Connect with us

California

Walmart and Target to make major policy change to every store across California

Published

on

Walmart and Target to make major policy change to every store across California


Advertisement

Walmart, Target, and Albertsons alongside other grocery giants are all making a big change to their stores in California.  

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a law banning plastic bags being used at such stores in the state.

The change will take legal effect on January 1, 2026, and will affect all grocery stores.

Some grocery chains such as Whole Foods have already phased out plastic bags at their checkouts nationwide. 

Consumers will be encouraged to bring their own bags to do their shopping, and those who do not will be offered a paper alternative. 

Advertisement

The new law will only affect the plastic bags used at supermarket checkouts, not the plastic bags that contain produce. 

Californians will soon be offered paper bags at the supermarket checkout 

The change comes after a decade of hard-fought campaigning from politicians trying to outlaw the bags.

In 2014 a similar law was passed in California but it only outlawed thin plastic bags, leaving a loophole for stores to use thicker plastic.

Laura Deehan, the director of Environment California, told local news that the bags actually created more waste as shoppers did not reuse or recycle the thicker bags.

‘There was a sudden surge in these much thicker plastic bags,’ Deehan, who campaigned for the new law, told KABC-TV.

Advertisement

‘The grocery stores felt like they met the definition of a reusable plastic bag, but what we found is that they’re really not being reused at all.’ 

In 2004 Californians threw away an average of eight pounds of plastic every year, which increased to eleven pounds per year by 2021, a state study concluded. 

The law ‘clearly needed a redo,’ Jenn Engstrom, of the California Public Interest Research Group told the Associated Press. 

‘Plastic bags create pollution in our environment and break into microplastics that contaminate our drinking water and threaten our health,’ she explained.

‘With the Governor’s signature, California has finally banned plastic bags in grocery checkout lanes once and for all.’ 

Advertisement

The law also redefined what can be considered a recyclable bag. 

Gavin Newsom introduced the US's first plastic bag ban while mayor of San Francisco in 2007

Gavin Newsom introduced the US’s first plastic bag ban while mayor of San Francisco in 2007 

As of 2028 only bags made from 50 percent or more recycled materials can be classified as recyclable.   

Newsom has a long-history of fighting against plastic bag use, having introduced America’s first plastic bag ban in 2007 while mayor of San Francisco. 

Now hundreds of cities across 28 states have their own plastic bag bans in place. 

Some form of state-wide plastic bag ban now exists in twelve states, including New York. 

Advertisement

The UK passed a law forcing supermarkets to charge for plastic bags in 2015, which led to a 98 percent reduction in their use according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Stores often face a backlash when they alter packaging to cut down on plastic use.

Earlier this year Costco began selling its $4.99 rotisserie chickens in soft plastic bags instead of the traditional hard-shelled plastic containers at its US locations.

The redesign uses 75 percent less plastic and cuts the use of 17 million pounds of resin a year, according to Costco.

But shoppers were quick to complain that the new design  causes a mess in trollies, cars and fridges – as it allows meat juice to leak out. 

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

California

California man beheaded his 1-year-old son with a knife, authorities say

Published

on

California man beheaded his 1-year-old son with a knife, authorities say


SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A man has been arrested on suspicion of beheading his 1-year-old son, Northern California authorities said.

The Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office said in a statement Friday that deputies responding to an early morning family disturbance call found a woman outside a home who told deputies that her husband Andrey Demskiy, 28, assaulted her and her mother.

Deputies forced their way into the house in northern Sacramento County when they learned Demskiy was inside with the boy. As they took him into custody, they found a “severed child’s head” in the bedroom where Demskiy was detained.

Detectives said Demskiy used a knife to behead his son after his wife and mother-in-law left the house, according to the statement. He was in custody and ineligible for bail, and was scheduled to appear in court Tuesday.

Advertisement

The sheriff’s department and the county public defenders office did not respond to emails seeking information on whether Demskiy had an attorney who could speak on his behalf.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Protests Swept California Campuses Last Year. Schools Are Now Blocking Them | KQED

Published

on

Protests Swept California Campuses Last Year. Schools Are Now Blocking Them | KQED


At UC Santa Cruz, police arrested one student who was using a megaphone during a demonstration on Oct. 7, according to an eyewitness who spoke to LookOut Santa Cruz. Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office public arrest reports show one person was arrested on the Santa Cruz campus for obstruction of a public officer and battery without injury that day.

While no arrests were made, Pomona College has suspended 12 students for the remainder of the 2024–25 academic year following an Oct. 7 demonstration in which they entered, damaged and vandalized a restricted building, according to the student newspaper. The college also banned dozens of students from the four other campuses of the Claremont Colleges, a consortium that includes Pomona.

Private colleges have implemented their own policy changes. Pomona College now requires students and faculty to swipe their ID cards to enter academic buildings. Since last semester, students and visitors entering USC are also required to show a school or photo ID.

Some students are still facing charges from last year’s protests

Few charges have been filed after UCLA’s encampment made headlines in April when counterprotesters led an attack on encampment protesters while law enforcement did not intervene for several hours. The following day, 254 people were arrested on charges related to the protest encampment. In October, two additional people were also arrested for participating in the counter-protester violence.

Advertisement

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office is pursuing three felony cases against individuals arrested at UCLA in relation to violence during last spring’s protests.

Meanwhile, the city attorney’s office is reviewing 93 misdemeanor cases from USC and 210 from UCLA, according to information it provided to CalMatters last month.

Lilyan Zwirzina, a junior at Cal Poly Humboldt, was among the students arrested in the early morning of April 30 following protesters occupying a campus building and ignoring orders to disperse from the university. Law enforcement took her to Humboldt County Correctional Facility, where she faced four misdemeanor charges, including resisting arrest. Zwirzina thought she’d have to cancel her study abroad semester, which conflicted with the court date she was given.

“I was pretty frustrated and kind of freaked out,” Zwirzina said. Authorities dropped the charges against her in July.

Pro-Palestinian protesters demand police officers go home during a protest outside of Siemens Hall at Cal Poly Humboldt in Arcata on April 22, 2024. (Mark McKenna/CalMatters)

The Humboldt County District Attorney’s Office didn’t pursue charges against 27 of the 39 people arrested, citing insufficient evidence. The 12 remaining cases were referred to the Cal Poly Humboldt Police Department for investigation. Those cases remain under investigation, according to the university.

Advertisement

For 13 people, including students, arrested at Stanford University in June, the Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen has not pressed charges as of Nov. 20, according to information his office provided CalMatters.

Elsewhere across the state, some district attorneys are pursuing misdemeanor and felony charges against student protesters. Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer is pursuing misdemeanor charges against 50 people, including two UCI professors, a teaching assistant, and 26 students, stemming from a protest at UC Irvine on Oct. 22, 2023. Charges include failure to disperse, resisting arrest and vandalism.

At Pomona College, 19 students were arrested on April 5 on charges of trespassing after some protesters entered and refused to leave an administrative building. Students arrested either had their cases dismissed or have accepted community service in lieu of further legal action. James Gutierrez, the attorney representing the arrested students, said he asked that the college drop charges against its students, citing their right to protest the use of paid tuition dollars.

“They are righteously demanding that their colleges, the ones they pay tuition to and housing fees and pour a lot of money into, that that university or college stop investing in companies that are directly supporting this genocide and indirectly supporting it,” he said.

Students fight back against campus protest policies

As administrators face the challenge of applying protest policies more uniformly and swiftly, the truer test of California public higher education institutions’ protest rules will be playing out in court.

Advertisement

In one already resolved case, UC leadership agreed in August to comply with a court order requiring the campus to end programs or events that exclude Jewish students. A federal judge ruled some Jewish students in support of Israel who were blocked from entering the encampment had their religious liberties violated — though some Jewish students did participate in UCLA’s protest encampment.

Now, students have filed at least two lawsuits against their campuses and the UC system for violating their rights while ending student encampments last spring. In September, ACLU NorCal filed suits against the UC and UC Santa Cruz for not providing students due process when they immediately barred arrested students from returning to campus.

“Those students should have gotten a hearing, an opportunity to defend themselves or to explain themselves, and the school would have shown evidence of why they created a risk of disturbance on campus,” Chessie Thacher, senior staff attorney at ACLU of Northern California, said.

UC Santa Cruz spokesperson Scott Hernandez-Jason said the university “appreciates the court’s careful deliberation” and that the university “is committed to upholding the right to free expression while also protecting the safety of its campus community.”

In October, ACLU SoCal filed lawsuits on behalf of two students and two faculty members against the UC and UCLA, alleging the actions the university took to break down the encampment violated their free speech rights.

Advertisement

UCLA spokesperson Ricardo Vazquez told CalMatters via email that the university would respond in court and that UCLA “fully supports community members expressing their First Amendment rights in ways that do not violate the law, our policies, jeopardize community safety, or disrupt the functioning of the university.”

“The encampment that arose on campus this spring became a focal point for violence, a disruption to campus, and was in violation of the law,” Vazquez said in the email statement. “These conditions necessitated its removal.”





Source link

Continue Reading

California

Southern California hiring in November runs 47% below average

Published

on

Southern California hiring in November runs 47% below average


A record 8.11 million at work in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties in November.

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending