budget crises are forcing the state to pull back spending, which is being compounded by cuts to government services at the federal level. 

Colorado lawmakers, who are in the midst of their legislative session, which began in January, are currently debating how to close a roughly $850 million budget gap in the upcoming fiscal year’s spending plan. They’re weighing cuts to Medicaid and other state programs after already having to close billion-dollar deficits last summer and spring. 
DeGruy Kennedy blamed the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, or TABOR, as the reason for the state’s grim budget environment, saying it has artificially limited Colorado’s ability to invest tax dollars into critical services. TABOR is an amendment to the state constitution approved by voters in 1992 that, among other things, limits state government revenue growth to the rate of population growth plus inflation.

Chris deGruy Kennedy, a former state representative and president and CEO of the liberal-leaning think tank Bell Policy Center, speaks about a proposal for a graduated income tax during a rally outside the Colorado Capitol on March 17, 2026
Robert Tann/The Aspen Times

“And to make matters worse, Donald Trump’s Congress passed a budget bill last year that gave massive tax cuts to the wealthy and the biggest corporations, all paid for by slashing funding for health care and food assistance programs,” deGruy Kennedy said, referring to Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is slated to cut Medicaid funding by about $1 trillion over the next decade. 

Jennifer Remington, a Jefferson County resident whose spinal cord injury 16 years ago left her body paralyzed, spoke during Tuesday’s rally about her reliance on Medicaid, which pays for her at-home care. 

“These services provide the personal care assistance I need for the parts of my daily life that my body can no longer do on its own,” Remington said, adding that it allows her to live at home with her children rather than a nursing home or institutional care. 

Advertisement

“Programs like Medicaid are not an abstract line item in the budget; they are lifelines,” she said. “… By supporting this graduated income tax initiative, we can make sure that the next person whose life changes overnight still has the support they need to rebuild it.” 

Under the graduated tax proposal, the state would be able to keep the revenue it collects from the new tax rates, even if it is above the TABOR limit. That revenue would serve as a dedicated funding stream for public schools, health care and child care. 

Colorado would still be required to refund revenue it would otherwise collect under the existing income tax rate if it exceeds TABOR. Supporters of the graduated tax measure say doing so will preserve TABOR refunds. 

Supporters of a proposed graduated income tax who rallied outside the Capitol on March 17, 2026, said raising taxes on higher earners will drive more dollars to underfunded programs, like K-12 schools
Robert Tann/The Aspen Times

Tamara Pogue, a Summit County commissioner who serves as chair of the nonprofit group Counties and Commissioners Acting Together, said the additional funding will give the state the support it needs to reduce strains on local governments, which are currently being asked to do more with less. 

Pogue said the challenges may look different depending on the community. She gave the examples of rural areas where fragile health care systems and a lack of public funding can have a ripple effect throughout the entire local economy, and rural resort areas, like hers, where the tourism economy — while vital for the state — puts pressure on housing, infrastructure and the workforce. 

“I’m one of many commissioners in this state who wake up to phone calls and emails about what people in our communities lack, and then go to bed without the resources to solve those very same problems,” Pogue said. 

Advertisement
Tamara Pogue, a Summit County commissioner who serves as chair of the nonprofit group Counties and Commissioners Acting Together, speaks about the impact the state’s budget challenges have on rural and resort communities during a rally outside the Colorado Capitol on March 17, 2026.
Robert Tann/The Aspen Times

The measure still has a long way to go before it can be placed in front of voters. Supporters must gather upwards of 125,000 signatures to get the measure on the ballot this November, a process that can cost millions. 

Colorado Democrats are also pushing forward a separate measure to refer a ballot question to voters that would raise the TABOR cap by potentially $2 billion annually for the next decade, with the additional money being channeled into K-12 schools. 

That proposal, which must first clear both chambers of the legislature for it to be placed on the ballot, is led by the Colorado Education Association. Republicans have vowed to oppose it, seeing it as an attack on TABOR, which they say keeps government spending in check and returns more money to taxpayers. 

Colorado is among a growing list of states considering ideas to tax wealthier earners. 

Lawmakers in Washington this month passed what’s been referred to as a “millionaires tax” that imposes a 9.9% tax on annual income over $1 million. In California, supporters of a wealth tax are seeking to place a measure on the November ballot that would impose a one-time 5% tax on residents with net worths over $1 billion. 





Source link

Advertisement

Colorado

Eagle Rock Ranch

Published

on

Eagle Rock Ranch


When Dave and Jean Gottenborg met as teenagers wrangling horses in Estes Park, they dreamed of one day running a ranch together. That dream fell by the wayside for decades until 2012, when the couple purchased Eagle Rock Ranch in the Tarryall Valley.

Talking about the Gottenborg’s ranch means deliberately avoiding words like “owners” and “ownership.” The couple “manage” their land — their preferred term — through the conservationist lens of thinkers like Wendell Berry and Aldo Leopold. Visitors are welcome on the land (see some basic guidelines here), and they sell their beef by the cut, box and share at their family-owned mercantile in Fairplay.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Where to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02

Published

on

Where to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels: TV channel, start time, streaming for Jun. 02


play

The 2026 MLB season has surpassed the quarter mark, and after each team’s first 40 games, there’s plenty of reasons to tune in all summer long.

Chicago White Sox slugger Munetaka Murakami has already proven doubters wrong by launching 17 home runs, Pittsburgh’s Paul Skenes consistently looks like the best version of himself on the mound and Milwaukee ace Jacob Misiorowski is throwing harder than any starter in the majors.

Advertisement

The MLB action continues on Tuesday as the Colorado Rockies visit the Los Angeles Angels.

Here’s everything you need to know to tune in for the first pitch.

See USA TODAY’s sortable MLB schedule to filter by team or division.

What time is Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels?

First pitch between the Los Angeles Angels and Colorado Rockies is scheduled for 9:38 p.m. (ET) on Tuesday, Jun. 02.

How to watch Colorado Rockies vs Los Angeles Angels on Tuesday

All times Eastern and accurate as of Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 6:33 a.m.

Advertisement

Watch MLB all season long with Fubo

MLB regional blackout restrictions apply

MLB scores, results

MLB scores for Jun. 02 games are available on usatoday.com . Here’s how to access today’s results:

See scores, results for all of today’s games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Major Northern Colorado cities warn lack of power generation could temporarily stunt region’s projected growth

Published

on

Major Northern Colorado cities warn lack of power generation could temporarily stunt region’s projected growth


Rapid growth across parts of Northern Colorado is colliding with a growing challenge — being able to access enough electricity to support new homes and businesses.

Local leaders in Greeley say demand for power has increased significantly in recent decades. This is as technology becomes more integrated into everyday life, and it creates pressure on an electric grid that is struggling to keep pace with population growth and development.

“We are growing pretty rapidly,” said Don Threewitt, interim community and economic developer for the city of Greeley.

Threewitt said the state’s electric demand has shifted dramatically in the last decade, as residents rely more heavily on technology. From smartphones and electric vehicles to increasingly connected homes and workplaces, the demand for electricity is rising faster than Colorado’s ability to generate and deliver power.

Advertisement

“I don’t think the average Coloradan realizes how much more power is needed to accommodate the lifestyle, the work life and sort of how we live today,” Threewitt told CBS Colorado.

CBS


Greeley officials say the city has many of the ingredients needed to continue attracting growth, including available land, water resources and a stable workforce. However, Threewitt said access to electricity has emerged as one of the biggest obstacles to accommodating more growth.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Republican U.S. Rep. Gabe Evans said the issue extends beyond Greeley and is affecting communities throughout Colorado.

“We don’t have enough power,” Evans told CBS Colorado.

Evans said power limitations are already influencing economic development decisions.

“I know of hundreds of jobs that Colorado has lost because a company that wanted to locate here couldn’t get the power,” Evans said.

Without additional electrical capacity, Evans warned that growth could slow substantially.

Advertisement

“(Without more power export) we can’t attract businesses; we can’t build new houses,” Evans said. “Really, growth comes to a screeching halt.”

Evans said he is working on legislation aimed at streamlining the process of generating and distributing power throughout the state, primarily through easing the process to receiving permits. Still, local leaders say addressing the challenge will require coordination among local governments, utilities, state officials and federal policymakers.

“It takes time, and it takes deliberate effort on a large group of people,” Threewitt said. “Let’s identify the need, provide the resources, and then get out of the way so it can get done.”

The challenge is particularly pressing in Greeley, where city officials say the population is growing between 1.5% and 3% annually. At the same time, planning and constructing the power lines needed to expand the electric grid can take between five and eight years.

Even those infrastructure projects depend on utilities having enough power available to distribute to customers.

Advertisement

In a statement, a spokesperson for Xcel Energy said the company is investing heavily to meet Colorado’s growing energy needs. The utility plans to invest $17.6 billion in Colorado through 2030 to modernize and expand the electric grid and add new energy resources.

The spokesperson said Xcel’s “Colorado Distribution System Plan” includes new substations, transformers and feeder projects in the Greeley area. The company is also adding 400 megawatts of dispatchable power at Fort St. Vrain and another 100 megawatts at Fort Lupton, both of which serve Greeley and Weld County.

According to the statement, Xcel has identified resource adequacy as a growing concern for several years and has proposed multiple solutions, including a near-term procurement plan designed to add 3,800 megawatts of new generation capacity. The company said the plan could save customers nearly $3 billion by utilizing expiring tax credits.

Xcel also plans to file additional proposals addressing both short-term and long-term power needs. The utility company said it remains committed to working with regulators, local communities and policymakers to ensure reliable electric service while supporting economic growth across Colorado.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending